We show that the set of natural numbers has an exponential diophantine definition in the rationals. It follows that the corresponding decision problem is undecidable.

Let $a,b,c$ be a primitive Pythagorean triple and set $a=m^{2}-n^{2},b=2mn,c=m^{2}+n^{2}$ , where $m$ and $n$ are positive integers with $m>n$ , $\text{gcd}(m,n)=1$ and $m\not \equiv n~(\text{mod}~2)$ . In 1956, Jeśmanowicz conjectured that the only positive integer solution to the Diophantine equation $(m^{2}-n^{2})^{x}+(2mn)^{y}=(m^{2}+n^{2})^{z}$ is $(x,y,z)=(2,2,2)$ . We use biquadratic character theory to investigate the case with $(m,n)\equiv (2,3)~(\text{mod}~4)$ . We show that Jeśmanowicz’ conjecture is true in this case if $m+n\not \equiv 1~(\text{mod}~16)$ or $y>1$ . Finally, using these results together with Laurent’s refinement of Baker’s theorem, we show that Jeśmanowicz’ conjecture is true if $(m,n)\equiv (2,3)~(\text{mod}~4)$ and $n<100$ .

Let $a$ and $m$ be relatively prime positive integers with $a>1$ and $m>2$. Let ${\it\phi}(m)$ be Euler’s totient function. The quotient $E_{m}(a)=(a^{{\it\phi}(m)}-1)/m$ is called the Euler quotient of $m$ with base $a$. By Euler’s theorem, $E_{m}(a)$ is an integer. In this paper, we consider the Diophantine equation $E_{m}(a)=x^{l}$ in integers $x>1,l>1$. We conjecture that this equation has exactly five solutions $(a,m,x,l)$ except for $(l,m)=(2,3),(2,6)$, and show that if the equation has solutions, then $m=p^{s}$ or $m=2p^{s}$ with $p$ an odd prime and $s\geq 1$.

Let $a$, $b$, and $c$ be primitive Pythagorean numbers such that ${{a}^{2}}\,+\,{{b}^{2}}\,=\,{{c}^{2}}$ with $b$ even. In this paper, we show that if ${{b}_{0}}\,\equiv \,\in \,\,\,\left( \bmod \,a \right)$ with $\text{ }\!\!\varepsilon\!\!\text{ }\,\in \,\left\{ \pm 1 \right\}$ for certain positive divisors ${{b}_{0}}$ of $b$, then the Diophantine equation ${{a}^{x}}\,+\,{{b}^{y}}\,=\,{{c}^{z}}$ has only the positive solution $\left( x,\,y,\,z \right)\,=\,\left( 2,\,2,\,2 \right)$.

Let (a,b,c) be a primitive Pythagorean triple such that b is even. In 1956, Jeśmanowicz conjectured that the equation ax+by=cz has the unique solution (x,y,z)=(2,2,2) in the positive integers. This is one of the most famous unsolved problems on Pythagorean triples. In this paper we propose a similar problem (which we call the shuffle variant of Jeśmanowicz’ problem). Our problem states that the equation cx+by=az with x,y and z positive integers has the unique solution (x,y,z)=(1,1,2) if c=b+1 and has no solutions if c>b+1 . We prove that the shuffle variant of the Jeśmanowicz problem is true if c≡1 mod b.

Let a,b,c be relatively prime positive integers such that a2+b2=c2 with b even. In 1956 Jeśmanowicz conjectured that the equation ax+by=cz has no solution other than (x,y,z)=(2,2,2) in positive integers. Most of the known results of this conjecture were proved under the assumption that 4 exactly divides b. The main results of this paper include the case where 8 divides b. One of our results treats the case where a has no prime factor congruent to 1 modulo 4, which can be regarded as a relevant analogue of results due to Deng and Cohen concerning the prime factors of b. Furthermore, we examine parities of the three variables x,y,z, and give new triples a,b,c such that the conjecture holds for the case where b is divisible by 8. In particular, to prove our results, we shall show an important result which asserts that if x,y,z are all even, then x/2,y/2,z/2 are all odd. Our methods are based on elementary congruence and several strong results on generalized Fermat equations given by Darmon and Merel.

We present some applications of the Subspace Theorem to the investigation of the arithmetic of the values of Laurent series f(z) at S-unit points. For instance we prove that if f(qn) is an algebraic integer for infinitely many n, then h(f(qn)) must grow faster than n. By similar principles, we also prove diophantine results about power sums and transcendency results for lacunary series; these include as very special cases classical theorems of Mahler. Our arguments often appear to be independent of previous techniques in the context.

We will give explicit bounds for the number of solutions of polynomial-exponential equations. In contrast to earlier work, the bounds are independent of the coefficients of the equations, and they are of only single exponential growth in the number of coefficients.