Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-f9nfp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-19T06:18:17.242Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Part II - Applications

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 December 2016

Edited by
Frances M. Ross
Frances M. Ross
Affiliation:
IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, New York
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy , pp. 189 - 390
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2016

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

References

Faraday, M., The Bakerian lecture: experimental relations of gold (and other metals) to light. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond., 147 (1857), 145–181.Google Scholar
Daniel, M. C. and Astruc, D., Gold nanoparticles: assembly, supramolecular chemistry, quantum-size-related properties, and applications toward biology, catalysis, and nanotechnology. Chem. Rev., 104 (2004), 293–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murphy, C. J. Sau, T. P., Gole, A. M., et al., Anisotropic metal nanoparticles: synthesis, assembly, and optical applications. J. Phys. Chem. B, 109 (2005), 13857–13870.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xia, Y., Xiong, Y., Lim, B. and Skrabalak, S. E., Shape-controlled synthesis of metal nanocrystals: simple chemistry meets complex physics? Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 48 (2009), 60–103.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, H.-G., Niu, K. and Zheng, H., Observation of growth of metal nanoparticles. Chem. Commun., 49 (2013), 11720–11727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niu, K.-Y., Park, J., Zheng, H. and Alivisatos, A. P., Revealing bismuth oxide hollow nanoparticle formation by the Kirkendall effect. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 5715–5719.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Xin, H. L. and Zheng, H., In situ observation of oscillatory growth of bismuth nanoparticles. Nano Lett., 12 (2012), 1470–1474.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, H., Smith, R. K., Jun, Y.-W., et al., Observation of single colloidal platinum nanocrystal growth trajectories. Science, 324 (2009), 1309–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grogan, J. M., Schneider, N. M., Ross, F. M. and Bau, H. H., Bubble and pattern formation in liquid induced by an electron beam. Nano Lett., 14 (2013), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
den Heijer, M., Shao, I., Radisic, A., Reuter, M. C. and Ross, F. M., Patterned electrochemical deposition of copper using an electron beam. APL Materials, 2 (2014), 022101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Lin, X.-M., Sun, Y. and Rajh, T., In situ visualization of self-assembly of charged gold nanoparticles. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135 (2013), 3764–3767.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woehl, T. J., Park, C., Evans, J. E., et al., Direct observation of aggregative nanoparticle growth: kinetic modeling of the size distribution and growth rate. Nano Lett., 14 (2013), 373–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, H.-G., Cui, L., Whitelam, S. and Zheng, H., Real-time imaging of Pt3Fe nanorod growth in solution. Science, 336 (2012), 1011–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, G., Jiang, Y., Lin, F., et al., In situ study of the growth of two-dimensional palladium dendritic nanostructures using liquid-cell electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 9447–9450.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woehl, T. J., Evans, J. E., Arslan, I., Ristenpart, W. D. and Browning, N. D., Direct in situ determination of the mechanisms controlling nanoparticle nucleation and growth. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 8599–8610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. E., Jungjohann, K. L., Browning, N. D. and Arslan, I., Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 2809–2813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Niu, K.-Y., Liao, H.-G. and Zheng, H., Visualization of the coalescence of bismuth nanoparticles. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 416–424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, D., Nelson, M. H., Lee, J. R., et al., Direction-specific interactions control crystal growth by oriented attachment. Science, 336 (2012), 1014–1018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuk, J. M., Park, J., Ercius, P., et al., High-resolution EM of colloidal nanocrystal growth using graphene liquid cells. Science, 336 (2012), 61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wulff, G., On the question of speed of growth and dissolution of crystal surfaces. Z. Krystallogr. Mineral., 34 (1901), 449–530.Google Scholar
Gibbs, J. W., Bumstead, H. A., Van Name, R. G. and Longley, W. R., The Collected Works of J. Willard Gibbs (London: Longmans, Green and Co., 1902).Google Scholar
Tian, N., Zhou, Z.-Y., Sun, S.-G., Ding, Y. and Wang, Z. L., Synthesis of tetrahexahedral platinum nanocrystals with high-index facets and high electro-oxidation activity. Science, 316 (2007), 732–735.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ringe, E., Van Duyne, R. P. and Marks, L. D., Wulff construction for alloy nanoparticles. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 3399–3403.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bealing, C. R., Baumgardner, W. J., Choi, J. J., Hanrath, T. and Hennig, R. G., Predicting nanocrystal shape through consideration of surface-ligand interactions. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 2118–2127.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, H.-G., Zherebetskyy, D., Xin, H., et al., Facet development during platinum nanocube growth. Science, 345 (2014), 916–919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, H.-G. and Zheng, H., Liquid cell transmission electron microscopy study of platinum iron nanocrystal growth and shape evolution. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 135 (2013), 5038–5043.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kimura, Y., Niinomi, H., Tsukamoto, K. and García-Ruiz, J. M., In situ live observation of nucleation and dissolution of sodium chlorate nanoparticles by transmission electron microscopy. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 136 (2014), 1762–1765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sutter, E., Jungjohann, K., Bliznakov, S. et al., In situ liquid-cell electron microscopy of silver-palladium galvanic replacement reactions on silver nanoparticles. Nat. Commun., 5 (2014), 4946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jungjohann, K., Bliznakov, S., Sutter, P., Stach, E. A. and Sutter, E., In situ liquid cell electron microscopy of the solution growth of Au–Pd core–shell nanostructures. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 2964–2970.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lewis, E. A., Haigh, S. J., Slater, T. J. A., et al., Real-time imaging and local elemental analysis of nanostructures in liquids. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 10019–10022.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, J., Gao, W., Wen, J. et al., Growth of Au on Pt icosahedral nanoparticles revealed by low-dose in situ TEM. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2711–2715.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Clercq, A., Dachraoui, W., Margeat, O., et al., Growth of Pt–Pd nanoparticles studied in situ by HRTEM in a liquid cell. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 5 (2014), 2126–2130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kraus, T. and de Jonge, N., Dendritic gold nanowire growth observed in liquid with transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 29 (2013), 8427–8432.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, H.-G., Shao, Y., Wang, C. M., et al., TEM study of fivefold twinned gold nanocrystal formation mechanism. Mater. Lett., 116 (2014), 299–303.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alloyeau, D., Dachraoui, W., Javed, Y., et al., Unravelling kinetic and thermodynamic effects on the growth of gold nanoplates by liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2574–2581.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parent, L. R., Robinson, D. B., Woehl, T. J., et al., Direct in situ observation of nanoparticle synthesis in a liquid crystal surfactant template. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 3589–3596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Parent, L. R., Robinson, D. B., Cappillino, P. J., et al., In situ observation of directed nanoparticle aggregation during the synthesis of ordered nanoporous metal in soft templates. Chem. Mater., 26 (2014), 1426–1433.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X. and Wen, J., In situ wet-cell TEM observation of gold nanoparticle motion in an aqueous solution. Nanoscale Res. Lett., 7 (2012), 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, E. A. and de Jonge, N., Microfluidic system for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 622–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, H., Claridge, S. A., Minor, A. M., Alivisatos, A. P. and Dahmen, U., Nanocrystal diffusion in a liquid thin film observed by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 9 (2009), 2460–2465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., Smith, J. M., Park, J., et al., 3D motion of DNA-Au nanoconjugates in graphene liquid cell electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 4556–4561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jonge, N., Poirier-Demers, N., Demers, H., Peckys, D. B. and Drouin, D., Nanometer-resolution electron microscopy through micrometers-thick water layers. Ultramicroscopy, 110 (2010), 1114–1119.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, E. R., Mecklenburg, M., Shevitski, B., Singer, S. B. and Regan, B. C., Charged nanoparticle dynamics in water induced by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 28 (2012), 3695–3698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mueller, C., Harb, M., Dwyer, J. R. and Miller, R. D., Nanofluidic cells with controlled pathlength and liquid flow for rapid, high-resolution in situ imaging with electrons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 4 (2013), 2339–2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, F., Josephson, D. P. and Stein, A., Colloidal assembly: the road from particles to colloidal molecules and crystals. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 50 (2011), 360–388.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Baker, J. L., Widmer-Cooper, A., Toney, M. F., Geissler, P. L. and Alivisatos, A. P., Device-scale perpendicular alignment of colloidal nanorods. Nano Lett., 10 (2009), 195–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J., Zheng, H., Lee, W. C., et al., Direct observation of nanoparticle superlattice formation by using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 2078–2085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grogan, J. M., Rotkina, L. and Bau, H. H., In situ liquid-cell electron microscopy of colloid aggregation and growth dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 83 (2011), 061405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oleshko, V. P. and Howe, J. M., Are electron tweezers possible? Ultramicroscopy, 111 (2011), 1599–1606.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batson, P. E., Reyes-Coronado, A., Barrera, R. G., et al., Nanoparticle movement: plasmonic forces and physical constraints. Ultramicroscopy, 123 (2012), 50–58.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Batson, P. E., Reyes-Coronado, A., Barrera, R. G., et al., Plasmonic nanobilliards: controlling nanoparticle movement using forces induced by swift electrons. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 3388–3393.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, H., Mirsaidov, U. M., Wang, L.-W. and Matsudaira, P., Electron beam manipulation of nanoparticles. Nano Lett., 12 (2012), 5644–5648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, H., Using molecular tweezers to move and image nanoparticles. Nanoscale, 5 (2013), 4070–4078.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, Y.-T., Wang, C.-Y., Hong, Y.