Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-w9n4q Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-19T06:33:02.522Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 May 2025

Luis Schiumerini
Luis Schiumerini
Affiliation:
University of Notre Dame, Indiana
Get access
Type
Chapter
Information
Incumbency Bias
Why Political Office is a Blessing and a Curse in Latin America
 , pp. 225 - 240
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Achen, Christopher. 2013. “A Baseline for Incumbency Effects.” Paper presented at a conference in honor of David Mayhew, Yale University, New Haven, CT.Google Scholar
Achen, Christopher, and Bartels, Larry. 2017. Democracy for Realists: Why Elections Do Not Produce Responsive Government. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Afonso, José, and Serra, José. 2007. “El Federalismo Fiscal en Brasil: Una Visión Panorámica.” Revista de la CEPAL (91):29–52.Google Scholar
Afonso, José Roberto, and Araújo, Erika Amorim. 2006. “Local Government Organization and Finance: Brazil.” In Local Governance in Developing Countries, ed. Shah, Anwar. The World Bank, pp. 381–416.Google Scholar
Ahler, Douglas J., and Sood, Gaurav. 2018. “The Parties in Our Heads: Misperceptions about Party Composition and Their Consequences.” Journal of Politics 80(3):964–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alemán, Eduardo, and Navia, Patricio. 2009. “Institutions and the Legislative Success of ‘Strong’ Presidents: An Analysis of Government Bills in Chile.” Journal of Legislative Studies 15(4):401–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Cameron D. 2006. “Economic Voting and Multilevel Governance: A Comparative Individual-Level Analysis.” American Journal of Political Science 50(2):449–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Angrist, Joshua D., and Pischke, Jörn-Steffen. 2008. Mostly Harmless Econometrics: An Empiricist’s Companion. Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aninat, Cristóbal, Londregan, John, Navia, Patricio, and Vial, Joaquín. 2006. “Political Institutions, Policymaking Processes, and Policy Outcomes in Chile.” Inter-American Development Bank, pp. 1–64.Google Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Hirano, Shigeo, Snyder, James Jr., and Ueda, Michiko. 2006. “Party and Incumbency Cues in Voting: Are They Substitutes?” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 1(2):119–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, and Snyder, James Jr. 2002. “The Incumbency Advantage in U.S. Elections.” Election Law Journal 1(3):315–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ansolabehere, Stephen, Snyder, James Jr., and Stewart, Charles III. 2000. “Old Voters, New Voters, and the Personal Vote: Using Redistricting to Measure the Incumbency Advantage.” American Journal of Political Science 44(1): 17–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2005. “Does Federalism Weaken Democratic Representation in the United States?” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 35(2):297–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arceneaux, Kevin. 2006. “The Federal Face of Voting: Are Elected Officials Held Accountable for the Functions Relevant to Their Office?” Political Psychology 27(5):731–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ardanaz, Martín, Leiras, Marcelo, and Tommasi, Mariano. 2014. “The Politics of Federalism in Argentina and Its Implications for Governance and Accountability.” World Development 53:26–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arias, Eric, Larreguy, Horacio, Marshall, John, and Querubin, Pablo. 2022. “Priors Rule: When Do Malfeasance Revelations Help or Hurt Incumbent Parties?” Journal of the European Economic Association 20(4):1433–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2002. “Federalismo e Relações Intergovernamentais no Brasil: A Reforma de Programas Sociais.” Dados 45:431–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arretche, Marta. 2012. Democracia, Federalismo e Centralização no Brasil. Fiocruz e FGV Editoras.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott. 2012. “Electoral Accountability: Recent Theoretical and Empirical Work.” Annual Review of Political Science 15:183–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott, and Mesquita, Ethan Bueno De. 2014. “Is Voter Competence Good for Voters? Information, Rationality, and Democratic Performance.” American Political Science Review 108(3):565–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ashworth, Scott, Mesquita, Ethan Bueno de, and Friedenberg, Amanda. 2018. “Learning about Voter Rationality.” American Journal of Political Science 62(1):37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Auerbach, Adam Michael, and Thachil, Tariq. 2023. Migrants and Machine Politics. Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Avelino Filho, George, Biderman, Ciro, and Desposato, Scott. 2021. “Sources of the Incumbency (Dis)advantage.” Brazilian Political Science Review 16(1):1–39.Google Scholar
Aytaç, Selim Erdem. 2018. “Relative Economic Performance and the Incumbent Vote: A Reference Point Theory.” Journal of Politics 80(1):16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baldwin, Kate. 2012. “Why Vote with the Chief? Political Connections and the Performance of Representatives in Zambia.” American Journal of Political Science 57(4):794–809.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barberia, Lorena, Avelino, George, and Zanlorenssi, Gabriel. 2019. “Economic Voting in Brazil’s Gubernatorial Elections, 1994–2014.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 49(2):250–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bertrand, Marianne, and Mullainathan, Sendhil. 2004. “Are Emily and Greg More Employable than Lakisha and Jamal? A Field Experiment on Labor Market Discrimination.” American Economic Review 94(4):991–1013.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Besley, Timothy. 2006. Principled Agents? The Political Economy of Good Government. Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Bhavnani, Rikhil R., and Lupu, Noam. 2016. “Oil Windfalls and the Political Resource Curse: Evidence from a Natural Experiment in Brazil.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the European Political Science Association, Brussels.Google Scholar
