Major depressive disorder (MDD), a leading cause of disability worldwide (World Health Organization, 2017), has been linked to the habitual use of dysfunctional emotion regulation strategies (Joormann & Stanton, Reference Joormann and Stanton2016). Neurobiological models of MDD have proposed that alterations in cortical-limbic pathways contribute to these deficits in emotion regulation (Kupfer, Frank, & Phillips, Reference Kupfer, Frank and Phillips2012; Mayberg, Reference Mayberg1997). In particular, the altered microstructure of the uncinate fasciculus (UNC), a white matter (WM) tract that connects key regions of the cortico-limbic circuit (i.e. amygdala and ventral prefrontal cortex), has been hypothesized to lead to aberrant emotion regulation in individuals with MDD (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Wang, Liu, Xi, Li, Zhang and Li2018). However, evidence regarding perturbed UNC microstructure in individuals with MDD is mixed. Numerous studies that use a tract-of-interest (TOI) approach report atypical UNC microstructure in MDD (Table 1), but whole-brain meta-analyses yield null findings (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Hu, Li, Huang, Lui, Kuang and Gong2016; Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, Zhao, Hu, Du, Chen, Wu and Gong2017; Liao et al., Reference Liao, Huang, Wu, Yang, Kuang, Du and Gong2013; Murphy & Frodl, Reference Murphy and Frodl2011; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Wang, Wang, Dai, Xiao, Feng and Chen2022). To answer the question of whether atypical UNC microstructure represents a neurobiological mechanism and potential treatment target for depression, the present meta-analysis extends the existing literature on UNC microstructure in MDD by consolidating evidence from 44 TOI studies.
Table 1. Characteristics of studies comparing fractional anisotropy or radial diffusivity in the uncinate fasciculus between individuals with depression and healthy controls
Abbreviations: DTI, diffusion tensor imaging; HDRS-17, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-item); RD, radial diffusivity.
Note: Bolded studies provided missing data upon request. One study (Choi et al., Reference Choi, Han, Kang, Won, Chang, Tae and Ham2016) compared UNC FA between individuals with depression and healthy controls using two samples with different genotypes.
UNC microstructure is most commonly quantified as fractional anisotropy (FA), a metric derived from diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) that correlates positively with the directionality and coherence of fibers within a WM bundle (Basser, Mattiello, & LeBihan, Reference Basser, Mattiello and LeBihan1994). Other indices used to characterize WM are axial diffusivity (AD) indicating diffusion along the main direction of the fibers, radial diffusivity (RD) measuring diffusion orthogonal to the main direction of the fibers, and mean diffusivity (MD) describing the rotationally invariant magnitude of diffusion. These three metrics have been associated with different tissue properties. AD is thought to reflect axonal organization and degeneration (Budde, Xie, Cross, & Song, Reference Budde, Xie, Cross and Song2009; Harsan et al., Reference Harsan, Poulet, Guignard, Steibel, Parizel, Loureiro de Sousa and Ghandour2006), RD has been shown to relate to the degree of myelination in animals (Song et al., Reference Song, Sun, Ramsbottom, Chang, Russell and Cross2002), and MD has been proposed to reflect variations within the intra- and extracellular space and a reduction in neuropil (Selemon & Goldman-Rakic, Reference Selemon and Goldman-Rakic1999). Aside from FA, RD is the metric that has been most intensely studied and discussed in the context of MDD (Dillon, Gonenc, Belleau, & Pizzagalli, Reference Dillon, Gonenc, Belleau and Pizzagalli2018). However, similar to the status of UNC FA, findings regarding UNC RD in depression are largely inconsistent (Table 1). Thus, it is of particular importance to integrate available evidence on these metrics (i.e., FA and RD), but integration of evidence regarding the other two metrics (i.e., AD and MD) might also advance our understanding of the neurobiological underpinnings of and potential treatment targets for depression.
Given the overarching goal of a personalized medicine approach for MDD, it is further necessary to understand which sociodemographic and clinical factors contribute to the heterogeneity in UNC findings across studies. Specifically, age might be an essential factor as the UNC matures until mid-adulthood (Lebel et al., Reference Lebel, Gee, Camicioli, Wieler, Martin and Beaulieu2012). Further, FA in the UNC has been shown to be lower in women than men (Taylor, MacFall, Gerig, & Krishnan, Reference Taylor, MacFall, Gerig and Krishnan2007). There might also be a diagnosis-by-sex interaction, as RD in the UNC appears to be higher in men with MDD than men without MDD (van Velzen et al., Reference van Velzen, Kelly, Isaev, Aleman, Aftanas, Bauer and Schmaal2020).