-J., et al., Electron beam manipulation of gold nanoparticles external to the beam. RSC Adv., 4 (2014), 31652–31656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jiang, Y., Zhu, G., Lin, F., et al., In situ study of oxidative etching of palladium nanocrystals by liquid cell electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 3761–3765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Hölzle, M. H., Zwing, V. and Kolb, D. M., The influence of steps on the deposition of Cu onto Au(111). Electrochim. Acta, 40 (1995), 1237–1247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hölzle, M. H., Apsel, C. W., Will, T. and Kolb, D. M., Copper deposition onto Au(111) in the presence of thiourea. J. Electrochem. Soc., 142 (1995), 3741–3749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnussen, O. M., Zitzler, L., Gleich, B., Vogt, M. R. and Behm, R. J., In-situ atomic-scale studies of the mechanisms and dynamics of metal dissolution by high-speed STM. Electrochim. Acta, 46 (2001), 3725–3733.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Magnussen, O. M., Polewska, W., Zitzler, L. and Behm, R. J., In situ video-STM studies of dynamic processes at electrochemical interfaces. Faraday Discuss., 121 (2002), 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Azhagurajan, M., Wen, R., Lahiri, A. et al., Direct evidence of homoepitaxial growth in the electrodeposition of Au observed by ultra-high resolution differential optical microscopy. J. Electrochem. Soc., 160 (2013), D361–D365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gallaway, J. W., Desai, D., Gaikwad, A. et al., A lateral microfluidic cell for imaging electrodeposited zinc near the shorting condition. J. Electrochem. Soci., 157 (2010), A1279–A1286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, F. M., Growth processes and phase transformations studied by in situ transmission electron microscopy. IBM J. Res., 44 (2000), 489–501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williamson, M. J., Tromp, R. M., Vereecken, P. M., Hull, R. and Ross, F. M., Dynamic electron microscopy in liquid environments. Nat. Mater., 2 (2003), 532–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, F. M. and Searson, P. C., In situ microscopy of the anodic etching of silicon. In Bailey, G. W., Ellisman, M. H., Hennigar, R. A. and Zaluzec, N. J., eds., Proceedings of the 53rd Annual MSA Meeting, Kansas City, August 1995, 232–233 (New York: Jones and Begell Publishing, 1995).Google Scholar
Bard, A. J. and Faulkner, L. R., Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd edn. (Hoboken, NJ: Wiley, 2001).Google Scholar
Holtz, M. E., Tu, Y., Gunceler, D. et al., Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1453–1459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacci, R. L., Black, J. M., Balke, N. et al., Nanoscale imaging of fundamental Li battery chemistry: solid-electrolyte interphase formation and preferential growth of lithium metal nanoclusters. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2011–2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, M. J., Investigations of materials issues in advanced interconnect structures. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Virginia (2002).Google Scholar
Radisic, A., Electrochemical nucleation and growth of copper, Ph.D. Thesis, The Johns Hopkins University (2005).Google Scholar
Grogan, J. M., Ph.D. Thesis, University of Pennsylvania (2012).Google Scholar
Radisic, A., Vereecken, P. M., Hannon, J. B., Searson, P. C. and Ross, F. M., Quantifying electrochemical nucleation and growth mechanisms from real-time kinetic data. Nano Lett., 6 (2006), 238–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Radisic, A., Ross, F. M. and Searson, P. C., In situ study of the growth kinetics of individual islands during electrodeposition of copper. J. Phys. Chem. B, 110 (2006), 7862–7868.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radisic, A., Vereecken, P. M., Searson, P. C. and Ross, F. M., The morphology and nucleation kinetics of copper islands during electrodeposition. Surf. Sci., 600 (2006), 1817–1826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, F. M., Electrochemical nucleation, growth and dendrite formation in liquid cell TEM. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 326–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. R., Singer, S. B., Augustyn, V. et al., In situ transmission electron microscopy of lead dendrites and lead ions in aqueous solution. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 6308–6317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grogan, J. M., Schneider, N. M., Ross, F. M. and Bau, H. H., The Nanoaquarium: a new paradigm in electron microscopy. J. Indian Inst. Sci., 92 (2012), 295–308.Google Scholar
den Heijer, M., Shao, X., Radisic, A., Reuter, M. C. and Ross, F. M., Patterned electrochemical deposition of copper using an electron beam. APL Mater., 2 (2014), 022101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehdi, B. L., Qian, J., Nasybulin, E. et al., Observation and quantification of nanoscale processes in lithium batteries by operando electrochemical (S)TEM. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2168–2173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leenheer, A. J., Sullivan, J. P., Shaw, M. J. and Harris, C. T., A sealed liquid cell for in situ transmission electron microscopy of controlled electrochemical processes. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 24 (2015), 1061–1068.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leenheer, A. J., Jungjohann, K. L., Zavadil, K. R., Sullivan, J. P. and Harris, C. T., Lithium electrodeposition dynamics in aprotic electrolyte observed in situ via transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano, 9 (2015), 4379–4389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chen, X., Noh, K. W., Wen, J. G. and Dillon, S. J., In situ electrochemical wet cell transmission electron microscopy characterization of solid–liquid interactions between Ni and aqueous NiCl2. Acta Mater., 60 (2012), 192–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sun, M., Liao, H.-G., Niu, K. and Zheng, H., Structural and morphological evolution of lead dendrites during electrochemical migration. Sci. Rep., 3 (2013), 2227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y. and Dillon, S. J., In situ observation of electrolytic H2 evolution adjacent to gold cathodes. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 1761–1763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeng, Z., Liang, W.-I., Liao, H.