Large field motion detection in goldfish, measured in the optomotor response, is based on the L-cone type, and is therefore color-blind (Schaerer & Neumeyer, 1996). In experiments using a two-choice training procedure, we investigated now whether the same holds for the detection of a small moving object (size: 8 mm diameter; velocity: 7 cm/s). In initial experiments, we found that goldfish did not discriminate between a moving and a stationary stimulus, obviously not taking attention to the cue “moving.” Therefore, random dot patterns were used in which the stimulus was visible only when moving. Using black and white random dot patterns with variable contrast between 0.2 and 1, we found that the fish could see motion only with high (0.8) contrast. In the decisive experiment, a red-green random dot pattern was used. By keeping the intensity of the red dots constant and reducing the intensity of the green dots, a narrow intensity range was found in which goldfish could no longer discriminate between the moving random dot stimulus in random dot surround and the stationary random dot pattern. The same was the case when a red moving disk was presented in green surround. This is the evidence that object motion is red-green color blind, i.e., color information cannot be used to detect the moving object. Calculations of the cone excitation values revealed that the M-cone type is decisive, as this cone type (and not the L-cone type) is not modulated by that particular red-green pattern in which the moving stimulus was invisible.

Goldfish (Carassius auratus) were trained to discriminate triangles and squares using a two choice procedure. In the first experiment, three goldfish were trained with food reward on a black outline triangle on a white background, while a black outline square was shown for comparison. In transfer tests, a Kanizsa triangle and a Kanizsa square were presented, perceived by humans as an illusory triangle- or square-shaped surface of slightly higher brightness than the background. The choice behavior in this situation indicates that goldfish are able to discriminate between both figures in almost the same way as in the training situation. In control experiments goldfish did not discriminate between shapes in which humans do not perceive the illusion. A series of generalization experiments was performed indicating the similarity between the tested shapes and the training triangle. From all these findings we conclude that goldfish are able to perceive an illusory triangle or square within the Kanizsa figures. In a second experiment, four goldfish were trained on a white outline triangle versus a white outline square, both on black background with white diagonal lines. In transfer tests in which the shapes were replaced by gaps within the white diagonal lines, goldfish were clearly able to discriminate between the two patterns based on the illusory contours. This was not the case in tranfer tests with phase shifted abutting lines.