Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-j65dx Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-19T13:55:30.159Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

5 - Blended Learning

from Part II - Environments

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 June 2025

By
Paul Gruba
Edited by
Glenn Stockwell  and
Yijen Wang
Glenn Stockwell
Affiliation:
Waseda University, Japan
Yijen Wang
Affiliation:
Waseda University, Japan
Get access

Summary

Blended, or hybrid, approaches to language learning continue to gain prominence. Resonant with established definitions of CALL, such approaches seek to promote ecological perspectives and embrace the ubiquity of technology. Questions of effectiveness and the justification of resources may result in a greater need for argument-based evaluation. Future research in blended language learning must take into account concepts inherent in multimodality, social semiotics, and computer mediated communication. Rather than revisit blended learning, however, porosity of environments may forge new metaphors of understanding and research.

Keywords

blendedhybridargumentsclaimsmultimodalityevaluation
Type
Chapter
Information
The Cambridge Handbook of Technology in Language Teaching and Learning , pp. 75 - 89
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Agar, J. (2020). What is technology? Annals of Science, 77(3), 377–382, https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2019.1672788CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, H. (2018). Blended basic language courses: Design, pedagogy, and implementation. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (2007). An introduction to rethinking pedagogy for a digital age. In Beetham, H., & Sharpe, R. (Eds.), Rethinking pedagogy for a digital age (pp. 1–10). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulton, A., & Vyatkina, N. (2021). Thirty years of data-driven learning: Taking stock and charting new directions over time. Language Learning & Technology, 25(3), 66–89. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/73450Google Scholar
Brown, H. D., & Lee, H. (2015). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy (4th ed.). Pearson Education.Google Scholar
Carrasco, B., & Johnson, S. M. (2015). Hybrid language teaching in practice: Perceptions, reactions, and results. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2007). Challenges in the evaluation of innovation: Observations from technology research. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 1(1), 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chapelle, C. A. (2014). Arguments for technology and language learning: Keynote presentation at the EUROCALL 2014 Conference. University of Groningen.Google Scholar
Douglas Fir Group (2016). A transdisciplinary framework for SLA in a multilingual world. The Modern Language Journal, 100(S1), 19–47. https://doi.org/10.1111/modl.12301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Egbert, J. (Ed). (2010). CALL in limited technology contexts. CALICO.Google Scholar
Garrett, N. (2009). Computer-assisted language learning trends and issues revisited: Integrating innovation. The Modern Language Journal, 93, 719–740. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2009.00969.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garrison, R., & Vaughan, H. (2008). Blended learning in higher education: Framework, principles and guidelines. Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Gleason, J. (2013). An interpretive argument for blended course design. Foreign Language Annals, 46, 588–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin-Jones, R. (2020). Building the porous classroom: An expanded model for blended language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 24(3), 1–18. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44731Google Scholar
González-Lloret, M., & Ortega, L. (2014). Technology-mediated TBLT: Researching technology and tasks. John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grgurovic, M. (2017). Blended language learning: Research and practice. In Chapelle, C. and Sauro, S. (Eds.), The handbook of technology and second language teaching and learning (pp. 150–168). John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Gruba, P. (2020). What does language testing have to offer multimodal listening? In Ockey, G. and Green, B. (Eds.), Another generation of fundamental considerations in language assessment (pp. 43–57). Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruba, P., & Hinkelman, D. (2012). Blending technologies in second language classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruba, P., & Nguyen, N. B. C. (2019). Evaluating technology integration in a Vietnamese university language program. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 32(5–6), 619–637. https://doi.org/10.1080/09588221.2018.1527365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gruba, P., Cárdenas-Claros, M., Suvorov, R., & Rick, K. (2016). Blended language program evaluation. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunberg, J., & Summers, M. (1992). Computer innovation in schools: A review of selected research literature. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 1(2), 255–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halliday, M., & Matthiessen, C. (2014). Halliday’s introduction to functional grammar (4th ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkelman, D. (2018). Blending technologies in second language classrooms (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hocky, N. (2014). Digital technologies in low-resource ELT contexts. ELT Journal, 68(1), 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, T., & Llosa, L. (2015). Design issues and inference in experimental L2 research. Language Learning, 65(S1), 76–96. https://doi.org/10.1111/lang.12113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jewitt, C. (2006). Technology, literacy, and learning: A multimodal approach. Routledge.Google Scholar
Jewitt, C., Bezemer, J., & O’Halloran, K. (2016). Introducing multimodality. Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, K. A., & Sharma, R. S. (2021). Higher education 4.0: The digital transformation of classroom lectures to blended learning. Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R. (2014). Technology as pharmakon: The promise and perils of the internet for foreign language education. The Modern Language Journal, 14, 340–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.2014.12065.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kern, R., & Warschauer, M. (2000). Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Knight, J., Dooly, M., & Barberà, E. (2020). Getting smart: Towards critical digital literacy pedagogies. Social Semiotics, 33(2), 326–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/10350330.2020.1836815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Korkealehto, K., Lakkala, M., & Toom, A. (2021). Enrolled or engaged? Student perceptions of engagement and oral interaction in a blended learning language course. The JALT CALL Journal, 17(1), 1–22.https://doi.org/10.29140/jaltcall.v17n1.268CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kress, G. (2015). Semiotic work: Applied linguistics and a social semiotic account of multimodality. AILA Review, 28(1), 49–71. https://doi.org/10.1075/aila.28.03kreCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kurek, M., & Muller-Hartmann, A. (2017). Task design for telecollaborative exchanges: In search of new criteria. System, 64, 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2016.12.004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurillard, D. (2012). Teaching as design science. Routledge.Google Scholar
Levy, M., & Stockwell, G. (2006). CALL dimensions: Options and issues in computer-assisted language learning. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
Lin, C.-J., & Mubarok, H. (2021). Learning analytics for investigating the mind map-guided AI chatbot approach in an EFL flipped speaking classroom. Educational Technology & Society, 24(4), 16–35.Google Scholar
Lotherington, H., & Jenson, J. (2011). Teaching multimodal and digital literacy in second language settings: New literacies, new basics, new pedagogies. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 31, 226–248. https://10.1017/S0267190511000110CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCarthy, M. (Ed.). (2016). The Cambridge guide to blended learning for language teaching. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mizza, D., & Rubio, F. (2020). Creating effective blended language learning courses: A research-based guide from planning to evaluation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mohan, B., & Luo, L. (2007). A systemic functional linguistics perspective on CALL. In Egbert, J. & Petrie, G. M. (Eds.), CALL research perspectives (pp. 87–96). Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Neumeier, P. (2005). A closer look at blended learning: Parameters for designing a blended learning environment for language teaching and learning. ReCALL, 17(2), 163–178. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0958344005000224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nicolson, M., Murphy, L., & Southgate, M. (2012). Language teaching in blended contexts. Dunedin Academic Press.Google Scholar
Oliver, M., & Trigwell, K. (2005). Can “blended learning” be redeemed? E-Learning, 2(1), 17–26. https://doi.org/10.2304/elea.2005.2.1.17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olteanu, A. (2019). Multiculturalism as multimodal communication: A semiotic perspective. Springer.Google Scholar
Oxford, R. L., & Jung, S.-H. (2006). National guidelines for technology integration in TESOL programs: Factors affecting (non) implementation. In Kassen, M. A., Murphy-Judy, K., Lavine, R. Z., & Peters, M. (Eds.), Preparing and developing technology-proficient L2 teachers (pp. 23–48). Computer Assisted Language Instruction Consortium.Google Scholar
Palikat, C. N., & Gruba, P. (2022). Sustainability of blended language learning programs. Routledge.Google Scholar
Ragnedda, M. (2020). Enhancing digital equity: Connecting the digital underclass. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reinders, H., & Lan, Y. J. (2021). Big data in language education and research. Language Learning & Technology, 25(1), 1–3. http://hdl.handle.net/10125/44746Google Scholar
Sharma, P., & Barret, B. (2007). Blended learning: Using technology in and beyond the language classroom. Macmillan.Google Scholar
Statista. (2021). Internet usage in the United States. www.statista.com/topics/2237/internet-usage-in-the-united-statesGoogle Scholar
Stein, J., & Graham, C. R. (2020). Essentials for blended learning: A standards-based guide (2nd ed.). Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sykes, J. (2019). Emergent digital discourses: What can we learn from hashtags and digital games to expand learners’ second language repertoire? Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 39, 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0267190519000138CrossRefGoogle Scholar
TESOL. (2021). The 6 principles for exemplary teaching of English learners©. TESOL International Association. www.tesol.org/the-6-principles/aboutGoogle Scholar
Thorne, K. (2003). Blended learning. Kogan Page.Google Scholar
Valdés, G., Kibler, A., & Walqui, A. (2014). Changes in the expertise of ESL professionals: Knowledge and action in an era of new standards. TESOL International Association. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED560135Google Scholar
van Lier, L. (2004). The ecology and semiotics of language learning: A sociocultural perspective. Kluwer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Warschauer, M. (2003). Technology and social inclusion: Rethinking the digital divide. MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Welker, J., & Berardino, L. (2005). Blended learning: Understanding the middle ground between traditional classroom and fully online instruction. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(1), 33–55. https://doi.org/10.2190/67FX-B7P8-PYUX-TDUPCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Further Reading

