Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:35:43.920Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Molecular mechanisms of cytochrome P450-mediated detoxification of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate in the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 April 2024

Aiyu Wang
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Crops, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China Yellow River Delta Modern Agriculture Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dongying, China
Yun Zhang
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Crops, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China Yellow River Delta Modern Agriculture Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dongying, China
Shaofang Liu
Affiliation:
Key Lab of Bioprocess Engineering of Jiangxi Province, College of Life Sciences, Jiangxi Science and Technology Normal University, Nanchang, China
Chao Xue
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Crops, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China
Yongxin Zhao
Affiliation:
Shandong Province Yuncheng County Agricultural and Rural Bureau, Yuncheng, China
Ming Zhao
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Crops, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China Yellow River Delta Modern Agriculture Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dongying, China
Yuanxue Yang
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Crops, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China Yellow River Delta Modern Agriculture Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dongying, China
Jianhua Zhang*
Affiliation:
Institute of Industrial Crops, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinan, China Yellow River Delta Modern Agriculture Research Institute, Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dongying, China
*
Corresponding author: Jianhua Zhang; Email: zhangjianhua198904@163.com
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) is a highly damaging invasive omnivorous pest that has developed varying degrees of resistance to commonly used insecticides. To investigate the molecular mechanisms of tolerance to tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate, the enzyme activity, synergistic effect, and RNA interference were implemented in S. frugiperda. The functions of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (P450) in the tolerance to tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate in S. frugiperda was determined by analysing changes in detoxification metabolic enzyme activity and the effects of enzyme inhibitors on susceptibility to the three insecticides. 102 P450 genes were screened via transcriptome and genome, of which 67 P450 genes were differentially expressed in response to tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate and validated by quantitative real-time PCR. The expression patterns of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 were analysed in different tissues and at different developmental stages in S. frugiperda. Silencing CYP340L16 significantly increased the susceptibility of S. frugiperda to tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. Furthermore, knockdown of CYP340AX8v2, CYP9A75, and CYP341B17v2 significantly increased the sensitivity of S. frugiperda to tetraniliprole. Knockdown of CYP340AX8v2 and CYP340AA4 significantly increased mortality of S. frugiperda to spinetoram. Knockdown of CYP9A75 and CYP341B15v2 significantly increased the susceptibility of S. frugiperda to emamectin benzoate. These results may help to elucidate the mechanisms of tolerance to tetraniliprole, spinetoram and emamectin benzoate in S. frugiperda.

Type
Research Paper
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2024. Published by Cambridge University Press

Introduction

The fall armyworm (FAW) Spodoptera frugiperda (J.E. Smith) is a moth of the genus Spodoptera Guenée of the Noctuidae family, and is native to tropical and subtropical regions of the Americas and is highly migratory (Johnson, Reference Johnson1987; Wang et al., Reference Wang, He, Zhang, Liu, Jing and Zhang2020; Wu et al., Reference Wu, Zhou, Long, Yang, Wei, Liao, Yang and Hu2021; He et al., Reference He, Wang, Chen, Ge, Wyckhuys and Wu2021a, Reference He, Wu, Gao and Wu2021b). Since 2016, S. frugiperda has spread to several countries in Africa and Asia, and appeared in 18 provinces in mainland China in 2019, and by 2020, the outbreak had spread rapidly to 27 provinces and 1338 districts (Jing et al., Reference Jing, Guo, Jiang, Zhao, Sethi, He and Wang2020). The S. frugiperda feeds on a wide range of crops, including corn, soybeans, cotton, and rice, causing huge agricultural losses (Huang et al., Reference Huang, Zhao, Sun, Ni, Liu, Wang, Gao and Wu2021; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Wyckhuys, Jia, Nie and Wu2021). The frequent and continuous use of insecticides is currently the main strategy for the management of S. frugiperda, which inevitably leads to the development of resistance. The S. frugiperda is currently resistant to a wide range of chemical insecticides, mainly organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids, as well as some new chemical insecticides such as diamides, spinosyns, and benzoylureas (Yu and McCord, Reference Yu and McCord2007; Carvalho et al., Reference Carvalho, Omoto, Field, Williamson and Bass2013; do Nascimento et al., Reference do Nascimento, Farias, Bernardi, Horikoshi and Omoto2016; Bolzan et al., Reference Bolzan, Padovez, Nascimento, Kaiser, Lira and Amaral2019; Lira et al., Reference Lira, Bolzan, Nascimento, Amaral, Kanno and Kaiser2020). More importantly, when S. frugiperda migrates, the alleles that produce resistance persist in resistant populations (Arias et al., Reference Arias, Cordeiro, Corrêa, Domingues, Guidolin and Omoto2019).

Insects, as an extremely abundant group of organisms in nature, have evolved a variety of resistance strategies under the pressure of insecticide selection. Increased expression or activity of insect detoxification metabolic enzymes is an important mechanism by which insects respond to insecticides. Genes encoding cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (P450), glutathione S-transferase (GST), and carboxylesterase (CarE) enhance insecticide resistance through sequence amplification, enhanced transcription, and mutation (Feyereisen Reference Feyereisen1999; Scott, Reference Scott1999; Hemingway et al., Reference Hemingway, Hawkes, McCarroll and Ranson2004). The P450s have been the focus of insecticide resistance research and have a wide range of substrates that can mediate resistance to almost all insecticides by metabolising a wide range of endogenous and exogenous compounds (Niwa et al., Reference Niwa, Matsuda, Yoshiyama, Namiki, Mita, Fujimoto and Kataoka2004; Shi et al., Reference Shi, Wang, Liu, Wu, Yang, Feyereisen, Heckel and Wu2018). The P450s metabolise organophosphates, pyrethroids, neonicotinoids, and other insecticides through hydroxylation and epoxidation, evolving resistance to different insecticides in insects (Li et al., Reference Li, Schuler and Berenbaum2007).

In our previous study, we found that tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate had high insecticidal activity against S. frugiperda (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Zhang, Wang, Duan, Xue, Wang, Zhao and Zhang2022a; Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Wang, Yu, Yang, Duan, Xue, Zhao and Zhang2022a). Tetraniliprole is a new diamide insecticide developed by Bayer CropScience, which is effective against the S. frugiperda (Li et al., Reference Li, Zhang, Jia, Zhou, Li and Huang2019; Xu et al., Reference Xu, Hu, Wu, Zhou and Hu2020). Spinetoram is a semi-synthetic product of spinosyn, derived from a soil inhibiting microorganism (Saccharopolyspora spinosa), effective in the management of lepidopteran pests (Zheng et al., Reference Zheng, Wang, Tan, Ma, Yan, Yang, Xu and Zhang2019; Sparks et al., Reference Sparks, Crouse, Benko, Demeter, Giampietro, Lambert and Brown2021). Emamectin benzoate is a new type of highly effective semi-synthetic antibiotic insecticide derived, synthesised, optimised, and modified from the fermentation product avermectin B1 as a lead compound (Yen and Lin, Reference Yen and Lin2004; Ioriatti et al., Reference Ioriatti, Anfora, Angeli, Civolani, Schmidt and Pasqualini2009). Spinetoram and emamectin benzoate are both broad-spectrum, high effective, low toxicity, low residue, and easily degradable green insecticides. However, in actual production, some pests have developed different degrees of resistance to spinetoram, tetraniliprole, and emamectin benzoate (Che et al., Reference Che, Huang, Guan, Wu and Yang2015; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Qi, Chi and Wuriyanghan2016; Gutiérrez-Moreno et al., Reference Gutiérrez-Moreno, Mota-Sanchez, Blanco, Whalon, Terán-Santofimio, Rodriguez-Maciel and DiFonzo2019; Huang et al., Reference Huang, Zhao, Sun, Ni, Liu, Wang, Gao and Wu2021).

