Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-fbnjt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-14T17:30:23.624Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Modeling nutritional and performance factors that influence the efficiency of weight gain in relation to excreted nitrogen in weaning piglets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 July 2019

K. M. Cardinal Open the ORCID record for K. M. Cardinal [Opens in a new window] ,
M. S. Vieira ,
M. B. Warpechowski ,
P. K. Ziegelmann ,
L. Montagne ,
I. Andretta  and
A. M. L. Ribeiro
K. M. Cardinal
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91540-000, Brazil
M. S. Vieira
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91540-000, Brazil
M. B. Warpechowski
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Paraná, Curitiba, PR 80035-050, Brazil
P. K. Ziegelmann
Affiliation:
Department of Statistic, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91509-000, Brazil
L. Montagne
Affiliation:
INRA/AgrocampusOuest, UMR 1079, Systèmes d’Elevage, Nutrition Et Humaine, F. 35000 Rennes, França
I. Andretta
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91540-000, Brazil
A. M. L. Ribeiro
Affiliation:
Department of Animal Science, Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, RS 91540-000, Brazil
Get access

Abstract

One of the most debated topics in pig production is the need to study, understand and change the production system in order to improve nutrient efficiency, becoming more environmentally friendly. The nitrogen excretion has highly deleterious effects on the environment, and it is necessary to develop tools that help to reduce the excretion of this compound without compromising productivity. Therefore, two models were generated to estimate the efficiency of weight gain in relation to excreted nitrogen in post-weaning piglets. Data for testing these models were obtained from previous master and PhD studies carried out at the Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul, Animal Science Laboratory using piglets in the post-weaning phase with results for performance and digestibility. The database that was constructed was composed of raw data from 10 studies carried out between 2000 and 2016, on a total of 726 piglets weaned at ages between 17 and 28 days, and to which 62 different treatments were applied. An exploratory analysis of the data was done by evaluating scatter plots and histograms, and variables representing different treatments were used in a stepwise multiple linear regression analysis, with the F-test used as the selection criterion. Two models were generated that either considered the nitrogen retained or not, to estimate the ratio between weight gain and excreted nitrogen using generalized linear model procedure. The authors analyzed the behavior of each variable to evaluate whether the equation generated was biologically coherent. Weight gain, dry matter intake, nitrogen intake, metabolizable energy intake, retained nitrogen and urinary nitrogen were all significant (P<0.001) variables in model I, and in model II the variable fecal nitrogen was also included. The models had high coefficients of determination (R2 of model I and II were 0.9013 and 0.8271, respectively), and the nitrogen ingested variable was the one that most strongly influenced growth efficiency. When the retained nitrogen variable was removed from the model, there was a reduction in the fit of the equations. It was possible to conclude that both of the two models generated could be applied and the amount of nitrogen ingested had the greatest influence on growth efficiency related to nitrogen excretion.

Keywords

meta-analysisnutritionproteinpollutantswine
Type
Research Article
Information
animal , Volume 14 , Issue 2 , February 2020 , pp. 261 - 267
Copyright
© The Animal Consortium 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

†

Present address: Faculdade de Agronomia, Avenida Bento Gonçalves, 7712 – Agronomia, RS 91540-000, Brazil. E-mail: katia.zootecnia@hotmail.com

*

In the original article Ziegelmann was spelled incorrectly. The spelling has subsequently been corrected.

