Hostname: page-component-669899f699-7xsfk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-24T23:24:53.576Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Predicting the geographical potential distribution of species Opisina arenosella Walker in China under different climate scenarios based on the MaxEnt model

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 October 2024

Zhiling Wang
Affiliation:
College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
Zhihang Zhuo
Affiliation:
College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
Yaqin Peng
Affiliation:
College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
Danping Xu*
Affiliation:
College of Life Science, China West Normal University, Nanchong, China
*
Corresponding author: Danping Xu; Email: xudanping@cwnu.edu.cn

Abstract

As global warming increases with the frequency of extreme weather, the distribution of species is inevitably affected. Among them, highly damaging invasive species are of particular concern. Being able to effectively predict the geographic distribution of invasive species and future distribution trends is a key entry point for their control. Opisina arenosella Walker is an invasive species, and its ability to live on the backs of foliage and generate canals to hide adds to the difficulty of control. In this paper, the current and future distributions of O. arenosella under three typical emission scenarios in 2050 and 2090 are projected based on the MaxEnt model combining 19 bioclimatic variables. Filter through the variables to find the four key environment variables: BIO 1, BIO 6, BIO 11 and BIO 4. The results show that O. arenosella is distributed only in the eight provinces of Tibet, Yunnan, Fujian, Guangxi, Taiwan, Guangdong, Hong Kong and Hainan in the southeastern region. Its high suitability area is concentrated in Taiwan and Hainan. In the long run, highly suitable areas will continue to increase in size, while moderately suitable areas and poorly suitable areas will decrease to varying degrees. This paper aims to provide theoretical references for the control of O. arenosella.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

*

These authors contributed equally to this work and should be regarded as co-first authors.