Clinical features, such as illness duration (Jenkins et al., Reference Jenkins, Barba, Campbell, Lamar, Shankman, Leow and Langenecker2016), severity of depressive symptoms (Charlton et al., Reference Charlton, Lamar, Zhang, Yang, Ajilore and Kumar2014; Greenberg et al., Reference Greenberg, Bertocci, Versace, Lima Santos, Chase, Siffler and Phillips2021), or medication use (Hu, Stavish, Leibenluft, & Linke, Reference Hu, Stavish, Leibenluft and Linke2020), may also contribute to inconsistencies in UNC findings. Further, depression frequently co-occurs with anxiety. In fact, more than 50% of individuals with depression also meet the criteria for anxiety (Kessler et al., Reference Kessler, Berglund, Demler, Jin, Koretz, Merikangas and Wang2003). Individuals with a primary diagnosis of anxiety have also shown reduced FA in the UNC (Phan et al., Reference Phan, Orlichenko, Boyd, Angstadt, Coccaro, Liberzon and Arfanakis2009; Tromp et al., Reference Tromp, Grupe, Oathes, McFarlin, Hernandez, Kral and Nitschke2012, Reference Tromp, Williams, Fox, Oler, Roseboom, Rogers and Kalin2019), suggesting that atypical UNC microstructure might be a common mechanistic pathway for both depression and anxiety.
Lastly, differences in processing pipelines could contribute to variance in UNC findings (Kuchling et al., Reference Kuchling, Backner, Oertel, Raz, Bellmann-Strobl, Ruprecht and Scheel2018). In DTI research, TOIs are defined in two ways. One strategy is to calculate the intersection between regions of a WM atlas and a sample-specific WM skeleton derived from the tract-based spatial statistics (TBSS) pipeline implemented in FSL (i.e. ENIGMA approach; http://enigma.ini.usc.edu/ongoing/dti-working-group/). A second strategy is to track fibers between relevant gray matter regions (here, amygdala and ventral prefrontal cortex; tractography approach). Notably, a recent meta-analysis using the ENIGMA approach (i.e., TBSS) did not find atypical UNC FA in individuals with MDD (van Velzen et al., Reference van Velzen, Kelly, Isaev, Aleman, Aftanas, Bauer and Schmaal2020). However, most original studies reporting aberrant UNC microstructure in MDD use a tractography approach, which is particularly sensitive to WM alterations (Kuchling et al., Reference Kuchling, Backner, Oertel, Raz, Bellmann-Strobl, Ruprecht and Scheel2018).
To advance our understanding of the role of atypical UNC microstructure in the risk architecture of MDD, it is further necessary to address whether such abnormalities represent a vulnerability for MDD (i.e., are also observable in individuals with an elevated risk of developing the disorder). First-degree relatives (REL) of individuals with MDD are at an increased risk for MDD themselves (Wilde et al., Reference Wilde, Chan, Rahman, Meiser, Mitchell, Schofield and Green2014). Indeed, earlier work suggests reduced FA in the UNC in REL compared to healthy control individuals (HC) (Huang, Fan, Williamson, & Rao, Reference Huang, Fan, Williamson and Rao2011). Although the number of studies in REL is limited, we believe it would be useful to synthesize this data to examine whether initial evidence supports reduced FA in the UNC as a vulnerability marker of MDD.
In summary, the present meta-analysis is the first to integrate available studies using a TOI approach to examine UNC microstructure in depression to extend existing literature in four ways. First, it consolidates evidence to determine whether reduced FA in the left and right UNC is a neurobiological marker of depression. Second, we examine whether higher RD in the left and right UNC is also a neurobiological marker of depression. Third, we test whether sociodemographic and clinical characteristics or the processing pipeline contribute to heterogeneity in UNC findings. Finally, we explore (a) whether other DTI metrics such as AD and MD also differ between individuals with and without MDD, and (b) whether atypical UNC microstructure is also present in first-degree relatives of individuals with MDD.
