Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:00:25.317Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ALIMENTAL FOOD CONSUMPTION AMONG URBAN HOUSEHOLDS: AN EMPIRICAL STUDY OF GHANA

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 February 2018

TING MENG
Affiliation:
China Agricultural University, Beijing, China former affiliation: The University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia
WOJCIECH J. FLORKOWSKI*
Affiliation:
Department of Agricultural and Applied Economics, The University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia
DANIEL B. SARPONG
Affiliation:
University of Ghana-Legon, Legon, Ghana
MANJEET S. CHINNAN
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, The University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia
ANNA V.A. RESURRECCION
Affiliation:
Department of Food Science, The University of Georgia, Griffin, Georgia
*
*Corresponding author's e-mail: wojciech@uga.edu
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In developing countries, problems such as malnutrition and food insecurity are shifting from rural to urban areas because of rapid urbanization. However, regional variations in alimental food consumption within urban settings have often been ignored. Using survey data, our study examines regional patterns of expenditure on fresh vegetables, fruits, and peanut products in urban households of Ghana. After accounting for socioeconomic and demographic factors, food expenditure on fresh vegetables and peanut products and income elasticity vary significantly across major cities. Food distributors may adjust their marketing strategies, while policy makers should pay attention to possible disparities in urban areas.

Type
Research Article
Creative Commons
Creative Common License - CCCreative Common License - BY
This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s) 2018

1. Introduction

The rapid urban population growth in many African countries (Fanzo, Reference Fanzo2012) will double the size of cities over the next 15 to 20 years (Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation [IHME] and Human Development Network, The World Bank, 2013). In Ghana, 58% of the population will reside in urban areas by 2030 (Farvacque-Vitkovic et al., Reference Farvacque-Vitkovic, Raghunath, Eghoff and Boakye2008). The consumption gap between urban and rural areas has been studied (Fotso, Reference Fotso2007; Smith, Ruel, and Ndiaye, Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2005; Van de Poel, O'Donnell, and Van Doorslaer, Reference Van de Poel, O'Donnell and Van Doorslaer2007), and regional variation in food consumption is consistently confirmed (Nayga, Reference Nayga1997; Ruel, Minot, and Smith, Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2004; Wetherbee and Cortés, Reference Wetherbee, Cortés, Carrier, Musick and Heithaus2004). With the rapid expansion of cities, problems such as malnutrition and food insecurity are shifting from rural to urban areas (Maxwell et al., Reference Maxwell, Levin, Armar-Klemesu, Ruel, Morris and Ahiadeke2000), and the specific urban nature of the problem needs to be addressed (Buttersby, Reference Buttersby2017). Widespread nutrient deficiencies still affect sub-Saharan Africa (Fanzo, Reference Fanzo2012; World Health Organization [WHO]/Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations [FAO], 2005; IHME and Human Development Network, The World Bank, 2013; McLean et al., Reference McLean, Cogswell, Egli, Wojdyla and de Benoist2008) despite evidence of some progress (Kassebaum et al., Reference Kassebaum, Jasrasaria, Naghavi, Wulf, Johns, Lozano and Regan2014) and contribute to increasing chronic diseases, including hypertension (Cappuccio and Miller, Reference Cappuccio and Miller2016; Mensah, Reference Mensah2008; Yach et al., Reference Yach, Hawkes, Gould and Hofman2004). For example, hypertension affected 27.1% of Ghana's urban residents in 2008 and is expected to increase by 68% in Africa as a whole between 2008 and 2025 (Twagirumukiza et al., Reference Twagirumukiza, De Bacquer, Kips, de Backer, Stichele and Van Bortel2011). Diets low in fruit and vegetables are the most common dietary risk factor contributing to the burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) (Kassebaum et al., Reference Kassebaum, Jasrasaria, Naghavi, Wulf, Johns, Lozano and Regan2014; Melaku et al., Reference Melaku, Temesgen, Deribew, Tessema, Deribe, Sahle and Abera2016). Peanut consumption studies examined and evaluated factors influencing consumer eating decisions in Ghana (Awuah et al., Reference Awuah, Fialor, Binns, Kagochi and Jolly2009; Florkowski and Kolavalli, Reference Florkowski and Kolavalli2016; Jolly et al., Reference Jolly, Awuah, Fialor, Agyemang, Kagochi and Binns2008; Meng et al., Reference Meng, Florkowski, Klepacka, Sarpong, Resurreccion, Chinnan and Ekielski2018), but not expenditure.

This study examines regional differences in household expenditure of alimental foods (i.e., fresh vegetables, fresh fruits, and peanut products) using primary survey data collected from urban households in Ghana. The current study addresses two major issues: (a) how the expenditure on fresh vegetables, fresh fruits, and peanut products varies across three regional capitals; and (b) the determinants of expenditure on these alimental food categories considering regional differences. Earlier studies regarding vegetable, fruit, and peanut product consumption in Ghana have focused on consumers at a single location (Glover-Amengor and Vowotor, Reference Glover-Amengor and Vowotor2013; Jolly et al., Reference Jolly, Awuah, Fialor, Agyemang, Kagochi and Binns2008; Kpodo, Mensah, and Dzah, Reference Kpodo, Mensah and Dzah2015) or at a province level (Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme, Reference Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme2015) and fail to capture the existence of regional differences in urban areas, which have implications for public health and marketing strategy. This study confirms the presence and magnitude of regional differences with regard to a common set of factors by applying rigor lacking in previous reports. Results suggest that after accounting for socioeconomic and demographic factors, urban household expenditures on fresh vegetables and peanut products still vary significantly across regions, and so do the corresponding income elasticities. However, such regional variation is not significant in the case of fresh fruit expenditures. Furthermore, this study also identifies key determinants that affect the consumption of alimental foods, such as marital status, age and education of respondents, and household income and size.

An understanding of regional variations within a country and the urban-specific consumer profile in Ghana helps in responding to WHO's Global NCD Action Plan (2013) for country-specific prevention and control of NCDs. Kpodo, Mensah, and Dzah (Reference Kpodo, Mensah and Dzah2015) provide information for formulation of programs to increase fruit and vegetable consumption but ultimately make a general suggestion to develop social marketing strategies. The current study provides much broader insights, but the design and implementation of programs boosting fruit and vegetable consumption ultimately rest with the government. In addition, this study provides useful insights into the changing commercial food sector (Meng et al., Reference Meng, Florkowski, Sarpong, Resurreccion and Chinnan2014) in a country facing rapid urbanization and the resulting demand for alimental foods popular in several West African countries (Affokpon et al., Reference Affokpon, Coyne, Lawouin, Tossou, Agbèdè and Coosemans2011). In Ghana, the vegetable and fruit consumption per capita was only 73.6 kg per year (Ruel, Minot, and Smith, Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2004), well below the WHO's recommendation of 146 kg of fruits and vegetables annually. National per capita peanut consumption is about 0.61 kg per week (Awuah, Reference Awuah1999). Eighty percent of Ghanaians eat peanut products weekly or more often (Jolly et al., Reference Jolly, Awuah, Fialor, Agyemang, Kagochi and Binns2008) as peanuts are processed into a wide variety of food items (Meng et al., Reference Meng, Florkowski, Klepacka, Sarpong, Resurreccion, Chinnan and Ekielski2018; Tsigbey, Brandenburg, and Clottey, Reference Tsigbey, Brandenburg and Clottey2003). Urban food supply systems in Ghana also display regional variation (Table 1). Food production and consumption patterns vary across regions in Ghana because of different agroecological conditions and regional market structures (Cudjoe, Breisinger, and Diao, Reference Cudjoe, Breisinger and Diao2010). Typically, the Coastal Belt is warm and dry, the southwest is hot and humid, and the north is relatively hot and dry. Modern supermarkets have spread in Ghana during recent years, but traditional food retail outlets such as open-air markets and street hawking remain important (Meng et al., Reference Meng, Florkowski, Sarpong, Resurreccion and Chinnan2014). In Accra, more than 90% of all food consumed is purchased (Levin et al., Reference Levin, Armar-Klemesu, Ruel, Morris and Ahiadeke2000). In addition, food price levels vary significantly across regions. Urban households in the Western Region are facing much higher food prices than households located in most other regions. The consumer price index (CPI) for food and nonalcoholic beverages for the Northern Region and Greater Accra was 272.95 and 334.03, respectively, and for the Western Region it was 351.47 (using the year 2002 as the base).

