We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
It is trite law that international arbitration is subject to control. When two parties agree to arbitrate a dispute, the resulting arbitral award will be recognized as producing legal effects only if it fulfills the conditions set forth in the applicable arbitration framework. This is due to the dual foundation of arbitration in party autonomy on the one hand and the applicable arbitration framework on the other.1 If one turns to the question of who is tasked to exercise this control, the answer is not straightforward. At first glance, it appears as if national courts are the sole guardians to watch over arbitral awards. This view reflects a public–private divide between arbitral tribunals who as private actors render an arbitral award, which is then subject to control by a national court as a public actor.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.