We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The third chapter provides an account of the Argentine Iguazú National Park’s first forty years. Initially conceived as an instrument to foster border colonization, the park included urban settlements inside its protected area, which set Argentine national parks apart internationally. Park directors attracted settlers from other regions of Argentina with promises of cheap lots and jobs in infrastructure projects and sought to transform them into a model border population. Throughout the years, life scientists at the Argentine national park agency criticized this policy of settlements inside national parks. At the same time, members of international bodies such as the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN) proposed a redefinition of the idea of national park, one which excluded the presence of humans. This debate ultimately informed changes in conservation policy in Argentina in the 1960s and 1970s. Scientists and park officials began advocating abroad for a more restrictive definition to influence policymakers at home. By the 1970s, the conservationists in the agency prevailed, adopting the international discourse of strict nature conservation, retracing park boundaries, and evicting settlers.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.