Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-10T03:21:56.178Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Welfare and the Role of Women: The Juvenile Court Movement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 January 2009

Elizabeth J. Clapp
Elizabeth J. Clapp
Affiliation:
Elizabeth Clapp is Lecturer in History, University of Leicester, Leicester LE1 7RH, England.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Only in recent years, largely as a consequence of developments in women's history, have scholars begun to explore the role of women in the building of the welfare state. By placing gender at the centre of their vision, these historians have questioned established certainties and undercut old paradigms. Analysis of the role of women in welfare has, moreover, influenced the wider history of women, bringing to light new facets of a major organizing concept for historians of women: the interaction between public and private spheres. This paper, therefore, has two linked purposes: to review recent scholarship on women's role in welfare and, through an analysis of the juvenile court movement, one of the major social welfare reforms of the Progressive Era, to identify issues of controversy and debate among historians of women and welfare.

Type
Research Article
Information
Journal of American Studies , Volume 28 , Issue 3 , December 1994 , pp. 359 - 383
Copyright
Copyright © Cambridge University Press 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 This observation has been made by Sklar, Kathryn Kish, “Comment: A Call for Comparisons,” American Historical Review, 95 (10 1990), 1109–1114CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

2 Works from this period include: Bremner, Robert, From the Depths: The Discovery of Poverty in the United States (New York: New York University Press, 1956)Google Scholar; Davis, Allen F., Spearheads of Reform: The Social Settlements and the Progressive Movement, 1890–1914 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1967)Google Scholar.

3 These aspects of welfare history are discussed by Chambers, Clarke A., “Toward a Redefinition of Welfare History,” Journal of American History, 73 (09 1986) 407–433CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Koven, Seth and Michel, Sonya, “Womanly Duties: Maternalist Politics and the Origins of Welfare States in France, Germany, Great Britain, and the United States, 1880–1920,” American Historical Review, 95 (10 1990), 1080–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Skocpol, Theda, Protecting Soldiers and Mothers: The Political Origins of Social Policy in the United States (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard Belknap Press, 1992), 11–30Google Scholar.

4 The definition is Chambers', “Toward a Redefinition of Welfare History,” 416–417. Such an interpretation can be seen in the following works: Platt, Anthony M., The Child Savers: The Invention of Delinquency (Chicago: Chicago University Press, 1969)Google Scholar; Rothman, David J., The Discovery of the Asylum: Social Order and Disorder in the New Republic (Boston: Little Brown & Co., 1971)Google Scholar; Katz, Michael B., The Irony of Early School Reform: Educational Innovations in Mid-Nineteenth Century Massachusetts (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1968)Google Scholar; Boyer, Paul, Urban Masses and Moral Order in America, 1820–1920 (Cambridge, MA.: Harvard University Press, 1978)Google Scholar.

5 Chambers, “Toward a Redefinition of Welfare History,” 420–433.

6 Gordon, Ann D., Buhle, Mari Jo and Dye, Nancy Schrom, “The Problem of Women's History,” in Carroll, Berenice A., ed., Liberating Women's History: Theoretical and Critical Essays (Urbana and Chicago: University of Illinois Press, 1976), 75–92Google Scholar.

7 DuBois, Ellen et al. , “Politics and Culture in Women's History,” Feminist Studies, 6 (Spring 1980), 26–64CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Hewitt, Nancy A., “Beyond the Search for Sisterhood: American Women's History in the 1980s,” Social History, 10 (10 1985), 299–321CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Kerber, Linda K., “Separate Spheres, Female Worlds, Woman's Place: The Rhetoric of Women's History,” Journal of American History, 75 (06 1988), 9–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

8 Koven and Michel, “Womanly Duties,” 1081–1084.

9 See Linda Gordon, “The New Feminist Scholarship on the Welfare State,” and Nelson, Barbara J., “The Origins of the Two-Channel Welfare State: Workmen's Compensation and Mothers' Aid,” in Gordon, Linda, ed., Women, the State and Welfare (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1990), 9–35, 123–151Google Scholar.

10 Abramovitz, Mimi, Regulating the Lives of Women: Social Welfare Policy from Colonial Times to the Present (Boston: South End Press, 1988), 36–40Google Scholar; and, Wilson, Elizabeth, Women and the Welfare State (London: Tavistock Publications, 1977)Google Scholar; as quoted in Koven and Michel, “Womanly Duties,” 1083–1084.

11 Overviews of this work are given by Gordon, “The New Feminist Scholarship on the Welfare State,” 9–35; Koven and Michel, “Womanly Duties,” 1080–1084; Skocpol, , Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, 30–40Google Scholar.

