Cold War mobilization and domestic politics: the United States

doi:10.1017/CHOL9780521837194.021

20 - Cold War mobilization and domestic politics: the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 28 September 2010

Laura Mcenaney

Edited by

Melvyn P. Leffler and

Odd Arne Westad

Show author details

Melvyn P. Leffler: Affiliation:
University of Virginia
Odd Arne Westad: Affiliation:
London School of Economics and Political Science

Book contents

Get access

Summary

As United States policymakers charted a more aggressive internationalism at the end of World War II, it was not immediately clear how ordinary Americans might be affected by this new course. Early Cold War blueprints mentioned a role for civilians in the emerging East–West conflict, but this amounted to fervent but still fuzzy calls for heightened public interest in current events. As US–Soviet relations grew chillier, Cold War architects such as George Kennan sermonized that morally flabby Americans would have to strengthen their civic muscles and “measure up” to earlier generations of revolutionary Americans whose courage and commitment had preserved the nation. In more muted and sterile policy parlance, other Cold Warriors grimly foretold a future of higher taxes, cuts in nondefense spending, and the restraint of civil liberties for the promise of internal security. By 1950, however, a National Security Council policy paper, NSC 68, warned more starkly that the Cold War was not merely a clash of ideologies but rather “a real war in which the survival of the free world [was] at stake.” To meet the challenge, Americans would have to summon their better selves and demonstrate their “ingenuity, sacrifice, and unity.”

Such were the stakes for mid-century Americans, but few of them readily understood their new civic burdens. National security planners talked more to one another than to their publics, and much of this early reflection about the Cold War’s domestic impact would be held closely within policy circles. And yet, to get the needed public engagement, presidents and a vast array of military and civilian administrators had to somehow translate and disseminate these plans to American citizens. From the immediate postwar years to the early 1960s, policymakers tasked the Cold War’s home-front institutions — state and local governments, schools, businesses, labor unions, civic organizations, and media — with the same objective of containment they would pursue at higher levels through military and covert means. The job was formidable: how could they popularize national security goals in a civilian vernacular? How could they reorient a nation-state around national security objectives while still maintaining the legal, economic, and cultural traditions that most citizens identified as “the American way of life”? Even NSC 68 acknowledged that the American people and American institutions would have to be mobilized through a “traditional democratic process” that respected basic values and institutions and the slower tempo of consensusbuilding.

Type: Chapter
Information: The Cambridge History of the Cold War , pp. 420 - 441

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CHOL9780521837194.021 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Appy, Christian G. (ed.), Cold War Constructions: The Political Culture of United States Imperialism (Amherst, MA: University of Massachusetts Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Bell, Jonathan, The Liberal State on Trial: The Cold War and American Politics in the Truman Years (New York: Columbia University Press, 2004).CrossRef Google Scholar

Boyer, Paul, Fallout: A Historian Reflects on America’s Half-Century Encounter with Nuclear Weapons (Columbus, OH: Ohio State University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Dudziak, Mary L., “Brown as a Cold War Case,” Journal of American History, 91 (June 2004).CrossRef Google Scholar

Dudziak, Mary L., Cold War Civil Rights: Race and the Image of American Democracy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Etzold, Thomas H. and Gaddis, John Lewis (eds.), Containment: Documents on American Policy and Strategy, 1945–1950 (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978).Google Scholar

Flipse, Scott, “Below-the-Belt Politics: Protestant Evangelicals, Abortion, and the Foundation of the New Religious Right, 1960–1975,” in Farber, David and Roche, Je. (eds.), The Conservative Sixties (New York: Peter Lang, 2003) –41.Google Scholar

Foner, Eric, The Story of American Freedom (New York: W. W. Norton, 1998).Google Scholar

Fried, Richard M., Nightmare in Red: The McCarthy Era in Perspective (New York: Oxford University Press, 1990).Google Scholar

Fried, Richard M., The Russians Are Coming! The Russians Are Coming Pageantry and Patriotism in Cold-War America (New York: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar

Fried, Richard M., “Voting against the Hammer and Sickle: Communism as an Issue in American Politics,” in Chafe, William H. (ed.), The Achievement of American Liberalism: The New Deal and Its Legacies (New York: Columbia University Press, 2003).Google Scholar

Friedberg, Aaron L., In the Shadow of the Garrison State: America’s Anti-Statism and Its Cold War Grand Strategy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).CrossRef Google Scholar

Gerstle, Gary, American Crucible: Race and Nation in the Twentieth Century (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Griffith, Robert and Theoharis, Athan (eds.), The Specter: Original Essays on the Cold War and the Origins of McCarthyism (New York: New Viewpoints, 1974).Google Scholar

Hogan, Michael J., A Cross of Iron: Harry S. Truman and the Origins of the National Security State, 1945–1954 (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998).CrossRef Google Scholar

Jacobs, Meg, Pocketbook Politics: Economic Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2005).Google Scholar

Kuznick, Peter J. and Gilbert, James, “US Culture and the Cold War,” in Kuznick, Peter J. and Gilbert, James (eds.), Rethinking Cold War Culture (Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press, 2001).Google Scholar

Lichtenstein, Nelson, State of the Union: A Century of American Labor (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2002).Google Scholar

Marshall, George, as quoted in George Lipsitz, Rainbow at Midnight: Labor and Culture in the 1940s (Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1994) –91.Google Scholar

May, Elaine Tyler, Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era (New York: Basic Books, 1988).Google Scholar

McEnaney, Laura, Civil Defense Begins at Home: Militarization Meets Everyday Life in the Fifties (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2000).Google Scholar

Meyerowitz, Joanne (ed.), Not June Cleaver: Women and Gender in Postwar America, 1945–1960 (Philadelphia: Temple University Press, 1994).Google Scholar

Pease, Donald E., “Hiroshima, the Vietnam Veterans War Memorial, and the Gulf War,” in Kaplan, Amy and Pease, Donald E. (eds.), Cultures of United States Imperialism (Durham, NC: Duke University Press, 1993) –58.Google Scholar

Robinson, Jo Ann Gibson, The Montgomery Bus Boycott and the Women Who Started It: The Memoir of Jo Ann Gibson Robinson (Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Press, 1987), 3.Google Scholar

Schrecker, Ellen, Many Are the Crimes: McCarthyism in America (Boston: Little, Brown and Company, 1998).Google Scholar

Sherry, Michael, In the Shadow of War: The United States since the 1930s (New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1995).Google Scholar

Yergin, Daniel, Shattered Peace: The Origins of the Cold War, 2nd ed. (New York: Penguin Press, 1990).Google Scholar