Key boundary-marking concepts

Roger Brownsword; Morag Goodwin

doi:10.1017/CBO9781139047609.012

8 - Key boundary-marking concepts

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2012

Roger Brownsword and

Morag Goodwin

Show author details

Roger Brownsword: Affiliation:
King's College London
Morag Goodwin: Affiliation:
Universiteit van Tilburg, The Netherlands

Book contents

Get access

Summary

Introduction

In 2010, the Nobel Prize Committee awarded the prize for medicine to Robert Edwards, the British pioneer of in vitro fertilisation (IVF) treatment. The Vatican reaction was swift. The head of the Pontifical Academy for Life, Ignacio Carrasco de Paula, described the award as ‘completely out of order’, as without the work of Dr Edwards ‘there would not be a large number of freezers filled with embryos in the world’. In making his comment on the decision to honour Dr Edwards, Bishop Carrasco de Paula is using the concept of the sanctity of life, or what we shall term below as ‘human dignity’, to determine the boundary of what he finds morally acceptable or legitimate. The concepts that we use in discussions about technology regulation to mark the boundary of legitimacy are the subject of this chapter.

Such moral concepts help us to determine what technology can be licensed, what cannot be entertained, and how far we can go. They determine the boundary of what can be permitted: although a technology may be allowed, there may be limitations to its use or development; or attempts made in regulation to mitigate certain unhappy or unhealthy consequences. We determine these limits by reference to what we term here as our ‘boundary-marking concepts’, i.e. those concepts that are most commonly used by participants in debates about the legitimacy of technological developments to mark the outer limit of moral acceptability. These concepts are used by participants because they give expression to beliefs or understandings that we find intrinsically valuable, that have, in the language of Ronald Dworkin, a touch of sacredness about them for the role they play in human life.

Type: Chapter
Information: Law and the Technologies of the Twenty-First Century
Text and Materials
, pp. 188 - 224

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139047609.012 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Dworkin, RonaldLife’s Dominion. An Argument about Abortion, Euthanasia, and Individual FreedomLondonVintage Books 1994Google Scholar

Brownsword, RogerThe Regulatory Challenge of Biotechnology. Human Genetics, Food and PatentsCheltenhamEdward Elgar 2007Google Scholar

Brownsword, RogerRights, Regulation and the Technological RevolutionOxfordOxford University Press 2008CrossRef Google Scholar

2008

Searle, John R.The Construction of Social RealityLondonPenguin 1995Google Scholar

Schmitt, CarlThe Concept of the PoliticalChicagoUniversity of Chicago Press 2007CrossRef Google Scholar

McCrudden, ChristopherHuman Dignity and Judicial Interpretation of Human RightsEuropean Journal of International Law 19 2008 655CrossRef Google Scholar

Beyleveld, DeryckBrownsword, RogerHuman Dignity in Bioethics and BiolawOxfordOxford University Press 2001Google Scholar

Kant, ImmanuelThe Metaphysics of MoralsCambridge University Press 1996CrossRef Google Scholar

Brownsword, RogerHuman RightsOxfordHart 2004Google Scholar

Atkins, E. M.Griffin, M. T.Cicero: On DutiesCambridgeCambridge University Press 1991Google Scholar

Sensen, OliverKant’s Conception of Human DignityKant-Studien 100. Jarg. 2009 S.309Google Scholar

Daele, Wolfgang van denDimensions of Technology RegulationNijmegenWolf Publishing 2010Google Scholar

Nozick, RobertAnarchy, State and UtopiaNew YorkBasic Books 1974Google Scholar

Campbell, TomCabrera, LauraRegulating Pre-implantation Genetic Diagnosis: A Comparative and Theoretical AnalysisAbingdonRoutledge 2012Google Scholar

2004

Kateb, GeorgeHuman DignityCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2011Google Scholar

1997

Dallal, AhmedIslam, Science and the Challenge of HistoryNew HavenYale University Press 2010Google Scholar

Larijani, BagherZahedi, F.Islamic Perspective on Human Research and Stem Cell ResearchTransplantation Proceedings 36 2004 3188CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Sloane, J. B.The Complete PlaysLondonPenguin 1969Google Scholar

2008

Mirandola, Pico dellaOn the Dignity of ManIndianapolisHackett 1965Google Scholar

Karpowicz, PhillipCohen, Cynthia B.Kooy, Derek van derDeveloping Human–Nonhuman Chimeras in Human Stem Cell Research: Ethical Issues and BoundariesKennedy Institute of Ethics Journal 15 2005 107CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Heidegger, MartinBasic WritingsLondonRoutledge & Kegan Paul 1978Google Scholar

Huxley, AldousBrave New WorldLondonFlamingo 1994Google Scholar

Fukuyama, FrancisOur Posthuman Future. Consequences of the Biotechnology RevolutionNew YorkFarrar, Straus and Giroux 2002Google Scholar

Habermas, JürgenThe Future of Human NatureCambridgePolity 2003Google Scholar

Arendt, HannahThe Human ConditionNew YorkDoubleday Books 1959Google Scholar

Sandel, MichaelThe Case Against PerfectionismCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2007Google Scholar

Dworkin, Sovereign VirtueCambridge, MAHarvard University Press 2000Google Scholar