Table 1. Regional Food Production and Food Preferences in Accra, Takoradi, and Tamale

Sources: Asante et al. (Reference Asante, Pufulete, Thomas, Wiredu and Intiful2015), Bellwood-Howard and Chimsi (Reference Bellwood-Howard and Chimsi2015), Djokoto, Afari-Sefa, and Addo-Quaye (Reference Djokoto, Afari-Sefa and Addo-Quaye2017), Gamor et al. (Reference Gamor, Akoto-Danso, Karg and Chagomoka2015), and Ghana Statistical Service (2013).

The regional variation in expenditure patterns could be a consequence of several different factors (Lee, Reference Lee1971). In spite of the rapid economic growth in Ghana, the regional divide has been significant. The north lags far behind the south in most development indicators (Grant and Nijman, Reference Grant and Nijman2004; Jatoe, Al-Hassan, and Adekunle, Reference Jatoe, Al-Hassan and Adekunle2012). Differences are attributable to history, climate, agricultural production conditions, and postindependent political neglect (The Overseas Development Institute and the Center for Economic Policy, 2005). The regional disparity in economic development, food production, and the food supply system discussed previously contributes to different food consumption patterns and hence nutrition status in urban households. Therefore, the regional heterogeneous patterns, represented in this study by residents in three cities (approximately 10.4% of the country's population), are taken into consideration in exploring alimental food consumption. Knowledge of factors driving or hampering expenditure on any of the considered product categories is indispensable in formulating national or regional marketing strategies in countries where market intelligence is poor.

2. Conceptual Framework

The conceptual framework of this study is based on the consumer demand theory and the Engel curve. Within budget constraints, households decide optimal levels of their food and nonfood consumption to maximize their utility level (equation 1):

(1) $$\begin{equation} {\rm{Max}}\ U = U\left( {{q_v},{q_f},{q_p},q} \right),\quad {\rm{subject\ to}}\ PQ = I, \end{equation}$$

where U is the household utility; qv , qf , qp, and q are household consumption of fresh vegetables, fruits, peanut products, and other goods, respectively; P and Q are the corresponding price index and consumption vectors, respectively; and I, a scalar, denotes household income. After solving for the Lagrange, the optimal consumption q* is determined by price index (P), household income (I), and household preferences (k) in equation (2):

(2) $$\begin{equation} q^* = q\left( {P,I;k} \right). \end{equation}$$

Given the stable price assumption (adjusted by regional CPI), the optimal expenditure (E*), the product of price index and consumption, is found to be a function of household income (I) and household preferences (k) shown in equation (3):

(3) $$\begin{equation} E^* = Pq^* = E\left( {I;k|P} \right). \end{equation}$$

The nonobserved household preferences (k) can be further shaped and captured by socioeconomic factors and demographic characteristics (Binkley, Reference Binkley2006; Ruel, Minot, and Smith, Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2004; Ziol-Guest, DeLeire, and Kalil, Reference Ziol-Guest, DeLeire and Kalil2006). In Ghana, fresh fruit consumption is associated with age, gender, and income (Wang et al., 2016). Jolly et al. (Reference Jolly, Awuah, Fialor, Agyemang, Kagochi and Binns2008) report that peanut consumption is influenced by age and education.

Therefore, food expenditures are determined by household income, socioeconomic factors, and demographic factors including household location, which has been supported by a number of studies. The close relationship between consumption of specific goods and income has been well documented by the Engel curve (Wetzstein, Reference Wetzstein2005). Studies are remarkably consistent in supporting the theory that fresh vegetable, fresh fruit, and peanut product consumption are influenced by sociodemographic factors in developed economies (e.g., Binkley, Reference Binkley2006; Hall et al., Reference Hall, Moore, Harper and Lynch2009; Jolly et al., Reference Jolly, Awuah, Fialor, Agyemang, Kagochi and Binns2008; Ziol-Guest, DeLeire, and Kalil, Reference Ziol-Guest, DeLeire and Kalil2006), in Africa (Ruel, Minot, and Smith, Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2004), and in Ghana (Jolly et al., Reference Jolly, Awuah, Fialor, Agyemang, Kagochi and Binns2008). In addition, location factors may relate with other determinant variables, such as income, in affecting food expenditures as shown by Giles and Hampton (Reference Giles and Hampton1987) in the case of significant income elasticity of demand variations between regions in New Zealand. In Ghana, location is associated with the consumption of selected fruits (Wang et al., 2016) and peanut products (Meng et al., Reference Meng, Florkowski, Klepacka, Sarpong, Resurreccion, Chinnan and Ekielski2018).

3. Data

The present study uses the survey data collected in three large cities in Ghana in 2011. Accra is the capital of Ghana, Takoradi is an important port and the fourth largest city, and Tamale is the capital city of the Northern Region. These three cities are among the top five largest cities in Ghana, which are home to half of the country's urban population (Farvacque-Vitkovic et al., Reference Farvacque-Vitkovic, Raghunath, Eghoff and Boakye2008). In terms of ecological zone types and city location, Accra, Takoradi, and Tamale represent the south coastal area, the west forest area, and the north savannah area, respectively. This selection also captures differences in regional economic development and possible differences in household structure and behavior resulting from varying ethnicities in the local populations. Ethnic differences posed a challenge in data collection because they required training a different set of enumerators fluent in the local languages (besides English) in the northern and coastal areas. Households surveyed in this study were part of the sample surveyed by the GSS, and the enumerators had previously participated in data collection through personal interviews there.

After the preparation of the questionnaire, data collection in the three cities took place between February and June 2011. Pilot testing of the questionnaire took place on the first day of data collection during the survey implementation in Tamale and did not reveal any potential problems in communicating issues or respondent difficulty in providing answers. During the following days, completed questionnaires were reviewed as they were gathered daily for potential response errors and data were entered concurrently into a spreadsheet. Similar procedures were applied to data collection in Takoradi and Accra.

Questions in the survey instrument were structured to ask respondents about their food shopping habits, food spending, and other information such as age, gender, occupation, household income, and household composition. Respondents were asked to report their weekly spending on fresh vegetables, fresh fruits, and peanut products. Peanut products include peanut paste, dzowe (ready-to-eat snack made of roasted, milled maize, roasted peanuts, sugar, and spices), kuli-kuli (snack made of fresh cake obtained after pressing peanuts for oil and fried in peanut oil; often rolled and shaped into rings in Ghana), and other common peanut-based products in Ghana.

