We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The concluding chapter draws together the empirical threads identified in the preceding chapters and considers their theoretical and political implications. At one level, the aims of the book have been simple and straightforward: to examine in what ways women’s experiences of transition to first-time motherhood have changed since the original study was conducted 21 years earlier. But the unfolding accounts of transition have been anything but simple or straightforward in what they signal about women’s lives, societal expectations and contemporary motherhood. This returns us to a question posed in the opening chapter of this book, ‘has it ever been a more challenging time to be a woman who is also a mother?’ This was asked for several reasons, including a notable policy gap between discursive tropes of ‘balancing’ work and family life and everyday working and childcare conditions in the UK. But it was also posed in relation to older first-time motherhood, the effects of digitalisation on transition/motherhood experiences and how selves and gendered agency are narrated. Just over a decade ago, in her controversial article, Anne Marie Slaughter concluded that ‘women still can’t have it all’. My question is: why are we still doing it all?
This is a love story but not as you know it. Should an academic study be framed in this way? Love seems an unlikely bedfellow for critical thinking. Watching an Emma Rice production and being in her rehearsal room you feel the love: a warm and generous welcoming in; a joyful celebration of the theatrical exchange. What produces this pleasurable affect and how might we consider its political potential? This Element positions Emma's theatre-making, a body of work spanning three decades, as feminist acts of love. Drawing on fieldwork research her practice is viewed through the critical lenses of feminisms and affect to consider its contextual tensions, its ethics of affirmation, staging of femininities and contribution to queer worldmaking. Mapping her work from this perspective brings to light her important contribution to UK feminist theatre; its love activism offering an emergent strategy for change.
This chapter is concerned with the plays and tableaux vivants authored, and performed, by women at the turn of the twentieth century. Irish myth was identified as a source for the creation of a national theatre, and the cultural bedrock for an independent nation, but it was also a source for women’s activism and theatrical work. Through comparison of nationalist feminist performances: the tableaux vivants performed by the Inghinidhe na hÉireann in 1901; Maud Gonne’s performance in Kathleen ni Houlihan in 1902; and Gonne’s play Dawn (published 1904), with the pacifist feminism of Eva Gore-Booth’s play The Triumph of Maeve (published 1905), we can see how women’s diverse approaches to mythmaking and theatrical form provide a revealing study in the challenges that feminist politics faced in Ireland in the early twentieth century. Intervening in and exploiting the contradictions and tensions which animated this period of political ferment allowed these women to utilize myth to facilitate their self-authorship and to assert the creativity of female bodies; a revolutionary action which engaged with the rise of the woman-nation figure and countered disembodied icons of femininity.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.