References

Andretta, I, Haushild, L, Kipper, M, Pires, PG and Pomar, C 2017. Environmental impacts of precision feeding programs applied in pig production. Animal 12, 1990–1998.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arnaiz, V, Ribeiro, AM, Kessler, AM, Raber, M and Kuana, S 2009. Efecto del peso al destete, temperatura ambiental y energía metabolizable del pienso en lechones recién destetados. Revista Brasileira de Ciências Agrárias 4, 472–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barea, R, Dubois, S, Gilbert, H, Sellier, P, Van Milgen, J and Noblet, J 2010. Energy utilization in pigs selected for high and low residual feed intake. Journal of Animal Science 88, 2062–2072.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beaulieu, A, Levesque, C and Patience, J 2006. The effects of dietary energy concentration and weaning site on weaning pig performance 1. Journal of Animal Science 84, 1159–1168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berrocoso, J, Saldaña, B, Serrano, M, Cámara, L, Ibáñez, M and Mateos, G 2013. Influence of crude protein content, ingredient complexity, feed form, and duration of feeding of the phase I diets on productive performance and nutrient digestibility of Iberian pigs. Journal of Animal Science 91, 1237–1246.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Boddicker, N, Gabler, N, Spurlock, M, Nettleton, D and Dekkers, J 2011. Effects of ad libitum and restricted feeding on early production performance and body composition of Yorkshire pigs selected for reduced residual feed intake. Animal 5, 1344–1353.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cherubini, E, Zanghelini, GM and Tavares, JMR 2015. The finishing stage in swine production: influences of feed composition on carbon footprint. Environment, Development and Sustainability 17, 1313–1326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dourmad, J, Seve, B, Latimier, P, Boisen, S, Fernandez, J, Van der Peet-Schwering, C and Jongbloed, A 1999. Nitrogen consumption, utilisation and losses in pig production in France, The Netherlands and Denmark. Livestock Production Science 58, 261–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dourmad, J-Y, Hassouna, M, Robin, P, Guingand, N, Meunier-Salaün, M and Lebret, B 2009. Influence of pig rearing system on animal performance and manure composition. Animal 3, 606–616.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunshea, F, Eason, P, Campbell, R and King, R 1998. Interrelationships between dietary ractopamine, energy intake, and sex in pigs. Australian Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 565–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garcia-Launay, F, Van der Werf, H, Nguyen, TTH, Le Tutour, L and Dourmad, J-Y 2014. Evaluation of the environmental implications of the incorporation of feed-use amino acids in pig production using Life Cycle Assessment. Livestock Science 161, 158–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gloaguen, M, Le Floc’h, N, Corrent, E, Primot, Y and Van Milgen, J 2014. The use of free amino acids allows formulating very low crude protein diets for piglets. Journal of Animal Science 92, 637–644.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gloaguen, M, Le Floc’h, N, Primot, Y, Corrent, E and Van Milgen, J 2013. Response of piglets to the standardized ileal digestible isoleucine, histidine and leucine supply in cereal–soybean meal-based diets. Animal 7, 901–908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Guggenbuhl, P, Waché, Y and Wilson, J 2012. Effects of dietary supplementation with a protease on the apparent ileal digestibility of the weaned piglet. Journal of Animal Science 90, 152–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hutchings, NJ, ten Hoeve, M, Jensen, R, Bruun, S and Søtoft, LF 2013. Modelling the potential of slurry management technologies to reduce the constraints of environmental legislation on pig production. Journal of environmental management 130, 447–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Knap, PW and Bishop, SC 2000. Relationships between genetic change and infectious disease in domestic livestock. BSAP Occasional Publication 27, 65–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Le Bellego, L, Van Milgen, J, Dubois, S and Noblet, J 2001. Energy utilization of low-protein diets in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 79, 1259–1271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lovatto, P, Lehnen, C, Andretta, I, Carvalho, A and Hauschild, L 2007. Meta-análise em pesquisas científicas-enfoque em metodologias. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 36, 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McAuliffe, GA, Chapman, DV and Sage, CL 2016. A thematic review of life cycle assessment (LCA) applied to pig production. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 56, 12–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Metzler-Zebeli, B and Zebeli, Q 2013. Cereal β-glucan alters nutrient digestibility and microbial activity in the intestinal tract of pigs, and lower manure ammonia emission: a meta-analysis. Journal of Animal Science 91, 3188–3199.