After deleting incomplete records, 1,010 observations were analyzed in the study. Table 2 shows the definition and units of variables included in the empirical analysis and selected descriptive statistics at the city level. Notice that food expenditure and income in our analysis were adjusted using the regional CPI calculated for May 2011 to tease out the different price levels across regions. In this sample, 60.6% of respondents are from Accra; 20.8%, from Takoradi; and the remaining 18.6%, from Tamale. On average, a Ghanaian household spends 13.3 cedis on fresh vegetables, 5.5 cedis on fresh fruits, and 3.5 cedis on peanut products per week, which accounts for 24.2%, 10.4%, and 7.6% of the household's weekly food expenditure, respectively (US$1 = 1.49989 Ghanaian cedis on January 1, 2011; GSS, 2013). Among the respondents, 64.2% were reported as self-employed, 24.3% were government or civil employees, and 11.5% were students, retired, or unemployed.

Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Variables Included in the Empirical Model

Among the surveyed urban households, three out of four respondents were married. The married rate at the national population level was 58% in 2010, pooling urban and rural areas together (GSS, 2012a). The high percentage of married households in this study is lower than in some earlier reports (Quisumbing, Hallman, and Ruel, Reference Quisumbing, Hallman and Ruel2003). The average age of participants in our survey was 39.2 years old. There is no corresponding population statistic for age, but according to the GSS (2012b), a majority of the urban population in 2010 (61.3%) was within the range of 15–64 years old. In terms of education level, more than one-half of the respondents have an education higher than high school, which is consistent with the national education level (United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund, 2013). The mean household income in the month preceding the survey was 652.2 cedis, which is close to the population income statistic of 650.45 cedis (calculated based on the gross national income per capita [The World Bank, 2017] and four-person household).

The weekly household food expenditures on fresh vegetables, fresh fruits, and peanut products in the three cities are shown in Table 3. Weekly household expenditures on fresh vegetables are 14.4, 10.5, and 11.9 cedis in Accra, Takoradi, and Tamale, respectively; expenditures on fresh fruits are 5.7, 4.9, and 5.2 cedis, respectively; and expenditures on peanut products are 2.7, 3.3, and 6.0 cedis, respectively. Among the three cities, households in Accra have higher fresh vegetable expenditures, whereas households in Tamale reported higher food expenditures on peanut products.

Table 3. Weekly Household Expenditure on Fresh Vegetables, Fresh Fruits, and Peanut Products in Three Cities in Ghana

Note: ANOVA, analysis of variance.

4. Empirical Model

First, the analysis of variance (ANOVA) is employed to examine whether weekly household expenditure for each food category varies by location. In this study, ANOVA tests are conducted for three food categories (i.e., fresh vegetables, fresh fruits, and peanut products) separately across three big cities (i.e., Accra, Takoradi, and Tamale).

Second, the multivariate Tobit (MV-Tobit) model is used to examine the impact of regional differences on food expenditures after controlling for sociodemographic variables. A small number of zero food expenditures in three food categories suggest that the Tobit model is suitable (Greene, Reference Greene2003).

For comparison, the equations are estimated using ordinary least squares, and the only difference is the statistically significant coefficient associated with expenditures on vegetables in Tamale; the same coefficient in the MV-Tobit results is marginally insignificant. However, the choice of the MV-Tobit is further supported by households’ limited expenditure on the three foods. Also, household expenditures on the three food items may be related to each other because vegetables, fruits, and peanut products may be ingredients in the same dish or complementary dishes in the same week. The multivariate version of the Tobit model is applied to address the potential cross-equation correlations of food expenditure across different food items in our study to obtain more efficient results (Barslund, Reference Barslund2009) because the correlation parameters in the multivariate Tobit model allow capturing correlations of cross-equation errors if they exist. Equation (4) shows the empirical model. Latent variables of weekly household expenditures (E*’s) are the dependent variables, and explanatory variables (X) include sociodemographic characteristics, location, and interaction terms between location and income; B’s are the estimated coefficients; the subscripts v, f, and p indicate vegetables, fruits, and peanut products, respectively; and e’s are the stochastic error terms.

(4) $$\begin{equation} \begin{array}{@{}l@{}} {E_v}^* = X{B_v} + {e_v}\\ {E_f}^* = X{B_f} + {e_f}\\ {E_p}^* = X{B_p} + {e_p}\\ E = \max ({E^*},{\rm{ }}0) \end{array} \end{equation}$$

The error term vector follows a multivariate normal distribution in equation (5):

(5) $$\begin{equation} \begin{array}{@{}l@{}} e = {\rm{ }}\left( {{e_v},{e_f},{e_p}} \right) ^\prime {\rm{ }}\sim {N}\left( {0,V} \right)\\ 0 = \left[ {\begin{array}{@{}*{1}{c}@{}} 0\\ 0\\ 0 \end{array}} \right],\quad V = \left[ {\begin{array}{@{}*{3}{l}@{}} {r_v^2}&\quad {{r_{vf}}}&\quad {{r_{vp}}}\\ {{r_{vf}}}&\quad {r_f^2}&\quad {{r_{fp}}}\\ {{r_{vp}}}&\quad {{r_{fp}}}&\quad {r_p^2} \end{array}} \right], \end{array} \end{equation}$$

where V is the variance-covariance matrix of error terms, rij’s are the corresponding cross-equation correlations between equations i and j, and ri’s are the standard deviations of error terms. For example, rvf is the correlation coefficient between the error terms in the fresh vegetable expenditure equation and the fresh fruit expenditure equation. The model was estimated using the maximum simulated likelihood by STATA “mvtobit” program (Barslund, Reference Barslund2009).

Third, to check if the zero-excess issue exists in the data, the study compares the proportions of observed and predicted zero responses. Results indicate that probabilities of observed zero responses in fresh vegetable, fresh fruit, and peanut product expenditures are 1.21%, 7.53%, and 6.41%, respectively, which are much smaller than the predicted probability of zero expenditure by the MV-Tobit model (i.e., 14.8%, 19.8%, and 20.0%). Therefore, there is no need to consider a zero-inflated model in the current study.

5. Results

5.1. ANOVA on Alimental Food Expenditure Mean across Regions

Results of ANOVA on food expenditure means regarding the alimental food categories across regions are displayed in Table 3. The results indicate that the regional variation is statistically significant in the household expenditure on fresh vegetables and peanut products but not on fresh fruits. On average, Accra households spend more on fresh vegetables, followed by Tamale and Takoradi households. Such patterns are quite different in relation to peanut products, where Tamale households lead in expenditures followed by households in Takoradi and Accra. An earlier study indicated that the selected domestic fruit consumption frequency (i.e., pineapple and banana) by urban households in Ghana is associated with location (Wang et al., 2016). The differences result from ability to grow specific fruit in a particular ecological zone, and the study did not provide price or expenditure information. The pineapple sector is well organized in Ghana and has been a traditional exporter.

To further examine location difference, control of the sociodemographic factors becomes necessary. Therefore, despite results from ANOVA supporting the existence of location differences in fresh vegetable and peanut product expenditures, whether such disparity originates from the location factor or from sociodemographic factors associated with location is still not clear. The following section compares the estimation results of determinants of household expenditure, including socioeconomic factors, demographic factors, location, and interaction terms between location and income.

5.2. Cross-Equation Correlations in MV-Tobit Model

Estimation results from the MV-Tobit model are in Table 4, which displays estimated coefficients of demographic factors, socioeconomic factors, and location, as well as correlation parameters in the estimation equation system. As compared with the conventional Tobit model, the multivariate version of the Tobit model allows this study to examine potential correlations between each pair of food categories. This subsection focuses on the cross-equation correlations between three food categories, and the next two subsections separately discuss significant socioeconomic and demographic factors that affect alimentive food expenditure, as well as effects of household location.