-G. et al., Visualization of electrode-electrolyte interfaces in LiPF6/EC/DEC electrolyte for lithium ion batteries via in-situ TEM. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1745–1750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacci, R. L., Dudney, N. J., More, K. L. et al., Direct visualization of initial SEI morphology and growth kinetics during lithium deposition by in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 2104–2107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gu, M., Parent, L. R., Mehdi, L. et al., Demonstration of an electrochemical liquid cell for operando transmission electron microscopy observation of the lithiation/delithiation behavior of Si nanowire battery anodes. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 6106–6112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehdi, B. L., Gu, M., Parent, L. R. et al., In situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy for battery research. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 484–492.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unocic, R. R., Sun, X. G., Sacci, R. L. et al., Direct visualization of solid electrolyte interphase formation in lithium-ion batteries with in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1029–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
den Heijer, M., In-situ transmission electron microscopy of electrodeposition: technical development, beam effects and lithography. M.Sc. Thesis, University of Leiden (2008).Google Scholar
de Jonge, N. and Ross, F. M., Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 695–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unocic, R. R., Sacci, R. L., Brown, G. M. et al., Quantitative electrochemical measurements using in situ ec-S/TEM devices. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 452–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Andricacos, P. C., Uzoh, C., Dukovic, J. O., Horkans, J. and Deligianni, H., Damascene copper electroplating for chip interconnections. IBM J. Res. Devel., 42 (1998), 567–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scharifker, B. and Hills, G., Theoretical and experimental studies of multiple nucleation. Electrochimica Acta., 28 (1983), 879–889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Milchev, A., Electrocrystallization, Fundamentals of Nucleation and Growth (New York: Springer US, 2002).Google Scholar
Vereecken, P. M., Binstead, R. A., Deligianni, H. and Andricacos, P. C., The chemistry of additives in damascene copper plating. IBM J. Res. Devel., 49 (2005), 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yang, L., Radisic, A., Nagara, M. et al., Multi-scale modeling of direct copper plating on resistive non-copper substrates. Electrochimica Acta, 78 (2012), 524–531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, N. M., Park, J. H., Grogan, J. M. et al., Visualization of active and passive control of morphology during electrodeposition. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (S3) (2014), 1530–1531.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ross, F. M., den Heijer, M., Williamson, M. J. and Steingart, D., Correlating light microscopy and electron microscopy for measuring microstructural evolution during electrochemical deposition. Adv. Imag. Electron Phys., 179 (2013), 180–182.Google Scholar
Schneider, N. M., Liquid cell electron microscopy with the nanoAquarium: radiation and electrochemistry (January 1, 2015). Dissertations available from ProQuest, Paper AAI3721631.Google Scholar
Abellan Baeza, P., Mehdi, B. L., Parent, L. R. et al., Probing the degradation mechanisms in electrolyte solutions for Li-ion batteries by in-situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1293–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Z., Liang, W.-I., Chub, Y.-H. and Zheng, H. M., In situ TEM study of the Li–Au reaction in an electrochemical liquid cell. Faraday Discuss., 176 (2014), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, E., Jungjohann, K., Bliznakov, S. et al., In situ liquid-cell electron microscopy of silver-palladium galvanic replacement reactions on silver nanoparticles. Nat. Commun., 5 (2014), 4946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unocic, R. R., Baggetto, L., Veith, G. M. et al., Probing battery chemistry with liquid cell electron energy loss spectroscopy. Chem. Commun., 51 (2015), 16377–16380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nagai, Y., Carbajal, J. D., White, J. H. et al., An electrochemically controlled microcantilever biosensor. Langmuir, 29 (2013), 9951–9957.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, N. M., Park, J. H., Grogan, J. M. et al., In situ electrochemical measurements in the Nanoaquarium. Microsc. Microanal., 19 (S2) (2013), 433–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Tarascon, J.-M. and Armand, M., Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature, 414 (2001), 359–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Armand, M. and Tarascon, J.-M., Building better batteries. Nature, 457 (2008), 652–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arico, A. S., Bruce, P., Scrotasi, B., Tarascon, J.-M. and Van Schalkwijk, W., Nanostructured materials for advanced energy conversion and storage devices. Nat. Materials, 4 (2005), 366–377.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Goodenough, J. B. and Kim, Y., Challenges for rechargeable Li batteries. Chem Mater., 22 (2010), 587–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Debe, M. K., Electrocatalyst approaches and challenges for automotive fuel cells. Nature, 486 (2013), 43–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wang, C. M., In situ transmission electron microscopy and spectroscopy studies of rechargeable batteries under dynamic operating conditions: a retrospective and perspective view. J. Mater. Res., 30 (2014), 326–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, N. and Ross, F. M., Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 695–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, M. J., Tromp, R. M., Vereecken, P. M., Hull, R. and Ross, F. M., Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid–liquid interface. Nat. Mater., 2 (2003), 532–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unocic, R. R., Sacci, R. L., Brown, G. M. et al., Quantitative electrochemical measurements using in situ ec-S/TEM devices. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 452–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zeng, Z., Liang, W.-I., Liao, H.-G. et al., Visualization of electrode–electrolyte interfaces in LiPF6/EC/DEC electrolyte for lithium ion batteries via in situ TEM. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1745–1750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacci, R. L., Black, J. M., Balke, N. et al., Nanoscale imaging of fundamental Li battery chemistry: solid-electrolyte interphase formation and preferential growth of lithium metal nanoclusters. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2011–2018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sacci, R. L., Dudney, N. J., More, K. L. et al., Direct visualization of initial SEI morphology and growth kinetics during lithium deposition by in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 2104–2107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtz, M. E., Yu, Y., Gunceler, D. et al., Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1453–1459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gu, M., Parent, L. R., Mehdi, B. L. et al., Demonstration of an electrochemical liquid cell for operando transmission electron microscopy observation of the lithiation/delithiation behavior of Si nanowire battery anodes. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 6106–6112.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unocic, R. R., Sun, X.-G., Sacci, R. L. et al., Direct visualization of solid electrolyte interphase formation in lithium-ion batteries with in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1029–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unocic, R. R., Sacci, R. L., Brown, G. M. et al., Quantitative electrochemical measurements using in situ ec-S/TEM devices. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 452–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moshkovich, M., Cojocaru, M., Gottlieb, H. E. and Aurbach, D., The study of the anodic stability of alkyl carbonate solutions by in situ FTIR spectroscopy, EQCM, NMR and MS. J. Electroanal. Chem., 497 (2001), 84–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Z., Liang, W.-I., Chu, Y.-H. and Zheng, H., In situ TEM study of the Li–Au reaction in an electrochemical liquid cell. Faraday Discuss., 176 (2014), 95–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zeng, Z., Liang, W.-I., Liao, H.-G. et al., Visualization of electrode–electrolyte interfaces in LiPF6/EC/DEC electrolyte for lithium ion batteries via in situ TEM. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1745–1750.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mehdi, B. L., Qian, J., Nasybulin, E. et al., Observation and quantification of nanoscale processes in lithium batteries by operando electrochemical (S)TEM. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2168–2173.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tang, M., Lu, S. and Newman, J., Experimental and theoretical investigation of solid-electrolyte-interphase formation mechanisms on glassy carbon. J. Electrochemi. Soc., 159 (2012), A1775–A1785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tang, M. and Newman, J., Transient characterization of solid-electrolyte-interphase using ferrocene. J. Electrochem. Soc., 159 (2012), A281–A289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unocic, R., Adamczyk, L., Dudney, N. et al., In-situ TEM characterization of electrochemical processes in energy storage systems. Microsc. Microanal., 17 (2011), 1564–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, K., Nonaqueous liquid electrolytes for lithium-based rechargeable batteries. Chem Rev., 104 (2004), 4303–4418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ring, E. A. and de Jonge, N., Microfluidic system for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 622–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grogan, J. M. and Bau, H. H., The Nanoaquarium: a platform for in situ transmission electron microscopy in liquid media. J. Microelectromech. Syst., 19 (2010), 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bard, A. J. and Faulkner, L. R., Electrochemical Methods: Fundamentals and Applications, 2nd edn. (New York: John Wiley & Sons, 2001).Google Scholar
Verma, P., Maire, P. and Novák, P., A review of the features and analyses of the solid electrolyte interphase in Li-ion batteries. Electrochimica Acta, 55 (2010), 6332–6341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winter, M., The solid electrolyte interphase: the most important least understood solid electrolyte in rechargeable Li batteries. Z. Phys. Chem., 223 (2009), 1395–1406.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sacci, R. L., Dudney, N. J., More, K. L. et al., Direct visualization of initial SEI morphology and growth kinetics during lithium deposition by in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 2104–2107.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moshkovich, M., Gofer, Y. and Aurbach, D., Investigation of the electrochemical windows of aprotic alkali metal (Li, Na, K) salt solutions. J. Electrochem. Soc., 148 (2001), E155–E167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aurbach, D., Levi, M. D., Levi, E. et al., Common electroanalytical behavior of Li intercalation processes into graphite and transition metal oxides. J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (1998), 3024–3034.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unocic, R. R., Sun, X.-G., Sacci, R. L. et al., Direct visualization of solid electrolyte interphase formation in lithium-ion batteries with in situ electrochemical transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1029–1037.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schneider, N. M., Norton, M. M., Mendel, B. J. et al., Electron–water interactions and implications for liquid cell electron microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C., 118 (2014), 22373–22382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abellan, P., Woehl, T. J., Parent, L. R. et al., Factors influencing quantitative liquid (scanning) transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 4873–4880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woehl, T. J., Evans, J. E., Arslan, I., Ristenpart, W. D. and Browning, N. D., Direct in situ determination of the mechanisms controlling nanoparticle nucleation and growth. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 8599–8610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woehl, T. J., Park, C., Evans, J. E. et al., Direct observation of aggregative nanoparticle growth: kinetic modeling of the size distribution and growth rate. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 373–378.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Abellan, P., Mehdi, B. L., Parent, L. R. et al., Probing the degradation mechanisms in electrolyte solutions for Li-ion batteries by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1293–1299.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtz, M. E., Yu, Y., Gunceler, D. et al., Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1453–1459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noh, K. W. and Dillon, S. J., Morphological changes in and around Sn electrodes during Li ion cycling characterized by in situ environmental TEM. Scripta Materialia, 69 (2013), 658–661.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhattacharyya, R., Key, B., Chen, H. et al., In situ NMR observation of the formation of metallic lithium microstructures in lithium batteries. Nat. Mater., 9 (2010), 504–510.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nishikawa, K., Mori, T., Nishida, T., Fukunaka, Y and Rosso, M., Li dendrite growth and Li+ ionic mass transfer phenomenon. J. Electroanal. Chem., 661 (2011), 84–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ely, D. R. and Garcia, R. E., Heterogeneous nucleation and growth of lithium electrodeposits on negative electrodes. J. Electrochem. Soc., 160 (2013), A662–A668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishida, T., Nishikawa, K., Rosso, M. and Fukunaka, Y., Optical observation of Li dendrite growth in ionic liquid. Electrochimica Acta, 100 (2013), 333–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. R., Singer, S. B., Augustyn, V. et al., In situ transmission electron microscopy of lead dendrites and lead ions in aqueous solution. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 6308–6317.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sun, M., Liao, H.-G., Niu, K., Zheng, H., Structural and morphological evolution of lead dendrites during electrochemical migration. Sci. Rep., 3 (2013), 3227.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leenheer, A. J., Jungjohann, K. L., Zavadil, K. R., Sullivan, J. P. and Harris, C. T., Lithium electrodeposition dynamics in aprotic electrolyte observed in situ via transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano, 9 (2015), 4379–4389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Riedl, T., Gemming, T. and Wetzig, K., Extraction of EELS white-line intensities of manganese compounds: methods, accuracy, and valence sensitivity. Ultramicroscopy, 106 (2006), 284–291.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Varela, M., Oxley, M., Luo, W. et al., Atomic-resolution imaging of oxidation states in manganites. Phys. Rev. B., 79 (2009), 085117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unocic, R. R., Baggetto, L., Veith, G. M. et al., Probing battery chemistry with liquid cell electron energy loss spectroscopy. Chem. Commun., 51 (2015), 16377–16380.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meier, J. C., Galeano, C., Katsounaros, I. et al., Degradation mechanisms of Pt/C fuel cell catalysts under simulated start–stop conditions. ACS Catal., (2012), 832–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhu, G.-Z., Prabhudev, S., Yang, J. et al., In situ liquid cell TEM study of morphological evolution and degradation of Pt–Fe nanocatalysts during potential cycling. J. Phys. Chem. C., 118 (2014), 22111–22119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References and Notes

Shaw, B. and Kelly, R., What is corrosion? Interface, Electrochem. Soc., Spring (2006), 24–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Duquette, D. and Schafrik, R., Research Opportunities in Corrosion Science and Engineering (Washington, D.C.: The National Academies Press, 2011).Google Scholar
Song, G.-L., The grand challenges in electrochemical corrosion research. Front. Mater, 1 (2014), 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, G., Electrochemical techniques in corrosion: status, limitations, and needs. J. ASTM Int., 5 (2008), 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Jonge, N. and Ross, F. M., Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 695–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jungjohann, K. L., Evans, J. E., Aguiar, J. A., Arslan, I. and Browning, N. D., Atomic-scale imaging and spectroscopy for in situ liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 621–627.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Holtz, M. E., Yu, Y., Gao, J., Abruna, H. D. and Muller, D. A., In situ electron energy loss spectroscopy in liquids. Microsc. Microanal., 19 (2013), 1027–1035.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unocic, R. R., Baggetto, L., Unocic, K. et al., Coupling EELS/EFTEM imaging with environmental fluid cell microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 1104–1105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zaluzec, N. J., Burke, M. G., Haigh, S. J. and Kulzick, M. A., X-ray energy-dispersive spectrometry during in situ liquid cell studies using an analytical electron microscope. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 323–329.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, S., Janssen, A., Zhong, Z. L., Zaluzec, N. J. and Burke, M. J., Liquid in situ analytical electron microscopy: examining SCC precursor events for Type 304 stainless steel in H2O. Microsc. Microanal., 21 (2015), 1291–1292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCafferty, E., Introduction to Corrosion Science (New York: Springer, 2010).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, G. and Sridhar, N., Understanding localized corrosion. Mater. Today, 11 (2008), 38–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, G., Pitting corrosion of metals. J. Electrochem. Soc., 145 (1998), 2186–2198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soltis, J., Passivity breakdown, pit initiation and propagation of pits in metallic materials: review. Corros. Sci., 90 (2015), 5–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Accelerated dissolution of thin metal films had been observed during continuous imaging under the electron beam.Google Scholar