Hopkins, Patrick D.A Moral Vision of TranshumanismJournal of Evolution and Technology 19 2008 3Google Scholar

Turkle, SherryAlone Together: Why We Expect More from Technology and Less from Each OtherNew YorkBasic Books 2011Google Scholar

Carr, NicholasThe Shallows: How the Internet Is Changing the Way We Read, Think and RememberLondonAtlantic Books 2010Google Scholar

Mill, J. S.Utilitarianism, On Liberty and Considerations on Representative GovernmentLondonDent 1993Google Scholar

Harris, JohnHuman EnhancementOxfordOxford University Press 2009Google Scholar

Brownsword, RogerHuman Rights in the Digital AgeAbingdonRoutledge-Cavendish 2005Google Scholar

Parfitt, DerekReasons and PersonsOxfordClarendon Press 1987Google Scholar

Mcintyre, T. J.Scott, ColinRegulating TechnologiesOxfordHart 2008Google Scholar

Giddens, AntonyRisk and ResponsibilityModern Law Review 62 1999 1CrossRef Google Scholar

Buchanan, AllenBrock, Dan W.Daniels, NormanWikler, DanielFrom Chance to Choice. Genetics and JusticeCambridgeCambridge University Press 2000CrossRef Google Scholar

Gerards, Janneke H.Heringa, Aalt-WillemJannsen, Heleen L.Genetic Discrimination and Genetic Privacy in a Comparative PerspectiveAntwerp and LondonIntersentia 2005Google Scholar

1995

Savulescu, JulianProcreative Beneficence: Why We Should Select the Best ChildrenBioethics 15 2001 413CrossRef Google Scholar PubMed

Custers, BartThe Power of Knowledge: Ethical, Legal, and Technological Aspects of Data MiningNijmegenWolf Publishing 2004Google Scholar

Hildebrandt, MireilleKoops, Bert-JaapThe Challenges of Ambient Law and Legal Protection in the Profiling EraModern Law Review 73(3) 2010 428CrossRef Google Scholar

Mansell, R.Digital Opportunities and the Missing Link for Developing CountriesOxford Review of Economic Policy 17 2001CrossRef Google Scholar

2007

Bruce, DonaldBruce, AnnEngineering Genesis: Ethics and the GM RevolutionLondonEarthscan 2003

Dutfield, GrahamThe Regulatory Challenge of BiotechnologyCheltenhamEdward Elgar 2007Google Scholar

Barsh, R. LawrenceIndigenous Peoples: An Emerging Object of International LawAmerican Journal of International Law 80 1986 369CrossRef Google Scholar

Marris, ClairePublic Views on GMOs: Deconstructing the MythsEMBO Rep. 2(7) 2001 545CrossRef Google Scholar

Locke, JohnTwo Treatise of GovernmentCambridgeCambridge University Press 1988CrossRef Google Scholar

Lessig, LawrencePrivacy as PropertySocial Research 69 2002 255Google Scholar

Cohen, JulieExamined Lives: Informational Privacy and the Subject as ObjectStanford Law Review 52 2000 1378CrossRef Google Scholar

Maskus, Keith E.Reichman, Jerome H.International Public Goods and Transfer of Technology Under a Globalized Intellectual Property RegimeCambridgeCambridge University Press 2005CrossRef

Nwabueze, Remigius N.Medical Law and EthicsAldershotAshgate 2007Google Scholar

Gordley, JamesFoundations of Private Law: Property, Tort, Contract, Unjust EnrichmentOxfordOxford University Press 2006Google Scholar

1908

Wilkinson, StephenBodies For Sale: Ethics and Exploitation in the Human Body TradeAbingdonRoutledge 2003Google Scholar

Beyleveld, DeryckBrownsword, RogerResearch on Basic Ethical Principles in Bioethics and BiolawCopenhagen and BarcelonaCentre for Ethics and Law 1998Google Scholar

1988

Berg, JessicaOwning Persons: The Application of Property Theory to Embryos and FetusesWake Forest Law Review 40 2005 159Google Scholar

Solove, Daniel J.The Digital Person: Technology and Privacy in the Information AgeNew YorkNew York University Press 2004Google Scholar

Nissenbaum, Helen F.Privacy in Context: Technology, Policy and the Integrity of Social LifeStanfordStanford University Press 2009Google Scholar

Mayer-Schönberger, ViktorDelete: The Virtues of Forgetting in the Digital AgePrincetonPrinceton University Press 2011Google Scholar

2009

Cuijpers, ColetteSlim kiezen bij slimme metersPrivacy en informatie 95 2011 131Google Scholar

O’Hara, KieronThe Spy in the Coffee Machine: The End of Privacy as We Know ItOxfordOneworld Publications 2008Google Scholar

Garfinkel, SimsonDatabase Nation: The Death of Privacy in the 21st CenturySebastopol, CAO’Reilly Media 2000Google Scholar

Kasper, Debbie V. S.The Evolution (or Devolution) of PrivacySociological Forum 20 2005 69CrossRef Google Scholar

Nissenbaum, Helen F.Privacy as Contextual IntegrityWashington Law Review 79 2004 119Google Scholar

Palfrey, JohnGasser, UrsBorn Digital. Understanding the First Generation of Digital NativesNew YorkBasic Books 2008Google Scholar