Method
Literature review
The present meta-analysis has been pre-registered in PROSPERO (ID #CRD42021276200). To identify relevant studies, we used the search engine PubMed with the following search terms: depression and WM. We included all original research articles published before July 9th, 2022, that used a TOI approach to compare FA of the left and right UNC between individuals with a lifetime diagnosis of depression or REL and HC. Depression was broadly defined as a lifetime diagnosis of MDD, persistent depressive disorder, or other specified depressive disorders. REL were defined as first-degree relatives of an individual who either (1) met criteria for MDD, or (2) scored higher than the clinical cut-off on a dimensional depression rating scale. We excluded book chapters, conference abstracts, review articles, and case reports. We identified 49 different studies that met our inclusion criteria (Fig. 1). In addition to including individuals with current depression, one study also included individuals with lifetime depression who were currently in remission (Shakeel et al., Reference Shakeel, Hassel, Davis, Metzak, MacQueen, Arnott and Lebel2021). Two studies with overlapping samples (Lamar et al., Reference Lamar, Charlton, Ajilore, Zhang, Yang, Barrick and Kumar2013; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Leow, Ajilore, Lamar, Yang, Joseph and Kumar2012) were combined and included in the present meta-analysis. One study used two samples with different genotypes to compare UNC FA between MDD and HC (Choi et al., Reference Choi, Han, Kang, Won, Chang, Tae and Ham2016); here, we included data from both samples separately.
Figure 1. Flow chart of the literature search process. Abbreviations: FA, fractional anisotropy; HC, healthy controls; MDD, major depressive disorder; NOS, Newcastle-Ottawa Assessment Scale; REL, first-degree relatives; TOI, tract-of-interest; UNC, uncinate fasciculus. Note: *One study (Liu et al., Reference Liu, Kang, Zhang, Yang, Liu, Wang and Sun2021) compared UNC FA between MDD and HC as well as REL and HC.
Data extraction
From all studies, we extracted means and standard deviations of FA and, if available, RD, MD, and AD, of the left and right UNC separately for each study group. We also pulled information about participants' mean age (43 studies, n MDD = 4930), sex ratio (42 studies, n MDD = 4875), mean illness duration (24 studies, n MDD = 1339), the percentage of participants using psychotropic medication (35 studies, n MDD = 1818), and the percentage of subjects with lifetime comorbid anxiety disorder (30 studies, n MDD = 3803). Further, we extracted Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS; Hamilton, Reference Hamilton1960) mean scores (23 studies, n MDD = 1227), given that it was the most frequently reported measure of depressive symptom severity. In line with prior work, we standardized scores across different versions of the HDRS (Hu et al., Reference Hu, Stavish, Leibenluft and Linke2020). Finally, we also noted whether TBSS or tractography was used to process DTI data.
We contacted corresponding authors when information regarding UNC FA or RD, or the percentage of individuals with comorbid anxiety, was missing. We obtained the requested data from 36 studies (Table 1; online Supplementary Table S1). We evaluated the quality of all studies using the Newcastle-Ottawa assessment scale (NOS; online Supplementary Table S2) and excluded two studies with NOS scores below 5 (Niida, Niida, Kuniyoshi, Motomura, & Uechi, Reference Niida, Niida, Kuniyoshi, Motomura and Uechi2013; Pines, Sacchet, Kullar, Ma, & Williams, Reference Pines, Sacchet, Kullar, Ma and Williams2018) (online Supplementary Table S3). EX initially extracted all available data, and LN cross-checked it independently.
Data analyses
All analyses used the metafor package (version 3.4-0) for R software (R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria; http://www.r-project.org/). We calculated the effect sizes for each study as standardized mean difference values (Cohen's d) and used the effect sizes to conduct random-effects inverse-variance weighted meta-analyses. We tested whether lower FA or higher RD in the bilateral UNC differentiated MDD or REL from HC, and considered effects significant at p < 0.025, correcting for tests in two hemispheres. As an exploratory analysis, we also tested whether there were differences in MD and AD in the bilateral UNC when comparing MDD and HC. Publication bias was determined using Egger's test for asymmetry, and the robustness of results was assessed using jackknife sensitivity analyses. Using a meta-analytic fixed-effects model, we compared FA effect sizes in the left and right hemispheres in individuals with MDD. Using this approach, we also indirectly compared FA effect sizes between REL and individuals with MDD to determine whether the effect size was similar in these study groups.