In this study, the enzymatic activities of P450, CarE, and GST were determined after tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate treatments, and the synergistic effects of piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and diethyl maleate (DEM) on insecticides in S. frugiperda were validated. Moreover, a total of 102 P450 genes were identified in the transcriptome and genome of S. frugiperda, of which 67 P450 genes showed up-regulated in expression in response to tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. The expression patterns of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 were analysed in different tissues and at different developmental stages of S. frugiperda. The functions of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 in the susceptibility of S. frugiperda to insecticides were verified via RNA interference (RNAi). The results of this study provide a basis for further exploration of the mechanisms of tolerance to tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate in S. frugiperda.

Materials and methods

Insect rearing

The S. frugiperda population without exposure to insecticides was collected from Tancheng (Shandong, China) in 2019. It was reared in an illumination incubator at 26 ± 1 °C with 60–70% relative humidity and 16 h light: 8 h dark photoperiod. The S. frugiperda larvae was reared with an artificial diet (Bowling, Reference Bowling1967), and the adults were fed with 10% honey solution referring to our previous research.

Insecticide and chemical

Tetraniliprole technical (99.00%) was purchased from Bayer Crop Science Co., Ltd (Beijing, China). Spinetoram technical (85.80%) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States). Emamectin benzoate technical (95.00%) was provided by Shandong Lukang Biopesticides Co., Ltd (Dezhou, China). Triton X-100 was purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, United States). Dimethyl sulfoxide (DMSO) was purchased from Solaibao Technology Co., LTD (Beijing, China).

Toxicity assay and sample collection

Tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate were firstly dissolved with a small amount of DMSO to 10,000 mg L−1, then further diluted in distilled water with 0.05% Triton X-100 to their LC50 concentration of 0.092 mg L−1, 0.161 mg L−1, and 0.194 mg L−1, and equal amounts of DMSO and Triton X-100 were added to the distilled water as control. The maize leaves were cut into rectangle of 2 cm × 0.5 cm, soaked in the medicaments for 15 s, and then took out to dry. The 3rd-instar larvae were fed on the treated maize leaves, and reared at 25 ± 1 °C, photoperiod 16 h: 8 h and relative humidity 50%–70%. Each treatment was repeated for three times with thirty larvae in each replication. The survival active insects were collected and frozen in liquid nitrogen and then stored at −80 °C 48 h after treatment. For tissue dissection, the S. frugiperda were rinsed three times with 75% ethanol and washed three times with sterilised deionised water. With a stereomicroscope, the tissues of the head, cuticula, malpighian tubule, fat body, and midgut of S. frugiperda were dissected in chilled 1 × phosphate-buffered saline (pH 7.4) with sterile forceps. Tissues dissected from fifteen 3rd-instar larvae and each tissue sample included three independent biological replications. In addition, the egg, the first-instar to sixth-instar larvae, prepupa, pupa, male adult, and female adult of S. frugiperda were collected. The tissue and instar samples of S. frugiperda were stored at −80 °C for the following experiments.

Detoxification enzyme activity assay

The protein concentration was determined by BCA protein quantification/concentration assay kit from Dalian Meilun Biotechnology Co., Ltd (Dalian, China). The activities of glutathione S-transferase (GST), Carboxylesterase (CarE), and cytochrome P450 monooxygenase (P450) were determined by GST Kit, CarE enzyme activity assay kit and MFO kit from Suzhou Comin Biotechnology Co., LTD (Suzhou, China).

About 0.1 g of the sample was added into the extract in the 1 ml kit and homogenised in ice bath to obtain crude enzyme solution. Determination of P450 enzyme activity: The crude enzyme solution was centrifuged at 4 °C for 20 min at 12,000 g, and the absorption value was determined at 400 nm with a microplate reader. The production of 1 nmol p-nitrophenol per milligram of protein per minute is defined as a unit of enzyme activity. GST enzyme activity determination: The crude enzyme solution was centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min at 8000 g, and the absorption value was determined at 340 nm wavelength. At 37℃, 1 μmol CDNB was catalysed to bind to GST per mg of protein per minute as a unit of enzyme activity. CarE enzyme activity determination: The crude enzyme solution was centrifuged at 4℃ for 30 min at 15,000 rpm and the absorption value was determined at 450 nm. At 37℃, an increase of 1 per milligram hiprotein per minute in catalytic absorbance was defined as one unit of enzyme activity.

Synergism bioassay

In the synergism experiment, 50 μg of piperonyl butoxide (PBO) and diethyl maleate (DEM) were dissolved in 0.5 μl dimethyl sulfoxide, and then injected into the antesternum of 3rd-instar larvae of S. frugiperda. Two hours later, the injected S. frugiperda was treated with tetraniliprole at the concentration of 0.092 mg L−1, spinetoram at the concentration of 0.161 mg L−1 and emamectin benzoate at the concentration of 0.194 mg L−1. The mortality was checked 48 hours later.

RNA isolation, library construction and sequencing

The total RNA was extracted by TRIzol reagent (Invitrogen, United States) following the manufacturer's procedure. The total RNA quantity and purity were analysed using a |Bioanalyzer 2100 (Agilent, United States) with RIN number >7.0. The twelve RNA samples from S. frugiperda of the three insecticides with LC50 treatment groups and the control were then used for mRNA preparation and cDNA library construction, and followed by NovaSeq 600 sequencing using a 150 bp paired-end sequencing strategy. After the final transcriptome was generated, StringTie was used to estimate the expression levels of all transcripts. StringTie was used to perform expression level for mRNAs by calculating FPKM (Fragments Per Kilobase of transcript sequence per Million base pairs). The differentially expressed mRNAs were selected with fold change >2 or fold change <0.5 and with parametric F-test comparing nested linear models (p value < 0.05) by R package edgeR. The sequencing data had been deposited in the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) at the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) with the accession number GSE226546.

Identification of P450 genes and phylogenetic analysis

The sequences of P450 genes were searched in the transcriptome and genome of S. frugiperda according to the annotation information. The short (<500 bp) and repetitive sequences were removed, and the amino acid sequences of the remaining P450 genes were blasted against the NCBI non-redundant (Nr) protein database to remove the redundant sequences and faulty annotated sequences. A phylogenetic tree was generated by the ClustalW alignment of the amino acid sequences with P450 genes from other insect species using the neighbour-joining method in MEGA 5.05 with 1000 bootstrap replications.

Quantitative real-time PCR

Reverse transcription to cDNA from 1 μg of total RNA was performed using the PrimeScript™ RT reagent kit with gDNA Eraser (Takara, Japan). The relative mRNA expression was analysed by RT-qPCR. It was carried out by an IQ™ 5 multicolour real-time PCR detection system (BIO-RAD, USA) with the SYBR PrimeScriptTM RT-PCR Kit (Takara, Japan). The GAPDH (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) was used as an endogenous control and the 2−ΔΔCt method was used to calculate the relative expression (Livak and Schmittgen, Reference Livak and Schmittgen2001). The RT-qPCR reaction included three independent technical and biological replications. The primers were listed in Supplementary Table S1.