Bleck, Jaimie, and van de Walle, Nicolas. 2013. “Valence Issues in African Elections: Navigating Uncertainty and the Weight of the Past.” Comparative Political Studies 46(11):1394–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boas, Taylor, Hidalgo, Daniel, and André Melo, Marcus. 2019. “Norms versus Action: Why Voters Fail to Sanction Malfeasance in Brazil.” American Journal of Political Science 63(2):385–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonvecchi, Alejandro, and Lodola, Germán. 2011. “The Dual Logic of Intergovernmental Transfers: Presidents, Governors, and the Politics of Coalition-Building in Argentina.” Publius: The Journal of Federalism 41(2):179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brady, Henry, and Collier, David. 2010. Rethinking Social Inquiry: Diverse Tools, Shared Standards. Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Brollo, Fernanda, and Nannicini, Tommaso. 2012. “Tying Your Enemy’s Hands in Close Races: The Politics of Federal Transfers in Brazil.” American Political Science Review 106(4):742–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brollo, Fernanda, Nannicini, Tommaso, Perotti, Roberto, and Tabellini, Guido. 2013. “The Political Resource Curse.” American Economic Review 103(5):1759–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brusco, Valeria, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Stokes, Susan. 2004. “Vote Buying in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 39(2):66–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brutger, Ryan, Kertzer, Joshua D., Renshon, Jonathan, and Weiss, Chagai M.. 2022. Abstraction in Experimental Design: Testing the Tradeoffs. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno, Natália, and Dunning, Thad. 2017. “Race, Resources, and Representation: Evidence from Brazilian Politicians.” World Politics 69(2):327–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bueno, Natalia, and Tuñón, Guadalupe. 2015. “Graphical Presentation of Regression Discontinuity Results.” Political Methodologist 22(2):4–8.Google Scholar
Bunker, Kenneth, and Navia, Patricio. 2010. “Democracia Comunal en Chile, 1992–2008.” Política y Gobierno 17(2):243–78.Google Scholar
Bunker, Kenneth, and Navia, Patricio. 2015. “Incumbency Advantage and Tenure Length in the Chilean Chamber of Deputies, 1989-2009.” Revista de Ciencia Política 35(2):251–71.Google Scholar
Bussell, Jennifer. 2019. Clients and Constituents: Political Responsiveness in Patronage Democracies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cabot, Diego. 2018. Los Cuadernos: Cómo fue la Investigación Secreta del Caso de Corrupción Más Importante de la Historia Argentina. Sudamericana.Google Scholar
Cain, Bruce, Ferejohn, John, and Fiorina, Morris. 1987. The Personal Vote. Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callen, Michael, Gulzar, Saad, and Rezaee, Arman. 2020. “Can Political Alignment Be Costly?” Journal of Politics 82(2):612–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calónico, Sebastian, Cattaneo, Matias D., and Titiunik, Rocío. 2014. “Robust Nonparametric Confidence Intervals for Regression-Discontinuity Designs.” Econometrica 82(6):2295–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calónico, Sebastian, Cattaneo, Matias D., and Titiunik, Rocío. 2024. rdrobust: An R Package for Robust Nonparametric Inference in Regression-Discontinuity Designs. https://doi.org/10.32614/RJ-2015-004,Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Escolar, Marcelo. 2005. La Nueva Política de Partidos en la Argentina: Crisis Política, Realineamientos Partidarios y Reforma Electoral. Prometeo.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Micozzi, Juan Pablo. 2004. “The Governor’s Backyard: A Seat-Vote Model of Electoral Reform for Subnational Multiparty Races.” Journal of Politics 67(4):1323–35.Google Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2004. “Who Delivers? Partisan Clients in the Argentine Electoral Market.” American Journal of Political Science 48(4):742–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2012. “When Parties Meet Voters Assessing Political Linkages through Partisan Networks and Distributive Expectations in Argentina and Chile.” Comparative Political Studies 46(7):851–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto, and Murillo, María Victoria. 2019. Non-policy Politics: Richer Voters, Poorer Voters, and the Diversification of Electoral Strategies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, Daniela, and Zucco, Cesar. 2016. “Presidential Success and the World Economy.” Journal of Politics 78(2):589–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, Daniela, and Zucco, Cesar. 2020. The Volatility Curse: Exogenous Shocks and Representation in Resource-Rich Democracies. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campello, Daniela, and Zucco, Cesar. 2024. “Benchmarking across Borders is a Tall Order.” Working paper, Fundação Getulio Vargas.Google Scholar
Carlin, Ryan, Hellwig, Timothy, Love, Gregory, Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia, and Singer, Matthew. 2021. “When Does the Public Get It Eight? The Information Environment and the Accuracy of Economic Sentiment.” Comparative Political Studies 54(9):1499–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Ryan, Love, Gregory, and Martínez-Gallardo, Cecilia. 2015. “Cushioning the Fall: Scandals, Economic Conditions, and Executive Approval.” Political Behavior 37:109–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Ryan, Singer, Matthew, and Zechmeister, Elisabeth. 2015. The Latin American Voter: Pursuing Representation and Accountability in Challenging Contexts. University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carlin, Ryan, and Singh, Shane. 2015. “Executive Power and Economic Accountability.” Journal of Politics 77(4):1031–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carnes, Nicholas, and Lupu, Noam. 2016. “Do Voters Dislike Working-Class Candidates? Voter Biases and the Descriptive Underrepresentation of the Working Class.” American Political Science Review 110(4):832–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CIPPEC. 2024. Observatorio Electoral Argentino.Google Scholar
Corrales, Javier, and Penfold, Michael. 2014. “Manipulating Term Limits in Latin America.” Journal of Democracy 25(4):157–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Corvalán, Alejandro, Cox, Paulo, and Osorio, Rodrigo. 2018. “Indirect Political Budget Cycles: Evidence from Chilean Municipalities.” Journal of Development Economics 133:1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cover, Albert, and Mayhew, David. 1977. “Congressional Dynamics and the Decline of Competitive Congressional Elections.” In Congress Reconsidered. Praeger, pp. 54–72.Google Scholar
