We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Exposure therapy is a widely recognized and effective treatment for OCD, but it may not work as effectively for EDs. Some of the reasons for poor delivery or treatment manual avoidance are known broadly, but hesitancy can be higher for ED clinicians specifically. EDs have a high mortality and self-harm rate and significant physiological comorbidities, making clinicians more hesitant to utilize certain interventions. Complexities such as starvation effects, the ego-syntonic presentation, and low motivation can compromise exposure therapy. There may be need for reassurance, safety behaviors, and distraction when the primary treatment goal is weight gain. Additionally, there are emotions outside of anxiety that are not effectively treated with exposure (i.e., guilt, disgust, anger). Uniquely, the fears and concerns associated with EDs are also present in the general population. Preoccupation with health, size, and weight is prevalent in society, which affects beliefs about the body and food. This may lead to clinicians overempathizing with patients and can affect the way they facilitate and process food and weight exposures during treatment, all complicating exposure therapy for EDs.
The treatment of underweight and malnourished individuals with eating disorders (EDs) and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) poses unique challenges and considerations. Low weight and malnourishment have implications on symptom presentation, treatment course, and outcomes. Clinicians should consider the impact of malnourishment on organ systems, the importance of medical care in treatment, and dietary considerations for weight restoration. Restrictive eating disorders such as AN and atypical AN can lead to similar psychological effects of malnourishment even if not underweight. Current ED treatment programs consider all patients as having malnutrition effects due to their illness, regardless of BMI. Atypical AN often goes unnoticed, leading to reinforcement of disordered eating behavior. Chronic malnutrition and starvation can affect almost every major organ system and result in permanent damage or death if not addressed. Additionally, underweight or malnourished patients often have a lot of dietary needs and need a lot of calories for restoration, which can be complicated by OCD symptoms such as obsessionality and intolerance of uncertainty.
To explore explicit beliefs about the controllability of obesity and the internalisation of negative weight-related stereotypes among public health trainees.
Design:
Cross-sectional online survey assessing explicit beliefs about the controllability of obesity using the Beliefs About Obese Persons Scale (BAOP) and internalisation of weight bias using the Modified Weight Bias Internalization Scale (WBIS-M). Bivariate associations between BAOP and WBIS-M scores and demographic characteristics were examined using t tests or ANOVA with post hoc Tukey’s tests.
Setting:
School of Public Health at a large, Midwestern University.
Participants:
Public health students (n 322).
Results:
Relative to students who identified as male, those who identified as female had a stronger belief that obesity is not within the control of the individual (P = 0·03), yet had more internalisation of weight bias (P < 0·01). Greater weight bias internalisation was also seen among students who perceived themselves to be of a higher weight status (P < 0·001) and those who were at risk for food insecurity (P < 0·01).
Conclusions:
Public health trainees may be more attuned to the complexities of weight relative to trainees in other health-related fields, but are still susceptible to internalisation of negative weight-related stereotypes.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.