Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:05:07.311Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The NutriChip project – translating technology into nutritional knowledge

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 July 2012

Guy Vergères*
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Biljana Bogicevic
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Caroline Buri
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
Sandro Carrara
Affiliation:
Integrated Systems Laboratory, Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Lausanne, Switzerland
Magali Chollet
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Linda Corbino-Giunta
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Lotti Egger
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Doreen Gille
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Katrin Kopf-Bolanz
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Kurt Laederach
Affiliation:
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Clinical Nutrition, University Hospital, Berne, Switzerland
Reto Portmann
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Qasem Ramadan
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Microsystems 2, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015Lausanne, Switzerland
Jeremy Ramsden
Affiliation:
Collegium Basilea (Institute of Advanced Study), Basel, Switzerland
Flurina Schwander
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Paolo Silacci
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Barbara Walther
Affiliation:
Federal Department of Economic Affairs (FDEA), Agroscope Liebefeld-Posieux Research Station ALP, Schwarzenburgstrasse 161, 3003Berne, Switzerland
Martin Gijs
Affiliation:
Laboratory of Microsystems 2, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), CH-1015Lausanne, Switzerland
*
*Corresponding author: Dr G. Vergères, fax +41 31 323 82 27, email guy.vergeres@alp.admin.ch
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Advances in food transformation have dramatically increased the diversity of products on the market and, consequently, exposed consumers to a complex spectrum of bioactive nutrients whose potential risks and benefits have mostly not been confidently demonstrated. Therefore, tools are needed to efficiently screen products for selected physiological properties before they enter the market. NutriChip is an interdisciplinary modular project funded by the Swiss programme Nano-Tera, which groups scientists from several areas of research with the aim of developing analytical strategies that will enable functional screening of foods. The project focuses on postprandial inflammatory stress, which potentially contributes to the development of chronic inflammatory diseases. The first module of the NutriChip project is composed of three in vitro biochemical steps that mimic the digestion process, intestinal absorption, and subsequent modulation of immune cells by the bioavailable nutrients. The second module is a miniaturised form of the first module (gut-on-a-chip) that integrates a microfluidic-based cell co-culture system and super-resolution imaging technologies to provide a physiologically relevant fluid flow environment and allows sensitive real-time analysis of the products screened in vitro. The third module aims at validating the in vitro screening model by assessing the nutritional properties of selected food products in humans. Because of the immunomodulatory properties of milk as well as its amenability to technological transformation, dairy products have been selected as model foods. The NutriChip project reflects the opening of food and nutrition sciences to state-of-the-art technologies, a key step in the translation of transdisciplinary knowledge into nutritional advice.

Type
Horizons in Nutritional Science
Copyright
Copyright © The Authors 2012

Current trends in human nutrition

Dynamic definition of health

In 1946, the WHO defined health as ‘a state of complete physical, mental and social well-being and not merely the absence of disease or infirmity’(1). This definition contains a static component that no longer suits current knowledge in the biomedical sciences. The conference ‘Is health a state or ability? Towards a dynamic concept of health’ has revised this definition and proposed a more dynamic approach by defining health as ‘the ability to adapt and to self manage’(Reference Huber, Knottnerus and Green2). In this context, the increased incidence of chronic metabolic diseases paralleling the ageing of the human organism may be due to a loss in the metabolic plasticity of the organism, i.e. its ability to respond adequately in a timely and quantitative manner to external challenges(Reference Godfrey, Gluckman and Hanson3). The metabolic nature of food indicates that nutrition could positively or negatively modulate metabolic plasticity and consequently the development of chronic diseases.

Food is more than a confounding factor

That nutrition is crucial to growth, development, function and the maintenance of health is obvious. In wealthy societies, the prevention and treatment of disease is most obviously associated with the widespread use of pharmaceuticals rather than dietary modification. There are many more scientific publications on pharmaceuticals than on food. Why is that so? Beyond obvious economical arguments, a comparison of the chemical and biological properties of food and drugs explains the imbalance in research activities: drugs are mostly single chemical entities possessing targeted pharmacological activity and being adsorbed in a supervised manner. Food, on the other hand, is composed of thousands of uncharacterised chemical compounds that are ingested unsupervised(Reference Gillies and Krul4). Thus it seems that scientists may have been so far lacking the tools to characterise the interaction of food with the human organism as efficiently as in the case of drugs.