Table 4. Estimation Results of Food Expenditure on Fresh Vegetables, Fresh Fruits, and Peanut Products in Urban Households of Ghana, 2011

Notes: Asterisks (*, **, and ***) denote coefficients are significant at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively. Standard errors are in parentheses.

First, the likelihood ratio (LR) test verifies the hypothesis that all three covariance parameters (i.e., R’s) are jointly equal to zero. If such a hypothesis holds, then the MV-Tobit model can be simplified to three single Tobit models. Results of the LR test suggest rejecting the null hypothesis in Table 4 (Chi-square statistics = 510.512, d = 3). It indicates that the correlation parameters regarding the three equations do not jointly equal zero. In other words, the error terms in this specific equation system are correlated. Therefore, by considering the across-equation correlations, the MV-Tobit model provides more efficient results than three separate Tobit models.

Second, Table 5 shows the estimation of correlation in the variance-covariance matrix of cross-equation error terms. The pair of vegetables and fruits has the largest correlation coefficient (0.59), followed by the pair of vegetables and peanuts (0.28), and fruits and peanuts (0.22). The large correlation between vegetables and fruits indicates that a household consuming more vegetables is also more likely to eat more fruits. Moreover, significantly positive correlations between peanuts and other food categories confirm the traditional diet in Ghana, where peanut products are often consumed as a complement to fresh vegetables and fruits. For example, a roasted banana and roasted peanuts can be combined for lunch, and peanut products and vegetables are often used as ingredients in the same dish like the well-liked peanut soup.

Table 5. Correlation Coefficients across Equations

Notes: Asterisks (***) denote significance at the 5% level.

5.3. Significant Socioeconomic and Demographic Factors

This section focuses on significant socioeconomic and demographic factors affecting alimentive food expenditure, and effects of household location will be discussed in the next section. Marginal effects of explanatory variables on the observed food expenditure are derived by multiplying the estimated coefficients by the probability of being in the noncensored part of the distribution (Brown, Harris, and Taylor, Reference Brown, Harris and Taylor2012) and are displayed in Table 6.

Table 6. Marginal Effects of Significant Determinants of Food Expenditure on Fresh Vegetables, Fresh Fruits, and Peanut Products in Urban Households of Ghana, 2011

Notes: Asterisks (*, **, and ***) denote marginal effects are significant at the 10%, 5%, and 1% levels, respectively. Standard errors are in parentheses.

5.3.1. Fresh Vegetables

Results indicate that fresh vegetable expenditure is significantly affected by a number of sociodemographic factors including income, education, marital status, and age. Household income has a positive effect on fresh vegetable expenditure, and the income elasticity is 0.20. Such a finding is quite consistent with previous studies (Hall et al., Reference Hall, Moore, Harper and Lynch2009; Ruel, Minot, and Smith, Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2004). Increased income contributes to more nutritious food consumption (Hama and Chern, Reference Hama and Chern1988), so well-off households tend to pursue a healthier diet and likely consume more vegetables. Well-educated respondents spend 1.90 cedis more on fresh vegetables every week than those with lower than high school education levels because, in general, higher educated people perceive nutrition as more important in food shopping (Nayga, Reference Nayga1997). Besides socioeconomic factors, the demographic characteristics such as marital status and age also have a statistically significant influence. Married households have higher spending on fresh vegetables than their counterparts, which is consistent with the finding by Ziol-Guest, DeLeire, and Kalil (Reference Ziol-Guest, DeLeire and Kalil2006) that married households allocate a greater share of their food budget on vegetables; a respondent from a married household spends 2.19 cedis more on fresh vegetable purchases. Moreover, because of increasing knowledge of the link between health maintenance and diet, age has a positive effect and leads to a fresh vegetable expenditure increase. Ten-year advancement in age brings about an increase of 1.3 cedis in weekly fresh vegetable spending. The finding confirms that fresh vegetable consumption varies by age (Lock et al., Reference Lock, Pomerleau, Causer, Altmann and McKee2005). In Ghana, the effect may also be influenced by the Ministry of Health program focused on regenerative health and the key role of vegetable and fruit consumption to achieve its objectives (Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme, Reference Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme2015).

As compared with an Accra household, those from Takoradi spend 2.61 cedis less on weekly fresh vegetable purchases. Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme (Reference Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme2015) suggested that the Coastal Zone may produce fewer vegetables implying that a change in distribution system could lead to a lower vegetable consumption there, but the analysis was at the province level using data for 2008. In case of Tamale, the interaction term suggests that an increase in income induces spending on fresh vegetables. It is plausible that the differences in the level of regional development contribute to the observed effect.

5.3.2. Fresh Fruits

Similar to the fresh vegetable expenditure discussed previously, high fresh fruit spending is also closely associated with changes in income and education. Consumers who have lower income or less education pay less attention to buying healthy food (Buzby et al., Reference Buzby, Gould, Kendall, Jones, Robinson and Blayney2013). The results of this study indicate that weekly fresh fruit expenditure significantly increases with income. The income elasticity of fresh fruit expenditure is 0.21, which is slightly higher than the income elasticity of fresh vegetable expenditure. The finding is consistent with the results in the study by Ruel, Minot, and Smith (Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2004) that the estimated income elasticity for fruit expenditure is greater than the elasticity for vegetable expenditure in eight sub-Saharan countries including Ghana. Moreover, a high educational attainment of respondents leads to a 2.10 cedis premium in fresh fruit expenditure per week (more than in the case of vegetables) as compared with that of households with less than high school education. Education has been linked to more frequent consumption of selected fruit in Ghana (Wang et al., 2016).

In terms of demographic factors, the effects of marital status, age, and household composition are found to be statistically significant. High fresh fruit expenditure is associated with the respondent's marital status, a finding consistent with results reported by Ziol-Guest, DeLeire, and Kalil (Reference Ziol-Guest, DeLeire and Kalil2006). Specifically, the gap of weekly fresh fruit expenditure between married and nonmarried households is about 0.81 cedis (about 15%) but is considerably smaller than in the case of expenditure on fresh vegetables. Additionally, as age increases, food expenditure on fresh fruits grows. A 10-year increase in the respondent's age brings about an increase of 0.4 cedis in weekly fresh fruit spending, although the increase is less than the corresponding increase in vegetable expenditure. A noticeable difference between the set of factors influencing fruit and vegetable expenditure is associated with the number of adults in a household—that is, those with more adult members are found to spend more on fresh fruits, and the corresponding increase is 0.35 cedis per week per one additional adult member in a household. This finding is consistent with previous studies. For example, Ruel, Minot, and Smith (Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2004) found that adult share is positively associated with the budget allocated to fruits and vegetables in several sub-Saharan African countries.

5.3.3. Peanut Products

Income has a significant positive effect on peanut product expenditure, and the corresponding income elasticity is 0.07. Such a finding is consistent with the repeated reports of the importance of peanuts in Ghana's households (Jolly et al., Reference Jolly, Awuah, Fialor, Agyemang, Kagochi and Binns2008; Meng et al., Reference Meng, Florkowski, Klepacka, Sarpong, Resurreccion, Chinnan and Ekielski2018). Peanut product spending in urban households increases as income increases but at a much slower pace as compared with vegetable or fruit expenditure. Education also causes expenditure on peanut products to increase; households of well-educated consumers spend 0.59 cedis (17%) more on peanut products per week than those of less educated consumers. The finding confirms the positive role of education in peanut consumption (Moon et al., Reference Moon, Florkowski, Beuchat, Resurreccion, Chinnan, Paraskova and Jordanov1999). In addition, expenditure on peanut products is positively related to the number of adult household members, with a marginal effect of 0.22 cedis per week. It is likely that a larger number of adults leads to an increased purchase of peanut paste, a versatile peanut products used in various dishes and eaten on various occasions.