RNA interference

The double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) was synthesised using a T7 high yield transcription kit (Invitrogen, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. The primers for dsRNA synthesis were listed in Supplementary Table S1. The 3rd-instar larvae of S. frugiperda was injected with 0.5 μl (4 μg/μl) dsRNA of target gene. The 3rd-instar larvae of S. frugiperda was injected with the dsEGFP (enhanced green fluorescent protein) as a control. The injected 3rd-instar larvae were transferred onto the artificial diet for rearing. The experiments included three biological replications, and each replication included fifteen insects. The knockdown efficiency of the dsRNA was analysed through RT-qPCR in 24 h and 48 h, respectively. To assess the sensitivity of the injected S. frugiperda to insecticides, the 3rd-instar larvae were treated with tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate at LC50 concentration. The mortality of S. frugiperda was checked after 48 h.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis was performed with SPSS 20.0 software (IBM Corporation). The Student's t-test was used to compare the differences between treatments. Data were shown as mean ± standard error (SE). The P < 0.05 and P < 0.01 were considered statistically significant and very significant differences, respectively.

Results

Effects of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate on the detoxification enzyme activity

The relative level of MFO activity in S. frugiperda was significantly increased by 34.32-fold, 29.35-fold, and 3.77-fold under tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate treatment at 48 h compared to the control (fig. 1a, d, g). The relative level of GST activity was significantly increased by 1.46-fold, 1.21-fold, and 2.25-fold under tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate treatment at 48 h compared to the control (fig. 1c, f, i). The relative level of CarE activity was no significant difference under tetraniliprole and emamectin benzoate treatment at 48 h, respectively (fig. 1b, h). After spinetoram treatment, the activity of CarE decreased significantly compared to the control (fig. 1e).

Figure 1. Detoxification enzyme activity after insecticides treatment. (a, d, g) MFO activity after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. (b, e, h) CarE activity after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. (c, f, i) GST activity after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. The asterisk (*) and asterisks (**) indicate P < 0.05 and P < 0.01. ns represents no significant difference.

Synergistic effects of PBO and DEM on the mortality of S. frugiperda

After PBO injection, the mortality of S. frugiperda was significantly increased by 1.78-fold, 1.72-fold, and 1.41-fold under tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate treatment compared to the control (fig. 2a–c). After DEM injection, there was no significant synergistic effect on the mortality of S. frugiperda treated with tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate compared to the control group (fig. 2df).

Figure 2. Effects of synergists on mortality of S. frugiperda. (a-c) The synergism of PBO on S. frugiperda mortality after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. (d-f) The synergism of DEM on S. frugiperda mortality after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. The asterisks (**) indicate P < 0.01. ns represents no significant difference.

Overall analysis of sequencing data

Twelve independent cDNA libraries constructed from control, tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate treatments were sequenced on the HiSeq 2500 platform, yielding an average of 45,658,671 clean reads (Table S2). Data quality evaluation showed good data quality with Q20 and Q30 ratios of >99% and >98% for all samples and GC counts ranging from 49% to 51%. The total clean reads of the twelve libraries were merged and de novo assembly using Trinity software, yielding a total of 45,707 unigenes (Fig. S1). The distribution of unigenes was between 1000–2000 bp, accounting for 15.4%, with 4487 (9.8%) unigenes with nucleotide lengths greater than 2000 bp.

Functional annotation and analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

By Blastx homology search, 21,374 of 45,707 unigenes matched entries in the NCBI non-redundant (Nr) protein database with a cut-off E-value of 10−5. Most of the unigenes had homologies with Spodoptera litura (59.03%) (fig. 3a). To further elucidate the biological functions of these unigenes, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) assignments were used to classify 45,707 unigenes into different functional groups according to KEGG pathways. Based on sequence homology, 12,731 unigenes (27.85%) were annotated and classified into six biological processes (fig. 3b). Ultimately, a total of 3477 unigenes were aligned to metabolism, including carbohydrate (18.98%), lipid (15.90%), amino acid (14.98%), and cofactors and vitamins (10.07%). Among 12,731 annotated unigenes, most were aligned to genetic information processing (2374), cellular process (1850), and organismal systems (1800).

Figure 3. Annotation of S. frugiperda transcriptome. (a) Species distributions of top Blastx matches to Nr database. (b) The unigenes involve in different KEGG classifications.

To identify DEGs associated with the three insecticides (tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate versus control samples) at LC50 concentration, the DESeq method was used. Of the 3891 DEGs identified in the control and tetraniliprole samples, 2043 were up-regulated and 1848 were down-regulated (fig. 4a). A total of 979 DEGs were detected in the control and spinetoram samples, of which 632 were up-regulated and 347 were down-regulated (fig. 4b). Of the 1634 DEGs identified in the control and emamectin benzoate samples, 721 were up-regulated and 913 were down-regulated (fig. 4c). Cluster heat map showing visual comparison of DEGs between insecticide treatment and control (fig. 4d-f).

Figure 4. Effect of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate treatments on differential gene expression in S. frugiperda. (a) Number of up- and down-regulated DEGs and Volcano plot of DEGs in tetraniliprole exposure. (b) Number of up- and down-regulated DEGs and Volcano plot of DEGs in spinetoram exposure. (c) Number of up- and down-regulated DEGs and Volcano plot of DEGs in emamectin benzoate exposure. Red data points indicated up-regulated unigenes and green data points indicated down-regulated unigenes. (d) Heatmap of DEGs between tetraniliprole and control. (e) Heatmap of DEGs between spinetoram and control. (f) Heatmap of DEGs between emamectin benzoate and control.

Identification and screening of differentially expressed P450 genes

The sequences of P450 genes were identified by a BLAST search against the database of transcriptome and genome in S. frugiperda. The complete coding region was confirmed by ORF finder and protein BLAST results (Table S3). These identified P450 genes were classified into different subfamilies via alignment between S. frugiperda and other insect species. A total of 102 P450 genes were identified in S. frugiperda, including seven in CYP2, forty in CYP3, forty-seven in CYP4, and eight in mitochondrial clade (Table S3, fig. 5). To obtain potential P450 genes that might be involved in the tolerance of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate, the expression induction of sixty-seven differentially expressed P450 genes identified in the transcriptome of S. frugiperda was detected after insecticide treatment with LC50 concentration by RT-qPCR.

Figure 5. Phylogenetic analysis of P450 genes of S. frugiperda. The numbers above the branches indicate the support for the phylogenies, and only values above 50% are shown. Blackened circles indicate the S. frugiperda position. Sf, S. frugiperda; Se, Spodoptera exigua; Px, Plutella xylostella; Ha, Helicoverpa armigera.

Thirty-one P450 genes were significantly up-regulated after tetraniliprole treatment, including sixteen in CYP3 and fifteen in CYP4 (fig. 6). Twenty-seven P450 genes were significantly up-regulated after spinetoram treatment, including nine in CYP3 and eighteen in CYP4 (fig. 6). Seven P450 genes were significantly up-regulated after emamectin benzoate treatment, including four in CYP3 and three in CYP4 (fig. 6). Among the P450 genes, the expression of ten genes was changed by more than 2.0-fold with tetraniliprole treatment, among which CYP6AE43v2, CYP340AX8v2, and CYP341B17v2 were up-regulated more than 4.0-fold. After spinetoram treatment, the expression of twenty P450 genes was changed by more than 2.0-fold, among which CYP9G17, CYP340AA3v2, CYP340AA4, CYP340L1v2, CYP340L7v1, CYP340L8v2, CYP341B15v2, and CYP367A1v1 were up-regulated more than 4.0-fold. Only two P450 genes (CYP9A75 and CYP341B15v2) were up-regulated by more than 2.0-fold after emamectin benzoate treatment. CYP340L16 was significantly up-regulated after tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate treatments (fig. 7). Thirteen genes, including CYP6AB58v1, CYP6AE75, CYP9G17, CYP321A10v2, CYP321A8v2, CYP4L13, CYP4S9, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340G2, CYP340L19v1, CYP340L1v2, CYP340L7v1, and CYP340L16, were significantly up-regulated in both tetraniliprole and spinetoram treatments (fig. 7). Five genes, including CYP6AE69, CYP6AE74, CYP9A75, CYP4G75, and CYP340L16, were significantly up-regulated in both tetraniliprole and emamectin benzoate treatments (fig. 7). Three genes, including CYP6AB60, CYP341B15v2, and CYP340L16, were significantly up-regulated in both spinetoram and emamectin benzoate treatments (fig. 7).