Towards nutritional systems biology

The application of functional genomics to the fields of food and nutrition sciences is about to surmount this hurdle. The molecular fate of nutrients in ingested food (composition, digestion, intestinal transport, metabolic activation, excretion) can now be monitored in humans with a precision, sensitivity and functional understanding that was previously not possible. Human tissues and fluids can be investigated for their epigenetic, genetic, transcriptomic, proteomic and metabolomic profiles and complement classical analyses to obtain holistic information on the molecular processes taking place as the response of the organism to the ingestion of food(Reference Fenech, El Sohemy and Cahill5). Studies that combine these analytical levels are still rare(Reference Bakker, van Erk and Pellis6) but they are precursors of a nutritional systems biology, which will move nutritional science one step closer to an objective understanding of the effects of food on human physiology, in particular on the maintenance of health.

Postprandial stress: a surrogate of metabolic plasticity?

As the analytical tools are available, the challenge is now to translate the concept of metabolic plasticity into parameters that are measurable and nutritionally relevant. The cellular metabolism of nutrients, culminating in the synthesis of the biochemical energy embodied in ATP, produces side effects that include the mitochondrial production of reactive oxygen species (oxidative stress), the synthesis of misfolded proteins (endoplasmic reticulum stress) and the activation of defence mechanisms by immune cells (inflammatory stress). These effects accumulate at the level of the organism to produce a phenomenon named postprandial stress(Reference Margioris7). Under normal conditions, postprandial stress is of low magnitude and transient in nature so that it disappears within a few hours post-ingestion. An unhealthy diet, permanent snacking and/or a diseased organism may, however, increase the magnitude of postprandial stress and/or delay its recovery so that fasting baseline values for markers of postprandial stress may increase over time and contribute to the development of chronic metabolic diseases(Reference Margioris7). This concept has already been demonstrated for glucose in human blood as the glycaemic index, a measure of the postprandial glucose response, emerges as a potentially important determinant of the risk of cardiovascular diseases(Reference Burger, Beulens and Boer8). We propose that postprandial stress can be used as an indicator of metabolic plasticity and, consequently, of health.

Blood as a source of biomarkers

Biomarkers in blood can provide specific information on the health status of organs, such as the heart, liver or kidney. The diagnostic strength of clinical chemistry is due to the ability of blood to serve as a sentinel of the body carrying molecular information between organs(Reference Bándi and Ramsden9). As clinical chemistry informs physicians about the ability of patients to respond to drugs, the same strategy should be used by nutritionists to monitor the quality of the interaction between consumers and food products. The assessment of metabolic and immunomodulatory biomarkers (insulin, glucose, TAG, cholesterol, hormones, cytokines, etc.) already belongs for decades to the arsenal of tools used by nutritional scientists. This arsenal is, however, in the process of being dramatically augmented with the advent of nutrigenomics(Reference Fenech, El Sohemy and Cahill5). Blood, as a connective fluid tissue, is very appropriate for the monitoring of biomarkers indicating postprandial stress in order to assess the impact of food on metabolic plasticity.

Probing the impact of nutrition on postprandial systemic inflammation in humans

High-fat meals are associated with postprandial systemic inflammation

Inflammation is a major component of metabolic diseases. Subjects ingesting high-fat meals experience a postprandial systemic rise in pro-inflammatory cytokines, the level of these cytokines being higher in obese than in lean subjects(Reference Nappo, Esposito and Cioffi10). A repetition of postprandial inflammatory stress over prolonged periods of time may significantly contribute to the development of chronic inflammation. In that context, epidemiology has established a positive correlation between a dietary regimen rich in trans-fatty acids and fasting markers of systemic inflammation(Reference Lopez-Garcia, Schulze and Meigs11). Clear evidence for a relationship between the consumption of high-fat meals and chronic low-grade inflammation has, however, not been demonstrated, taking into account the fact that carbohydrates may also contribute to this phenomenon(Reference Calder, Ahluwalia and Brouns12). The inflammatory stress imposed by inadequate or inappropriate diets may contribute negatively to the maintenance of health by reducing the metabolic plasticity of the organism. A quantitative analysis of the postprandial kinetics of inflammatory biomarkers in the blood of human subjects thus provides information on the quality of the interaction between specific foods and the organism. This proposition forms the conceptual basis for the biological modules of the present NutriChip project (Fig. 1).