Cox, Gary. 1997. Making Votes Count: Strategic Coordination in the World’s Electoral Systems. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary, and Katz, Jonathan. 1996. “Why Did Incumbency Advantage in U.S. House Elections Grow?” American Journal of Political Science 40(2): 478–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dantas, Humberto. 2007. “Coligações em Eleições Majoritárias Municipais: A Lógica do Alinhamento Dos Partidos Políticos Brasileiros nas Disputas de 2000 e 2004.” PhD thesis, University of São Paulo.Google Scholar
De Magalhães, Leandro. 2015. “Incumbency Effects in a Comparative Perspective: Evidence from Brazilian Mayoral Elections.” Political Analysis 23(1):113–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Mello, Luiz, and Moccero, Diego. 2006. “Brazil’s Fiscal Stance during 1995-2005: The Effect of Indebtedness on Fiscal Policy over the Business Cycle.” Economics Department Working Paper 485.Google Scholar
Delli Carpini, Michael, and Keeter, Scott. 1997. What Americans Know about Politics and Why It Matters. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Desposato, Scott W. 2006. “Parties for Rent? Ambition, Ideology, and Party Switching in Brazil’s Chamber of Deputies.” American Journal of Political Science 50(1):62–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dix, Robert. 1984. “Incumbency and Electoral Turnover in Latin America.” Journal of Interamerican Studies and World Affairs 26(4):435–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duch, Raymond, and Stevenson, Randolph. 2008. The Economic Vote: How Political and Economic Institutions Condition Election Results. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad. 2012. Natural Experiments in the Social Sciences: A Design-Based Approach. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunning, Thad, Grossman, Guy, Humphreys, Macartan, Hyde, Susan D., McIntosh, Craig, and Nellis, Gareth. 2019. Information, Accountability, and Cumulative Learning: Lessons from Metaketa I. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, Andrew. 2017. “Quality-Based Explanations of Incumbency Effects.” Journal of Politics 79(4):1315–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, Andrew, and Spirling, Arthur. 2017. “Incumbency Effects and the Strength of Party Preferences: Evidence from Multiparty Elections in the United Kingdom.” Journal of Politics 79(3):903–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert. 1971. “The Advantage of Incumbency in Congressional Elections.” Polity 3:395–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert, and Titiunik, Rocío. 2015. “Using Regression Discontinuity to Uncover the Personal Incumbency Advantage.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 10(1):101–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Erikson, Robert S. 1988. “The Puzzle of Midterm Loss.” Journal of Politics 50(4):1011–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falleti, Tulia. 2010. Decentralization and Subnational Politics in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FAO. 2015. OECD-FAO Agricultural Outlook 2015.Google Scholar
Fearon, James. 1999. “Electoral Accountability and the Control of Politicians: Selecting Good Types Versus Sanctioning Poor Performance.” In Democracy, Accountability, and Representation, ed. Przeworski, Adam, Stokes, Susan, and Manin, Bernard. Cambridge University Press, pp. 55–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fenno, Richard F. 1978. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Fenwick, Tracy Beck. 2015. Avoiding Governors. University of Notre Dame.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferejohn, John A. 1977. “On the Decline of Competition in Congressional Elections.” American Political Science Review 71(1):166–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraz, Claudio, and Finan, Frederico. 2008. “Exposing Corrupt Politicians: The Effects of Brazil’s Publicly Released Audits on Electoral Outcomes.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 123(2):703–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ferraz, Claudio, and Finan, Frederico. 2011. “Electoral Accountability and Corruption: Evidence from the Audits of Local Governments.” American Economic Review 101(4):1274–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub, and Limongi, Fernando. 1995. “Partidos políticos na Câmara dos Deputados: 1989-1994.” Dados 38(3):497–524.Google Scholar
Figueiredo, Argelina Cheibub, and Limongi, Fernando. 2000. “Presidential Power, Legislative Organization, and Party Behavior in Brazil.” Comparative Politics 32(2): 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fiorina, Morris. 1981. Retrospective Voting in American Elections. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Fiva, Jon H., and Smith, Daniel M.. 2018. “Political Dynasties and the Incumbency Advantage in Party-Centered Environments.” American Political Science Review 112(3):706–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fouirnaies, Alexander. 2021. “Do Newspapers Benefit Incumbents? Evidence from Denmark 1849–1915.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 16(4):505–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Anthony, and Hall, Andrew B.. 2014. “Disentangling the Personal and Partisan Incumbency Advantages: Evidence from a Structural Regression Discontinuity Design.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 9:501–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fowler, Anthony, and Hall, Andrew B.. 2018. “Do Shark Attacks Influence Presidential elections? Reassessing a Prominent Finding on Voter Competence.” Journal of Politics 80(4):1423–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Freier, Ronny. 2015. “The Mayor’s Advantage: Causal Evidence on Incumbency Effects in German Mayoral Elections.” European Journal of Political Economy 40:16–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fuentes, Claudio. 2018. “Confianza en el Gobierno Local y Capacidades Institucionales de los Municipios Chilenos: Un Análisis Multinivel.” Revista Iberoamericana de Estudios Municipales (18):91–120.Google Scholar
Gailmard, Sean. 2019. “Optimism, Pessimism, and Dialogue in Electoral-Accountability Research.” PS: Political Science & Politics 52(4):630–3.Google Scholar