Figure 6. Verification of expression level of P450 genes in S. frugiperda. (a-d) Relative expression of 67 P450 genes in S. frugiperda susceptible strain after exposure to tetraniliprole, spinetoram and emamectin benzoate at the LC50 dose. Data and error bar represent the mean and standard error (SE) of three biological replications. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Figure 7. Venn diagram analysis of the numbers of up-regulated P450 genes by tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate.

Expression profiles analysis of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 in S. frugiperda

CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 were selected for further functional study and the expression profiles of them were examined in the tissues of head, cuticula, malpighian tubule, fat body, and midgut and at different developmental stages of S. frugiperda (Fig. S2). Tissue-specific expression analysis showed that CYP9A75 was highly expressed in the midgut, with relative lower expression in cuticula, head, fat body, and malpighian tubule (fig. 8A). The expression of CYP340AA4 was more abundant in the cuticula (fig. 8B). CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 were exclusively expressed in the head, with considerable low expression levels in the remaining four tissues of cuticula, malpighian tubule, fat body, and midgut (fig. 8c-f).

Figure 8. Expression patterns of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 in S. frugiperda. (a-f) Expression of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 in different tissues of S. frugiperda. (g-l) Expression of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 at different developmental stages of S. frugiperda. Pupa-F-1 d, the female pupal stage at 1 d; Pupa-M-1 d, the male pupal stage at 1 d; Pupa-F-4 d, the female pupal stage at 4 d; Pupa-M-4 d, the male pupal stage at 4 d; Pupa-F-7 d, the female pupal stage at 7 d; Pupa-M-7 d, the male pupal stage at 7 d; Adult-F-4 d, the female adult stage at 4 d; Adult -M-4 d, the male adult stage at 4 d. Data and error bar represent the mean and standard error (SE) of three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

The results of RT-qPCR analysis showed that the expression of these six P450 genes at different developmental stages had some specificity. CYP9A75 expression was high in the male pupal stage at 1 d, relatively low in eggs (fig. 8g). CYP340AA4 was mainly expressed in 2nd-instar and 4th-instar larvae, with relatively low expression in male pupal stages at 7 d and in eggs (fig. 8h). CYP340AX8v2 was expressed at all developmental stages, with higher expression in 1st-instar larvae, followed by 2nd-instar larvae and male pupal stages at 1 d (fig. 8i). CYP340L16 was most abundantly expressed in 4th-instar larvae, followed by 2nd- and 3rd-instar larvae (fig. 8j). CYP341B15v2 was mainly expressed in adults, followed by 4th-instar and 5th-instar larvae (fig. 8k). CYP341B17v2 was more highly expressed in 1st-instar larvae (fig. 8l).

CYP340L16, CYP340AX8v2, CYP9A75, CYP341B15v2, CYP341B17v2, and CYP340AA4 impact on the susceptibility of S. frugiperda to insecticides

To further investigate the relationship between P450 genes and insecticides tolerance, RNAi was used to knockdown the expression of CYP340L16, CYP340AX8v2, CYP9A75, CYP341B15v2, CYP341B17v2, and CYP340AA4 based on the results of insecticide induction. The expression of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 significantly decreased by 46.42%, 60.52%, 52.08%, 68.61%, 46.85%, and 57.33% after injection of dsRNAs compared to the control larvae injected with dsEGFP in 12 h (fig. 9a), while the 24 h expression significantly decreased by 59.34%, 74.59%, 62.45%, 54.99%, 37.22%, and 38.26% in comparison to the control (fig. 9h).

Figure 9. Functional analysis of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B18v2 by RNAi. (a, h) Expression of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B18v2 in S. frugiperda at 12 h and 24 h after dsRNA injection. (b, i) Mortality rates of dsCYP340L16 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate at 12 h and 24 h. (c, j) Mortality rates of dsCYP340AX8v2 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of tetraniliprole and spinetoram at 12 h and 24 h. (d, k) Mortality rates of dsCYP9A75 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of tetraniliprole and emamectin benzoate at 12 h and 24 h. (e, l) Mortality rates of dsCYP341B15v2 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of spinetoram and emamectin benzoate at 12 h and 24 h. (f, m) Mortality rates of dsCYP341B18v2 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of tetraniliprole at 12 h and 24 h. (g, n) Mortality rates of dsCYP340AA4 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of spinetoram at 12 h and 24 h. The asterisk (*) and asterisks (**) indicate P < 0.05 and P < 0.01. ns represents no significant difference.

The subsequent bioassays demonstrated that knockdown of CYP340L16 dramatically increased the mortalities of larvae treated with tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate by 36.67%, 22.22%, and 23.33% in 12 h, and increased the mortalities by 45.56%, 17.78%, and 43.33% in 24 h (fig. 9b, i). Injection of dsCYP340AX8v2 significantly increased the mortalities of larvae treated with tetraniliprole and spinetoram by 31.11% and 25.56% in 12 h, and increased the mortalities by 62.22% and 54.44% in 24 h (fig. 9c, j). Injection of dsCYP9A75 significantly increased the mortalities of larvae treated with tetraniliprole and emamectin benzoate by 16.67% and 34.44% in 12 h, and increased the mortalities by 46.67% and 30.00% in 24 h (fig. 9d, k). Injection of dsCYP341B15v2 significantly increased the mortalities of larvae treated with emamectin benzoate by 30.00% and 34.44% in 12 h and 24 h (fig. 9e, l). However, no significant difference was observed in mortality between dsCYP341B15v2-treated and dsEGFP-treated larvae following exposure to spinetoram (fig. 9e, l). Knockdown of CYP341B17v2 dramatically increased the mortalities of larvae treated with tetraniliprole by 20.00% in 12 h and 18.89% in 24 h (fig. 9f, m). Knockdown of CYP340AA4 dramatically increased the mortalities of larvae treated with spinetoram by 13.33% in 12 h and 43.33% in 24 h (fig. 9g, n).

Discussion

Tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate have high insecticidal activity against lepidopteran pests and are widely used in the control of S. frugiperda. The active ingredient of spinetoram is a natural product from the fermentation of the soil-borne Saccharopolyspora spinosa. Emamectin benzoate is derived, synthesised, optimised and modified from the fermentation product avermectin B1 as a lead compound. Spinetoram and emamectin benzoate are both broad-spectrum, high effective, low toxicity, low residue, and easily degradable green insecticides. Tetraniliprole is a new diamide insecticide. In addition, mechanisms of resistance to biogenic and chemical insecticides may differ in insects. Therefore, these three insecticides were used to treat S. frugiperda and analyse the resistance mechanism of them.