12 Gordon, Linda, “Family Violence, Feminism and Social Control,” in DuBois, Ellen Carol and Ruiz, Vicki L., eds., Unequal Sisters: A Multicultural Reader in U.S. Women's History (New York: Routledge, 1990), 141–156Google Scholar; Gordon, Linda, “Single Mothers and Child Neglect, 1880–1920,” American Quarterly, 37 (Summer 1985), 173–192CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Gordon, Linda, Heroes of Their Own Lives: The Politics and History of Family Violence (London: Virago Press, 1989)Google Scholar; review by Scott, Joan W., Signs, 15 (Summer 1990), 848–852CrossRefGoogle Scholar. See also, Brenzel, Barbara, Daughters of the State: A Social Portrait of the First Reform School for Girls in North America, 1855–1905 (Cambridge, MA.: MIT Press, 1983)Google Scholar.

13 Boris, Eileen, “Restructuring the ‘Family’: Women, Progressive Reform, and the Problem of Social Control,” in Frankel, Noralee and Dye, Nancy S., eds., Gender, Class, Race and Reform in the Progressive Era (Lexington: University of Kentucky Press, 1991), 73–86Google Scholar; Ladd-Taylor, Molly, “Hull House goes to Washington: Women and the Children's Bureau,” in Frankel, and Dye, , Gender, Class, Race and Reform, 110–126Google Scholar; Lebsock, Suzanne, “Women and American Politics, 1880–1920,” in Tilly, Louise A. and Gurin, Patricia, eds., Women, Politics and Change (New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1990), 35–62Google Scholar; Muncy, Robyn, Creating a Female Dominion in American Reform, 1890–1935 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991), 93–123Google Scholar; Odem, Mary, “Single Mothers, Delinquent Daughters, and the Juvenile Court Movement in Early 20th Century Los Angeles,” Journal of Social History, 25 (Fall 1991), 27–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

14 Gordon, “The New Feminist Scholarship on the Welfare State,” 10–18; Boris, “Restructuring the Family,” 74; Koven, Seth and Michel, Sonya, “Gender and the Origins of the Welfare State,” Radical History Review, 43 (1989), 112–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

15 See for instance: Berg, Barbara, The Remembered Gate: Origins of American Feminism: The Women and the City, 1800–1860 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1978)Google Scholar; Blair, Karen, The Clubwoman as Feminist: True Womanhood Redefined, 1868–1914 (New York: Holmes & Meier Publishers Inc., 1980)Google Scholar; Platt, The Child Savers.

16 For a discussion of the vocabulary to be used to describe this kind of feminism, see: Cott, Nancy F., “What's in a Name? The Limits of ‘Social Feminism’; or Expanding the Vocabulary of Women's History,” Journal of American History, 76 (12 1989), 809–829CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

17 Welter, Barbara, “The Cult of True Womanhood, 1820–1860,” American Quarterly, 18, (Summer 1966), 150–174CrossRefGoogle Scholar. “Republican Motherhood” is defined by Kerber, Linda, Women of the Republic: Intellect and Ideology in Revolutionary America (New York: W. W. Norton, 1980)Google Scholar.

18 See for instance: Carroll Smith-Rosenberg, “Bourgeois Discourse and the Progressive Era: An Introduction,” 167–181, and “The New Woman as Androgyne: Social Disorder and Gender Discourse, 1870–1936,” 245–296, in Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll, Disorderly Conduct: Visions of Gender in Victorian America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1985)Google Scholar; Wilson, Margaret Gibbons, The American Woman in Transition: The Urban Influence, 1870–1920 (Westport: Greenwood Press, 1979), passim.Google Scholar; Scott, Anne Firor, “On Seeing and Not Seeing: A Case of Historical Invisibility,” Journal of American History, 71 (06 1984), 7–21CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

19 Smith-Rosenberg, Carroll, “The Female World of Love and Ritual: Relations between Women in Nineteenth Century America,” Signs, 1 (Autumn 1975), 1–29CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Cott, Nancy F., The Bonds of Womanhood:‘ Women's Sphere’ in New England, 1780–1835 (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Freedman, Estelle, “Separation as Strategy: Female Institution Building and American Feminism, 1870–1930,” Feminist Studies, 5, (Fall 1979), 512–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

20 Cook, Blanche Wiesen, “Female Support Networks and Political Activism: Lillian Wald, Crystal Eastman, Emma Goldman,” Chrysalis, 8 (Summer 1979), 43–61Google Scholar; Sahli, Nancy, “Smashing: Women's Relationships Before the Fall,” Chrysalis, 8 (Summer 1979), 17–27Google Scholar; Johnson, James, “The Role of Women in the Founding of the United States Children's Bureau,” in George, Carol V. R., “Remember the Ladies”: New Perspectives on Women in American History: Essays in Honor of Nelson Manfred Blake (Syracuse: Syracuse University Press, 1975)Google Scholar.

