No CrossRef data available.
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 19 April 2024
1 C-376/98 Germany v Parliament and Council [2000] ECLI:EU:C:2000:544.
2 This would be a novel expansion to the literature, building upon similar types of work that explore the ways in which nudge design impacts validity; see, eg, K Grill, “Expanding the Nudge: Designing Choice Contexts and Choice Contents” (2014) 5 Rationality, Markets and Morals 139–62.
3 Eg R Baldwin, “From regulation to behaviour change: giving nudge the third degree” (2014) 77(6) Modern Law Review 831–57; A van Aaken, “Judge the Nudge: In Search of the Legal Limits of Paternalistic Nudging in the EU” in A Alemanno and A Sibony (eds), Nudging and the Law. What Can EU Law Learn from Behavioural Sciences? (Oxford, Hart 2015).
4 S Gainsbury et al, “Reducing Internet Gambling Harms Using Behavioral Science: A Stakeholder Framework” (2020) 11 Frontiers in Psychiatry 598589.
5 F Motka et al, “Who uses self-exclusion to regulate problem gambling? A systematic literature review” (2018) 7(4) Journal of Behavioral Addictions 903.
6 C Devault-Tousignant, “Qualitative Experience of Self-Exclusion Programmes: A Scoping Review” (2023) 20(5) International Journal of Environmental Research on Public Health 3987.
7 C Varallo and C Cravetto, “Alcoholic Beverages Labelling: Analysis of the Joint-self Regulatory Proposal of the Industry on Nutrition Labelling and Ingredients’ Declaration” (2018) 9(2) European Journal of Risk Regulation 329.
8 The summary of the consultation responses can be accessed at <https://ec.europa.eu/info/law/better-regulation/have-your-say/initiatives/12749-Food-labelling-revision-of-rules-on-information-provided-to-consumers/public-consultation_en>.
9 See the analysis by Movendi International at <https://movendi.ngo/news/2022/02/18/european-parliament-does-dirty-work-for-big-alcohol-votes-to-water-down-cancer-prevention-through-alcohol-policy/>.
10 The Court of Justice of the European Union has confirmed that even significant negative consequences for economic operators can be justified on the ground of protecting public health: C-547/14 Philip Morris Brands and Others [2016] ECLI:EU:C:2016:325.
To send this article to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about sending to your Kindle. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save this article to your Dropbox account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Dropbox account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save this article to your Google Drive account, please select one or more formats and confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you used this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your Google Drive account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.