5.4. Summary of Regional Variation Controlling for Sociodemographic Factors

Based on the results of the MV-Tobit model, Figures 1–3 summarize the regional variation in household weekly fresh vegetable, fresh fruit, and peanut product expenditures. After controlling for sociodemographic factors, expenditures on fresh vegetables and peanut products vary across regions, but the regional variation in fresh fruit expenditure is not confirmed. Regarding the latter, an earlier study of fruit consumption confirmed differences across ecological zones in Ghana (Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme, Reference Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme2015).

Figure 1. Regional Variation in Fresh Vegetable Expenditure

Figure 2. The Absence of Regional Variation in Fresh Fruit Expenditure

Figure 3. Regional Variation in Peanut Product Expenditure

Households in Accra and Tamale have significantly higher fresh vegetable expenditure than Takoradi-based households (Figure 1). The likely major factor hampering fresh vegetable consumption in Takoradi is the high food price in the Western Region of Ghana, which is 5% higher than in Greater Accra and 29% higher than in northern areas. Improvements in distribution system (Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme, Reference Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme2015) and easing cross-regional shipments (road improvement) can increase fresh vegetable availability. In addition, the curve for Tamale households has a significantly steeper slope, suggesting that households are more sensitive to income growth than residents in the other two cities in terms of increasing their fresh vegetable expenditure. This finding suggests that increasing income is more efficient in northern Ghana than in southern and western Ghana if the enhanced fresh vegetable consumption is a goal. Given the relatively lower level of development in northern Ghana, a localized program that targets increasing vegetable consumption may make a real difference.

In the case of fresh fruits (Figure 2), after controlling for the selected sociodemographic factor effects, weekly household expenditure does not significantly vary across regions. This finding indicates that current household expenditure on fresh fruits can be fully explained by the sociodemographic characteristics associated with each household, for which regional variation is not significant. This result is different from the earlier reported differences in fruit consumption across ecological zones in Ghana based on 2008 national data (Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme, Reference Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme2015). It also has to be noted that the availability of various fruits varies across the three cities in this study, and Kpodo, Mensah, and Dzah (Reference Kpodo, Mensah and Dzah2015) indicated that the choice of fruit was primarily influenced by availability. However, the absence of statistically significant differences in fruit expenditure suggests that distributors may have flexibility in choosing the fruit mix supplied to retail outlets in each city. However, from a public health standpoint, the fruit mix matters because of regional differences in nutrient deficits and their content in various types of fruit.

Regarding peanut product expenditure (Figure 3), households in regional capital cities (i.e., Tamale and Takoradi) have significantly higher expenditure than the Accra-based households. Tamale is located in the northern zone, generally considered to be a high production and consumption zone of peanut products, whereas Greater Accra is considered a low production and consumption zone (Awuah, Fialor, and Jolly, Reference Awuah, Fialor and Jolly2001). Moreover, income has a positive effect on peanut product expenditure in households in Tamale and Accra, but Tamale households’ peanut product expenditure is more responsive to income growth. In contrast, as household income increases, the peanut spending decreases in Takoradi. Peanut and peanut-based products are an integral part of the diet in West African countries including Ghana, and results indicate that regional capital cities such as Takoradi and Tamale adhere to the traditional diet more strongly than the capital city households, but Takoradi households, for reasons not discerned by this study, spend less on peanut products as income increases.

6. Discussion

This study identified specific characteristics of households associated with the change in expenditure on three alimental food groups. Factors resulting in an increase of expenditure on all three foods include income and education. The measured effect of income suggests that only a substantial income increase leads to higher expenditures, and the effect can be expected to be largest in the case of vegetables. This outcome is desirable as vegetables are low in calories and high in vitamins, minerals, and antioxidants (Smith and Eyzaguirre, Reference Smith and Eyzaguirre2007; Uusiku et al., Reference Uusiku, Oelofse, Duodu, Bester and Faber2010) and unlikely to contribute to the double burden of malnutrition and obesity observed in Africa (Schneider et al., Reference Schneider, Bradshaw, Steyn, Norman and Laubscher2009). Especially underutilized are African (indigenous) leafy vegetables, which are well adapted to local conditions, often characterized by a short growing season, and high in nutrients (Shiundu and Oniang'o, Reference Shiundu and Oniang'o2007). African leafy vegetables are often cooked with peanuts (Nguni and Mwila, Reference Nguni and Mwila2007), and in Ghana, peanut soup is very popular. Exotic vegetables grown in Ghana tend to be more suited to the modern distribution system and sales at supermarkets as their postharvest handling is simpler, shelf-life is longer, and losses to retailers are smaller than those of indigenous leafy vegetables.

However, no single vegetable provides all nutrients necessary for good health (Uusiku et al., Reference Uusiku, Oelofse, Duodu, Bester and Faber2010). Encouraging leafy vegetable production in areas surrounding cities can be effective if distributors organize a supply system of rapidly moving the product to retail outlets, eliminating the barrier of accessibility. The expected increase in incomes in Ghana because of economic growth reduces the affordability barrier for many consumers who will seek variety (stimulated by gains in education) and creates opportunities for all types of vegetables. A similar effect of income and education has been established in the case of fruit expenditure in this study.

“Education and behavior-change programs” (Ruel, Minot, and Smith, Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2004) promoting fresh vegetable and fruit consumption should focus on emphasizing the health benefits of high vegetable and fruit intake. The Republic of South Africa initiated a public health program aimed at increasing vegetable and fruit consumption (Faber, Laubscher, and Laurie, Reference Faber, Laubscher and Laurie2013). However, the program is educational in nature. An earlier study (Kpodo, Mensah, and Dzah, Reference Kpodo, Mensah and Dzah2015) suggested the need for a program supporting the consumption of fruits and vegetables in Ghana. Results of the current study indicate that income is still the major constraint of alimentary food consumption. This information could be used to target certain population subgroups with specific public health interventions and food marketing campaigns (Hermann et al., Reference Hermann, Harrison, Afifi and Jenkins2008). A nationwide program is unlikely because of a number of pressing issues including higher priority public health problems (e.g., rapidly growing hypertension among Ghanaians), but perhaps narrower, targeted programs could be initiated. The positive effect of location (Tamale) and income on vegetable expenditures (Table 5) suggests localized efforts could be beneficial. A public education program drawing attention to the benefits of fruit and vegetable consumption could make a difference.

Seasonality is a factor that can strongly influence vegetable and fruit supply and expenditure. However, there are vegetables and fruits that are suited to each season, and given Ghana's various ecological zones, domestic production opportunities exist year-round. Additionally, some root vegetables (e.g., yams, sweet potatoes) can be stored to extend the period of availability, but finding suitable storage may be the primary limiting factor. Emerging modern retail outlets such as supermarket chains are accompanied by a distribution system capable of the interregional shipment of fruits and vegetables. The investment in technical infrastructure that takes place in Ghana will facilitate transportation, enhancing accessibility outside the harvest season in a particular region.

