Glycosomes are specialized peroxisomes found in all kinetoplastid organisms. The organelles are unique in harbouring most enzymes of the glycolytic pathway. Matrix proteins, synthesized in the cytosol, cofactors and metabolites have to be transported across the membrane. Recent research on Trypanosoma brucei has provided insight into how these translocations across the membrane occur, although many details remain to be elucidated. Proteins are imported by a cascade of reactions performed by specialized proteins, called peroxins, in which a cytosolic receptor with bound matrix protein inserts itself in the membrane to deliver its cargo into the organelle and is subsequently retrieved from the glycosome to perform further rounds of import. Bulky solutes, such as cofactors and acyl-CoAs, seem to be translocated by specific transporter molecules, whereas smaller solutes such as glycolytic intermediates probably cross the membrane through pore-forming channels. The presence of such channels is in apparent contradiction with previous results that suggested a low permeability of the glycosomal membrane. We propose 3 possible, not mutually exclusive, solutions for this paradox. Glycosomal glycolytic enzymes have been validated as drug targets against trypanosomatid-borne diseases. We discuss the possible implications of the new data for the design of drugs to be delivered into glycosomes.

The enzymes and receptors in parasites that can be qualified as targets for antiparasite chemotherapy should perform essential functions in the parasites and demonstrate some feasibility for selective inhibition. They can be tentatively identified through detailed analysis of various aspects of metabolisms in the parasites or elucidation of the mechanisms of action among proven antiparasitic agents. Preliminary verifications of these putative targets can be indicated by in vitro antiparasite activity of an inhibitor of the target. However, before a major long-term effort to pursue in-depth structure-activity analysis of the target is to be committed for specific inhibitor design, further validations of the target are essential to insure that future studies are not misguided. One old-fashioned approach to validate a target in the pharmaceutical industry is by correlating target inhibitions with antiparasitic activities among large numbers of drug derivatives. The results are often indicative but hardly ever conclusive. Another method is by comparing the putative drug targets between the drug-sensitive and the drug-resistant parasites for potential discrepancies. Unfortunately, the latter often result from indirect causes, such as reduced drug transport, instead of an alteration of the drug target itself. The third experimental approach is by disrupting the gene encoding the putative target in parasite, which can provide the most conclusive evidence on whether the target plays an indispensible role in the parasite. But special conditions are needed for the gene knockout mutants to survive to exhibit their phenotypes and to allow genetic complementation studies for further verifications. Furthermore, gene knockout experiments are often difficult to perform on cells of multiple ploidy or genes of multiple copies, and are currently applicable only to a limited number of protozoan parasites. In the current article I have tried to take a cursory look at some eleven putative drug targets among various parasites, each supported by well-established antiparasitic agents identified as its inhibitors. I have also considered the evidence for validity of each of them and the potential means of further verifying their validity.