We conducted meta-regression analyses to investigate whether age, sex, illness duration, depressive symptom severity, medication use, comorbid anxiety, and DTI processing pipeline contributed to heterogeneity across studies. Using Bonferroni correction to correct for multiple comparisons, we set a final statistical threshold for significance of p uncorrected < 0.007 (in other words, p corrected < 0.05). Recommendations suggest that meta-regression analyses should include at least 20 studies to produce robust findings. Thus, we examined sources of heterogeneity for studies comparing FA between MDD to HC (n = 44), but not for studies comparing RD between MDD and HC (n = 15) or studies investigating FA between REL and HC (n = 6). We also did not examine sources of heterogeneity for studies comparing MD between MDD and HC (n = 17) or for studies comparing AD between MDD and HC (n = 12). Data and code supporting this study's findings are publicly available on the Open Science Forum (https://osf.io/hdp57/).
Results
Literature review and quality assessment
Our initial literature search encompassed 2803 studies (Fig. 1). After screening the titles and abstracts, we reviewed the full text of 297 studies. We excluded studies if they (1) did not examine FA, (2) did not include the UNC as a TOI, (3) used a whole-brain approach, (4) did not provide FA data, (5) used a sample that overlapped with another study already included in our meta-analysis, or (6) yielded a NOS quality score ≤ 5 (Fig. 1, online Supplementary Table S3). A total of 49 studies were included in our meta-analysis (Fig. 1). Overall demographic and clinical characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis are reported in Table 2, accompanied by specific details for each study in Table 1 and online Supplementary Table S1. Meta-regression analyses were conducted in subsets of studies that provided the relevant information on age (n = 43), sex (n = 42), mean illness duration (n = 24), mean HDRS scores (n = 23), medication use (n = 35), and comorbid anxiety (n = 30). All studies provided information on the DTI processing pipeline. There were missing data on demographic characteristics (age: 1 study missing data; sex: 2 studies missing data) and clinical characteristics (mean illness duration: 20 studies missing data; mean HDRS scores: 21 studies missing data; medication use: 10 studies missing data; comorbid anxiety: 14 studies missing data).
Table 2. Overall demographic and clinical characteristics of studies included in the meta-analysis
Abbreviations: FA, fractional anisotropy; HC, healthy controls; HDRS-17, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (17-item); MDD, major depressive disorder; RD, radial diffusivity; REL, first-degree relatives at-risk for depression.
a These means are based on less than 75% of studies, which reported this information in the published manuscript.
b These means are based on less than 50% of studies, which reported this information in the published manuscript.
Fractional anisotropy in the uncinate fasciculus
The Egger's test indicated no publication bias among the studies that reported FA in the left (z = 0.79, p = 0.432; Figure 2) and right UNC (z = −0.01, p = 0.993; Figure 2), so we included all studies in the final analysis. We found that individuals with MDD showed reduced FA in the right UNC (WMD = −0.25, 95% CI [−0.42 to −0.09], p = 0.003; Figure 2); however, this effect was only marginally significant in the left UNC (WMD = −0.21, 95% CI [−0.42 to 0.01], p = 0.059; Figure 2). FA effect sizes between the left and right UNC did not differ (p = 0.735), suggesting no significant difference between the two hemispheres. In the right UNC, jackknife sensitivity analysis found that no single study drove these results. For the left UNC, jackknife sensitivity analysis showed that the effect became significant (p = 0.013) when leaving out one particular study, which consisted of individuals with MDD who experienced moderate anxiety symptoms (Doolin et al., Reference Doolin, Andrews, Carballedo, McCarthy, O'Hanlon, Tozzi and Frodl2019).
Figure 2. Tract-of-interest meta-analysis comparing fractional anisotropy in the uncinate fasciculus between individuals with depression and healthy controls. Here, the left uncinate fasciculus (in orange) and right uncinate fasciculus (in red) are depicted. These tracts interconnect the amygdala (in green) to the orbitofrontal cortex (in blue). (a) Forest plots, with the black diamond representing the overall effect size of each study. (b) Funnel plots, with the dotted line representing the overall effect size. Symmetric funnel plots indicate an absence of publication bias, with a majority of studies falling in the area of statistical non-significance (p > 0.1). The five most extreme points on each funnel plot are labeled with the study author and year. Abbreviations: CI, confidence interval; FA, fractional anisotropy; RE model, random-effect model; SE, standard error.
