Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-vcmr7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-09T16:10:39.354Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Geometric Approximation via Coresets

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 June 2025

Jacob E. Goodman
Affiliation:
City College, City University of New York
Janos Pach
Affiliation:
City College, City University of New York and New York University
Emo Welzl
Affiliation:
Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule Zürich
Get access

Summary

The paradigm of coresets has recently emerged as a powerful tool for efficiently approximating various extent measures of a point set P. Using this paradigm, one quickly computes a small subset Q of P, called a coreset, that approximates the original set P and and then solves the problem on Q using a relatively inefficient algorithm. The solution for Q is then translated to an approximate solution to the original point set P. This paper describes the ways in which this paradigm has been successfully applied to various optimization and extent measure problems.

1. Introduction

One of the classical techniques in developing approximation algorithms is the extraction of “small” amount of “most relevant” information from the given data, and performing the computation on this extracted data. Examples of the use of this technique in a geometric context include random sampling [Chazelle 2000; Mulmuley 1993], convex approximation [Dudley 1974; Bronshteyn and Ivanov 1976], surface simplification [Heckbert and Garland 1997], feature extraction and shape descriptors [Dryden and Mardia 1998; Costa and Cesar 2001]. For geometric problems where the input is a set of points, the question reduces to finding a small subset (a coreset) of the points, such that one can perform the desired computation on the coreset.

As a concrete example, consider the problem of computing the diameter of a point set. Here it is clear that, in the worst case, classical sampling techniques like ϵ-approximation and ϵ-net would fail to compute a subset of points that contain a good approximation to the diameter [Vapnik and Chervonenkis 1971; Haussler and Welzl 1987].

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2005

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Accessibility standard: Unknown

Accessibility compliance for the PDF of this book is currently unknown and may be updated in the future.

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×