Unocic, R. R., Sacci, R. L., Brown, G. M. et al., Quantitative electrochemical measurements using in situ ec-S/TEM devices. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 452–461.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frankel, G. and Rohwerder, M., Electrochemical techniques for corrosion. In Encyclopedia of Electrochemistry (Weinheim, Germany: Wiley-VCH, 2007).Google Scholar
Kelly, R. G., Scully, J. R., Shoesmith, D. and Buchheit, R., Electrochemical Techniques in Corrosion Science and Engineering (New York: Marcel Dekker, 2013).Google Scholar
Frankel, G., Techniques for Corrosion Quantification in the Characterization of Materials, 2nd edn. (Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons, 2012), pp. 850–864.Google Scholar
Keddam, M., Application of advanced electrochemical techniques and concepts to corrosion phenomena. Corrosion, 62 (2006), 1056–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, G., The growth of 2-D pits in thin film aluminum. Corros. Sci., 30 (1990), 1203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balazs, L. and Gouyet, J., Two-dimensional pitting corrosion of aluminium thin layers. Phys. A Stat. Mech. Appl., 217 (1995), 319–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Frankel, G., Pit growth in thin metallic films. Mater. Sci. Forum, 247 (1997), 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Proost, J., Baklanov, M. and Verbeeck, R., Morphology of corrosion pits in aluminum thin film metallizations. J. Solid State Electrochem., 2 (1998), 150–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hernandez, S., Griffin, A. Jr., Brotzen, F. and Dunn, C., The effect of thickness on the corrosion susceptibility of Al thin film metallizations. J. Electrochem. Soc., 142 (1995), 1215–1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, Y.-P., Cheng, C.-F., Wang, G.-C. and Lu, T.-M., Characterization of pitting corrosion in aluminum films by light scattering. Appl. Phys. Lett., 73 (1998), 2432–2434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chee, S. W., Ross, F. M., Duquette, D. and Hull, R., Studies of corrosion of Al thin films using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. MRS Proc., 1525 (2013), mrsf12-1525-ss11-03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chee, S. W., Duquette, D. J., Ross, F. M. and Hull, R., Metastable structures in Al thin films before the onset of corrosion pitting as observed using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 462–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chee, S. W., Pratt, S. H., Hattar, K. et al., Studying localized corrosion using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 51 (2015), 168–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chee, S. W., Hull, R. and Ross, F. M., Liquid cell TEM of the corrosion of metal films in aqueous solutions. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 1110–1111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liao, H.-G., Niu, K. and Zheng, H., Observation of growth of metal nanoparticles. Chem. Commun., 49 (2013), 11720–11727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jiang, Y., Zhu, G., Lin, F., Zhang, H. and Jin, C., In situ study of oxidative etching of palladium nanocrystals by liquid cell electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 3761–3765.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wu, J., Gao, W., Yang, H. and Zuo, J.-M., Imaging shape-dependent corrosion behavior of Pt nanoparticles over extended time using a liquid flow cell and TEM. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1508–1509.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sutter, E., Jungjohann, K., Bliznakov, S. et al., In situ liquid-cell electron microscopy of silver-palladium galvanic replacement reactions on silver nanoparticles. Nat. Commun., 5 (2014), 4946.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chee, S. W., Park, J.-H., Pinkowitz, A. et al., Liquid cell TEM of Al thin film corrosion under potentiostatic polarization. Microsc. Microanal., 21 (2015), 973–974.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Park, J. H., Chee, S. W., Kodambaka, S. and Ross, F. M., In situ LC-TEM studies of corrosion of metal thin films in aqueous solutions. Microsc. Microanal., 21 (2015), 1291–1292.Google Scholar
Noh, K. W, Tai, K., Mao, S. and Dillon, S. J., Grain boundary parting limit during dealloying. Adv. Eng. Mater., 17 (2015), 157–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mayer, J., Giannuzzi, L. A., Kamino, T. and Michael, J., TEM sample preparation and FIB-induced damage. MRS Bull., 32 (2007), 400–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Unocic, R., Adamczyk, L., Dudney, N. et al., In-situ TEM characterization of electrochemical processes in energy storage systems. Microsc. Microanal., 17 (2011), 1564–1565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhong, X., Burke, M. G., Schilling, S., Haigh, S. J. and Zaluzec, N. J., Novel hybrid sample preparation method for in situ liquid cell TEM analysis. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1514–1515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woehl, T. J., Jungjohann, K. L., Evans, J. E. et al., Experimental procedures to mitigate electron beam induced artifacts during in situ fluid imaging of nanomaterials. Ultramicroscopy, 127 (2013), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ring, E. A. and de Jonge, N., Microfluidic system for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 622–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoppe, S. M., Sasaki, D. Y., Kinghorn, A. N. and Hattar, K., In-situ transmission electron microscopy of liposomes in an aqueous environment. Langmuir, 29 (2013), 9958–9961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Abellan, P., Woehl, T. J., Parent, L. R. et al., Factors influencing quantitative liquid (scanning) transmission electron microscopy. Chem. Commun., 50 (2014), 4873–4880.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, K. L., Anderson, I. M. and de Jonge, N., Transmission electron microscopy with a liquid flow cell. J. Microsc., 242 (2011), 117–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