Garay, Candelaria. 2016. Social Policy Expansion in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gasper, John T., and Reeves, Andrew. 2011. “Make It Rain? Retrospection and the Attentive Electorate in the Context of Natural Disasters.” American Journal of Political Science 55(2):340–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geddes, Barbara. 1990. “How the Cases You Choose Affect the Answers You Get: Selection Bias in Comparative Politics.” Political Analysis 2:131–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelman, Andrew, and King, Gary. 1990. “Estimating Incumbency Advantage without Bias.” American Journal of Political Science 34(4):1142–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, Alan, and Green, Donald. 2012. Field Experiments: Design, Analysis, and Interpretation. WW Norton.Google Scholar
Gervasoni, Carlos. 2010. “A Rentier Theory of Subnational Regimes: Fiscal Federalism, Democracy, and Authoritarianism in the Argentine Provinces.” World Politics 62(2):302–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward. 2006. “Boundary Control: Subnational Authoritarianism in Democratic Countries.” World Politics 58(1):101–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, Edward, and Calvo, Ernesto. 2000. “Federalism and Low-Maintenance Constituencies: Territorial Dimensions of Economic Reform in Argentina.” Studies in Comparative International Development 35(3):32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudy, Agustina. 2007. “The Distributive Politics of Emergency Employment Programs in Argentina (1993-2002).” Latin American Research Review 42(2):33–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giraudy, Agustina. 2010. “Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity after Democratization: Argentina and Mexico in Comparative Perspective.” PhD thesis, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill.Google Scholar
Giraudy, Agustina. 2015. Democrats and Autocrats: Pathways of Subnational Undemocratic Regime Continuity within Democratic Countries. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goidel, Robert, and Shields, Todd. 1994. “The Vanishing Marginals, the Mass Media, and the Bandwagon.” Journal of Politics 56(3):802–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goldberger, Arthur Stanley. 1991. A Course in Econometrics. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Golden, Miriam, and Picci, Lucio. 2015. “Incumbency Effects Under Proportional Representation: Leaders and Backbenchers in the Postwar Italian Chamber of Deputies.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 40(4):509–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
González-Ocantos, Ezequiel, Muñoz, Paula, Pavão, Nara, and Hidalgo, Viviana Baraybar. 2023. Prosecutors, Voters and the Criminalization of Corruption in Latin America: The Case of Lava Jato. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordin, Jorge. 2006. “Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations, ‘Argentine Style.”’ Journal of Public Policy 26(03):255–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gottlieb, Jessica. 2016. “Greater Expectations: A Field Experiment to Improve Accountability in Mali.” American Journal of Political Science 60(1):143–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greene, Kenneth. 2007. Why Dominant Parties Lose: Mexico’s Democratization in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Jiehan, Liu, Liu, Licheng, Liu, Ziyi, Mummolo, Jonathan, and Xu, Yiqing. 2024. interflex: Multiplicative Interaction Models Diagnostics and Visualization. https://yiqingxu.org/packages/interflex/Google Scholar
Hainmueller, Jens, Mummolo, Jonathan, and Xu, Yiqing. 2019. “How Much Should We Trust Estimates from Multiplicative Interaction Models? Simple Tools to Improve Empirical Practice.” Political Analysis 27(2):163–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harding, Robin. 2015. “Attribution and Accountability: Voting for Roads in Ghana.” World Politics 67(4):656–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Lenz, Gabriel. 2014. “Substituting the End for the Whole: Why Voters Respond Primarily to the Election-Year Economy.” American Journal of Political Science 58(1):31–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neal. 2009. “Myopic Voters and Natural Disaster Policy.” American Political Science Review 103(3):387–406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, and Malhotra, Neal. 2010. “Random Events, Economic Losses, and Retrospective Voting: Implications for Democratic Competence.” Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5(2):193–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, Andrew, Malhotra, Neal, and Mo, Cecilia. 2010. “Irrelevant Events Affect Voters’ Evaluations of Government Performance.” Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 107(29):12804–9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hellwig, Timothy, and Samuels, David. 2008. “Electoral Accountability and the Variety of Democratic Regimes.” British Journal of Political Science 38(1):65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hidalgo, Daniel, and Lima, Renato. 2016. “Elite Contestation and Mass Participation in Brazilian Legislative Elections, 1945-2014.” In New Order and Progress: Democracy and Development in Brazil, ed. Schneider, Ben Ross. Oxford University Press, pp. 241–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Gregory, Hill, Seth, and Lenz, Gabriel. 2012. “Sources of Bias in Retrospective Decision Making: Experimental Evidence on Voters’ Limitations in Controlling Incumbents.” American Political Science Review 106(4):720–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, Wendy. 2010. The Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil, 1989-2009. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imbens, Guido W., and Angrist, Joshua D.. 1994. “Identification and Estimation of Local Average Treatment Effects.” Econometrica 62(2):467–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Inman, Robert P. 2007. “Federalism’s Values and the Value of Federalism.” CESifo Economic Studies 53(4):522–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary. 2015. “It’s Nothing Personal: The Decline of the Incumbency Advantage in US House Elections.” Journal of Politics 77(3):861–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johannessen, Peter G. 2017. “Visibility and Local Electoral Accountability.” Working Paper, Kellogg Institute of International Affairs, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Jones, Mark. 1997. “Federalism and the Number of Parties in Argentine Congressional Elections.” Journal of Politics 59(2):538–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, Mark, Saiegh, Sebastián, Spiller, Pablo, and Tommasi, Mariano. 