Search

Skip to main content Accessibility help

Home
Search

Only show content I have access to (0)

Chapters (1)

Last 3 years (1)

From year:

To year:

Apply

Law (1)

litigation system

Cambridge University Press (1)

View selected items
Save to my bookmarks
Export citations
Download PDF (zip)
Save to Kindle
Save to Dropbox
Save to Google Drive
Save content to
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to .

To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Please be advised that item(s) you selected are not available.
You are about to save
Your Kindle email address

Please provide your Kindle email.

@free.kindle.com @kindle.com (service fees apply)

By using this service, you agree that you will only keep content for personal use, and will not openly distribute them via Dropbox, Google Drive or other file sharing services

1 results

4 - Truth Finding and the Mirage of Inquisitorial Process
from Part II - Convergences between Systems
- By Adrian A. S. Zuckerman
Edited by Jordi Ferrer Beltrán, Carmen Vázquez
Book:

Evidential Legal Reasoning

Published online:

05 May 2022

Print publication:

19 May 2022, pp 71-83
- Chapter
- - Get access
    
    Check if you have access via personal or institutional login
    
    Log in Register
- Export citation
Summary

My argument is that it is impossible for a judge to both provide unrepresented and poorly qualified litigants with meaningful legal assistance while at the same time avoiding impartiality. The English system of civil justice offers poor access to litigants of limited means. This has been the case for a long time, but the problem has become even more serious since the abolition of legal aid in civil cases and there it is now urgent to address it. The strategy that seems to appeal to the legislator favours procedures that can be conducted without the involvement of professional advocates, of inquisitorial proceedings. This strategy is misconceived. While there is much to be said for simplifying the litigation system through use of technology, online resources and other labour-saving measures, there is no substitute for adversarial process.

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

1 results

4 - Truth Finding and the Mirage of Inquisitorial Process

Summary

Search Results

Refine search

Refine search

Actions for selected content:

Save Search

1 results

4 - Truth Finding and the Mirage of Inquisitorial Process

Summary