21 Rousmaniere, John P., “Cultural Hybrid in the Slums: The College Woman and the Settlement House, 1889–1894,” American Quarterly, 22 (1970), 45–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Conway, Jill, “Women Reformers and American Culture, 1870–1930,” Journal of Social History, 5 (1971–1972), 164–177CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Rothman, Sheila, Woman's Proper Place: A History of Changing Ideals and Practices, 1870 to the Present (New York: Basic Books Inc., 1978), 104–114Google Scholar; Sklar, Kathryn Kish, “Hull House in the 1890s: A Community of Women Reformers,” Signs, 10 (Summer 1985), 658–677CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Sklar, Kathryn Kish, “Who Funded Hull House?” in McCarthy, Kathleen D., ed., Lady Bountiful Revisited: Women, Philanthropy and Power (New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 1990), 94–115Google Scholar. But see also, Crocker, Ruth Hutchinson, Social Work and Social Order: The Settlement Movement in Two Industrial Cities, 1889–1930 (Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1992) who suggests that female dominion was shortlived, 216–217Google Scholar.

22 Muncy, Creating A Female Dominion; Ladd-Taylor, “Hull House goes to Washington.”

23 Skocpol, , Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, 353–354Google Scholar.

24 Ibid., 317–372.

25 This definition of maternalism appears in Michel, Sonya and Rosen, Robyn, “The Paradox of Maternalism: Elizabeth Lowell Putnam and the American Welfare State,” Gender and History, 4 (Autumn 1992), 364CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

26 Koven and Michel, “Womanly Duties,” 1076–1084; Dye, Nancy S., “Introduction,” in Frankel, and Dye, , Gender, Class, Race and Reform, 1–9Google Scholar; Gordon, Linda, “Social Insurance and Public Assistance: The Influence of Gender in Welfare Thought in the United States, 1890–1935,” American Historical Review, 97 (02 1992), 19–54CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed.

27 Baker, Paula, “The Domestication of Politics: Women and American Political Society, 1780–1920,” American Historical Review, 89 (1984), 620–647CrossRefGoogle Scholar. For similar analyses see: Gordon, “The New Feminist Scholarship on the Welfare State,” 23–24; Scott, Anne Firor, “Women's Voluntary Associations: From Charity to Reform,” in McCarthy, , ed., Lady Bountiful Revisited, 1–31Google Scholar; Lebsock, “Women and American Politics, 1880–1920,” 35–62. Baker has further elaborated on male and female political cultures in: Baker, Paula, The Moral Framework of Public Life: Gender, Politics and the State in Rural New York, 1870–1930 (New York: Oxford University Press, 1991)Google Scholar. See also Monoson, S. Sara, “The Lady and the Tiger: Women's Electoral Activism in New York City Before Suffrage,” Journal of Women's History, 2 (Fall 1990), 100–135CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

28 Muncy, Creating a Female Dominion, passim.; Fitzpatrick, Ellen, Endless Crusade: Women Social Scientists and Progressive Reform (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990)Google Scholar; Gordon, “Social Insurance and Public Assistance” 19–54; DuBois, Ellen Carol, “Harriot Stanton Blatch and the Transformation of Class Relations among Woman Suffragists,” in Frankel, and Dye, , Gender, Class, Race and Reform, 162–179Google Scholar; Sarvasy, Wendy, “Beyond the Difference versus Equality Debate: Postsuffrage Feminism, Citizenship, and the Quest for a Feminist Welfare State,” Signs, 17 (Winter 1992), 329–362CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

29 On differences between male and female reformers see: Gordon, “ Social Insurance and Public Assistance,” 19–54; Monoson, “The Lady and the Tiger,” 100–135; Flanagan, Maureen A., “Gender and Urban Political Reform: The City Club and the Woman's City Club of Chicago in the Progressive Era,” American Historical Review, 95 (10 1990), 1032–1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Baker, The Moral Framework of Public Life, passim.