Heterogeneity in fractional anisotropy findings
Comorbid anxiety explained variability in findings in the left (β = 0.01, z = 2.00, R 2 = 15%, p uncorrected = 0.046, p corrected = 0.322) but not right UNC (β = 0.00, z = 1.46, R 2 = 4%, p uncorrected = 0.146, p corrected ≥ 1; online Supplementary Table S4). Specifically, comorbid anxiety attenuated the group difference between individuals with MDD and HC in the left UNC. We found no evidence that age, sex, duration of illness, the severity of depressive symptoms, medication use, or the DTI processing pipeline contributed to variance in UNC findings in individuals with MDD (all ps uncorrected > 0.124, all ps corrected > 0.868).
Radial diffusivity in the uncinate fasciculus
For the left UNC, Egger's test indicated one outlier that showed greatly elevated RD in individuals with MDD (Koshiyama et al., Reference Koshiyama, Fukunaga, Okada, Morita, Nemoto, Usui and Hashimoto2020). After excluding this study, Egger's test showed no publication bias in the left UNC (z = −0.73, p = 0.466; online Supplementary Fig. S1). In the right UNC, Egger's test suggested no publication bias (z = −0.72, p = 0.475; online Supplementary Fig. S1). Thus, for the final analysis, we excluded one study (Koshiyama et al., Reference Koshiyama, Fukunaga, Okada, Morita, Nemoto, Usui and Hashimoto2020) for the left UNC and included all studies for the right UNC. We found no differences in RD in the left (WMD = −0.01, 95% CI [−0.19 to 0.17], p = 0.936; online Supplementary Fig. S1) or right UNC (WMD = 0.11, 95% CI [−0.10 to 0.31], p = 0.307; online Supplementary Fig. S1) when comparing individuals with MDD to HC. RD effect sizes were comparable between the left and right UNC (p = 0.416).
Exploratory analysis
We found no FA differences in the left or right UNC when comparing REL to HC (online Supplementary Fig. S2). Indirect comparisons of UNC FA between hemispheres also yielded no significant results (p = 0.811). However, indirect comparisons of UNC FA between REL and individuals with MDD yielded significant results in the right UNC (WMD = 0.33, 95% CI [0.06 to 0.60], p = 0.019) and marginally significant results in the left UNC (WMD = 0.33, 95% CI [−0.05 to 0.71], p = 0.093). In other words, individuals with MDD showed reduced UNC FA compared to REL. Separately, we found no differences in MD or AD in the left or right UNC when comparing individuals with MDD to HC (online Supplementary Figs S3 and S4).
Discussion
The present meta-analysis, which integrates data from 5016 individuals with MDD and 18 425 HC, associates MDD with reduced FA in the uncinate fasciculus, suggesting perturbed coherence of this tract. We also provide preliminary evidence for a laterality effect potentially related to comorbid anxiety. In contrast to our hypothesis, this effect was not related to alterations in RD, which was comparable between individuals with (N MDD = 1087) and without MDD (N HC = 1532). We also found no support for the hypothesis that aberrant UNC FA represents a vulnerability for MDD. However, the available sample of REL was small (N REL = 116, N HC = 531), and thus must be cautiously interpreted.
Consistent with neurobiological models of depression (Kupfer et al., Reference Kupfer, Frank and Phillips2012; Mayberg, Reference Mayberg1997) that state that aberrancies in cortical-limbic pathways are implicated in perturbed emotion regulation, we associate MDD with reduced FA in the UNC, which links the ventral prefrontal cortex and the amygdala. Prior work links reduced FA in the UNC to less effective reappraisal (d'Arbeloff et al., Reference d'Arbeloff, Kim, Knodt, Radtke, Brigidi and Hariri2018; Eden et al., Reference Eden, Schreiber, Anwander, Keuper, Laeger, Zwanzger and Dobel2015; Zuurbier, Nikolova, Åhs, & Hariri, Reference Zuurbier, Nikolova, Åhs and Hariri2013) and less amygdala regulation in response to emotional stimuli (Hein et al., Reference Hein, Mattson, Dotterer, Mitchell, Lopez-Duran, Thomason and Monk2018). However, these studies focused on non-depressed individuals. Thus, future studies should investigate the relationship between UNC microstructure and emotion regulation deficits in individuals with MDD, possibly by integrating DTI and task-based functional magnetic resonance imaging.