Fig. 1 Overview of the biological modules of the NutriChip project.

Anti-inflammatory properties for dairy products?

Several food products, including orange juice(Reference Ghanim, Sia and Upadhyay13) and tomato(Reference Burton-Freeman, Talbot and Park14), have been demonstrated to reduce the postprandial inflammatory response to high-fat meals. Dairy products may also have anti-inflammatory properties in human adults. Lower levels of fasting pro-inflammatory cytokines have indeed been documented in epidemiological(Reference Panagiotakos, Pitsavos and Zampelas15) and intervention(Reference Hunter, Brown and Green16) studies in human adults consuming dairy products. Decreased postprandial levels of pro-inflammatory cytokines after the consumption of dairy products have also been reported(Reference Nestel, Pally and MacIntosh17). We have investigated the postprandial kinetic response of healthy human subjects to the ingestion of dairy products by measuring the genome-wide expression of genes in the subjects' blood cells. This analysis revealed a common postprandial kinetic pattern for the expression of inflammatory genes, thus illustrating the tight link between nutrition and the immune system(Reference Sagaya, Hurrell and Vergères18).

Milk is a unique food; its immunomodulatory properties result from two hundred million years of evolution of the mammary gland(Reference Lemay, Lynn and Martin19). Milk can also be transformed technologically in an almost infinite number of ways. In particular, the fermentation of milk by lactic acid bacteria clearly adds to its immunomodulatory potential(Reference Walther and Sieber20), even more since recent analytical breakthroughs highlight the importance of the gut microbiota on human metabolism(Reference Lyra, Lahtinen and Tiihonen21). Milk thus appears to be a strategic vector to deliver immunomodulatory nutrients to the human organism in order to improve its metabolic health.

Comparative analysis of postprandial inflammatory stress in humans

High-fat meals can be used as ‘positive controls’ eliciting the postprandial production of inflammatory cytokines in humans, against which other products can be compared. In order to identify suitable conditions for carrying out such comparative studies, the relationship between the energy dose of the selected high-fat meal and the postprandial production of inflammatory cytokines should be investigated. High-energy doses may induce a significant inflammatory response and consequently allow the identification of statistically significant changes even with a relatively small number of subjects. On the other hand, low-energy doses may be nutritionally more realistic and provide more flexibility in designing interventions that evaluate the ability of co-ingested food products to inhibit the postprandial inflammation induced by a high-fat meal. The present NutriChip project measures the postprandial inflammatory stress of subjects having ingested three different energy doses of a fatty meal. Pro-inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6, are measured as markers for inflammation.

The pro-inflammatory environment is exacerbated in humans with metabolic diseases(Reference Nappo, Esposito and Cioffi10). The NutriChip project thus compares the postprandial stress of lean healthy subjects to subjects with metabolic diseases. As the biological processes regulating inflammation and the metabolism of macronutrients are interconnected(Reference Fresno, Alvarez and Cuesta22), measuring the postprandial metabolic response (insulin, glucose, TAG, lipoproteins) in addition to the inflammatory markers should provide further insight into the impact of food on the organism.

In addition to the discrete set of metabolic and immune-modulatory parameters, the blood cell transcriptome and the serum metabolome of the lean and obese subjects are measured. A comparative analysis of the fasting and postprandial samples then allows the identification of biomarkers modulated by nutrition that may have an impact on the development of metabolic diseases.

