We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Chapter 8 contains an in-depth case study of the opioid mass tort litigation in federal and state courts. It describes the inception and development of the opioid drug crisis and how the opioid crisis affected state and local municipalities, in requiring additional expenditures of money to provide medical, policing, and various social services to communities affected by the crisis. The chapter describes the initiation of opiod litigation, the hundreds of lawsuit, consolidation and transfer of all the opioid litigation into a federal MDL under Judge Dan Polsters supervision in the Northern District of Ohio. The chapter chronicles the management and litigation in the federal MDL proceedings and Judge Polsters approval of a public nuisance claim which actually went to trial. The chapter narrates the resulting, cascading opioid settlements with opioid manufacturers, distributors, and pharmacies concurrent with and after the MDL bellwether public nuisance trial. The chapter further chronicles the fate of opioid public nuisance in state courts, with a notable rejection of a public nuisance claim by the Oklahoma Supreme Court. The chapter ends by documenting the many state court opioid settlements during 2021-2022.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.