We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Due to the accelerating global epidemic of trauma, efficient and sustainable models of trauma care that fit low-resource settings must be developed. In most low-income countries, the burden of surgical trauma is managed by non-doctors at local district hospitals.
Objective:
This study examined whether it is possible to establish primary trauma surgical services of acceptable quality at rural district hospitals by systematically training local, non-graduate, care providers.
Methods:
Seven district hospitals in the most landmine-infested provinces of Northwestern Cambodia were selected for the study. The hospitals were referral points in an established prehospital trauma system. During a four-year training period, 21 surgical care providers underwent five courses (150 hours total) focusing on surgical skills training. In-hospital trauma deaths and postoperative infections were used as quality-of care indicators. Outcome indicators during the training period were compared against pre-intervention data.
Results:
Both the control and treatment populations had long prehospital transport times (three hours) and were severely injured (median Injury Severity Scale Score = 9). The in-hospital trauma fatality rate was low in both populations and not significantly affected by the intervention. The level of post-operative infections was reduced from 22% to 10.3% during the intervention (95% confidence interval for difference 2.8–20.2%). The trainees' selfrating of skills (Visual Analogue Scale) before and after the training indicated a significantly better coping capacity.
Conclusions:
Where the rural hospital is an integral part of a prehospital trauma system, systematic training of non-doctors improves the quality of trauma surgery. Initial efforts to improve trauma management in low-income countries should focus on the district hospital.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.