Screening food products in an in vitro model of digestion

In vitro screening strategy

Despite their complexity, human intervention studies are clearly the ‘gold standard’ in nutritional science(Reference Most, Ershow and Clevidence23). Their limitations are logistical in nature, as the resources necessary to screen a large number of products for specific properties are prohibitive. Furthermore, the use of human subjects as a screening tool to test products that are not bioactive or even unsafe is unethical even if the trials involve a low grade of invasiveness by limiting analyses to blood samples. In vitro models are thus needed for the efficient screening of bioactive food products. In the NutriChip project, a panel of dairy products is digested in vitro, the digested nutrients are transported through an intestinal cell monolayer, and the ability of the transported nutrients to modulate the inflammatory activity of immune cells is finally measured. The immunomodulatory properties of these products are compared to those of the high-fat meal and the most active dairy products are tested in human intervention trials.

Characterising the molecular composition of the test products

If one wants to follow the fate of the nutrients present in food during digestion, intestinal transport and metabolic activation, the composition of the undigested food should first be characterised at the molecular level. Recent developments in the fields of proteomics/peptidomics(Reference Senechal and Kussmann24) and metabolomics/lipidomics(Reference Shepherd, Fraser and Stewart25) now allow food scientists to go significantly beyond the macronutrient composition of food, thus opening the path to the identification of specific bioactive molecules in food products. As the delivery of high-density data increases, sharing this information by creating interactive data banks that can be used by the scientific community has the potential to boost the efficacy of food and nutrition research. In the context of the NutriChip project, several hundred milk and bacterial proteins have been separated by two-dimensional PAGE and identified by liquid chromatography coupled to MS (LC–MS) in a variety of dairy products. The reference maps will be made freely available in the form of an interactive online platform, the Dairy Protein Atlas (R. Portmann, private communication).

In vitro digestion

In vitro models that mimic human digestion are the subject of intense research(Reference McClements and Li26). The European COST Action FA1005 (Improving health properties of food by sharing our knowledge on the digestive process) was initiated in 2011 and aims to harmonise research by defining a reference model for in vitro digestion. Most models are composed of three steps that represent digestion along the gastrointestinal tract. Appropriate buffer composition, identity and concentration of digestive enzymes, pH, and digestion times are selected accordingly. The first step mimics digestion by saliva in the mouth. The second step mimics gastric digestion in the presence of pancreatic juice. The third step models intestinal digestion in the presence of bile salts. The most advanced models introduce dynamic features such as mastication, peristaltic movements or the controlled secretion of digestive juices. Whereas dynamic models are closer to human physiology, the less elaborate static models are still widely used in most research laboratories(Reference McClements and Li26).

The NutriChip project has validated a static three-step model for the specific digestion of dairy products using pasteurised whole milk as a standard(Reference Kopf-Bolanz, Schwander and Gijs27). Interestingly, a comparison of the amino acids released from milk proteins during the course of the in vitro digestion revealed that the fraction of essential amino acids released by digestion was significantly higher than the total fraction of these amino acids present in the entire pool of milk proteins. This observation suggests that the digestive system has evolved in a way that allows an efficient extraction of the essential amino acids present in food, in particular in milk.

Transport through confluent intestinal cells

In analogy to pharmacokinetics, the concept of nutrikinetics becomes more and more important in nutrition science. The absorption of nutrients through intestinal cells significantly contributes to their bioavailability. In vitro, the intestinal transport of nutrients is most often measured with the confluent layers of intestinal cell lines(Reference Sandberg28), although intestinal tissues isolated from animals are also used(Reference Albin and Tappenden29). Proteomics and metabolomics will dramatically increase our knowledge of the intestinal transport of nutrients. For example, while the transport of amino acids, dipeptides and tripeptides is well characterised, the transport of larger peptides, even of intact proteins, remains poorly characterised. In particular, the population and fraction of large peptides being transported through the gut, the mechanisms mediating this transport and even its biological significance are current research challenges(Reference Brandtzaeg30). High-density (‘omics’) data gained from in vitro experiments will allow the identification of bioavailable nutrients, which will then be specifically traced in humans. Such data will contribute to the identification of functional food components as well as to a better understanding of the mechanisms mediating oral tolerance(Reference Miron and Cristea31). A high-density analytical strategy (metabolomics, peptidomics) can thus be applied to identify the metabolites transported through a confluent layer of Caco-2 cells. The identified dairy nutrients can then be investigated for their presence in the postprandial sera of human subjects participating in intervention studies.