Metabolic resistance is one of the main mechanisms of insect resistance to insecticides. P450, GST, and CarE are three major detoxifying enzymes of insects, which can metabolise exogenous compounds such as insecticides (Wei et al., Reference Wei, Clark and Syvanen2001; Li et al., Reference Li, Schuler and Berenbaum2007; Cui et al., Reference Cui, Lin, Wang, Liu, Chang, Reeck, Qiao, Raymond and Kang2011). In this study, enzymatic activities of P450 and GST were significantly increased after treatment with tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate compared to the control group. PBO and DEM are multifunctional oxidase and esterase inhibitors that act synergistically by inhibiting metabolic enzymes in insects and reducing the degradation of insecticides in their tissues. PBO injection significantly increased the susceptibility of S. frugiperda to insecticides, while DEM injection had no significant effect on the susceptibility. Enhanced P450 detoxification enzyme activity was identified as the major driver of tolerance to insecticides (Lu et al., Reference Lu, Cheng, Li, Ni, Chen, Li, Tang, Li, Chen, Zeng and Song2019a, Reference Lu, Li, Cheng, Ni, Chen, Li, Tang, Sun, Li, Liu, Qin, Chen, Zeng and Song2019b, Reference Lu, Cheng, Li, Li, Zeng and Song2020). It has been demonstrated that the cytochrome P450 is involved in the detoxification metabolism of tannin in S. litura and could increase the tolerance of the Tribolium castaneum to plant toxicants (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Gao, Xue, An and Zhang2021; Zhao et al., Reference Zhao, Xue, Zhu, Wang, Zhang, Li, Ji, Niu, Gao, Luo and Cui2022). Therefore, the cytochrome P450 might be involved in the detoxification metabolism of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate in S. frugiperda.

Transcriptome sequencing has given us the opportunity to gain a comprehensive understanding of gene expression following insecticide treatment and to detect genes that may be involved in insecticide metabolism. In this study, 102 P450 genes were identified in S. frugiperda. Previous studies showed that there were 180 P450 genes in Culex quinquefasciatus (Yang and Liu, Reference Yang and Liu2011), 90 P450 genes in Drosophila melanogaster (Tijet et al., Reference Tijet, Helvig and Feyereisen2001), 85 P450 genes in Plutella xylostella (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Tang, He, Ma, Vasseur, Baxter, Yang, Huang, Song and You2015), 84 P450 genes in Bombyx mori (Ai et al., Reference Ai, Zhu, Duan, Yu, Zhang, Wan and Xiang2011) and 36 P450 genes in Pediculus humans (Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kang, Min, Yoon, Strycharz, Johnson, Mittapalli, Margam, Sun, Li, Xie, Wu, Kirkness, Berenbaum, Pittendrigh and Clark2010). Differences in the number of insect P450 genes may be related to the depth of sequencing or the insect's adaptation to its environment. In insects, CYP3 and CYP4 clades are highly correlated with the development of insecticide resistance (Yang et al., Reference Yang, Li and Zhang2013; Li et al., Reference Li, Li, Zhu, Gao and Liang2018; Wang et al., Reference Wang, Jiang, Mota-Sanchez, Wang, Li, Gao, Lu and Yang2019). In this study, forty and forty-seven P450 genes were identified in CYP3 and CYP4 clades, respectively. In C. quinquefasciatus, 72 P450 genes in CYP3 clade and 83 P450 genes in CYP4 clade were identified, and there were 36 P450 genes in CYP3 clade and 32 P450 genes in CYP4 clade, 26 P450 genes in CYP3 clade and 36 P450 genes in CYP4 clade, 36 P450 genes in CYP3 clade and 33 P450 genes in CYP4 clade, 11 P450 genes in CYP3 clade and 9 P450 genes in CYP4 clade, in D. melanogaster, P. xylostella, B. mori and P. humans, respectively (Tijet et al., Reference Tijet, Helvig and Feyereisen2001; Lee et al., Reference Lee, Kang, Min, Yoon, Strycharz, Johnson, Mittapalli, Margam, Sun, Li, Xie, Wu, Kirkness, Berenbaum, Pittendrigh and Clark2010; Ai et al., Reference Ai, Zhu, Duan, Yu, Zhang, Wan and Xiang2011; Yang and Liu, Reference Yang and Liu2011; Yu et al., Reference Yu, Tang, He, Ma, Vasseur, Baxter, Yang, Huang, Song and You2015). These results suggested that P450 genes in CYP3 and CYP4 clades might play important roles in the metabolism of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate in S. frugiperda.

It has been shown that chlorantraniliprole, emamectin benzoate, and Bacillus thuringiensis affected several P450 genes in S. frugiperda resulting in up-regulation of CYP4G75, CYP6AB12, CYP321A7, CYP321A8, CYP321A9, CYP321A10, CYP321B1, CYP321B5, CYP6AE44, and CYP6AE43 (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Su, Lu, Zhen, Zhu, Li, Dong, Wang, Xu, Kong, Liu, Chen and Gao2020a). In order to obtain potential P450 genes that may be associated with detoxification of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate, sixty-seven differentially expressed P450 genes were selected for RT-qPCR validation. Thirteen P450 genes of CYP6AB58v1, CYP6AE75, CYP9G17, CYP321A10v2, CYP321A8v2, CYP4L13, CYP4S9, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340G2, CYP340L19v1, CYP340L1v2, CYP340L7v1, and CYP340L16 were significantly up-regulated in tetraniliprole and spinetoram exposure. Five P450 genes of CYP6AE69, CYP6AE74, CYP9A75, CYP4G75, and CYP340L16 were significantly up-regulated in tetraniliprole and emamectin benzoate exposure. Three P450 genes of CYP6AB60, CYP341B15v2, and CYP340L16 were significantly up-regulated in spinetoram and emamectin benzoate exposure. The gene CYP340L16 was significantly up-regulated in tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate exposure. These results suggested that different types of insecticides could induce up-regulation of some of the same P450 genes in the same insect species, thereby leading to the development of cross-resistance. In Bemisia tabaci, CYP6CM1 conferred the cross-resistance between neonicotinoid and pymetrozine (Nauen et al., Reference Nauen, Vontas, Kaussmann and Wölfel2013). The P450, CYP6Z1 conferred cross-resistance between carbamate and pyrethroid in a major African malaria vector, Anopheles funestus (Ibrahim et al., Reference Ibrahim, Ndula, Riveron, Irving and Wondji2016). In Tetranychus cinnabarinus, CYP389C16 contributed to the cross-resistance between cyflumetofen and pyridaben (Feng et al., Reference Feng, Ou, Zhang, Wen, Shi, Yang, Hu, Zhang, Shen, Xu and He2020). In addition to the up-regulated genes, four P450 genes were significantly down-regulated after induction of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate, namely CYP6B50, CYP6AN4v1, CYP321A7v2, and CYP321B3v2. They may be involved in pest fitness cost or other biological processes.

Cytochrome P450 genes were expressed in one or some specific developmental stages or tissues of insects and might be associated with specific functions (Chung et al., Reference Chung, Sztal, Pasricha, Sridhar, Batterham and Daborn2009). We selected six genes that were highly up-regulated following induction by at least one of the three insecticides and analysed their tissue and stage-specific expression patterns. Tissue-specific expression analysis showed that CYP9A75 was highly expressed in the midgut, which is the primary digestion tissue and important site for storage of various metabolic enzymes (Terra et al., Reference Terra, Dias, Oliveira, Ferreira and Venancio2018). CYP340 has been reported to be a lepidoptera-specific family with midgut-specific expression and abundant transposable elements for each gene in P. xylostella, and family members are organised in clusters (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Tang, He, Ma, Vasseur, Baxter, Yang, Huang, Song and You2015). But in our research, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 were exclusively expressed in the head. It has been reported that lepidopteral specific CYP367s expressed mainly in the head tissue in P. xylostella suggested a role in olfaction or detoxification (Yu et al., Reference Yu, Tang, He, Ma, Vasseur, Baxter, Yang, Huang, Song and You2015). And in sects, the head tissue was the control centre for many behaviours (Jia et al., Reference Jia, Lin, Liang, Yu and Li2010; Liu et al., Reference Liu, Huang, Zhang, Liu and An2019). Therefore, we have reason to think that these genes might also be involved in the behaviour regulation of S. frugiperda in addition to the detoxification of insecticides. The expression of resistance-related genes was closely linked to the developmental period of the insects (Mao et al., Reference Mao, Rupasinghe, Johnson, Zangerl, Schuler and Berenbaum2009). In our study, most of the genes were highly expressed during the feeding stage, especially during the 2th-instar to 6th-instar larval stage, when the larva ingests and digests more food, and thus are more likely to be exposed to foreign substances such as pesticides.

