Hostname: page-component-669899f699-tzmfd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-25T20:47:30.261Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Carnivorous Plants and Man-Eating Women: Vegetal (New) Womanhood and the Botanical Gothic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 January 2025

Daisy Reid Open the ORCID record for Daisy Reid [Opens in a new window]
Daisy Reid*
Affiliation:
University of Southern California, United States
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores the genre of the botanical gothic, a derivative of the fin de siècle adventure novel in which (generally male) British explorers engage in combat with fictitious killer vegetation from the colonial periphery. I argue that the carnivorous plant of the botanical gothic is intimately entangled with another “man-eating” figure: that of the New Woman. Through a reading of H. G. Wells's “The Flowering of the Strange Orchid” (1894), Algernon Blackwood's “The Man Whom the Trees Loved” (1912), and Beatrice Grimshaw's “The Tale of the Scarlet Butterflies” (1908), I demonstrate the extent to which the monstrous plant is implicitly gendered as threateningly female and depicted as a sort of exoticized vegetal femme fatale that lures weak-minded men to their demise. This, I argue, builds upon contemporaneous anxieties surrounding feminine sexual independence and the destabilization of gender roles in order to create an excessively sensualized feminine plant “rival” to supplant—and indeed queer—the normatively gendered dynamic of the local, domestic space. Male subjects in such narratives are emasculated under the threateningly penetrative agencies of the carnivorous plant that becomes a vegetal stand-in, I suggest, for the deviant and “man-eating” sexuality attributed to the New Woman figure herself.

Type
Research Article
Information
Victorian Literature and Culture , Volume 52 , Issue 3 , Fall 2024 , pp. 535 - 561
Check for updates
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Works Cited

Allen, Grant. “Queer Flowers.” Popular Science Monthly 26 (1884): 177–87.Google Scholar
Beekman, E. M. Introduction to Rumphius’ Orchids: Orchid Texts from “The Ambonese Herbal,” by Georgius Everhardus Rumphius and E. M. Beekman, xv–xlviii. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2003.Google Scholar
Beer, Gillian. Darwin's Plots: Evolutionary Narrative in Darwin, George Eliot, and Nineteenth-Century Fiction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blackwood, Algernon. “The Man Whom the Trees Loved.” 1912. In Pan's Garden: A Volume of Nature Stories, 3–104. London: Macmillan, 1919.Google Scholar
Caird, Mona. The Daughters of Danaus. London: Bliss, Sands & Foster, 1894.Google Scholar
Chang, Elizabeth Hope. Novel Cultivations: Plants in British Literature of the Global Nineteenth Century. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press, 2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chase, Mark W., Christenhutz, Maarten J. M., Sanders, Dawn, and Fay, Michael F.. “Murderous Plants: Victorian Gothic, Darwin and Modern Insights into Vegetable Carnivory.” Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 161, no. 4 (2009): 329–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Mel Y. Animacies: Biopolitics, Racial Mattering, and Queer Affect. Durham: Duke University Press, 2012.Google Scholar
Dowling, Linda. “The Decadent and the New Woman in the 1890s.” Nineteenth-Century Fiction 33, no. 4 (1979): 434–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grimshaw, Beatrice. “The Tale of the Scarlet Butterflies.” Sunset: The Magazine of the Pacific and of All the Far West 21 (1908): 579–89.Google Scholar
Hustak, Carla, and Myers, Natasha. “Involutionary Momentum: Affective Ecologies and the Sciences of Plant/Insect Encounters.” Differences 25, no. 5 (2012): 74–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keetley, Dawn. “Introduction: Six Theses on Plant Horror; or, Why Are Plants Horrifying?” In Plant Horror: Approaches to the Monstrous Vegetal in Fiction and Film, edited by Keetley, Dawn and Tenga, Angela, 1–30. London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laracy, Eugénie, and Laracy, Hugh. “Beatrice Grimshaw: Pride and Prejudice in Papua.” Journal of Pacific History 12, no. 3 (1997): 154–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackay, Saffron. “Fire and Broken Petals: How the Suffragettes Made Their Mark on Kew.” Kew Royal Botanical Gardens, February 2, 2018, www.kew.org/read-and-watch/fire-and-broken-petals-how-the-suffragettes-made-their-mark-on-kew.Google Scholar
Marder, Michael. Plant-Thinking: A Philosophy of Vegetal Life. New York: Columbia University Press, 2013.Google Scholar
Meeker, Natania, and Szabari, Antónia. “From the Century of the Pods to the Century of the Plants: Plant Horror, Politics, and Vegetal Ontology.” Discourse 34, no. 1 (2012): 32–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meeker, Natania, and Szabari, Antónia. Radical Botany: Plants and Speculative Fiction. New York: Fordham University Press, 2019.Google Scholar
Miller, T. S. “Lives of the Monster Plants: The Revenge of the Vegetable in the Age of Animal Studies.” Journal of the Fantastic in the Arts 23, no. 3 (2012): 460–79.Google Scholar
Pollan, Michael. The Botany of Desire: A Plant's-Eye View of the World. New York: Random House, 2001.Google Scholar
Price, Cheryl Blake. “The Subtle Art: Poison in Victorian Literature.” PhD diss., Florida State University, 2012, https://fsu.digital.flvc.org/islandora/object/fsu%3A183072/.Google Scholar
Price, Cheryl Blake. “Vegetable Monsters: Man-Eating Trees in Fin-de-Siècle Fiction.” Victorian Literature and Culture 41, no. 2 (2013): 311–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prior, Sophia. Carnivorous Plants and “The Man-Eating Tree.” Chicago: Field Museum of Natural History, 1939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pykett, Lyn. Foreword to The New Woman in Fiction and in Fact: Fin-de-Siècle Feminisms, edited by Richardson, Angelique and Willis, Christ, xi–xii. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2001.Google Scholar
Said, Edward. Orientalism. New York: Vintage Books, 1979.Google Scholar
Salleh, Ariel. Foreword to Ecofeminism, by Shiva, Vandava and Mies, Maria, ix–xii. London: NBN International, 2014.Google Scholar
Sandford, Stella. Vegetal Sex: Philosophy of Plants. London: Bloomsbury Academic, 2022.Google Scholar
Schaffer, Talia. “‘Nothing But Foolscap and Ink’: Inventing the New Woman.” In The New Woman in Fiction and in Fact: Fin-de-Siècle Feminisms, edited by Richardson, Angelique and Willis, Christ, 39–52. Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, Jonathan. “Une Fleur du Mal? Swinburne's ‘The Sundew’ and Darwin's Insectivorous Plants.” Victorian Poetry 41, no. 1 (2003): 131–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swinburne, Algernon Charles. “The Sundew.” In Poems and Ballads. London: John Camden Hotten, 1866.Google Scholar
Tosh, John. A Man's Place: Masculinity and the Middle-Class Home in Victorian England. New Haven: Yale University Press, 1999.Google Scholar
Voskuil, Lynn. “Victorian Orchids and the Forms of Ecological Society.” In Strange Science: Investigating the Limits of Knowledge in the Victorian Age, edited by Karpenko, Lara and Claggett, Shalyn, 19–39. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2016.Google Scholar
Wells, H. G. “The Flowering of the Strange Orchid.” 1894. In The Stolen Bacillus and Other Incidents, 17–47. London: Methuen, 1895.Google Scholar
Wollstonecraft, Mary. A Vindication of the Rights of Woman: With Strictures on Political and Moral Subjects. London: J. Johnson, 1796.Google Scholar