Inflammatory action of nutrients on immune cells

Once transported and metabolised by the intestinal cellular barrier, the primary fate of nutrients is to interact with receptors on their target organs and cells. Immune cells are obvious cellular targets to demonstrate the pro- or anti-inflammatory potential of the translocated molecules. The design of the immunomodulatory in vitro system depends on the mechanism inducing the postprandial activation of inflammatory cytokines in response to a high-fat meal. Several mechanisms can be put forward to account for this activation effect(Reference Margioris7, Reference Calder, Ahluwalia and Brouns12, Reference Ghanim, Sia and Upadhyay13, Reference Lee, Zhao and Youn32Reference Laugerette, Vors and Géloën34): (i) long-chain fatty acids activate the Toll-like receptor pathway of immune cells; (ii) fat promotes the translocation of bacterial endotoxin from the gut into the circulation by increasing paracellular intestinal permeability; (iii) the fatty acid particles undergoing intestinal transcytosis are intracellular cargos for bacterial endotoxin; (iv) the metabolism of the energy-dense fat macronutrients induces the production of a non-specific cellular stress response. The NutriChip project uses a co-culture Transwell system composed of a confluent layer of Caco-2 cells, which allows the application of in vitro digested food on its apical side, and a basolateral culture of a monocytic cell line differentiated to macrophages, which will react to the presence of pro-inflammatory molecules in the basolateral media by producing inflammatory cytokines, such as IL-6. The Transwell system allows a wide range of variations in the experimental set-up that will enable the different inflammatory models proposed here to be tested.

The NutriChip

The Transwell co-culture system suffers from several drawbacks, in particular its inability to provide a dynamically controlled flow of cell nutrients and stimuli to the in vitro intestinal model, the long growth times needed for the intestinal cells to differentiate into functional enterocytes and to reach confluence, the high costs of the system (since it demands relatively large volumes of media to grow the cells), and an external signal detection system that requires the manual withdrawing and manipulation of samples. The NutriChip project takes a micro-engineering strategy to alleviate these hurdles. The NutriChip is a miniaturised replica of the Transwell system integrated into a micro-system (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2 A schematic representation of the engineering modules of the NutriChip project (adapted from http://www.nano.tera.ch/projects/403.php).

The gut-on-a-chip

Working with a microfluidic chip allows significant reduction of the liquid volumes of cell culture chambers (down to the 10 μl range), when compared to a classical co-culture system. Therefore, the use of microfluidic devices will lead to reduced reagent consumption, and obviously reagent-associated costs can be diminished accordingly. Moreover, miniaturisation procedures allow the fabrication of many identical analytical devices on a given microfluidic chip surface, paving the way for parallel assays and high-throughput analyses. Microfluidic chips can also be equipped with certain functionality, at the cost of some technological effort and complexity; for example, miniaturised valves and pumps can be configured on the chip, which can be easily operated using external pressure control. Such valves also permit to separate on-chip the two cell types of the co-culture system, which allows both types of cells to grow independently under optimum media conditions and permits them to correctly differentiate. If it is observed that both cell types have reached the target structure (e.g. formation of a confluent layer for the epithelial cells and differentiation of the seeded monocytic cells to macrophages), the two cell reservoirs can be put in fluidic communication by simply opening an on-chip valve and the chip can then be exploited for food testing. The microfluidic chips will be configured with a suitable microfluidic architecture, i.e. appropriate microchannels for exposing the cell solutions to culture media, washing buffer, fluorescent detection labels, functionalised magnetic beads, etc., which will allow controlled and quantitative testing of the food quality parameters(Reference Ramadan, Jafarpoorchekab and Kopf-Bolanz35).