Integrating information from 44 TOI studies, we extend findings from a prior meta-analysis that found reduced UNC FA when examining three whole-brain and TOI studies on individuals with late-life depression (Wen, Steffens, Chen, & Zainal, Reference Wen, Steffens, Chen and Zainal2014). Specifically, we provide more conclusive evidence of reduced UNC FA in individuals with depression across the lifespan. However, our meta-analysis contrasts prior whole-brain meta-analyses that found no alterations in UNC FA in individuals with MDD (Chen et al., Reference Chen, Hu, Li, Huang, Lui, Kuang and Gong2016; Jiang et al., Reference Jiang, Zhao, Hu, Du, Chen, Wu and Gong2017; Liao et al., Reference Liao, Huang, Wu, Yang, Kuang, Du and Gong2013; Murphy & Frodl, Reference Murphy and Frodl2011; Zhou et al., Reference Zhou, Wang, Wang, Dai, Xiao, Feng and Chen2022). Indeed, a recent report (Winter et al., Reference Winter, Leenings, Ernsting, Sarink, Fisch, Emden and Hahn2022) shows a large overlap in the distribution of neurobiological markers including whole-brain FA between individuals with depression and HCs. However, unlike TOI approaches, whole-brain approaches are less sensitive to effects in small tracts such as the UNC. In contrast to a recent meta-analysis that also found no differences in UNC FA between individuals with MDD and HC using the ENIGMA approach (van Velzen et al., Reference van Velzen, Kelly, Isaev, Aleman, Aftanas, Bauer and Schmaal2020), 80% of the studies included in our meta-analysis used a tractography (rather than a TBSS) approach, which has been shown to be more sensitive to capturing WM alterations (Kuchling et al., Reference Kuchling, Backner, Oertel, Raz, Bellmann-Strobl, Ruprecht and Scheel2018). Thus, methodological heterogeneity might explain diverging findings in meta-analyses of WM in MDD.
Our findings link MDD most strongly to reduced FA in the right UNC. Effects were less consistent in the left hemisphere. Our findings suggest that comorbid anxiety might contribute to this heterogeneity. Specifically, a higher proportion of patients with comorbid anxiety was associated with higher FA in the left UNC. This finding is consistent with prior work demonstrating a positive relationship between trait anxiety and FA in the left UNC (Modi et al., Reference Modi, Trivedi, Singh, Kumar, Rathore, Tripathi and Khushu2013; Montag, Reuter, Weber, Markett, & Schoene-Bake, Reference Montag, Reuter, Weber, Markett and Schoene-Bake2012). This finding is also consistent with a prior study, which found that individuals with MDD and comorbid anxiety do not show altered UNC microstructure (Canu et al., Reference Canu, Kostić, Agosta, Munjiza, Ferraro, Pesic and Filippi2015), though individuals with solely MDD (Table 1) or anxiety (Tromp et al., Reference Tromp, Grupe, Oathes, McFarlin, Hernandez, Kral and Nitschke2012) do show alterations in the UNC. More work is needed to delineate specific and shared mechanisms of depression and anxiety. Such work might leverage latent variable approaches such as bifactor models (Scopel Hoffmann et al., Reference Scopel Hoffmann, Moore, Kvitko Axelrud, Tottenham, Zuo, Rohde and Salum2022), which can be used to parse specific and shared factors of symptoms of depression and anxiety, which can then be related to WM microstructure.
Perturbations in UNC microstructure are not specific to MDD. For example, atypical UNC microstructure has been linked to bipolar disorder (Xu et al., Reference Xu, Nguyen, Hu, Stavish, Leibenluft and Linke2022), anxiety disorders (Jenkins et al., Reference Jenkins, Barba, Campbell, Lamar, Shankman, Leow and Langenecker2016), and attention-deficit/ hyperactivity disorder (van Ewijk, Heslenfeld, Zwiers, Buitelaar, & Oosterlaan, Reference van Ewijk, Heslenfeld, Zwiers, Buitelaar and Oosterlaan2012). A mega-analysis also found atypical UNC microstructure in individuals with schizophrenia (Koshiyama et al., Reference Koshiyama, Fukunaga, Okada, Morita, Nemoto, Usui and Hashimoto2020). As the UNC is implicated in the pathophysiology of different disorders, it is pivotal that future work examines more closely its relevance to specific transdiagnostic processes (e.g. emotion regulation).
