We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The study of foreign relations law has been largely devoted to the study of domestic laws as they affect foreign policy, a welcome complement to the traditional emphasis on international law. There has been less interest, however, in the legal dimensions of formulating foreign policy, a particular form of statecraft that is reducible to neither the constraints of domestic law, nor those of international law but that remains, in its own specific way, legally informed. In articulating and extolling the value of that dimension, Guy de la Charrière, a long time legal advisor to the French foreign ministry who ended his career on the bench of the ICJ, contributed to our understanding of "foreign relations law" long before "foreign relations law" became fashionable. He did so in a way that emphasized the significance of strategic legal considerations in the formulation of foreign policy; what he called "la politique juridique extérieure des Etats" (the legal foreign policy of states). These considerations are not so much legal constraints as lawyers would have them, but factors that highly determine, over time, the orientation and purpose of states' policies and commitment to international law. Uncovering such early and non-Anglophone voices in the effort to formulate the conceptual framework of foreign relations law can help further problematize the very notion.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.