Regional differences have also been confirmed in this study. Regional variations need to be taken into consideration when the public sector formulates health promotion programs. Households located in two regional capitals differ in the set of factors influencing expenditure. This result is consistent with the observed differences in vegetable and fruit consumption across ecological zones based on a 2008 national survey (Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme, Reference Amo-Adjei and Kumi-Kyereme2015). Assistance programs, if possible, involving fresh vegetables need to focus on households in certain regions, and increasing household income seems an efficient way to promote fresh vegetable consumption, especially in areas with lagging development such as Tamale. Local development programs creating more job opportunities might be the key to increasing nutrient-dense food consumption in the long run. In the meantime, initiatives such as reducing postharvest loss and improving food storage (Ruel, Minot, and Smith, Reference Smith, Ruel and Ndiaye2004) may increase food availability, decrease food price, and therefore, encourage healthy food consumption.

Although peanut product consumption has health-promoting effects, the public sector needs to be concerned about food safety issues such as aflatoxin contamination in these products (International Agency for Research on Cancer, 2015; Udomkun et al., Reference Udomkun, Wiredu, Nagle, Bandyopadhyaya, Müeller and Vanlauve2017). Peanut products in African countries, including Ghana, have been reported to face a higher contamination risk. Results show that expenditure on peanut products is high and present in all areas, especially in the regional capital cities such as Tamale and Takoradi. Those households with relatively higher peanut product expenditures are, at the same time, potentially exposed to a higher risk of aflatoxin contamination. Therefore, the public sector needs to focus on monitoring peanut product production, storage, processing, and distribution to reduce contamination risk. Government food safety programs may have to target the northern part of Ghana, where households eat more peanut-based products.

7. Conclusions

The fast pace of urbanization in Ghana supports examining issues affecting urban residents including the consumption of nutrient-dense foods (i.e., vegetables, fruits, and peanut products). However, there are no studies that examine the expenditure pattern of urban households on these specific food categories. In many sub-Saharan African countries, consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables is affected by the existence of ecological zones suiting varying plant production and distribution systems that suffer from underdeveloped technical infrastructure. Urbanization offers income opportunities unavailable in rural areas but also induces lifestyle change leading to rapid increases in NCDs. The burden of such diseases may be eased by increased consumption of vegetables, fruits, and peanut products. The current study fills the gap in the literature by quantifying the effects of sociodemographic, income, and location factors influencing expenditures on fresh fruits, fresh vegetables, and peanut products in three major cities in Ghana: Accra, Takoradi, and Tamale. This study complements and extends insights from earlier studies that either focused on consumption of fruits and vegetables in various ecological zones or at a single urban location.

Income plays an important and positive role in encouraging higher expenditures on all three food types considered in this study. The effect is largest in the case of expenditure on vegetables, a highly desirable outcome from a public health standpoint. This result is also important for the emerging presence of supermarkets in cities, suggesting increased marketing opportunities for this category in Ghana. If expansion of supermarket presence continues, it may be the food retail sector that modernizes the regional supply base, stimulating increased production by local farmers. Fruit consumption is also likely to increase in response to increasing household incomes. The effect on increasing peanut consumption is less, but still positive.

Household demographic characteristics that contribute to increased expenditure on fresh vegetables and fresh fruit include age and the number of adults in a household. An important factor consistently influencing such expenditure is the marital status of a consumer. Although married households have higher spending than households of nonmarried consumers, fruit and vegetable marketers may adjust their product mix to accommodate preferences of nonmarried individuals. Availability of fruits and vegetables and the time required for preparation may need to be considered.

This study identified differences in the effects of income and other factors on expenditure with regard to location. Consumers in Tamale and Takoradi display a different propensity to spend on vegetables and peanut products, but not on fruits. The latter effect is interesting because it suggests that fresh fruit marketing practices do not differ across urban centers in Ghana. This tendency echoes the general increase in popularity of fruit worldwide, but this study did not consider the fruit mix purchased by consumers. Preferences for specific fruits still need to be considered because they have different postharvest requirements as well as different nutrient content.

This study is based on survey data collected at a specific time of year. The nature of cross-sectional data and the content of the questionnaire do not allow drawing conclusions with regard to availability of specific fruits or vegetables. Seasonality still strongly influences the production and supply of these two product groups in Ghana. Moreover, consumers may substitute one fruit or vegetable for another given availability and price without changing the total amount of spending. Future studies may investigate drivers of specific consumer choices. With steady economic growth, expanding road infrastructure, and changes in retailing, the pattern of expenditure on vegetables, fruits, and peanut products will require continuous research.

Footnotes

The authors acknowledge financial support from the Peanut Innovation and Mycotoxin Lab/U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) for the collection of the data used in this study through the grant “Enhancing the peanut value chain, from processing to marketing peanut and peanut products,” USAID RF W-710-023. The authors express their appreciation to Amanda Hollar, Jerri Snodgrass, John Cruickshank, and Laura Alfonso for their assistance in the preparation of this manuscript. The authors extend their appreciation to anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

