An immunogold ultrastructural study was made of Cryptosporidium parvum-infected intestinal cells from SCID mice to locate parasite antigens recognized by monoclonal antibodies raised against sporozoite or oocyst wall antigens. The results suggested that these antigens were present in more than one life-cycle stage and demonstrated that the intracellular parasite modified the parasitophorous vacuole membrane and villous membrane surrounding the parasite. In an immuno-fluorescence antibody test monoclonal antibody (MAb) IB5 reacted with the oocyst wall, MAb 2C3 with the whole sporozoite and MAb 2B2 with the sporozoite surface. Western and dot-blot studies demonstrated that different carbohydrate epitopes were recognized by the respective sporozoite-reactive antibodies. In the ultrastructural examination MAb 1B5 reacted with macro- and microgametocytes as well as the oocyst wall. In the macrogametocyte MAb 1B5 recognized the large electron-dense bodies characteristic of this stage and, in some parasites, the parasitophorous vacuole and the parasite pellicle. The sporozoite-reactive MAbs were able to bind to all developmental stages. These antibodies recognized the parasite cytoplasm and, additionally, MAb 2B2 produced substantial labelling of the parasite membrane. Significantly, both these antibodies also detected antigen in the parasitophorous vacuole membrane and, to a lesser extent, the villous membrane surrounding the parasite.

The physiological and morphological properties of color-opponent bipolar cells in the carp retina were studied. Fifty nine OFF-center bipolar cells and 63 ON-center bipolar cells out of about 500 total bipolar cells recorded showed color-opponent responses. The OFF-center color-opponent bipolar cells were classified into three subgroups according to their spectral and spatial responses. Fifty OFF-center color-opponent cells responded with depolarization to a blue light spot and with hyperpolarization to a red spot in the receptive-field center. The polarity of the surround response was opposite to that of center response at each wavelength. Therefore these cells were classified as OFF double-opponent cells (OFF-DO). Eight cells responded with hyperpolarization to a blue and green spot and with depolarization to a red spot. The surround responses of those cells were depolarizing at any wavelength (R+G− cell). One responded with hyperpolarization to a blue and red spot and with depolarization to a green spot. The surround response showed a different spectral characteristic from that of the center response. It responded with depolarization to a blue and green annulus and with hyperpolarization to a red annulus (R−G+B− cell). The ON-center color-opponent bipolar cells were similarly classified into three subgroups. Sixty of ON-center color-opponent cells were the double color-opponent type (ON-DO cell), showing the responses of opposite polarity to the OFF-DO cells. Two cells were classified as R−G+ cell, and one cell as R+G−B+ cell. Both OFF- and ON-DO cells were identified by their morphology as Cajal's giant bipolar cells, and R+G−, R−G+, R−G+B−, and R+G−B+ cells as Cajal's small bipolar cells. The analysis of the latency and the ionic mechanisms of their responses suggest that DO cells under light-adapted conditions receive direct inputs from long-wavelength (red) cones, RG cells from middle-wavelength (green) cones, and RGB cells from short-wavelength (blue) cones. Possible mechanisms of the opponent inputs to these bipolar cells are discussed.