To further investigate the role of P450 genes in the development of insecticide resistance, functional validation was performed using RNAi technology. As a powerful tool to study the function of specific genes in vivo through function loss experiments, RNAi has been widely used in many insects (Zhang et al., Reference Zhang, Su, Zhen, Lu, Li, Ge, Chen, Pei, Shi and Chen2020b, Reference Zhang, Mao, Ren, Jin, Zhang, Cai, He, Li and Wan2022b; Xiao and Lu, Reference Xiao and Lu2022; Yang et al., Reference Yang, Wang, Zhang, Xue, Zhao and Zhang2022b). In this study, silencing CYP340L16 dramatically increased the mortality of S. frugiperda larvae treated with tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate at 12 h and 24 h, indicating that CYP340L16 might be a broad-spectrum P450 gene responding to multiple selection pressures from insecticides. CYP340AX8v2 and CYP9A75 played an important role in the sensitivity of two insecticides in S. frugiperda. CYP341B15v2, CYP341B17v2, and CYP340AA4 only played an important role in individual insecticide sensitivity in S. frugiperda. Different P450 gene members have different substrates, but they may overlap to adapt to changes in the environment. Expression of multiple P450 genes induced in response to exogenous compounds such as pesticides showed evolutionary plasticity (Qiu, Reference Qiu2014).

In summary, our study described the effects of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate on P450 enzyme activity and P450 gene expression in S. frugiperda. The expression patterns of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 in S. frugiperda were analysed in different tissues and at different developmental stages, and the functions in insecticides detoxification of these six P450 genes were further validated by RNAi. The results provide a basis for further exploration of the detoxification mechanism to tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate in S. frugiperda.

Supplementary material

The supplementary material for this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1017/S000748532300038X.

Acknowledgements

The work was funded by Technology Innovation Guidance Plan of Shandong Province, China (2022LYXZ026, 2020LYXZ030), Agricultural Scientific and Technological Innovation Project of Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences, China (CXGC2023A05, CXGC2023F06) and Science and Technology Research Project of Education Department of Jiangxi Province, China (No. GJJ201130).

Competing interests

None.

