Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T14:34:17.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Present-state dependency in valuation of the future

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 April 2021

John R. Monterosso*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA90089. johnrmon@usc.edu

Abstract

Ainslie's target article provides a map of distinct mechanisms relevant to self-control, potentially providing needed precision to the field. He also breaks new ground in characterizing the symbiotic relationship between suppression and resolve. In this commentary, I argue that one behaviorism-based feature of his framework, present-state independence, is unjustified and unnecessary for the broader claims of the theory.

Type
Open Peer Commentary
Creative Commons
The target article and response article are works of the U.S. Government and are not subject to copyright protection in the United States.
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2021. Published by Cambridge University Press

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Babb, S. (2017). Quitting smoking among adults – United States, 2000–2015. MMWR. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 65.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, X., Kleinschmidt, H., Martin, J. A., Han, Y., Thelen, M., Meiberth, D., … Weber, B. (2017). A reduction in delay discounting by using episodic future imagination and the association with episodic memory capacity. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peters, J., & Büchel, C. (2010). Episodic future thinking reduces reward delay discounting through an enhancement of prefrontal-mediotemporal interactions. Neuron, 66(1), 138148.Google ScholarPubMed
Sayette, M. A., Loewenstein, G., Griffin, K. M., & Black, J. J. (2008). Exploring the cold-to-hot empathy gap in smokers. Psychological Science, 19(9), 926932.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2003). Affective forecasting.Google Scholar