FA is a sensitive but non-specific indicator of WM microstructure. At a cellular level, FA findings might relate to atypical myelination. Indeed, it has been proposed that myelination, better assessed through RD, is a mechanism of depression (Boda, Reference Boda2021; Gao et al., Reference Gao, Ma, Tang, Liang, Huang, Wang and Tang2017; Hemanth Kumar et al., Reference Hemanth Kumar, Mishra, Trivedi, Singh, Rana and Khushu2014; Hou et al., Reference Hou, Lai, Jiang, Liu, Qian, Zhang and Zhou2021). Our results do not support this hypothesis. Thus, future work must investigate alternative drivers of aberrant FA, such as vascular and glial changes and axonal branching or pruning (Sampaio-Baptista & Johansen-Berg, Reference Sampaio-Baptista and Johansen-Berg2017). Identifying cellular mechanisms underlying perturbed UNC microstructure in MDD might aid in developing novel therapeutics for this debilitating condition.
Finally, it is essential to place atypical UNC microstructure within the risk architecture of MDD. To this end, we integrated studies examining UNC microstructure in REL of MDD. Differences in UNC microstructure were observed between REL and individuals with MDD, but not between REL and HC. Though preliminary, this suggests that altered UNC microstructure may not represent a vulnerability but develops during MDD, and thus may be a consequence, or a ‘scar’, of MDD (Rohde, Lewinsohn, & Seeley, Reference Rohde, Lewinsohn and Seeley1990; Wichers, Geschwind, van Os, & Peeters, Reference Wichers, Geschwind, van Os and Peeters2010).
Numerous studies have shown that repetition of behaviors and sleep patterns independently modify WM throughout the lifespan (Sampaio-Baptista & Johansen-Berg, Reference Sampaio-Baptista and Johansen-Berg2017). It is conceivable that, during MDD, the well-documented bias towards negative emotional content (Gotlib & Joormann, Reference Gotlib and Joormann2010) and the excessive use of maladaptive emotion regulation strategies such as rumination (Joormann & Stanton, Reference Joormann and Stanton2016) shape the UNC. Further, perturbed sleep is a frequently reported symptom of depression (Nutt, Wilson, & Paterson, Reference Nutt, Wilson and Paterson2008), that often persists during remission. Sleep deprivation has been hypothesized to lead to reduced structural integrity of the UNC (Jamieson, Broadhouse, Lagopoulos, & Hermens, Reference Jamieson, Broadhouse, Lagopoulos and Hermens2020), which is supported by recent findings that associated poor sleep quality with reduced FA and higher RD in the UNC in healthy adolescents (Jamieson et al., Reference Jamieson, Schwenn, Beaudequin, Shan, McLoughlin, Lagopoulos and Hermens2021). Future work should investigate the relationship between UNC FA and sleep in individuals with MDD, as understanding this association could have implications for the treatment of MDD.
Finally, we like to point out that depression as a diagnostic category might encompass multiple subtypes (Fried, Reference Fried2017). Thus, it may not be possible to link such a broad phenotype to a specific neurobiological signature (Winter et al., Reference Winter, Leenings, Ernsting, Sarink, Fisch, Emden and Hahn2022). Instead, future work might consider, alternate phenotyping strategies such as latent profile analysis, when examining the role of WM microstructure in depression, as perturbations in the UNC might only be found in subgroups of patients. This could be an important step towards a personalized treatment approach for depression.
Limitations
While we were well-powered to examine our main question, findings on RD, MD, AD and REL must be considered preliminary, given the substantially smaller number of studies used in these analyses. Unfortunately, we could not determine whether findings generalize to diverse racial and ethnic backgrounds as the majority of studies (n = 40) did not report these variables. It will be important that future studies report participants' racial and ethnic background, as these demographic features may relate to traumatic experiences (Kirkinis, Pieterse, Martin, Agiliga, & Brownell, Reference Kirkinis, Pieterse, Martin, Agiliga and Brownell2021) and could contribute to inter-study variance in UNC findings.
Conclusion
The present meta-analysis found reduced FA in the UNC in individuals with, but not those at risk for, MDD. However, comorbid anxiety may weaken associations between depression and UNC microstructure. Future work needs to investigate when and how perturbations in UNC microstructure develop and should aim to link it to psychological processes previously implicated in depression, such as impaired emotion regulation.
Supplementary material
The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291723000107.
Financial support
This work was supported by the National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship Program (DGE: 1842487) and the National Institute of Mental Health Intramural Research Program (ZIA: MH002778-21). The funding source supported the decision to submit the article for publication. The authors assert that all procedures contributing to this work comply with the ethical standards of the relevant national and institutional committees on human experimentation and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2008.
Conflict of interest
We have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Open access