References

Affokpon, A., Coyne, D.L., Lawouin, L., Tossou, C., Agbèdè, R.D., and Coosemans, J.. “Effectiveness of Native West African Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi in Protecting Vegetable Crops against Root-Knot Nematodes.” Biology and Fertility of Soils 47,2(2011):207–17.Google Scholar
Amo-Adjei, J., and Kumi-Kyereme, A.. “Fruit and Vegetable Consumption by Ecological Zone and Socioeconomic Status in Ghana.” Journal of Biosocial Science 47,5(2015):613–31.Google Scholar
Asante, M., Pufulete, M., Thomas, J., Wiredu, E., and Intiful, F.. “Food Consumption Pattern of Ghanaians Living in Accra and London.” International Journal of Current Research 7,5(2015):16216–23.Google Scholar
Awuah, R., Fialor, S.C., Binns, A., Kagochi, J., and Jolly, C.M.. “Factors Influencing Market Participants Decision to Sort Groundnuts along the Marketing Chain in Ghana.” Peanut Science 36,1(2009):6876.Google Scholar
Awuah, R., Fialor, S.C., and Jolly, C.M.. “Groundnut Production and Consumption Characteristics and Awareness of Aflatoxin and Its Effects in Ghana.” Kumasi, Ghana: Kwame Nkhrumah University of Science and Technology, 2001.Google Scholar
Awuah, R.T. “Aflatoxigenic Fungi and Aflatoxin Contamination of Groundnut and Groundnut-Based Products in Ghana: Implications and Concerns.” Paper presented at the National Workshop on Groundnut and Groundnut Aflatoxins, Kumasi, Ghana, Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology, September 19–21, 1999.Google Scholar
Barslund, M. MVTOBIT: Stata Module to Calculate Multivariate Tobit Models by Simulated Maximum Likelihood (SML). Statistical Software Components. Chesnut Hill, MA: Department of Economics, Boston College, 2009. Internet site: http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s456875.html (Accessed June 1, 2014).Google Scholar
Bellwood-Howard, I., and Chimsi, E.. Urban and Peri-urban Agriculture in Tamale: A Policy Narrative. URBANET, UrbanFood Plus, RUAF Foundation, Ghana WASH Programme, University for Development Studies, and International Water Management Institute, 2015.Google Scholar
Binkley, J.K.The Effect of Demographic, Economic, and Nutrition Factors on the Frequency of Food Away from Home.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 40,2(2006): 372–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, S., Harris, M.N., and Taylor, K.. “Modelling Charitable Donations to an Unexpected Natural Disaster: Evidence from the US Panel Study of Income Dynamics.” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 84,1(2012):97110.Google Scholar
Buttersby, J.MDGs to SDGs – New Goals, Same Gaps: The Continued Absence of Urban Food Security in the Post-2015 Global Development Agenda.” African Geographical Review 36,1(2017):115–29.Google Scholar
Buzby, J.C., Gould, H.L., Kendall, M.E., Jones, T.F., Robinson, T., and Blayney, D.P.. “Characteristics of Consumers of Unpasteurized Milk in the United States.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 47,1(2013):153–66.Google Scholar
Cappuccio, F.P., and Miller, M.A.. “Cardiovascular Disease and Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa: Burden, Risk and Interventions.” Internal and Emergency Medicine 11,3(2016):299305.Google Scholar
Cudjoe, G., Breisinger, C., and Diao, X.. “Local Impacts of a Global Crisis: Food Price Transmission, Consumer Welfare and Poverty in Ghana.” Food Policy 35,4(2010):294302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Djokoto, J.G., Afari-Sefa, V., and Addo-Quaye, A.. “Vegetable Diversification in Cocoa-Based Farming Systems in Ghana.” Agriculture and Food Security 6,6(2017):110.Google Scholar
Faber, M., Laubscher, R., and Laurie, S.. “Availability of, Access to and Consumption of Fruits and Vegetables in a Peri-urban Area in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa.” Maternal and Child Nutrition 9,3(2013):409–24.Google Scholar
Fanzo, J. “The Nutrition Challenge in Sub-Saharan Africa.” United Nations Development Programme (UNDP) Regional Bureau for Africa, Working Paper 2012-012, New York: UNDP, 2012.Google Scholar
Farvacque-Vitkovic, C., Raghunath, M., Eghoff, C., and Boakye, C.. “Development of the Cities of Ghana: Challenges, Priorities and Tools.” Africa Region Working Paper Series No. 110, Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2008. Internet site: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/318351468256521007/pdf/448710NWP0Box31UBLIC10AFRWP0no10110.pdf (Accessed December 22, 2017).Google Scholar
Florkowski, W.J., and Kolavalli, S.. “Aflatoxin Control in Groundnut Value Chain in Sub-Saharan Africa: The Case of Ghana.” Food Protection Trends 36,2(2016): 96107.Google Scholar
Fotso, J.C.Urban–Rural Differentials in Child Malnutrition: Trends and Socioeconomic Correlates in Sub-Saharan Africa.” Health and Place 13,1(2007):205–23.Google Scholar
Gamor, G., Akoto-Danso, E.K., Karg, H., and Chagomoka, T.. Traditional Recipes from the Northern Region of Ghana. Tainan, Taiwan: AVRDC–The World Vegetable Center, Publication No. 15–794, 2015.Google Scholar
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). Population 12 Years and Older by District and Marital Status, 2010. Accra, Ghana: GSS, 2012a. Internet site: http://www.statsghana.gov.gh/pop_stats.html (Accessed June 26, 2017).Google Scholar
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). Population by Region, District, Locality of Residence, Age Groups and Sex, 2010. Accra, Ghana: GSS, 2012b. Internet site: http://www.statsghana.gov.gh/pop_stats.html (Accessed June 26, 2017).Google Scholar
Ghana Statistical Service (GSS). 2010 Population and Housing Census Regional Analytical Report (Greater Accra). Accra, Ghana: GSS, 2013. Internet site: http://www.statsghana.gov.gh (Accessed July 3, 2017).Google Scholar
Giles, D.E., and Hampton, P.. “A Regional Consumer Demand Model for New Zealand.” Journal of Regional Science 27,1(1987):103–18.Google Scholar
Glover-Amengor, M., and Vowotor, K.A.. “Survey on Consumption of Vegetables and Fruits in a Coastal District in Ghana.” Journal of Natural Sciences Research 3,8(2013):8489.Google Scholar
Grant, R., and Nijman, J.. “The Re-scaling of Uneven Development in Ghana and India.” Tijdschrift voor Economische en Sociale Geografie 95,5(2004):467–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, W. H. Econometric Analysis. 5th ed. Delhi, India: Pearson Education, 2003.Google Scholar
Hall, J.N., Moore, S., Harper, S.B., and Lynch, J.W.. “Global Variability in Fruit and Vegetable Consumption.” American Journal of Preventive Medicine 36,5(2009):402409.Google Scholar
Hama, M.Y., and Chern, W.S.. “Food Expenditure and Nutrient Availability in Elderly Households.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 22,1(1988):39.Google Scholar
Hermann, D.R., Harrison, G.G., Afifi, A., and Jenkins, E.. “Effect of a Targeted Subsidy on Intake of Fruits and Vegetables among Low-Income Women in the Special Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and Children.” American Journal of Public Health 98,1(2008):98105.Google Scholar
Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME) and Human Development Network, The World Bank. The Global Burden of Disease: Generating Evidence, Guiding Policy – Sub-Saharan Africa Regional Edition. Seattle, WA: IHME, 2013.Google Scholar
International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). Mycotoxin Control in Low- and Middle-Income Countries. Lyon, France: IARC, Working Group Report No. 9, 2015.Google Scholar
Jatoe, J.B.D., Al-Hassan, R., and Adekunle, B.. Why Northern Ghana Lags behind in Ghana's Growth and Poverty Reduction Success. Nairobi, Kenya: African Economic Research Consortium, Draft Policy Brief, 2012. Internet site: https://www.africaportal.org/publications/why-northern-ghana-lags-behind-in-ghanas-growth-and-poverty-reduction-success/ (Accessed May 7, 2014).Google Scholar
Jolly, C.M., Awuah, R.T., Fialor, S.C., Agyemang, K.O., Kagochi, J.M., and Binns, A.D.. “Groundnut Consumption Frequency in Ghana.” International Journal of Consumer Studies 32,6(2008):675–86.Google Scholar
Kassebaum, N.J., Jasrasaria, R., Naghavi, M., Wulf, S.K., Johns, N., Lozano, R., Regan, M., et al.A Systematic Analysis of Global Anemia Burden from 1990 to 2010.” Blood 123,5(2014):615–24.Google Scholar
Kpodo, F.M., Mensah, C., and Dzah, C.S.. “Fruit and Vegetable Consumption Patterns and Preferences of Students in a Ghanaian Polytechnic.” World Journal of Nutrition and Health 3,3(2015):5559.Google Scholar
