Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T16:38:23.744Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Place and purpose of research training

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

Ed Day
Affiliation:
Royal College of Psychiatrists, 17 Belgrave Square, London SW1X 8PG
Paul Ramchandani
Affiliation:
Royal College of Psychiatrists, 17 Belgrave Square, London SW1X 8PG
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
The Columns
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC-BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © 2000, The Royal College of Psychiatrists

Sir: The ability to appraise research and apply the results to everyday clinical practice currently has a high profile. At present, one-fifth of all higher training time for psychiatrists is allocated to research activities in the form of the research day. The need for two sessions per week devoted to research has been questioned, and a working party of the Collegiate Trainees' Committee (CTC) was formed to consider the place of research training within the specialist registrar years. Their findings can be found in a report published on the College website (Reference Ramchandani, Corby and GuestRamchandani et al, 2000).

This report continues to recognise research as an integral part of higher training in psychiatry, but argues for increased flexibility in the use of the research day. At present the Higher Specialist Training Handbook states that “the HSTC now requires two sessions each week to be devoted to planning, conducting and communicating the outcome of a research project” (Royal College of Psychiatrists, 1998). However, many trainees find it difficult to undertake a significant research project, and the experience of a failed attempt to achieve publication can be demoralising.

It is important to distinguish between actually doing research, and appraising and applying the results of research in everyday clinical practice. There is a need to shift the emphasis away from publication as the solitary goal of research time. The CTC suggests that clear individual objectives should be set for the use of a trainee's research time, allowing far greater flexibility over the methods by which these are met. Such objectives may include the ability to formulate answerable questions from clinical situations, to confidently appraise research findings, and to use research evidence in developing service provision or evaluating clinical practice. Documented training objectives allow trainees to monitor their own progress and, in conjunction with their research tutor or supervisor, to ensure that their individual needs are appropriately met during higher training.

While undertaking a research project is one way of meeting these aims, other specific training experiences have an important role. Courses and seminars, clearly focused smaller projects (including audit) and other forms of scholarship can enable trainees to reach the consultant level with a clear grasp of the skills needed to inform and improve their practice. The CTC still believes that the research day forms a crucial part of a fully balanced training but needs to be used more effectively and in an individually tailored manner.

References

Ramchandani, P., Corby, C., Guest, L., et al (2000) The Place and Purpose of Research Training for Specialist Registrars: A View from the Collegiate Trainees' Committee (CTC) www.rcpsych.ac.uk/members/ctc.htm Google Scholar
Royal College of Psychiatrists (1998) Higher Specialist Training Handbook. Occasional Paper OP43. London: Royal College of Psychiatrists.Google Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.