References

Ai, J, Zhu, Y, Duan, J, Yu, Q, Zhang, G, Wan, F and Xiang, ZH (2011) Genome-wide analysis of cytochrome P450 monooxygenase genes in the silkworm, Bombyx mori. Gene 480, 4250.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arias, O, Cordeiro, E, Corrêa, AS, Domingues, FA, Guidolin, AS and Omoto, C (2019) Population genetic structure and demographic history of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): implications for insect resistance management programs. Pest Management Science 75, 29482957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bolzan, A, Padovez, FE, Nascimento, AR, Kaiser, IS, Lira, EC and Amaral, FS (2019) Selection and characterization of the inheritance of resistance of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to chlorantraniliprole and cross-resistance to other diamide insecticides. Pest Management Science 75, 26822689.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowling, CC (1967) Rearing of two lepidopterous pests of rice on a common artificial diet. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 60, 12151216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carvalho, RA, Omoto, C, Field, LM, Williamson, MS and Bass, C (2013) Investigating the molecular mechanisms of organophosphate and pyrethroid resistance in the fall armyworm Spodoptera frugiperda. PLoS One 8, e62268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Che, W, Huang, J, Guan, F, Wu, Y and Yang, Y (2015) Cross-resistance and inheritance of resistance to emamectin benzoate in Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Journal of Economic Entomology 108, 20152020.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, H, Sztal, T, Pasricha, S, Sridhar, M, Batterham, P and Daborn, PJ (2009) Characterization of Drosophila melanogaster cytochrome P450 genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 106, 57315736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cui, F, Lin, Z, Wang, H, Liu, S, Chang, H, Reeck, G, Qiao, C, Raymond, M and Kang, L (2011) Two single mutations commonly cause qualitative change of nonspecific carboxylesterases in insects. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 41, 18.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
do Nascimento, AR, Farias, JR, Bernardi, D, Horikoshi, RJ and Omoto, C (2016) Genetic basis of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) resistance to the chitin synthesis inhibitor lufenuron. Pest Management Science 72, 810815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feng, K, Ou, S, Zhang, P, Wen, X, Shi, L, Yang, Y, Hu, Y, Zhang, Y, Shen, G, Xu, Z and He, L (2020) The cytochrome P450 CYP389C16 contributes to the cross-resistance between cyflumetofen and pyridaben in Tetranychus cinnabarinus (Boisduval). Pest Management Science 76, 665675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feyereisen, R (1999) Insect P450 enzymes. Annual Review of Entomology 44, 507533.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gutiérrez-Moreno, R, Mota-Sanchez, D, Blanco, CA, Whalon, ME, Terán-Santofimio, H, Rodriguez-Maciel, JC and DiFonzo, C (2019) Field-evolved resistance of the fall armyworm (lepidoptera: noctuidae) to synthetic insecticides in Puerto Rico and Mexico. Journal of Economic Entomology 112, 792802.10.1093/jee/toy372CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
He, LM, Wang, TL, Chen, YC, Ge, SS, Wyckhuys, KG and Wu, KM (2021a) Larval diet affects development and reproduction of East Asian strain of the fall armyworm. Spodoptera Frugiperda. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 20, 736744.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
He, LM, Wu, QL, Gao, XW and Wu, KM (2021b) Population life tables for the invasive fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda fed on major oil crops planted in China. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 20, 745754.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hemingway, J, Hawkes, NJ, McCarroll, L and Ranson, H (2004) The molecular basis of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 34, 653665.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, JM, Zhao, YX, Sun, H, Ni, H, Liu, C, Wang, X, Gao, CF and Wu, SF (2021) Monitoring and mechanisms of insecticide resistance in Spodoptera exigua (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), with special reference to diamides. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 174, 104831.10.1016/j.pestbp.2021.104831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ibrahim, SS, Ndula, M, Riveron, JM, Irving, H and Wondji, CS (2016) The P450 CYP6Z1 confers carbamate/pyrethroid cross-resistance in a major African malaria vector beside a novel carbamate-insensitive N485I acetylcholinesterase-1 mutation. Molecular Ecology 25, 34363452.10.1111/mec.13673CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ioriatti, C, Anfora, G, Angeli, G, Civolani, S, Schmidt, S and Pasqualini, E (2009) Toxicity of emamectin benzoate to Cydia pomonella (L.) and Cydia molesta (Busck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae): laboratory and field tests. Pest Management Science 65, 306312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jia, Q, Lin, K, Liang, J, Yu, L and Li, F (2010) Discovering conserved insect microRNAs from expressed sequence tags. Journal of Insect Physiology 56, 17631769.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jing, DP, Guo, JF, Jiang, YY, Zhao, JZ, Sethi, A, He, KL and Wang, ZY (2020) Initial detections and spread of invasive Spodoptera frugiperda in China and comparisons with other noctuid larvae in cornfields using molecular techniques. Insect Science 27, 780790.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, SJ (1987) Migration and the life history strategy of the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda in the western hemisphere. International Journal of Tropical Insect Science 8, 543549.10.1017/S1742758400022591CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, SH, Kang, JS, Min, JS, Yoon, KS, Strycharz, JP, Johnson, R, Mittapalli, O, Margam, VM, Sun, W, Li, HM, Xie, J, Wu, J, Kirkness, EF, Berenbaum, MR, Pittendrigh, BR and Clark, JM (2010) Decreased detoxification genes and genome size make the human body louse an efficient model to study xenobiotic metabolism. Insect Molecular Biology 19, 599615.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X, Schuler, MA and Berenbaum, MR (2007) Molecular mechanisms of metabolic resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annual Review of Entomology 52, 231253.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, X, Li, R, Zhu, B, Gao, X and Liang, P (2018) Overexpression of cytochrome P450 CYP6BG1 may contribute to chlorantraniliprole resistance in Plutella xylostella (L.). Pest Management Science 74, 13861393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, W, Zhang, Y, Jia, HR, Zhou, WW, Li, BT and Huang, HJ (2019) Residue analysis of tetraniliprole in rice and related environmental samples by HPLC/MS. Microchemical Journal 150, 104168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lira, EC, Bolzan, A, Nascimento, AR, Amaral, FS, Kanno, RH and Kaiser, IS (2020) Resistance of Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to spinetoram: inheritance and cross-resistance to Spinosad. Pest Management Science 76, 26742680.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y, Qi, M, Chi, Y and Wuriyanghan, H (2016) De novo assembly of the transcriptome for oriental armyworm Mythimna separata (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and analysis on insecticide resistance-related genes. Journal of Insect Science 16, 92.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, M, Huang, J, Zhang, G, Liu, X and An, J (2019) Analysis of miRNAs in the heads of different castes of the bumblebee Bombus lantschouensis (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Insects 10, 349.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Livak, KJ and Schmittgen, TD (2001) Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2−ΔΔCT method. Methods (San Diego, CA.) 25, 402408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, K, Cheng, Y, Li, W, Ni, H, Chen, X, Li, Y, Tang, B, Li, Y, Chen, D, Zeng, R and Song, Y (2019a) Copper-induced H2O2 accumulation confers larval tolerance to xanthotoxin by modulating CYP6B50 expression in Spodoptera litura. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 159, 118126.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, K, Li, WR, Cheng, YB, Ni, HF, Chen, X, Li, Y, Tang, BJ, Sun, XM, Li, YM, Liu, TT, Qin, NN, Chen, DM, Zeng, RS and Song, YY (2019b) Copper exposure enhances Spodoptera litura larval tolerance to β-cypermethrin. Pesticide Biochemistry and Physiology 160, 127135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, K, Cheng, Y, Li, W, Li, Y, Zeng, R and Song, Y (2020) Activation of CncC pathway by ROS burst regulates cytochrome P450 CYP6AB12 responsible for λ-cyhalothrin tolerance in Spodoptera litura. Journal of Hazardous Materials 387, 121698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mao, W, Rupasinghe, SG, Johnson, RM, Zangerl, AR, Schuler, MA and Berenbaum, MR (2009) Quercetin-metabolizing CYP6AS enzymes of the pollinator Apis mellifera (Hymenoptera: Apidae). Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology. Part B, Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 154, 427434.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nauen, R, Vontas, J, Kaussmann, M and Wölfel, K (2013) Pymetrozine is hydroxylated by CYP6CM1, a cytochrome P450 conferring neonicotinoid resistance in Bemisia tabaci. Pest Management Science 69, 457461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niwa, R, Matsuda, T, Yoshiyama, T, Namiki, T, Mita, K, Fujimoto, Y and Kataoka, H (2004) CYP306A1, a cytochrome P450 enzyme, is essential for ecdysteroid biosynthesis in the prothoracic glands of Bombyx and Drosophila. Journal of Biological Chemistry 279, 3594235949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Qiu, XH (2014) Molecular mechanisms of cytochrome P450-mediated drug resistance in insects. Acta Entomologica Sinica 57, 477482.Google Scholar
Scott, JG (1999) Cytochromes P450 and insecticide resistance. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 29, 757777.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shi, Y, Wang, H, Liu, Z, Wu, S, Yang, Y, Feyereisen, R, Heckel, DG and Wu, Y (2018) Phylogenetic and functional characterization of ten P450 genes from the CYP6AE subfamily of Helicoverpa armigera involved in xenobiotic metabolism. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 93, 7991.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sparks, TC, Crouse, GD, Benko, Z, Demeter, D, Giampietro, NC, Lambert, W and Brown, AV (2021) The spinosyns, spinosad, spinetoram, and synthetic spinosyn mimics-discovery, exploration, and evolution of a natural product chemistry and the impact of computational tools. Pest Management Science 77, 36373649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Terra, WR, Dias, RO, Oliveira, PL, Ferreira, C and Venancio, TM (2018) Transcriptomic analyses uncover emerging roles of mucins, lysosome/secretory addressing and detoxification pathways in insect midguts. Current Opinion in Insect Science 29, 3440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tijet, N, Helvig, C and Feyereisen, R (2001) The cytochrome P450 gene superfamily in Drosophila melanogaster: annotation, intron-exon organization and phylogeny. Gene 262, 189198.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wang, ZG, Jiang, SS, Mota-Sanchez, D, Wang, W, Li, XR, Gao, YL, Lu, XP and Yang, XQ (2019) Cytochrome P450-mediated λ-cyhalothrin-resistance in a field strain of Helicoverpa armigera from Northeast China. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 67, 35463553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, WW, He, PY, Zhang, YY, Liu, TX, Jing, XF and Zhang, SZ (2020) The population growth of Spodoptera frugiperda on six cash crop species and implications for its occurrence and damage potential in China. Insects 11, 639.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wei, SH, Clark, AG and Syvanen, M (2001) Identification and cloning of a key insecticide-metabolizing glutathione S-transferase (MdGST-6A) from a hyper insecticide-resistant strain of the housefly Musca domestica. Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 31, 11451153.10.1016/S0965-1748(01)00059-5CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, LH, Zhou, C, Long, GY, Yang, XB, Wei, ZY, Liao, YJ, Yang, H and Hu, CX (2021) Fitness of fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda to three solanaceous vegetables. Journal of Integrative Agriculture 20, 755763.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xiao, T and Lu, K (2022) Functional characterization of CYP6AE subfamily P450s associated with pyrethroid detoxification in Spodoptera litura. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 219, 452462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xu, LN, Hu, CY, Wu, F, Zhou, ZY and Hu, BJ (2020) Effects of tetraniliprole on the control of Spodoptera litura in cotton fields. Xinjiang Agricultural. Science 57, 10901094.Google Scholar
Yang, T and Liu, N (2011) Genome analysis of cytochrome P450s and their expression profiles in insecticide resistant mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus. PLoS One 6, e29418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, X, Li, X and Zhang, Y (2013) Molecular cloning and expression of CYP9A61: a chlorpyrifos-ethyl and lambda-cyhalothrin-inducible cytochrome P450 cDNA from Cydia pomonella. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 14, 2421124229.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, XM, Wyckhuys, KG, Jia, XP, Nie, FY and Wu, KM (2021) Fall armyworm invasion heightens pesticide expenditure among Chinese smallholder farmers. Journal of Environmental Management 282, 111949.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, YX, Zhang, Y, Wang, AY, Duan, AL, Xue, C, Wang, KY, Zhao, M and Zhang, JH (2022a) Four MicroRNAs, miR-13b–3p, miR-278-5p, miR-10483-5p, and miR-10485-5p, Mediate insecticide tolerance in Spodoptera frugiperda. Frontiers in Genetics 12, 820778.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yang, Y, Wang, A, Zhang, Y, Xue, C, Zhao, M and Zhang, J (2022b) Activating pathway of three metabolic detoxification phases via down-regulated endogenous microRNAs, modulates triflumezopyrim tolerance in the small brown planthopper, Laodelphax striatellus (Fallén). International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 222, 24392451.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yen, TH and Lin, JL (2004) Acute poisoning with emamectin benzoate. Journal of Toxicology-Clinical Toxicology 42, 657661.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, SJ and McCord, E (2007) Lack of cross-resistance to indoxacarb in insecticide-resistant Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Plutella xylostella (Lepidoptera: Yponomeutidae). Pest Management Science 63, 6367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yu, L, Tang, W, He, W, Ma, X, Vasseur, L, Baxter, SW, Yang, G, Huang, S, Song, F and You, M (2015) Characterization and expression of the cytochrome P450 gene family in diamondback moth, Plutella xylostella (L.). Scientific Reports 5, 8952.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, BZ, Su, X, Lu, LY, Zhen, CA, Zhu, B, Li, YS, Dong, WY, Wang, G, Xu, YB, Kong, FB, Liu, RQ, Chen, XL and Gao, XW (2020a) Effects of sublethal doses of three insecticides on cytochrome P450 gene expression in Spodoptera frugiperda. Acta Entomologica Sinica 63, 565573.Google Scholar
Zhang, BZ, Su, X, Zhen, CA, Lu, LY, Li, YS, Ge, X, Chen, DM, Pei, Z, Shi, MW and Chen, XL (2020b) Silencing of cytochrome P450 in Spodoptera frugiperda (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) by RNA interference enhances susceptibility to chlorantraniliprole. Journal of Insect Science 20, 12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhang, YC, Gao, SS, Xue, S, An, SH and Zhang, KP (2021) Disruption of the cytochrome P450 CYP6BQ7 gene reduces tolerance to plant toxicants in the red flour beetle, Tribolium castaneum. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 172, 263269.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, Y, Wang, AY, Yu, L, Yang, YX, Duan, AL, Xue, C, Zhao, M and Zhang, JH (2022a) Systematic identification and characterization of differentially expressed microRNAs under tetraniliprole exposure in the fall armyworm, Spodoptera frugiperda. Archives of Insect Biochemistry and Physiology 110, e21875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, J, Mao, K, Ren, Z, Jin, R, Zhang, Y, Cai, T, He, S, Li, J and Wan, H (2022b) Odorant binding protein 3 is associated with nitenpyram and sulfoxaflor resistance in Nilaparvata lugens. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 209, 13521358.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhao, P, Xue, H, Zhu, X, Wang, L, Zhang, K, Li, D, Ji, J, Niu, L, Gao, X, Luo, J and Cui, J (2022) Silencing of cytochrome P450 gene CYP321A1 effects tannin detoxification and metabolism in Spodoptera litura. International Journal of Biological Macromolecules 194, 895902.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, Q, Wang, YQ, Tan, YT, Ma, QL, Yan, WJ, Yang, S, Xu, HH and Zhang, ZX (2019) Bioactivity of spinetoram and its field efficiency against Spodoptera frugiperda. Journal of Environmental Entomology 41, 11691174.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Figure 1. Detoxification enzyme activity after insecticides treatment. (a, d, g) MFO activity after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. (b, e, h) CarE activity after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. (c, f, i) GST activity after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. The asterisk (*) and asterisks (**) indicate P < 0.05 and P < 0.01. ns represents no significant difference.