Going ‘nano’ and ‘tera’ with the NutriChip

Subjects ingesting high-fat meals have increased postprandial levels of insulin, glucose, TAG, cholesterol and pro-inflammatory cytokines released in the blood serum as well as activation of Toll-like receptors in their immune cells. The artificial gut-on-a-chip described previously will allow the quantitative acquisition of terabytes of information related to the nanoscale metabolic and immunomodulatory biomarkers. Although electrochemical detection of insulin(Reference Zhang, Mullens and Gorski36), glucose(Reference Boero, Carrara and Del Vecchio37) and cholesterol(Reference Carrara, Shumyantseva and Archakov38) has been already demonstrated in vitro, the first prototype of the NutriChip implements the direct fluorescent detection of Toll-like receptors on Caco-2 cells as well as of IL-6 in the media. Microfluidic chips are ideally suited to optical detection methods due to the non-invasive nature of the optical measurement techniques and the transparency of the microfluidic fabrication materials (e.g. glass and polydimethylsiloxane). The fluorescence intensity of light will be acquired with a dedicated complementary metal oxide semiconductor imager and fluorescent dyes as labels for the cells' receptors, while functionalised (anti-IL-6) magnetic micro-beads will be used for the capturing of the IL molecules and their quantification with an in situ immunomagnetic assay. Special complementary metal oxide semiconductor design will reduce the imager noise while decreasing the pixel area of sensors. This approach enables an image quality comparable with that obtained by using charge coupled device cameras(Reference Köklü, Ghaye and Beuchat39). Special image processing and analysis will increase the quality of the quantification of metabolites, thanks to more precise target sub-resolution and generation of synthetic images of fluorescent stained cells(Reference Ghaye, De Micheli and Carrara40). Therefore, the final optical detection system will combine a complementary metal oxide semiconductor imager and an integrated electronic microchip for the online quantitative analysis. The combination of the dynamic microfluidic-based cell co-culture, with prolonged time perfusion-based exchange of media and reagents, and the imaging system will offer near-real-time live-cell imaging for continuous tracking of the variation of immune cell response to perfused stimuli in a time-lapsed manner.

Limitations and applications of the NutriChip

Keeping in mind the versatility of the immune system, the limitations of the co-culture system as a model to mimic human digestion, intestinal transport of nutrients and immune activation by the absorbed nutrients are obvious. Care should thus be taken not to uncritically extrapolate the in vitro data to the in vivo situation. A comparative in vitro screening of the inflammatory properties of different food products should, however, reveal quantitative differences that are likely to be retrieved in vivo in the postprandial inflammatory response of the subjects having ingested these products. Thus, the dairy products selected in vitro for a low inflammatory impact, compared to the high-fat meal, will have to demonstrate the same relative activity in the human trial presented here.

The potential of the NutriChip extends beyond the identification of food products with a low impact on inflammatory stress. We are currently adapting the NutriChip to evaluate the effect of the food matrix on the intestinal transport of Ca (Ca-NutriChip). A recent report investigating the intestinal adhesion and metabolic activity of a probiotic bacterium suggests that guts-on-a-chip have the potential of better mimicking the in vivo situation than their macroscopic co-culture counterparts(Reference Kim, Huh and Hamilton41). Technologies are also available to extend the functionality of the NutriChip upwards to include the three in vitro digestion steps outlined earlier. Finally, in addition to food science and nutrition, the NutriChip should find applications in all fields of human biology in which gastrointestinal phenomena are important, in particular in medicine, pharmacology and toxicology.

Acknowledgements

The present work was supported by the Swiss federal programme Nano-Terea.ch (Project 20NA21_128840 NutriChip: A technological platform for nutrition analysis to promote healthy food). G. V., L. E. and R. P. participated in the European COST Action FA1005 Improving health properties of food by sharing our knowledge on the digestive process. None of the authors reports a conflict of interest. G. V. wrote the manuscript and is co-applicant of the NutriChip project. M. G. is principal investigator of the NutriChip project. S. C. and J. R. are co-applicants of the NutriChip project. All co-authors contributed scientifically to the implementation of at least one module of the NutriChip project and have reviewed the manuscript.