30 Cameron, Ardis, “Landscapes of Subterfuge: Working-Class Neighborhoods and Immigrant Women,” in Frankel, and Dye, , Gender, Class, Race and Reform, 56–72Google Scholar; Hewitt, Nancy, Women's Activism and Social Change, Rochester, New York, 1822–1872 (Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University Press, 1984)Google Scholar; Hewitt, Nancy A., “Varieties of Voluntarism: Class, Ethnicity, and Women's Activism in Tampa,” in Tilly, and Gurin, , Women, Politics and Change, 63–86Google Scholar; Hewitt, Nancy A., “Politicizing Domesticity: Anglo, Black and Latin Women in Tampa's Progressive Movements,” in Frankel, and Dye, , Gender, Class, Race and Reform, 24–41Google Scholar. But see Skocpol, , Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, 350–354Google Scholar on cross-class coalitions.

31 Giddings, Paula, When and Where I Enter: The Impact of Black Women on Race and Sex in America (New York: William Morrow & Co., Inc., 1984), 85–95Google Scholar; Hine, Darlene Clark, “‘We Specialize in the Wholly Impossible’: The Philanthropic Work of Black Women,” in McCarthy, , ed., Lady Bountiful Revisited, 70–93Google Scholar; Gordon, Linda, “Black and White Visions of Welfare: Women's Welfare Activism, 1890–1945,” Journal of American History, 78 (09 1991), 559–590CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Shaw, Stephanie J., “Black Club Women and the Creation of the National Association of Colored Women,” Journal of Women's History, 3 (Fall 1991), 10–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Nancy A. Hewitt, “Politicizing Domesticity: Anglo, Black and Latin Women in Tampa's Progressive Movements,” 24–41.

32 Sonya Michel and Robyn Rosen, “The Paradox of Maternalism,” 364–386; Goodwin, Joanne L., “An Experiment in Paid Motherhood: The Implementation of Mothers' Pensions in early Twentieth Century Chicago,” Gender and History, 4 (Autumn 1992), 323–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

33 Lou, Herbert H., Juvenile Courts in the United States (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1927)Google Scholar; Anthony M. Platt, The Child Savers; Hawes, Joseph M., Children in Urban Society: Juvenile Delinquency in Nineteenth Century America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1971)Google Scholar; Mennel, Robert M., Thorns and Thistles: Juvenile Delinquents in the United States, 1825–1940 (Hanover, New Hampshire: University Press of New England, 1973)Google Scholar; Schlossman, Steven L., Love and the American Delinquent: The Theory and Practice of ‘Progressive’ Juvenile Justice, 1821–1920 (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1977)Google Scholar; Ryerson, Ellen, The Best Laid Plans: America's Juvenile Court Experiment (New York: Hill and Wang, 1978)Google Scholar; Rothman, David J., Conscience and Convenience: The Asylum and Its Alternatives in Progressive America (Boston: Little Brown & Co., 1980)Google Scholar.

34 Zelizer, Viviana, Pricing the Priceless Child: The Changing Social Value of Children (New York: Basic Books Inc., 1985), passim.Google Scholar; Demos, John, Past, Present and Personal: The Family and the Life Course in American History (New York: Oxford University Press, 1986), 92–113Google Scholar.

35 Shapiro, Michael Steven, Child's Garden: The Kindergarten Movement from Froebel to Dewey (University Park and London: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1983)Google Scholar; Kett, Joseph, Kites of Passage: Adolescence in America, 1790 to the Present (New York: Basic Books, Inc., 1977)Google Scholar; Rothman, , Woman's Proper Place, 97–103Google Scholar.

36 Details about the members of the Club may be found in Powers, Dorothy Edwards, “The Chicago Woman's Club” (M.A. Thesis, University of Chicago, 1939), 55–63Google Scholar.

37 Frank, Henriette Greenbaume and Jerome, Amalie Hofer, Annals of the Chicago Woman's Club for the First Fifty Years of its Organization, 1876–1916 (Chicago: Chicago Woman's Club, 1916), 15Google Scholar.

38 Ibid., 11. On “maternalism” see Koven and Michel, “Womanly Duties,” 1076–1080; Skocpol, , Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, 314–320Google Scholar.

39 Annals of the Chicago Woman's Club; Flower, Lucy L., “The Duty of the State to Dependent Children,” Proceedings of the Illinois Conference of Charities and Correction (1896), 9–16Google Scholar.

40 Flower, “The Duty of the State to Dependent Children,” 11; “To Save the Children from the Jails,” 44, Clippings 1893, folder 506, Hull House Association Papers, Special Collections, University of Illinois at Chicago (hereafter HHA Papers); Minutes, 27 Feb. 1895, box 20, volume 89, Chicago Woman's Club Papers, Manuscript Division, Chicago Historical Society (hereafter CWC Papers); Annals of the Chicago Woman's Club, 159.

