Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Search

Refine search

Refine search

Access:
Content type:
Publication date:
Apply   From and To filters
Subject: Show more
Journals Show more
Publishers: Show more
Societies Show more
Series: Show more
Collections: Show more

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

1 results

  • 3 - The Science of Language in Republican China

  • Gina Anne Tam, Trinity University, Texas
  • Book:
    Dialect and Nationalism in China, 1860–1960
    Published online:
    28 February 2020
    Print publication:
    05 March 2020, pp 111-146

  • Summary

    Moving from politics in the early Republic to the academy, Chapter 3 argues that the emergence of the intertwined fields of folksong studies, dialectology, and ethnography after the 1919 May Fourth movement each suggested a distinct role for fangyan in China’s national invention - of, respectively, a medium to express authentic emotion, of subsidiaries to the national language, and as representative of a Han ethnicity. Folksong collectors sought to immortalize the oral culture of China’s countryside, thereby designating fangyan the nation’s culture authentically rendered. Linguists inspired by Western comparative linguistics sought to organize China’s languages into hierarchical taxonomies. Ethnographers juxtaposed fangyan surveys with research on Chinese ethnic minorities, in order to draw strict boundaries between the Han and China’s other ethnic groups. Together, these three disciplines set the terms for debate over the cultural and social roles of fangyan in policy, education, and art.