Figure 1

Figure 2. Effects of synergists on mortality of S. frugiperda. (a-c) The synergism of PBO on S. frugiperda mortality after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. (d-f) The synergism of DEM on S. frugiperda mortality after treatment of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate. The asterisks (**) indicate P < 0.01. ns represents no significant difference.

Figure 2

Figure 3. Annotation of S. frugiperda transcriptome. (a) Species distributions of top Blastx matches to Nr database. (b) The unigenes involve in different KEGG classifications.

Figure 3

Figure 4. Effect of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate treatments on differential gene expression in S. frugiperda. (a) Number of up- and down-regulated DEGs and Volcano plot of DEGs in tetraniliprole exposure. (b) Number of up- and down-regulated DEGs and Volcano plot of DEGs in spinetoram exposure. (c) Number of up- and down-regulated DEGs and Volcano plot of DEGs in emamectin benzoate exposure. Red data points indicated up-regulated unigenes and green data points indicated down-regulated unigenes. (d) Heatmap of DEGs between tetraniliprole and control. (e) Heatmap of DEGs between spinetoram and control. (f) Heatmap of DEGs between emamectin benzoate and control.

Figure 4

Figure 5. Phylogenetic analysis of P450 genes of S. frugiperda. The numbers above the branches indicate the support for the phylogenies, and only values above 50% are shown. Blackened circles indicate the S. frugiperda position. Sf, S. frugiperda; Se, Spodoptera exigua; Px, Plutella xylostella; Ha, Helicoverpa armigera.

Figure 5

Figure 6. Verification of expression level of P450 genes in S. frugiperda. (a-d) Relative expression of 67 P450 genes in S. frugiperda susceptible strain after exposure to tetraniliprole, spinetoram and emamectin benzoate at the LC50 dose. Data and error bar represent the mean and standard error (SE) of three biological replications. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Figure 6

Figure 7. Venn diagram analysis of the numbers of up-regulated P450 genes by tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate.

Figure 7

Figure 8. Expression patterns of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 in S. frugiperda. (a-f) Expression of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 in different tissues of S. frugiperda. (g-l) Expression of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B17v2 at different developmental stages of S. frugiperda. Pupa-F-1 d, the female pupal stage at 1 d; Pupa-M-1 d, the male pupal stage at 1 d; Pupa-F-4 d, the female pupal stage at 4 d; Pupa-M-4 d, the male pupal stage at 4 d; Pupa-F-7 d, the female pupal stage at 7 d; Pupa-M-7 d, the male pupal stage at 7 d; Adult-F-4 d, the female adult stage at 4 d; Adult -M-4 d, the male adult stage at 4 d. Data and error bar represent the mean and standard error (SE) of three biological replicates. Different letters indicate significant differences (P < 0.05).

Figure 8

Figure 9. Functional analysis of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B18v2 by RNAi. (a, h) Expression of CYP9A75, CYP340AA4, CYP340AX8v2, CYP340L16, CYP341B15v2, and CYP341B18v2 in S. frugiperda at 12 h and 24 h after dsRNA injection. (b, i) Mortality rates of dsCYP340L16 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of tetraniliprole, spinetoram, and emamectin benzoate at 12 h and 24 h. (c, j) Mortality rates of dsCYP340AX8v2 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of tetraniliprole and spinetoram at 12 h and 24 h. (d, k) Mortality rates of dsCYP9A75 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of tetraniliprole and emamectin benzoate at 12 h and 24 h. (e, l) Mortality rates of dsCYP341B15v2 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of spinetoram and emamectin benzoate at 12 h and 24 h. (f, m) Mortality rates of dsCYP341B18v2 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of tetraniliprole at 12 h and 24 h. (g, n) Mortality rates of dsCYP340AA4 injected larvae treated with LC50 concentration of spinetoram at 12 h and 24 h. The asterisk (*) and asterisks (**) indicate P < 0.05 and P < 0.01. ns represents no significant difference.

Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material 1

Wang et al. supplementary material
Download Wang et al. supplementary material 1(File)
File 25.9 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material 2

Wang et al. supplementary material
Download Wang et al. supplementary material 2(File)
File 10.8 KB
Supplementary material: File

Wang et al. supplementary material 3

Wang et al. supplementary material
Download Wang et al. supplementary material 3(File)
File 28.9 KB