41 Sklar, “Hull House in the 1890s,” 668–669; Davis, , Spearheads for Reform, xi, 38Google Scholar.

42 Sklar, “Hull House in the 1890s,” 658–677; Rothman, , Woman's Proper Place, 111–114Google Scholar; Skocpol, , Protecting Soldiers and Mothers, 434–450Google Scholar.

43 Lathrop, Julia, “Discussion,” Proceedings of the Illinois Conference of Charities, (1896), 62Google Scholar.

44 Kelley, Florence and Stevens, Alzina, “Wage Earning Children,” Hull House Maps and Papers (New York: Thomas Y. Crowell and Co., 1895), 49–76Google Scholar; Stevens, Alzina Parsons, “The Child, the Factory and the State,” The Arena, 10 (06 1894), 117–135Google Scholar.

45 Lathrop, Julia C., “The Development of the Probation System in a Large City,” Charities, 12 (01 7, 1905), 344–349Google Scholar; Hull House Bulletin, October 1896 and from December 1897; Case Studies (Restricted), supplement 1, folder 7, June 1897-August 1899, Juvenile Protective Association Papers, Special Collections, University of Illinois at Chicago (hereafter JPA Papers).

46 Case Studies (Restricted), supplement 1, folder 7, JPA Papers; Gordon, Heroes of Their Own Lives.

47 Leaflet, “To the Women and Women's Clubs of Illinois,” 15 Feb. 1896, scrapbook three, Lucy Flower and Coues Family Scrapbooks, Manuscript Division, Chicago Historical Society (hereafter Flower Scrapbooks); unattributed clipping, “To Save the Child: Women's Clubs of Chicago Tackle an Important Problem,” 10 May 1895, scrapbook three, Flower Scrapbooks.

48 Proceedings of the Illinois Conference of Charities, 1898; Chicago Bar Association Committee on Juvenile Courts, typescript dated 28 Oct. 1898, in possession of Manuscript Division, Chicago Historical Society; Hurley, Timothy D., Juvenile Courts and What They Have Accomplished (Chicago, 1904), 17–18, 69–71Google Scholar.

49 See for instance, two editorials in the New York Times, 18 Feb. 1897, 6 and 21 Feb. 1897, 14.

50 Schoff, Hannah Kent, “A Campaign for Childhood,” in Barrows, Samuel, ed., Children's Courts in the United States: Their Origins, Development and Results (Washington D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1904), 136Google Scholar.

51 Schoff, “A Campaign for Childhood,” 139.

52 Eliot, Charlotte C., “Missouri: The Change Wrought by the Juvenile Probation System in St. Louis,” in Barrows, Samuel, ed., Children's Courts in the United States, 162–163Google Scholar; “Juvenile Court Law in Sister States,” Juvenile Record, 2 (06 1901), 15Google Scholar; “Juvenile Court Laws adopted in other states,” Juvenile Record, 3 (06 1902), 11Google Scholar.

53 Letter to Crawford Hill, 21 July 1902, box 83, folder 3, Ben B. Lindsey Papers, Manuscript Division, Library of Congress (hereafter BBL Papers); letter to Mrs Sarah Platt Decker, 19 March 1906, box 7, folder 1, BBL papers; Creel, George and Lindsey, Ben B., Measuring up to Equal Suffrage (New York: National American Woman Suffrage Association, 1913), 3Google Scholar; The Problem of the Children and How the State of Colorado Cares for Them (Denver: A Report of the Juvenile Court of Denver, 1904), 137–140Google Scholar.

54 Lindsey, Ben B., “My Experience with Boys,” Ladies Home Journal, (10 1906)Google Scholar in box 260, folder 4, BBL Papers. On the question of the gender of juvenile offenders, see: Schlossman, Steven and Wallach, Stephanie, “The Crime of Precocious Sexuality: Female Juvenile Delinquency in the Progressive Era,” Harvard Educational Review, 48 (02 1978), 65–94CrossRefGoogle Scholar.

55 Lindsey, Judge Ben B. and O'Higgins, Harvey J., The Beast (New York: Doubleday, Page and Company, 1910)Google Scholar; manuscript letter, unaddressed, box 84, folder 5, BBL Papers; letter to G. Stanley Hall, 20 Sept. 1904, box 2, folder 6, BBL Papers.

56 Letter to Mrs Izetta George, 1 April 1902, box 82, folder 4, BBL Papers; letter from Mrs Izetta George, 2 April 1902, folder 4, box 82, BBL Papers.

57 Case Studies (Restricted), supplement 1, folder 7, JPA Papers; Odem, “Single Mothers, Delinquent Daughters, and the Juvenile Court in Early 20th Century Los Angeles”; Gordon, Heroes of Their Own Lives.