We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
This paper presents a robust adaptive controller based on the backstepping technique using an extended state observer (ESO), implemented on a 2PUS+RR parallel robot, to minimize the trajectory tracking error. The proposed backstepping-ESO controller scheme is designed to compensate for the robot’s structured (parametric) and unstructured (nonlinear friction, external disturbances, and dynamics) uncertainties. The overall stability of the controller is guaranteed by the Lyapunov theory. Cosimulation in MATLAB-Simulink and ADAMS View is presented to validate the results of the ESO and backstepping controller implemented in the virtual and physical prototype. For the virtual prototype, it was determined that the system is stable in 2 s and presents a maximum absolute error of 3.5 × $10^{-6}$ m for the actuator position and 2.8 × $10^{-5}$ rad for mobile platform orientation. Regarding the physical robot, a maximum absolute error of 5 × $10^{-4}$ m for the actuator position and 0.0575 rad for the orientation of the robot mobile platform values do not represent a problem for ankle rehabilitation movements. Experimental results were also presented and compared with ankle motion to demonstrate that the applied control system meets the motion requirements of the ankle rehabilitator.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.