2002. “Amateur Legislators–Professional Politicians: The Consequences of Party-Centered Electoral Rules in a Federal System.” American Journal of Political Science 46(3): 656–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, Mark Andreas, and Peress, Michael. 2012. “Benchmarking across Borders: Electoral Accountability and the Necessity of Comparison.” American Political Science Review 106(3):661–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kayser, Mark Andreas, and Wlezien, Christopher. 2011. “Performance Pressure: Patterns of Partisanship and the Economic Vote.” European Journal of Political Research 50(3):365–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kendall, Chad, and Rekkas, Marie. 2012. “Incumbency Advantages in the Canadian Parliament.” Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d’économique 45(4):1560–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Key, V. O. 1966. Home Style: House Members in Their Districts. Belknap Press.Google Scholar
Klašnja, Marko. 2015. “Corruption and Incumbency Disadvantage: Theory and Evidence.” Journal of Politics 928–42(4):3–24.Google Scholar
Klašnja, Marko. 2016. “Increasing Rents and Incumbency Disadvantage.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 28(2):225–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Klašnja, Marko, and Titiunik, Rocio. 2017. “The Incumbency Curse: Weak Parties, Term Limits, and Unfulfilled Accountability.” American Political Science Review 111(1):129–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Krehbiel, Keith, and Wright, John. 1983. “The Incumbency Effect in Congressional Elections: A Test of Two Explanations.” American Journal of Political Science 27(1):140–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
LAPOP. 2012. Americas Barometer 2012.Google Scholar
LAPOP. 2014. Americas Barometer 2014.Google Scholar
LAPOP. 2017. Americas Barometer 2017.Google Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2001. “Advantages and Disadvantages of Cognitive Heuristics in Political Decision Making.” American Journal of Political Science 45(4):951–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lau, Richard R., and Redlawsk, David P.. 2006. How Voters Decide: Information Processing in Election Campaigns. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lavareda, Antônio, and Telles, Helcimara. 2011. Como o Eleitor Escolhe Seu Prefeito. FGV.Google Scholar
Lee, David. 2008. “Randomized Experiments from Non-random Selection in US House Elections.” Journal of Econometrics 142(2):675–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leiras, Marcelo. 2006. “Parties, Provinces and Electoral Coordination: A Study on the Determinants of Party and Party System Aggregation in Argentina, 1983-2005,” PhD thesis, University of Notre Dame.Google Scholar
Leiras, Marcelo. 2007. Todos los Caballos del Rey: La Integración de los Partidos Políticos y el Gobierno Democrático de la Argentina, 1995-2003. Prometeo.Google Scholar
Leiras, Marcelo, Tuñón, Guadalupe, and Giraudy, Agustina. 2015. “Who Wants an Independent Court? Political Competition and Supreme Court Autonomy in the Argentine Provinces (1984–2008).” Journal of Politics 77(1):175–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Letelier, Leonardo. 2006. “Local Government Organization and Finance: Chile.” In Local Governance in Developing Countries, ed. Shah, Anwar. The World Bank, pp. 419–46.Google Scholar
Levitsky, Steven. 2003. Transforming Labor-Based Parties in Latin America: Argentine Peronism in Comparative Perspective. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitsky, Steven, and Way, Lucan A.. 2010. Competitive Authoritarianism: Hybrid Regimes after the Cold War. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levitt, Steven, and Wolfram, Catherine. 1997. “Decomposing the Sources of Incumbency Advantage in the US House.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 22(22):45–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, Blane D., Nguyen, Hieu T. M., and Hendrawan, Adrianus. 2020. “Political Accountability and Public Service Delivery in Decentralized Indonesia: Incumbency Advantage and the Performance of Second Term Mayors.” European Journal of Political Economy 64:101910.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limongi, Fernando, and Cortez, Rafael. 2010. “As Eleições de 2010 e o Quadro Partidário (The 2010 Elections and the Party System).” Novos Estudos Cebrap 88:21–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Limongi, Fernando, and Vasselai, Fabricio. 2018. “Entries and Withdrawals: Electoral Coordination across Different Offices and the Brazilian Party Systems.” Brazilian Political Science Review 12.Google Scholar
Lin, Winston. 2013. “Agnostic Notes on Regression Adjustments to Experimental Data: Reexamining Freedman’s Critique.” Annals of Applied Statistics 7(1):295–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Linden, Leigh. 2004. “Are Incumbents Really Advantaged? The Preference for Non-incumbents in Indian National Elections.” Working paper, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Livert, Felipe, Ávila, Gabriel, and Tapia, Constanza Carrasco. 2023. “Clientelism and Electoral competition: The Case of Chile’s Municipalities.” Revista de Ciencia Política 43:489–521.Google Scholar
Llaudet, Elena. 2013. “Parties’ Strategic Behavior as a Source of Incumbency Advantage: An Analysis of Spanish Senatorial Elections in the Post-Franco Era.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Lodola, Germán. 2005. “Protesta Popular y Redes Clientelares en la Argentina: El Reparto Federal del Plan Trabajar (1996-2001).” Desarrollo Económico 44(176):515–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lucardi, Adrián, and Rosas, Guillermo. 2014. “Is the Incumbent Curse the Incumbent’s Fault? Strategic Behavior and Negative Incumbency Effects in Young Democracies.” Electoral Studies 44:66–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo. 2014. Segmented Representation: Political Party Strategies in Unequal Democracies. Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Altman, David. 2011. “Uprooted but Stable: Chilean Parties and the Concept of Party System Institutionalization.” Latin American Politics and Society 53(2):1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Mardones, Rodrigo. 2009. “Political Targeting in a Clean Country.” Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association, Toronto.Google Scholar
Luna, Juan Pablo, and Rosenblatt, Fernando. 2017. “Las Organizaciones Partidarias: Antes y Después de 1973.” In Luna, Juan Pablo and Mardones, Rodrigo, eds., La Columna Vertebral Fracturada: Revisitando Intermediarios Políticos en Chile. Santiago: RiL editores, pp. 33–55.Google Scholar
Lupia, Arthur. 1994. “Shortcuts versus Encyclopedias: Information and Voting Behavior in California Insurance Reform Elections.” American Political Science Review 88(1):63–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2013. “Party Brands and Partisanship: Theory with Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Argentina.” American Journal of Political Science 57(1):49–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2014. “Brand Dilution and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America.” World Politics 66(4):561–602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam. 2016. Party Brands in Crisis: Partisanship, Brand dilution, and the Breakdown of Political Parties in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lupu, Noam, Gervasoni, Carlos, Oliveros, Virginia, and Schiumerini, Luis. 2015. Argentine Panel Election Study. University of Wisconsin.Google Scholar
Lupu, Noam, and Stokes, Susan. 2009. “The Social Bases of Political Parties in Argentina, 1912–2003.” Latin American Research Review 44(1):58–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macdonald, Bobbie. 2014. “Incumbency Disadvantages in African Politics? Regression Discontinuity Evidence from Zambian Elections.” SSRN. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2325674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz. 2006. Voting for Autocracy: Hegemonic Party Survival and Its Demise in Mexico. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magaloni, Beatriz, Diaz-Cayeros, Alberto, and Estévez, Federico. 2007. “Clientelism and Portfolio Diversification: A Model of Electoral Investment with Applications to Mexico.” In Patrons, Clients, and Policies: Patterns of Democratic Accountability and Political Competition, ed. Kitschelt, Herbert and Wilkinson, Steven. Cambridge University Press, pp. 182–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott. 1999. Rethinking Party Systems in the Third Wave of Democratization: The Case of Brazil. Stanford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Pérez-Liñán, Aníbal. 2013. Democracies and Dictatorships in Latin America: Emergence, Survival, and Fall. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, Power, Timothy J., and Bizzarro, Fernando. 2018. “The Uneven Institutionalization of a Party System: Brazil.” In Party Systems in Latin America: Institutionalization, Decay, and Collapse ed. Scott Mainwaring., Cambridge University Press, pp. 164–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Scully, Timothy. 1995. Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mainwaring, Scott, and Shugart, Matthew Soberg. 1997. Presidentialism and Democracy in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manin, Bernard. 1997. The Principles of Representative Government. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane. 2009. “A Selection Model of Political Representation.” Journal of Political Philosophy 17(4):369–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mardones, Rodrigo. 2006. “Descentralización y Transición en Chile.” Revista de Ciencia Política 26(1):3–24.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974 a. “Congressional Elections: The Case of the Vanishing Marginals.” Polity 6(3):295–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayhew, David. 1974 b. The Electoral Connection. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Mayhew, David. 2008. “Incumbency Advantage in US Presidential Elections: The Historical Record.” Political Science Quarterly 123(2):201–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meireles, Fernando. 2019. “Political Careers in the House of Representatives: A Quasi-Experimental Analysis.” Dados 62.Google Scholar
Melo, Marcus, Pereira, Carlos, and Figueiredo, Carlos Mauricio. 2009. “Political and Institutional Checks on Corruption: Explaining the Performance of Brazilian Audit Institutions.” Comparative Political Studies 42(9):1217–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo, Marcus, Pereira, Carlos, and Souza, Saulo. 2010. “The Political Economy of Fiscal Reform in Brazil.” Inter-American Development Bank, Working Paper Series 117.Google Scholar
Molina, José. 2001. “The Electoral Effect of Underdevelopment: Government Turnover and Its Causes in Latin-American, Caribbean and Industrialized Countries.” Electoral Studies 20(3):427–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Montero, Alfred, and Samuels, David. 2004. Decentralization and Democracy in Latin America. Notre Dame University Press.Google Scholar
Mummolo, Jonathan, and Peterson, Erik. 2019. “Demand Effects in Survey Experiments: An Empirical Assessment.” American Political Science Review 113(2):517–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, Paula. 2014. “An Informational Theory of Campaign Clientelism: The Case of Peru.” Comparative Politics 47:79–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muñoz, Paula. 2019. Buying Audiences. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Mustapic, Ana María. 2002. “Del Partido Peronista al Partido Justicialista. Las Transformaciones de un Partido Carismático.” In El Asedio a la Política. Los Partidos Latinoamericanos en la Era Neoliberal, ed. Medina, Juan Manuel Abal and Cavarozzi, Marcelo. Homo Sapiens, pp. 137–61.Google Scholar
Navia, Patricio. 2008. Legislative Candidate Selection in Chile. In Pathways to Power, ed. Morgenstern, Scott and Siavelis, Peter. Pennsylvania State University Press, pp. 92–118.Google Scholar
Nazareno, Marcelo, Stokes, Susan, and Brusco, Valeria. 2006. “Réditos y Peligros Electorales del Gasto público en la Argentina.” Desarrollo Económico 46(181):63–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nichter, Simeon. 2008. “Vote Buying or Turnout Buying? Machine Politics and the Secret Ballot.” American Political Science Review 102(1):19–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzwiecki, Sara. 2018. Uneven Social Policies: The Politics of Subnational Variation in Latin America. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Niedzwiecki, Sara. 2021. “The RAI Travels to Latin America: Measuring Regional Authority under Regime Change.” Regional & Federal Studies 31(2):235–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, Lucas. 2018. “Disloyal Brokers and Weak Parties.” American Journal of Political Science 62(1):84–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Novaes, Lucas, and Schiumerini, Luis. 2022. “Commodity Shocks and Incumbency Effects.” British Journal of Political Science 52(4):1689–708.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliveros, Virginia. 2013. “A Working Machine: Patronage Jobs and Political Services in Argentina.” PhD thesis, Columbia University.Google Scholar
Oliveros, Virginia. 2022. Patronage at Work: Public Jobs and Political Services in Argentina. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Oliveros, Virginia, and Scherlis, Gerardo. 2004. “Elecciones Concurrentes of Elecciones Desdobladas? La Manipulación de los Calendarios Electorales en la Argentina.” In Qué Cambió en la Política Argentina? Elecciones, Instituciones y Ciudadanía en Perspectiva Comparada, ed. Cheresky, Isidoro and Blanquer, Jean-Michel. Homo Sapiens, pp. 179–211.Google Scholar
Palanza, Valeria, Scartascini, Carlos, and Tommasi, Mariano. 2013. “A Tale of Two Latin American Congresses. Towards a Comparative Study of Institutionalization and Effectiveness.” Inter-American Development Bank, Research Department Working Paper 1363.Google Scholar
Paldam, Martin, and Skott, Peter. 1995. “A Rational-Voter Explanation of the Cost of Ruling.” Public Choice 83(1-2):159–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pavão, Nara. 2018. “Corruption as the Only Option: The Limits to Electoral Accountability.” Journal of Politics 80(3):996–1010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pepinsky, Thomas B. 2019. “The Return of the Single-Country Study.” Annual Review of Political Science 22:187–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, and Melo, Marcus André. 2016. “Reelecting Corrupt Incumbents in Exchange for Public Goods: ‘Rouba mas Faz’ in Brazil.” Latin American Research Review 50(4):88–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pereira, Carlos, Melo, Marcus André, and Figueiredo, Carlos. 2009. “The Corruption-Enhancing Role of Reelection Incentives? Counterintuitive Evidence from Brazil’s Audit Reports.” Political Research Quarterly 62(4):731–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Persson, Torsten, and Tabellini, Guido Enrico. 2002. Political Economics: Explaining Economic Policy. MIT Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Bingham, and Whitten, Guy. 1993. “A Cross-national Analysis of Economic Voting: Taking Account of the Political Context.” American Journal of Political Science 37(2):391–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pribble, Jennifer. 2015. “The Politics of Building Municipal Institutional Effectiveness in Chile.” Latin American Politics and Society 57(3):100–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ravishankar, Nirmala. 2009. “The Cost of Ruling: Anti-incumbency in Elections.” Economic and Political Weekly 44(10):92–8.Google Scholar
Remmer, Karen. 2007. “The Political Economy of Patronage: Expenditure Patterns in the Argentine Provinces, 1983–2003.” Journal of Politics 69(2): 363–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Riker, William. 1964. Federalism: Origin, Operation, Significance. Little Brown.Google Scholar
Riquelme, Luis, Gamboni, Cristóbal, Labarca, Christian, Parada, José, Pérez, Joaquín, and Ramírez, Francisco. 2021. “Descentralización Fiscal en Chile: aspectos presupuestarios de Gobiernos Regionales y Municipalidades.” Dirección de Presupuestos, Gobierno de Chile.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan. 2006. Hamilton’s Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Rodden, Jonathan, and Wibbels, Erik. 2011. “Dual Accountability and the Nationalization of Party Competition: Evidence from Four Federations.” Party Politics 17(September):629–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rubin, Donald B. 1974. “Estimating Causal Effects of Treatments in Randomized and Nonrandomized Studies.” Journal of Educational Psychology 66(5):688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ruiz Nicolini, Juan Pablo. 2020. polAr: Argentina Political Analysis. R Package Version 0.2.0.1.Google Scholar
Salas, Christian. 2016. “Incumbency Advantage in Multi-Member Districts: Evidence from Congressional Elections in Chile.” Electoral Studies 42: 213–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 1999. “Incentives to Cultivate a Party Vote in Candidate-Centric Electoral Systems: Evidence from Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 32(4):487–518.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 2003. Ambition, Federalism, and Legislative Politics in Brazil. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 2004 a. “From Socialism to Social Democracy: Party Organization and the Transformation of the Workers’ Party in Brazil.” Comparative Political Studies 37(9):999–1024.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David. 2004 b. “Presidentialism and Accountability for the Economy in Comparative Perspective.” American Political Science Review 98(3):425–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David, and Zucco, Cesar. 2014. “The Power of Partisanship in Brazil: Evidence from Survey Experiments.” American Journal of Political Science 58(1):212–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Samuels, David, and Zucco, Cesar. 2018. Partisans, Antipartisans, and Nonpartisans: Voting Behavior in Brazil. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scherlis, Gerardo. 2013. “The Contours of Party Patronage in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 48(3):63–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schiumerini, Luis. 2015. “Incumbency and Democracy in South America.” PhD thesis, Yale University.Google Scholar
Schiumerini, Luis, and Steinberg, David A.. 2020. “The Black Market Blues: The Political Costs of Illicit Currency Markets.” Journal of Politics 82(4): 1217–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shields, Todd, Goidel, Robert, and Tadlock, Barry. 1995. “The Net Impact of Media Exposure on Individual Voting Decisions in US Senate and House Elections.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 3(20):415–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 1997. “Continuity and Change in the Chilean Party System: On the Transformational Effects of Electoral Reform.” Comparative Political Studies 30(6):651–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2002 a. “The Hidden Logic of Candidate Selection for Chilean Parliamentary Elections.” Comparative Politics 34(4):419–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siavelis, Peter. 2002 b. “Sistema Electoral, Desintegración de Coaliciones y Democracia en Chile. El Fin de la Concertación.” Revista de Ciencia Política 24:419–38.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard. 2001. “Scaling Down: The Subnational Comparative Method.” Studies in Comparative International Development 36(1):93–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan. 2005. “Perverse Accountability: A Formal Model of Machine Politics with Evidence from Argentina.” American Political Science Review 99(3):315–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, Susan, Dunning, Thad, Nazareno, Marcelo, and Brusco, Valeria. 2013. Brokers, Voters, and Clientelism: The Puzzle of Distributive Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Svolik, Milan. 2013. “Learning to Love Democracy: Electoral Accountability and the Success of Democracy.” American Journal of Political Science 57(3): 685–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szwarcberg, Mariela. 2012. “Uncertainty, Political Clientelism, and Voter Turnout in Latin America: Why Parties Conduct Rallies in Argentina.” Comparative Politics 45(1):88–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Szwarcberg, Mariela. 2013. “The Microfoundations of Political Clientelism: Lessons from the Argentine Case.” Latin American Research Review 48(2):32–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Teele, Dawn Langan, Kalla, Joshua, and Rosenbluth, Frances. 2018. “The Ties that Double Bind: Social Roles and Women’s Underrepresentation in Politics.” American Political Science Review 112(3):525–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tertytchnaya, Katerina, Vries, Catherine De, Solaz, Hector, and Doyle, David. 2018. “When the Money Stops: Fluctuations in Financial Remittances and Incumbent Approval in Central Eastern Europe, the Caucasus and Central Asia.” American Political Science Review 112(4):758–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thachil, Tariq. 2014. Elite Parties, Poor Voters. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tommasi, Mariano. 2006. “Federalism in Argentina and The Reform of the 1990s.” In Federalism and Economic Reform: International Perspectives, ed. Wallack, Jessica and Srinivasan, Thirukodikaval Nilakanta. Cambridge University Press, pp. 25–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toral, Guillermo. 2024. “How Patronage Delivers: Political Appointments, Bureaucratic Accountability, and Service Delivery in Brazil.” American Journal of Political Science 68(2):797–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Torre, Juan Carlos. 2003. “Los Huérfanos de la Política de Partidos: Sobre los Alcances y la Naturaleza de la Crisis de Representación Partidaria.” Desarrollo Económico 42(168):647–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tow, Andy. 2024. Atlas Electoral de Andy Tow.Google Scholar
Uppal, Yogesh. 2009. “The Disadvantaged Incumbents: Estimating Incumbency Effects in Indian State Legislatures.” Public Choice 138(1):9–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vaishnav, Milan. 2017. When Crime Pays: Money and Muscle in Indian Politics. Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Arturo. 1977. Political Brokers in Chile: Local Government in a Centralized Polity. Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Valenzuela, Samuel, and Scully, Timothy. 1997. “Electoral Choices and the Party System in Chile: Continuity and Changes at the Recovery of Democracy.” Comparative Politics 29:511–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weaver, Julie Anne. 2021. “Electoral Dis-connection: The Limits of Reelection in Contexts of Weak Accountability.” Journal of Politics 83(4):1462–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2006. “Partisanship and Protest: The Politics of Workfare Distribution in Argentina.” Latin American Research Review 41(3):122–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2012. “What Wins Votes: Why Some Politicians Opt Out of Clientelism.” American Journal of Political Science 56(3):568–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2014. Curbing Clientelism in Argentina: Politics, Poverty, and Social Policy. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca, and Winters, Matthew S.. 2017. “Can Citizens Discern? Information Credibility, Political Sophistication, and the Punishment of Corruption in Brazil.” Journal of Politics 79(1):60–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca, and Winters, Matthew S.. 2014. “Third-Person versus Second-Person Vignettes in Survey Experimental Research on Sensitive Topics.” Unpublished Paper, University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Weschle, Simon. 2022. Money in Politics. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willis, Eliza, Garman, Christopher, and Haggard, Stephan. 1999. “The Politics of Decentralization in Latin America.” Latin American Research Review 7–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winters, Matthew, and Weitz-Shapiro, Rebecca. 2013. “Lacking Information or Condoning Corruption: When Do Voters Support Corrupt Politicians?” Comparative Politics 45(4):418–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Bank. 2013. World Development Indicators.Google Scholar
Zaller, John. 1992. The Nature and Origins of Mass Opinion. Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zarazaga, Rodrigo. 2016. “Party Machines and Voter-Customized Rewards Strategies.” Journal of Theoretical Politics 28(4):678–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Luis Schiumerini, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Incumbency Bias
  • Online publication: 17 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009636490.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Luis Schiumerini, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Incumbency Bias
  • Online publication: 17 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009636490.013
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Luis Schiumerini, University of Notre Dame, Indiana
  • Book: Incumbency Bias
  • Online publication: 17 May 2025
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009636490.013
Available formats
×