References

1World Health Organisation (1992) Basic Documents, 39th ed.Geneva: WHO.Google Scholar
2Huber, M, Knottnerus, JA, Green, L, et al. (2011) How should we define health? BMJ 343, d4163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3Godfrey, KM, Gluckman, PD & Hanson, MA (2010) Developmental origins of metabolic disease: life course and intergenerational perspectives. Trends Endocrinol Metab 21, 199205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4Gillies, PJ & Krul, ES (2007) Using genetic variation to optimize nutritional preemption. J Nutr 137, 270S274S.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5Fenech, M, El Sohemy, A, Cahill, L, et al. (2011) Nutrigenetics and nutrigenomics: viewpoints on the current status and applications in nutrition research and practice. J Nutrigenet Nutrigenomics 4, 6989.Google Scholar
6Bakker, GC, van Erk, MJ, Pellis, L, et al. (2010) An antiinflammatory dietary mix modulates inflammation and oxidative and metabolic stress in overweight men: a nutrigenomics approach. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 10441059.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7Margioris, AN (2009) Fatty acids and postprandial inflammation. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 12, 129137.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8Burger, KN, Beulens, JW, Boer, JM, et al. (2011) Dietary glycemic load and glycemic index and risk of coronary heart disease and stroke in Dutch men and women: the EPIC-MORGEN study. PLoS One 6, e25955.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9Bándi, G & Ramsden, JJ (2011) Emulating biology: the virtual living organism. J Biol Phys Chem 11, 97106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10Nappo, F, Esposito, K, Cioffi, M, et al. (2002) Postprandial endothelial activation in healthy subjects and in type 2 diabetic patients: role of fat and carbohydrate meals. J Am Coll Cardiol 39, 11451150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11Lopez-Garcia, E, Schulze, MB, Meigs, JB, et al. (2005) Consumption of trans fatty acids is related to plasma biomarkers of inflammation and endothelial dysfunction. J Nutr 135, 562566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12Calder, PC, Ahluwalia, N, Brouns, F, et al. (2011) Dietary factors and low-grade inflammation in relation to overweight and obesity. Br J Nutr 106, S578.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
13Ghanim, H, Sia, CL, Upadhyay, M, et al. (2010) Orange juice neutralizes the proinflammatory effect of a high-fat, high-carbohydrate meal and prevents endotoxin increase and Toll-like receptor expression. Am J Clin Nutr 91, 940949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14Burton-Freeman, B, Talbot, J, Park, E, et al. (2012) Protective activity of processed tomato products on postprandial oxidation and inflammation: a clinical trial in healthy weight men and women. Mol Nutr Food Res 56, 622631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
15Panagiotakos, DB, Pitsavos, CH, Zampelas, AD, et al. (2010) Dairy products consumption is associated with decreased levels of inflammatory markers related to cardiovascular disease in apparently healthy adults: the ATTICA study. J Am Coll Nutr 29, 357364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
16Hunter, DC, Brown, R, Green, T, et al. (2012) Changes in markers of inflammation, antioxidant capacity and oxidative stress in smokers following consumption of milk, and milk supplemented with fruit and vegetable extracts and vitamin C. Int J Food Sci Nutr 63, 90102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
17Nestel, PJ, Pally, S, MacIntosh, GL, et al. (2012) Circulating inflammatory and atherogenic biomarkers are not increased following single meals of dairy foods. Eur J Clin Nutr 66, 2531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18Sagaya, FM, Hurrell, RF & Vergères, G (2012) Postprandial blood cell transcriptomics in response to the ingestion of milk and yogurt by healthy individuals. J Nutr Biochem (epublication ahead of print version 7 May 2012).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
19Lemay, DG, Lynn, DJ, Martin, WF, et al. (2009) The bovine lactation genome: insights into the evolution of mammalian milk. Genome Biol 10, R43.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
20Walther, B & Sieber, R (2011) Bioactive proteins and peptides in foods. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 81, 181192.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