References

Barker, JR and MacIsaac, HJ (2022) Species distribution models: administrative boundary centroid occurrences require careful interpretation. Ecological Modelling 472, 110107. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2022.110107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, A and Stevens, M (2020) Temperature, topography, soil characteristics, and NDVI drive habitat preferences of a shade-tolerant invasive grass. Ecology and Evolution 10, 10785. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bradie, J and Leung, B (2017) A quantitative synthesis of the importance of variables used in MaxEnt species distribution models. Journal of Biogeography 44, 13441361. doi: 10.1111/jbi.12894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breiman, L (2001) Random forests. Machine Learning 45, 532. doi: 10.1023/A:1010933404324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Breiman, L, Friedman, J, Olshen, RA and Stone, CJ (1984) Classification and Regression Trees. United states: Springer Nature, 368 pp.Google Scholar
De'Ath, G (2007) Boosted trees for ecological modeling and prediction. Ecology 88, 243251. doi: 10.1890/0012-9658(2007)88[243:BTFEMA]2.0.CO;2.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elith, J and Leathwick, JR (2009) Species distribution models: ecological explanation and prediction across space and time. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 40, 677697. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.110308.120159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elith, J, Graham, CH, Anderson, RP, Dudík, M, Ferrier, S, Guisan, A, Hijmans, RJ, Huettmann, F, Leathwick, JR and Lehmann, A (2006) Novel methods improve prediction of species’ distributions from occurrence data. Ecography 29, 129151. doi: 10.1111/j.2006.0906-7590.04596.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elith, J, Phillips, SJ, Hastie, T, Dudík, M, Chee, YE and Yates, CJ (2011) A statistical explanation of MaxEnt for ecologists. Diversity and Distributions 17, 4357. doi: 10.1111/j.1472-4642.2010.00725.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Escalera, L, Hernandez, R, Soto-Rojas, C and Suazo-Ortuño, I (2018) Predicting Ambystoma ordinarium habitat in central Mexico using species distribution models. Herpetologica 74, 117126. doi: 10.1655/Herpetologica-D-16-00078.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedman, JH (1991) Multivariate adaptive regression splines. Annals of Statistics 19, 1141. doi: 10.1214/aos/1176347963.Google Scholar
Guisan, A and Zimmermann, NE (2000) Predictive habitat distribution models in ecology. Ecological Modelling 135, 147186. doi: 10.1016/S0304–3800(00)00354-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guisan, A Jr., Edwards, TC and Hastie, T (2002) Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecological Modelling 157, 89100. doi: 10.1016/S0304-3800(02)00204-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guisan, A, Zimmermann, NE, Elith, J, Graham, CH, Phillips, S and Peterson, AT (2007) What matters for predicting the occurrences of trees: techniques, data, or species’ characteristics? Ecological Monographs 77, 615630. doi: 10.1890/06-1060.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Guo, Q, Kelly, M and Graham, CH (2005) Support vector machines for predicting distribution of Sudden Oak Death in California. Ecological Modelling 182, 7590. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2004.07.012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jayanth, KP and Nagarkatti, S (1984) Testingbessa remota [Dip.: Tachinidae] against Opisina arenosella [Lep.: Cryptophasidae] and other lepidopterous hosts in India. Entomophaga 29, 415419. doi: 10.1007/BF02372163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jin, T, Lin, Y, Han, S, Ma, G, Wen, H and Peng, Z (2019) Host performance of Trichogramma species on Opisina arenosella, and evaluation of their biological control efficacy. Journal of Asia-Pacific Entomology 22, 990996. doi: 10.1016/j.aspen.2019.06.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jingjing, D, Siming, F, Jiaqiang, Z, Juan, S and Te, L (2023) Analysis of insect pests identified to species that were intercepted at Chinese ports of entry. Management of Biological Invasions 14, 641657. doi: 10.3391/mbi.2023.14.4.05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kumar, R (2002) Studies on Ecology, Reproductive Biology and Management of Opisina arenosella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Studies on Ecology, Reproductive Biology and Management of Opisina arenosella (Walker) (Lepidoptera: Oecophoridae) (Doctor Type). University of Agricultural Sciences, Bangalore.Google Scholar
Lever, RJAW (1969) Pests of the Coconut Palm. Finland: FAO Agricultural Study.Google Scholar
Li, L, Qingzhao, L, Xiongfei, Y, Guangchang, M, Bo, L, Fan, Y and Wei, Y (2021) Observation on the ultrastructures of antennal sensilla in Opisina arenosella. Journal of Environmental Entomology 43, 10701078.Google Scholar
Lu, H, Lyu, B, Tang, J, Wu, Q, Wyckhuys, KAG, Le, KH, Chongchitmate, P, Qiu, H and Zhang, Q (2023) Ecology, invasion history and biodiversity-driven management of the coconut black-headed caterpillar Opisina arenosella in Asia. Frontiers in Plant Science 14. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2023.1116221.Google ScholarPubMed
Mao, H and Kunimi, Y (1994) Longevity and fecundity of Brachymeria lasus (WALKER) (Hymenoptera: Chalcididae), a pupal parasitoid of the Oriental Tea Tortrix, Homona magnanima DIAKONOFF (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae) under laboratory conditions. Applied Entomology and Zoology 29, 237243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, C, Nampoothiri, CK, Radhakrishnan Nair, CP and Rajan, P (2010) Leaf-eating caterpillar (Opisina arenosella)-induced yield loss in coconut palm. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 30, 132137. doi: 10.1017/S174275841000024X.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muralimohan, K, Srinivasa, YB and Pn, S (2013) Effect of temperature on developmental biology of Opisina arenosella (Walker). Current Biotica 7, 228232.Google Scholar
Nasser, M and Abdurahiman, UC (2001) Biological control of the coconut caterpillar Opisina arenosella (Lepidoptera: Xylorictidae): achievements and prospects. In Upadhyay, RK, Mukerji, KG and Chamola, BP (eds), Biocontrol Potential and its Exploitation in Sustainable Agriculture: Volume 2: Insect Pests. Boston, MA: Springer US, pp. 285305.Google Scholar
Nneji, LM, Salako, G, Oladipo, S, Ayoola, A, Onadeko, A, Adedeji, B, Omotoso, O, Ugwumba, A and Adeola, A (2019) Species distribution modelling predicts habitat suitability and reduction of suitable habitat under future climatic scenario for Sclerophrys perreti: a critically endangered Nigerian endemic toad. African Journal of Ecology 58, 481491. doi: 10.1111/aje.12713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olden, JD, Lawler, JJ and Poff, NL (2008) Machine learning methods without tears: a primer for ecologists. The Quarterly Review of Biology 83, 171193.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perera, PACR, Hassell, MP and Godfray, HCJ (2009) Population dynamics of the coconut caterpillar, Opisina arenosella Walker (Lepidoptera: Xyloryctidae), in Sri Lanka. Bulletin of Entomological Research 78, 479492. doi: 10.1017/S0007485300013237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Phillips, SJ, Dudík, M and Schapire, R (2004) A maximum entropy approach to species distribution modeling. International Conference on Machine Learning, 655663. doi: 10.1145/1015330.1015412.Google Scholar
Phillips, SJ, Anderson, RP and Schapire, RE (2006) Maximum entropy modeling of species geographic distributions. Ecological Modelling 190, 231259. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2005.03.026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramkumar, , Muralimohan, K, Kiranmayi, L and Srinivasa, YB (2006) Discrete generation cycles in the tropical moth Opisina arenosella. Current Science India, 91, 811816.Google Scholar
Rhoden, CM, Peterman, WE and Taylor, CA (2017) Maxent-directed field surveys identify new populations of narrowly endemic habitat specialists. Peerj 5, e3632. doi: 10.7717/peerj.3632.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shameer, KS, Nasser, M, Mohan, C and Hardy, ICW (2018) Direct and indirect influences of intercrops on the coconut defoliator Opisina arenosella. Journal of Pest Science 91, 259275. doi: 10.1007/s10340-017-0904-6.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stockwell, D (1999) The GARP modelling system: problems and solutions to automated spatial prediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Science 13, 143158. doi: 10.1080/136588199241391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, Y (2017) Studies on the Suitability of Coconut Weaver Moth to Four Host Plants and its Distribution Pattern on Coconut Trees (Master Type). Hainan University, China.Google Scholar
Wang, Z, Xu, D, Liao, W, Xu, Y and Zhuo, Z (2023) Predicting the current and future distributions of Frankliniella occidentalis (Pergande) based on the MaxEnt species distribution model. Insects 14, 458. doi: 10.3390/insects14050458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed