We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This chapter uses the case of CAV standards to explore how this “disruptive innovation” may alter the boundaries of international trade agreements. Amid the transition to a driverless future, the transformative nature of disruptive innovation renders the interpretation and application of trade rules challenging. The chapter focuses on two issues – the goods/services boundaries, and the public/private sector boundaries. Considering the data-driven business models and the integrated technical features, CAV-related safety standards may disrupt the scope of coverage of the TBT Agreement. As CAVs evolve from level 0 to level 5, how should CAV standards be reclassified? In addition, for levels 1–4, in which humans and CAVs are co-drivers, the industry-led voluntary standards provide a baseline for judges in the evaluation of appropriate levels and evidence of CAV safety prior to deployment, which may become a strong incentive for CAV manufacturers to comply with “guidance,” “best practice,” or “codes of conduct.” To what extent should a WTO tribunal assume the responsibility of members with regard to CAV safety standards prepared and published by a private entity? The development of disruptive innovation involves changes in governance frameworks and calls for new governance approaches that break the boundaries of existing trade disciplines.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.