21Lyra, A, Lahtinen, S, Tiihonen, K, et al. (2010) Intestinal microbiota and overweight. Benef Microbes 1, 407421.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22Fresno, M, Alvarez, R & Cuesta, N (2011) Toll-like receptors, inflammation, metabolism and obesity. Arch Physiol Biochem 117, 151164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
23Most, MM, Ershow, AG & Clevidence, BA (2003) An overview of methodologies, proficiencies, and training resources for controlled feeding studies. J Am Diet Assoc 103, 729735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
24Senechal, S & Kussmann, M (2011) Nutriproteomics: technologies and applications for identification and quantification of biomarkers and ingredients. Proc Nutr Soc 70, 351364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25Shepherd, LV, Fraser, P & Stewart, D (2011) Metabolomics: a second-generation platform for crop and food analysis. Bioanalysis 3, 11431159.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26McClements, DJ & Li, Y (2010) Review of in vitro digestion models for rapid screening of emulsion-based systems. Food Funct 1, 3259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
27Kopf-Bolanz, KA, Schwander, F, Gijs, M, et al. (2012) Validation of an in vitro digestive system for studying macronutrient decomposition in humans. J Nutr 142, 245250.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28Sandberg, AS (2010) The use of Caco-2 cells to estimate Fe absorption in humans – a critical appraisal. Int J Vitam Nutr Res 80, 307313.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29Albin, DM & Tappenden, KA (2001) Advances in methods to evaluate gastrointestinal transport function. Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care 4, 351354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
30Brandtzaeg, P (2011) The gut as communicator between environment and host: immunological consequences. Eur J Pharmacol 668, S16S32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31Miron, N & Cristea, V (2012) Enterocytes: active cells in tolerance to food and microbial antigens in the gut. Clin Exp Immunol 167, 405412.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
32Lee, JY, Zhao, L, Youn, HS, et al. (2004) Saturated fatty acid activates but polyunsaturated fatty acid inhibits Toll-like receptor 2 dimerized with Toll-like receptor 6 or 1. J Biol Chem 279, 1697116979.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
33Konner, AC & Bruning, JC (2010) Toll-like receptors: linking inflammation to metabolism. Trends Endocrinol Metab 22, 1623.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
34Laugerette, F, Vors, C, Géloën, A, et al. (2011) Emulsified lipids increase endotoxemia: possible role in early postprandial low-grade inflammation. J Nutr Biochem 22, 5359.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
35Ramadan, Q, Jafarpoorchekab, H, Kopf-Bolanz, KA, et al. (2011) Nutrichip: an integrated microfluidic system for in vitro investigation of the immuno-modulatory function of dairy products. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on Miniaturized Systems for Chemistry and Life Sciences, μTAS, Seattle, USA, pp. 650652.Google Scholar
36Zhang, M, Mullens, C & Gorski, W (2005) Insulin oxidation and determination at carbon electrodes. Anal Chem 77, 63966401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
37Boero, C, Carrara, S, Del Vecchio, G, et al. (2011) Highly-sensitive carbon nanotubes-based sensing for glucose and lactate monitoring in cell culture. IEEE Trans Nanobiol 10, 5967.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38Carrara, S, Shumyantseva, VV, Archakov, AI, et al. (2008) Screen-printed electrodes based on carbon nanotubes and cytochrome P450scc for highly-sensitive cholesterol biosensors. Biosens Biolectron 24, 148150.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
39Köklü, G, Ghaye, J, Beuchat, R, et al. (2012) Quantitative comparison of commercial CCD and custom-designed CMOS camera for biological applications. In Proceedings of the International Conference IEEE ISCAS, 15–18 May 2011, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
40Ghaye, J, De Micheli, G & Carrara, S (2012) Simulated biological cells for receptors counting in fluorescence imaging. BioNanoScience 2, 94103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
41Kim, HJ, Huh, D, Hamilton, G, et al. (2012) Human gut-on-a-chip inhabited by microbial flora that experiences intestinal peristalsis-like motions and flow. Lab Chip 12, 21652174.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Figure 0

Fig. 1 Overview of the biological modules of the NutriChip project.

Figure 1

Fig. 2 A schematic representation of the engineering modules of the NutriChip project (adapted from http://www.nano.tera.ch/projects/403.php).