Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

2 results

  • 9 - Conclusion

  • John S. Dryzek, University of Canberra, Ana Tanasoca, Macquarie University, Sydney
  • Book:
    Democratizing Global Justice
    Published online:
    21 May 2021
    Print publication:
    10 June 2021, pp 221-225

  • Summary

    Global justice must be deliberated rather than just analysed, asserted, and advocated. The concluding chapter recapitulates the main arguments of the book, then reflects critically on the feasibility of democratizing global justice, especially when it comes to the practical proposals for institutional design developed in earlier chapters. An important shift toward more inclusive global governance processes has occurred in recent years and this may pave the way for a more defensible global order. This shift is in contrast to the democratic retreats that have occurred in many national governments. Global governance processes, while still far from deliberative and democratic ideals, have become more inclusive and participatory over time, as we have seen in the case of the Sustainable Development Goals. Promoting global deliberative democracy would be the natural next step. The pursuit of global justice requires deliberative global democratization.

  • 10 - Global information and computer ethics

  • Edited by Luciano Floridi, University of Hertfordshire
  • Book:
    The Cambridge Handbook of Information and Computer Ethics
    Published online:
    05 June 2012
    Print publication:
    15 April 2010, pp 163-180

  • Summary

    This chapter discusses three issues distinctively evoked by globally diffused Information and Communication Technologies (ICT): (i) the digital divide, (ii) online global citizenship and (iii) global deliberation and democratization. It explores ethical pluralism as a primary framework within which we may take up a global range of diverse ethical frameworks and decision-making traditions used to analyse and reflect upon characteristic issues of Information and Computing Ethics (ICE). In the course of the analysis the chapter uses the core issue of privacy as primary example. ICTs are a primary driver of globalization as they make possible trade, financial transactions and the relocation of labour into lower-cost labour markets. Ethical pluralism provides us with a way of understanding how a single norm may via the reflection and application of judgement apply in very different contexts in very different ways, with regard to notions of privacy in diverse Western cultures.