Grounded in arguments first created for language assessment purposes, Gleason turns a critical eye on the fundamentals needed to construct a solid frame of blended course design. Such arguments, made with colleagues, help ensure that efforts to foster blended approaches are situated in both theory and evidence.

An early adopter of blended approaches, Hinkelman provides clear insights into technology integration through a solid conceptual framework, action research, fresh lesson plans, and a curriculum that stimulates student engagement.

The award-winning book of Mizza and Rubio provides a comprehensive introduction to blended learning for language instructors. Each chapter mixes references with sound advice and presents accessible pathways to successful technology integration.

This book provides a concise introduction to the long-term, or sustained, integration of technology in the form of a device, learning management system, or application. The ethnographic study points to challenges of instructor uptake and acceptability of technology integration. Notably, the book advocates an increased emphasis on program management in leading change, constructing professional development opportunities, and adopting a mindset of evaluative thinking.

Gleason, J. (2013). An interpretive argument for blended course design. Foreign Language Annals, 46(4), 588–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hinkelman, D. (2018). Blending technologies in second language classrooms. Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mizza, D., & Rubio, F. (2020). Creating effective blended language learning courses: A research-based guide from planning to evaluation. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Palikat, C. N., & Gruba, P. (2022). Sustainability of blended language learning programs: Technology integration in English for Academic Purposes. Routledge.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Blended Learning
  • Edited by Glenn Stockwell, Waseda University, Japan, Yijen Wang, Waseda University, Japan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Technology in Language Teaching and Learning
  • Online publication: 15 June 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294850.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Blended Learning
  • Edited by Glenn Stockwell, Waseda University, Japan, Yijen Wang, Waseda University, Japan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Technology in Language Teaching and Learning
  • Online publication: 15 June 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294850.007
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Blended Learning
  • Edited by Glenn Stockwell, Waseda University, Japan, Yijen Wang, Waseda University, Japan
  • Book: The Cambridge Handbook of Technology in Language Teaching and Learning
  • Online publication: 15 June 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009294850.007
Available formats
×