Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T19:55:35.937Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
Accepted manuscript

Cover crops and fall residual herbicides for managing Italian ryegrass

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2025

Jose H S de Sanctis*
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Charles W Cahoon
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Wesley J Everman
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Travis W Gannon
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Katherine M Jennings
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Horticultural Science, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Zachary R Taylor
Affiliation:
Research Specialist, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Brock A Dean
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
Jacob C Forehand
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
James H Lee
Affiliation:
Graduate Research Assistant, Department of Crop and Soil Sciences, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA
*
Author for correspondence: Jose H S de Sanctis; Email: jhscarpa@ncsu.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

North Carolina growers have long struggled to control Italian ryegrass, and recent research has confirmed Italian ryegrass biotypes resistant to nicosulfuron, glyphosate, clethodim, and paraquat. Integrating alternative management strategies is crucial to effectively control such biotypes. The objectives of this study were to evaluate Italian ryegrass control with cover crops and fall-applied residual herbicides and investigate cover crop injury from residual herbicides. This study was conducted during the fall/winter of 2021-22 in Salisbury and fall/winter of 2021-22 and 2022-23 at Clayton, NC. The study was designed as a 3x5 split-plot, where the main plot consisted of three cover crop treatments (no-cover, cereal rye at 80 kg ha-1, and crimson clover at 18 kg ha-1), and the subplots consisted of five residual herbicide treatments (S-metolachlor, flumioxazin, metribuzin, pyroxasulfone, and nontreated). In the 2021-22 season at Clayton, metribuzin injured cereal rye and crimson clover 65% and 55%, respectively. However, metribuzin injured both cover crops ≤6% in 2022-23. Flumioxazin resulted in unacceptable crimson clover injury with 50% and 38% in 2021-22 and 2022-23 in Clayton and 40% at Salisbury, respectively. Without preemergence herbicides, cereal rye controlled Italian ryegrass 85% and 61% at 24 WAP in 2021-22 and 2022-23 at Clayton and 82% in Salisbury, respectively. In 2021-22, Italian ryegrass seed production was lowest in cereal rye treatments at both locations, except when cover crop was treated with metribuzin. For example, in Salisbury, cereal rye plus metribuzin resulted in 39324 seeds m–2, compared to ≤4386 seeds m–2 from all other cereal rye treatments. In 2022-23, Italian ryegrass seed production in cereal rye was lower when either metribuzin or pyroxasulfone were used PRE (2670 and 1299 seeds m–2, respectively) when compared to cereal rye without herbicides (5600 seeds m–2).

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BYCreative Common License - NCCreative Common License - ND
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is unaltered and is properly cited. The written permission of Cambridge University Press must be obtained for commercial re-use or in order to create a derivative work.
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Weed Science Society of America