Lee, F.Y.Regional Variations in Expenditure Patterns in the US.” Journal of Regional Science 11,3(1971):359–67.Google Scholar
Levin, C., Armar-Klemesu, M., Ruel, M., Morris, S., and Ahiadeke, C.. Urban Livelihoods and Food and Nutrition Security in Greater Accra, Ghana. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
Lock, K., Pomerleau, J., Causer, L., Altmann, D.R., and McKee, M.. “The Global Burden of Disease Attributable to Low Consumption of Fruit and Vegetables: Implications for the Global Strategy on Diet.” Bulletin of the World Health Organization 83,2(2005):100108.Google Scholar
Melaku, Y.A., Temesgen, A.M., Deribew, A., Tessema, G.A., Deribe, K., Sahle, B.W., Abera, S.F., et al.The Impact of Dietary Risk Factors on the Burden of Non-communicable Diseases in Ethiopia: Findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013.” International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity 13(2016):122.Google Scholar
Maxwell, D., Levin, C., Armar-Klemesu, M., Ruel, M., Morris, S., and Ahiadeke, C.. Urban Livelihoods and Food and Nutrition Security in Greater Accra, Ghana. Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2000.Google Scholar
McLean, E., Cogswell, M., Egli, I., Wojdyla, D., and de Benoist, B.. “Worldwide Prevalence of Anaemia, WHO Vitamin and Mineral Nutrition Information System, 1993–2005.” Public Health Nutrition 12,4(2008):444–54.Google Scholar
Meng, T., Florkowski, W.J., Klepacka, A.M., Sarpong, D.B., Resurreccion, A.V.A., Chinnan, M.S., and Ekielski, A.. “Preferences for Groundnut Products among Urban Residents in Ghana.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 98,2(2018):817–24.Google Scholar
Meng, T., Florkowski, W.J., Sarpong, D., Resurreccion, A., and Chinnan, M.. “Consumer's Food Shopping Choice in Ghana: Supermarket or Traditional Outlets.” International Food and Agribusiness Management Review 17, Special Issue A(2014):107–30.Google Scholar
Mensah, G.A.Epidemiology of Stroke and High Blood Pressure in Africa.” Heart 94,6(2008):697705.Google Scholar
Moon, W., Florkowski, W.J., Beuchat, L.R., Resurreccion, A.V., Chinnan, M.S., Paraskova, P., and Jordanov, J.. “Effects of Product Attributes and Consumer Characteristics on Attitude and Behavior: The Case of Peanuts in a Transition Economy.” Agribusiness 15,3(1999):411–25.Google Scholar
Nayga, R.M.Impact of Sociodemographic Factors on Perceived Importance of Nutrition in Food Shopping.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 31,1(1997):19.Google Scholar
Nguni, D., and Mwila, G.. “Opportunities for Increased Production, Utilization and Income Generation from African Leafy Vegetables in Zambia.” African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 7,4(2007):120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
The Overseas Development Institute and the Center for Economic Policy. Economic Growth in Northern Ghana. Revised report for UK Department for International Development (DFID) Ghana. Accra, Ghana: DFID Ghana, 2005.Google Scholar
Quisumbing, A.R., Hallman, K., and Ruel, M.T.. “Maquiladoras and Market Mamas: Women's Work and Childcare in Guatemala City and Accra.” Food Consumption and Nutrition Division Discussion Paper No. 153, Washington, DC: International Food Policy Research Institute, 2003.Google Scholar
Ruel, M.T., Minot, N., and Smith, L.. “Patterns and Determinants of Fruit and Vegetable Consumption in Sub-Saharan Africa: A Multicountry Comparison. Background paper for the Joint FAO/WHO Workshop on Fruit and Vegetables for Health, Kobe, Japan, September 1–3, 2004.Google Scholar
Schneider, M., Bradshaw, D., Steyn, K., Norman, R., and Laubscher, R.. “Poverty and Non-communicable Diseases in South Africa.” Scandinavian Journal of Public Health 37,2(2009):176–86.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shiundu, K.M., and Oniang'o, R.K.. “Marketing African Leafy Vegetables: Challenges and Opportunities in the Kenyan Context.” African Journal of Food, Agriculture, Nutrition and Development 7,4(2007):117.Google Scholar
Smith, F.I., and Eyzaguirre, P.. “African Leafy Vegetables: Their Role in the World Health Organization's Global Fruit and Vegetables Initiative.” African Journal of Food Agriculture Nutrition and Development 7,3(2007):117.Google Scholar
Smith, L.C., Ruel, M.T., and Ndiaye, A.. “Why Is Child Malnutrition Lower in Urban than in Rural Areas? Evidence from 36 Developing Countries.” World Development 33,8(2004):12851305.Google Scholar
Tsigbey, F.K., Brandenburg, R.L., and Clottey, V.A.. “Peanut Production Methods in Northern Ghana and Some Disease Perspectives.” Bethesda, MD: Collaborative Research Support Programs, USAID, 2003.Google Scholar
Twagirumukiza, M., De Bacquer, D., Kips, J.G., de Backer, G., Stichele, R.V., and Van Bortel, L.M.. “Current and Projected Prevalence of Arterial Hypertension in Sub-Saharan Africa by Sex, Age and Habitat: An Estimate from Population Studies.” Journal of Hypertension 29,7(2011):1243–52.Google Scholar
Udomkun, P., Wiredu, A.N., Nagle, M., Bandyopadhyaya, R., Müeller, J., and Vanlauve, B.. “Mycotoxins in Sub-Saharan Africa: Present Situation, Socio-economic Impact, Awareness, and Outlook.” Food Control 72A(February 2017):110–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
United Nations International Children's Emergency Fund (UNICEF). “At a Glance: Ghana.” Accra, Ghana: UNICEF, 2013. Internet site: http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/ghana_statistics.html (Accessed April 20, 2015).Google Scholar
Uusiku, N.P., Oelofse, A., Duodu, K.G., Bester, M.J., and Faber, M.. “Nutritional Value of Leafy Vegetables of Sub-Saharan Africa and Their Potential Contribution to Human Health: A Review.” Journal of Food Composition and Analysis 23,6(2010):499509.Google Scholar
Van de Poel, E., O'Donnell, O., and Van Doorslaer, E.. “Are Urban Children Really Healthier? Evidence from 47 Developing Dountries.” Social Science and Medicine 65 (10)(2007):19862003.Google Scholar
Wang, S., Florkowski, W.J., Sarpong, D.B., Chinna, M.S., and Resurreccion, A.V.A.. “Domestic and Imported Fruit Consumption Frequency among Urban Dwellers in Ghana.” Acta Horticulturae 1132 (2016):18.Google Scholar
Wetherbee, B.M., and Cortés, E.. “Food Consumption and Feeding Habits.” Biology of Sharks and Their Relatives. 1st ed. Carrier, J.C., Musick, J.A., and Heithaus, M.R., eds. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2004, pp. 225–46.Google Scholar
Wetzstein, M.E. Microeconomic Theory: Concepts and Connections. Mason, OH: Thomson/South-Western, 2005.Google Scholar
The World Bank. “GNI per Capita (constant 2010 US$).” Internet site: http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GNP.PCAP.KD (Accessed June 26, 2017).Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO). Global Action Plan for the Prevention and Control of Non-communicable Diseases 2013–2020. Geneva: WHO, 2013.Google Scholar
World Health Organization (WHO) and Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Fruit and Vegetables for Health: Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Workshop, 1–3 September 2004, Kobe, Japan. Geneva: WHO, 2005. Internet site: http://www.who.int/dietphysicalactivity/publications/fruit_vegetables_report.pdf (Accessed May 17, 2012).Google Scholar
Yach, D., Hawkes, C., Gould, C.L., and Hofman, K.J.. “The Global Burden of Chronic Diseases.” Journal of the American Medical Association 291,21(2004):2616–22.Google Scholar
Ziol-Guest, K.M., DeLeire, T., and Kalil, A.. “The Allocation of Food Expenditure in Married- and Single-Parent Families.” Journal of Consumer Affairs 40,2(2006):347–71.Google Scholar
Figure 0

Table 1. Regional Food Production and Food Preferences in Accra, Takoradi, and Tamale

Figure 1

Table 2. Descriptive Statistics of Variables Included in the Empirical Model

Figure 2

Table 3. Weekly Household Expenditure on Fresh Vegetables, Fresh Fruits, and Peanut Products in Three Cities in Ghana

Figure 3

Table 4. Estimation Results of Food Expenditure on Fresh Vegetables, Fresh Fruits, and Peanut Products in Urban Households of Ghana, 2011

Figure 4

Table 5. Correlation Coefficients across Equations

Figure 5

Table 6. Marginal Effects of Significant Determinants of Food Expenditure on Fresh Vegetables, Fresh Fruits, and Peanut Products in Urban Households of Ghana, 2011

Figure 6

Figure 1. Regional Variation in Fresh Vegetable Expenditure

Figure 7

Figure 2. The Absence of Regional Variation in Fresh Fruit Expenditure

Figure 8

Figure 3. Regional Variation in Peanut Product Expenditure