Hemispherectomy (HE) is a surgical intervention to treat intractable epilepsy. It involves disconnecting or removing the right or left cerebral hemisphere, depending on the location of the pathological substrate or epileptogenic activity. HE impacts neural functions related to social cognition (Fournier et al., 2008). This study investigates the effects of childhood HE on social deception and sarcasm using the Thames Awareness of Social Inferences Task (TASIT; McDonald, Flanagan, & Rollins, 2010) to explore emotion identification and social inference appraisal as adults.

Fifteen adults with hemispherectomy and 16 neurotypical controls completed the TASIT. All HE patients underwent hemispherectomy (right-HE = 10) during childhood (age of surgery = 3 months to 16 years) and had FSIQ > 70 at the time of study. HE and control groups were matched for age (HE M = 25.7, SD = 5.4; control M = 27.1, SD = 10.7) and education (HE M = 14.0, SD = 1.88; control M = 13.3, SD = 1.8). FSIQ was significantly lower in the HE group than control group (HE M= 90.8, SD = 9.4; control (M = 100.4, SD = 7.1). TASIT uses videotaped vignettes to assess aspects of social perception: emotion recognition (Part 1), social inference regarding sincerity, simple sarcasm, and paradoxical sarcasm (Part 2) and social inference regarding sincerity of speech (lie vs sarcasm) in the presence of additional text or visual cues (Part 3).

For Part 1, MANCOVA (covarying FSIQ) found no group difference in emotion identification. Analysis of data from Part 2 was conducted using repeated measures ANCOVA accounting for 2 groups x 3 conditions (sincere, simple sarcasm, and paradoxical sarcasm) and revealed only a significant overall group effect, F (1, 28) = 5.72, p = .024, np2 = .170. Likewise, analysis of Part 3 using repeated measures ANCOVA accounting for 2 groups x 2 cue types (visual, text) and 2 actor intentions (lie, sarcasm) revealed only a significant overall group effect, F (1,28) = 11.35, p = .002, np2 = .288, with no interaction of group by condition.

HE patients exhibited no difficulty identifying basic emotional expressions. Performance was significantly impaired when additional social information was added to the context (i.e., detecting sarcasm or deception). HE patients begin to struggle with the complexity of new social information or how it changes the meaning of a conversation. Even simple sarcastic exchanges are difficult to interpret. When a visual or textual cue was introduced to reveal the true state of affairs, HE patients could not could integrate the information into their interpretations of the scenario. There are unique contributions of the left and right hemispheres to cognitive processes for complex social behavior, and absence of an entire hemisphere results in deficits in social language comprehension. Future research should investigate performance differences in left vs. right HE patients.

The purpose of this investigation was to examine neuropsychological functioning after frontal (FL) or temporal lobectomy (ATL) in patients with localization related epilepsy. Few studies have compared cognitive changes following FL and ATL. Past research found improvement on measures of verbal and visual memory along with confrontation naming after FL (Busch et al., 2017). In contrast, a number of studies have reported verbal memory and naming decline in those undergoing left ATL. The current study examined post-operative cognitive changes in epilepsy patients who underwent either a left or right FL or ATL.

Subjects include 430 patients (204 men, 225 women, 1 gender not specified), who underwent surgical resection; Right FL = 25, Left FL = 26, Right ATL = 211, Left ATL = 168. Patients had a mean FSIQ = 90, ages ranging from 18 to 71 (mean age = 37 years), right (n=359), left (n=50), or mixed (n=18) handedness, and education ranging from 3 to 22 years (mean = 12.9 years of education). Change from pre- to post FL and ATL was examined in the following domains: learning and memory [Long Term Storage for Selective Reminding Tests (SRT), Wechsler’s Memory Scale (WMS): Logical Memory Delayed Recall (LM) and Visual Reproduction Delayed Recall (VR)], and language [Boston Naming Test (BNT)].

A one-way ANOVA was used to examine changes in language and memory. Our findings revealed statistically significant differences between resection groups for LM, SRT, and BNT. There were significant declines (p<.001) for left ATL when compared to right ATL for LM, SRT, and BNT. There were significant declines for left ATL, when compared to the gains in both left (p<.001; p=.002) and right (p=.018; p=.008) FL for LM and BNT. Left ATL also had significant declines when compared to gains in SRT (p<.001) for right FL. There were significant declines for left FL when compared to right ATL for SRT (p=.007). Lastly, there were significant gains for right FL when compared to left FL for SRT (p=.020).

The pre- to post-surgical neuropsychological change in learning, memory, and language is understudied in frontal lobe epilepsy (FLE); although several investigators reported some learning and memory impairments in FLE at either pre- or post-surgical time points (Johnson-Markve et al., 2011; Incisa Della Rocchetta et al., 1993). The current study suggests that resections of the frontal lobes are associated with better outcomes for naming and verbal memory (LM) when compared to left ATLs. Interestingly, verbal list learning declined more in left than right FL and right ATL patients suggesting a possible language based executive functioning component to this memory measure. As expected, our study further supports that left ATLs are associated with material specific memory declines. This pattern was not seen for those undergoing a right ATL (i.e., nonverbal memory did not decline in patients with right ATL).