Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T15:02:30.814Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Gender differences in treatment response to antidepressants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 January 2018

A. H. Young*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, The Royal Victoria Infirmary, Queen Victoria Road, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 4LP, UK
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Type
Columns
Copyright
Copyright © 2001 The Royal College of Psychiatrists 

Parker (Reference Parker2001) expertly reviews the evidence for efficacy and effectiveness of different classes of antidepressants. In particular, he addresses the issue of whether selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) are less efficacious in melancholia; reviews effectiveness studies; examines why there is a discordance between efficacy studies and clinical observation; and reviews the implications of differential effectiveness.

An additional important area that should be considered is that of gender differences in treatment response to antidepressants. Recent evidence has arisen to suggest that women may have a better response to SSRIs and men a better response to tricyclic antidepressants (Reference Kornstein, Schatzberg and ThaseKornstein et al, 2000). As depression is approximately twice as common in women than in men, gender differences of this nature are important and should be considered when reviewing this area. The reasons for this difference may be related to the effects of female sex hormones on serotonergic neurotransmission and in particular on the function of the 5-HT1A receptor (Reference Young, Dow and GoodwinYoung et al, 1993). The evidence for gender differences in treatment response to antidepressant is not definitive (Reference Kornstein, Schatzberg and ThaseKornstein et al, 2001; Reference Quitkin, Stewart and McGrathQuitkin et al, 2001) and further studies are needed to fully establish the validity of this notion. However, there are potentially important implications, and in the future clinical management strategies may take account of gender differences in treatment response.

Footnotes

Declaration of interest

I have received speakers' fees from pharmaceutical companies that manufacture SSRIs.

EDITED BY MATTHEW HOTOPF

References

Kornstein, S. G., Schatzberg, A. F., Thase, M. E., et al (2000) Gender differences in treatment response to sertraline versus imipramine in chronic depression. American Journal of Psychiatry, 157, 14451452.10.1176/appi.ajp.157.9.1445Google Scholar
Kornstein, S. G., Schatzberg, A. F., Thase, M. E., et al (2001) Dr Korstein and Colleagues reply (letter). American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 15321533.10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1532Google Scholar
Parker, G. (2001) ‘New’ and ‘old’ antidepressants: all equal in the eyes of the lore? British Journal of Psychiatry, 179, 9596.10.1192/bjp.179.2.95Google Scholar
Quitkin, F. M., Stewart, J. W. & McGrath, P. J. (2001) Gender differences in treatment response (letter). American Journal of Psychiatry, 158, 15311532.10.1176/appi.ajp.158.9.1531-aGoogle Scholar
Young, A. H., Dow, R. C., Goodwin, G. M., et al (1993) The effects of adrenalectomy and ovariectomy on the behavioural and hypothermic responses of rats to 8-hydroxy-2(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). Neuropharmacology, 32, 653657.10.1016/0028-3908(93)90078-HGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

eLetters

No eLetters have been published for this article.