We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Early childhood obesity (ECO) significantly increased in the United States. ECO interventions lack focus on the prevention of ECO for infants under two. Caregiver’s feeding styles (CFS) has shown to affect ECO development, but studies on CFS are limited. This study examined socioecological factors associated with CFS for infants under two in Nevada.
Design:
This cross-sectional study utilizing a survey, examined the five CFS-constructs: Responsive (RP), Non-Responsive (NRP) laissez-faire, NRP-pressuring, NRP-restrictive, and NRP-indulgent. Descriptive analysis and logistic regression following a hierarchical modeling approach were used to determine the associations between the CFS-constructs and socioecological factors (e.g., household, maternal mental health, and infant feeding).
Setting:
Clark County, Nevada.
Participants:
304 caregivers with infants under two.
Results:
NRP feeding styles were associated with low-income households (e.g., NRP-restrictive (AOR=2.60, 95% CI [1.01-6.71])), water insecurity (e.g., NRP-pressuring (AOR=2.46, 95% CI [1.00-6.06]), young mothers (e.g., NRP-laissez-faire (AOR=2.39, 95% CI [1.00-5.84])), lower maternal education (e.g., RP (AOR=0.58, 95% CI [0.33-1.00])), mild risk for depression (e.g., NRP-restrictive (AOR=0.50, 95% CI [0.28-0.90])) and a moderate to severe risk for anxiety (e.g., NRP-pressuring (AOR=0.32, 95% CI [0.14-0.74])). There were no associations between infant feeding factors and RP feeding.
Conclusion:
Our study identified socioecological factors associated with dissimilarities in CFS in Nevada. These findings can be used to tailor educational approaches to address disparities in early childhood obesity.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.