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Möhn, S and De Lange, C 1998. The effect of body weight on the upper limit to protein deposition in a defined population of growing gilts. Journal of Animal Science 76, 124–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Monteiro, ANTR, Garcia-Launay, F, Brossard, L, Wilfart, A and Dourmad, JY 2016. Effect of feeding strategy on environmental impacts of pig fattening in different contexts of production: evaluation through life cycle assessment. Journal of Animal Science 94, 4832–4847.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Montes, F, Meinen, R, Dell, C, Rotz, A, Hristov, AN, Oh, J and Dijkstra, J 2013. Special topics – Mitigation of methane and nitrous oxide emissions from animal operations: II. A review of manure management mitigation options. Journal of Animal Science 91, 5070–5094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morel, PCH and Wood, GR 2005. Optimisation of nutrient use to maximise profitability and minimise nitrogen excretion in pig meat production systems. In III International Symposium on Applications of Modelling as an Innovative Technology in the Agri-Food Chain, May 2005, Leuven, Belgium, pp. 269–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Research Council (NRC) 2012. Nutrient requirements of swine, 11th revised edition. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Oresanya, T, Beaulieu, A and Patience, J 2008. Investigations of energy metabolism in weaning barrows: the interaction of dietary energy concentration and daily feed (energy) intake. Journal of Animal Science 86, 348–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pomar, C, Andretta, I and Haushild, L 2017. Meeting individual nutrient requirements in growing pigs to optimize nutrient efficiency. In Achieving sustainable production of pig meat (ed. Wiseman, J), pp.1–14. Burleigh Dodds Science Publishing, London, UK.Google Scholar
Rezaei, R, Wang, W, Wu, Z, Dai, Z, Wang, J and Wu, G 2013. Biochemical and physiological bases for utilization of dietary amino acids by young pigs. Journal of Animal Science and Biotechnology 4, 7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ribeiro, AML, Farina, G, Vieira, MDS, Perales, VA and Kessler, ADM 2016. Energy utilization of light and heavy weaned piglets subjected to different dietary energy levels. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia 45, 532–539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rostagno, HS, Teixeira Albino, LF, Donzele, JL, Gomes, PC, de Oliveira, RF, Lopes, DC and Euclides, RF 2011. Tabelas Brasileiras para aves e suinos: Composição de Alimentos e Exigências Nutricionais, 3ª Edição. Universidade Federal de Viçosa–Departamento de Zootecnia, Viçosa, Minas Gerais, Brazil.Google Scholar
Roth, F, Gotterbarm, G, Windisch, W and Kirchgessner, M 1999. Influence of dietary level of dispensable amino acids on nitrogen balance and whole-body protein turnover in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 81, 232–238.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P and Daudin, J 2005. Les méta-analyses des données expérimentales: applications en nutrition animale. INRA Productions Animales 18, 63–73.Google Scholar
Sauvant, D, Schmidely, P, Daudin, J-J and St-Pierre, NR 2008. Meta-analyses of experimental data in animal nutrition. Animal 2, 1203–1214.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shirali, M, Doeschl-Wilson, A, Knap, PW, Duthie, C, Kanis, E, Van Arendonk, JAM and Roehe, R 2012. Nitrogen excretion at different stages of growth and its association with production traits in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 90, 1756–1765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Straarup, EM, Danielsen, V, Høy, CE and Jakobsen, K 2006. Dietary structured lipids for post-weaning piglets: fat digestibility, nitrogen retention and fatty acid profiles of tissues. Journal of Animal Physiology and Animal Nutrition 90, 124–135.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Van Milgen, J and Noblet, J 2003. Partitioning of energy intake to heat, protein, and fat in growing pigs. Journal of Animal Science 81, 86–93.Google Scholar
Webb, J, Broomfield, M, Jones, S and Donovan, B 2014. Ammonia and odour emissions from UK pig farms and nitrogen leaching from outdoor pig production. A review. Science of the Total Environment 470, 865–875.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yáñez, J, Landero, J, Owusu-Asiedu, A, Cervantes, M and Zijlstra, R 2013. Growth performance, diet nutrient digestibility, and bone mineralization in weaned pigs fed pelleted diets containing thermostable phytase. Journal of Animal Science 91, 745–754.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yin, Y, Yao, K, Liu, Z, Gong, M, Ruan, Z, Deng, D, Tan, B, Liu, Z and Wu, G 2010. Supplementing L-leucine to a low-protein diet increases tissue protein synthesis in weaning pigs. Amino Acids 39, 1477–1486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar