We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
The central argument of this chapter is that the poetry produced from 1965 to 1995 becomes legible as forming an Asian American poetics only about a decade after the period’s closing date. The chapter focuses on identifying and unpacking two foundational interpretive frameworks characterizing recent discussions of Asian American poetry. The first theorizes a crucial temporal discontinuity within the timeline of that poetry, beginning in the early 1980s with the publication of Theresa Hak Kyung Cha’s Dictee (1982). The second theorizes how contemporary Asian American poetics deploys this central discontinuity as a strategic necessity that allows a more flexible consideration of how Asian American poetry develops in parallel with the broader goals of the Asian American political movement, grounded in the late 1960s. Utilizing these two foundational frameworks, critical formulations of an Asian American poetics enact a subtle but significant transition away from discussions of the politics of race and representation, and toward a broader theoretical mapping of the politics of race as form, while nonetheless remaining committed to the sociopolitical project of Asian American studies.
Recommend this
Email your librarian or administrator to recommend adding this to your organisation's collection.