The liquid layer thicknesses quoted in atmospheric corrosion studies are normally in the tens of micrometers.Google Scholar
Sacci, R. L., Dudney, N. J., More, K. L. and Unocic, R. R., In operando transmission electron microscopy imaging of SEI formation and structure in Li-ion and Li-metal batteries. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1598–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schneider, N. M., Norton, M. M., Mendel, B. J. et al., Electron–water interactions and implications for liquid cell electron microscopy. J. Phys. Chem. C., 118 (2014), 22373–22382.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grogan, J. M., Schneider, N. M., Ross, F. M. and Bau, H. H., Bubble and pattern formation in liquid induced by an electron beam. Nano Lett., 14 (2013), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelm, M., Bohnert, E. and Pashalidis, I., Products formed from alpha radiolysis of chloride brines. Res. Chem. Intermed., 27 (2001), 503–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holtz, M. E., Yu, Y., Gunceler, D. et al., Nanoscale imaging of lithium ion distribution during in situ operation of battery electrode and electrolyte. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 1453–1459.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schilling, S., Janssen, A., Burke, M. G. et al., In situ analytical electron microscopy: imaging and analysis of steel in liquid water. 18th International Microscopy Congress (2014), www.microscopy.cz/proceedings/all.html#abstract-2947.Google Scholar
Bi-metallic exposure in the electrolyte frequently leads to galvanic corrosion but the effects of coupled metals are not so straightforward. Depending on the metals that are connected, it is possible that the more active metal becomes more resistant to corrosion. The reader is referred to general texts on corrosion for clarification.Google Scholar
Park, J.-H., Reuter, M. C., Kodambaka, S. and Ross, F. M., Electric field induced Au nanocrystal formation in aqueous solutions. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 1598–1599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoppe, S. M., Hernandez-Sanchez, B. A., Hattar, K. and Sasaki, D. Y., Progress towards in situ TEM of biofouling. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2012), 1132–1133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Lauga, E., Brenner, M. and Stone, H., Microfluidics: the no-slip boundary condition. In Tropea, C., Yarin, A., Foss, J., eds., Springer Handbook of Experimental Fluid Mechanics (Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2007) pp. 1219–1240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Israelachvili, J., Electrostatic forces between surfaces in liquids. In Intermolecular and Surface Forces (New York: Academic Press, 2011) pp. 291–337.Google Scholar
Parsons, R., The electrical double layer: recent experimental and theoretical developments. Chem. Rev., 90 (1990), 813–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, C. U. and Ohl, C.-D., Total-internal-reflection-fluorescence microscopy for the study of nanobubble dynamics. Phys. Rev. Lett., 109 (2012), 174501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Xu, K., Cao, P. and Heath, J. R., Graphene visualizes the first water adlayers on mica at ambient conditions. Science, 329 (2010), 1188–1191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Major, R. C., Houston, J. E., McGrath, M. J., Siepmann, J. I. and Zhu, X. Y., Viscous water meniscus under nanoconfinement. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96 (2006), 177803.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oh, S. H., Kauffmann, Y., Scheu, C., Kaplan, W. D. and Rühle, M., Ordered liquid aluminum at the interface with sapphire. Science, 310 (2005), 661–663.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Eswaramoorthy, S. K., Howe, J. M. and Muralidharan, G., In situ determination of the nanoscale chemistry and behavior of solid-liquid systems. Science, 318 (2007), 1437–1440.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Howe, J. M., Interfaces in Materials: Atomic Structure, Thermodynamics and Kinetics of Solid-Vapor, Solid-Liquid and Solid-Solid Interfaces (New York: Wiley-Interscience, 1997).Google Scholar
Kaplan, W. D. and Kauffmann, Y., Structural order in liquids induced by interfaces with crystals. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 36 (2006), 1–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donnelly, S. E., Birtcher, R. C., Allen, C. W. et al., Ordering in a fluid inert gas confined by flat surfaces. Science, 296 (2002), 507–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kim, B. J., Tersoff, J., Kodambaka, S. et al., Kinetics of individual nucleation events observed in nanoscale vapor-liquid-solid growth. Science, 322 (2008), 1070–1073.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ho, T. A., Papavassiliou, D. V., Lee, L. L. and Striolo, A., Liquid water can slip on a hydrophilic surface. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108 (2011), 16170–16175.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhu, Y. and Granick, S., Viscosity of interfacial water. Phys. Rev. Lett., 87 (2001), 096104.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huang, T.-W., Liu, S.-Y., Chuang, Y.-J. et al., Self-aligned wet-cell for hydrated microbiology observation in TEM. Lab Chip, 12 (2012), 340–347.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirsaidov, U., Ohl, C.-D. and Matsudaira, P., A direct observation of nanometer-size void dynamics in an ultra-thin water film. Soft Matter, 8 (2012), 7108–7111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirsaidov, U. M., Zheng, H., Bhattacharya, D., Casana, Y. and Matsudaira, P., Direct observation of stick-slip movements of water nanodroplets induced by an electron beam. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 109 (2012), 7187–7190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thompson, P. A. and Robbins, M. O., Origin of stick-slip motion in boundary lubrication. Science, 250 (1990), 792–794.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Urbakh, M., Klafter, J., Gourdon, D. and Israelachvili, J., The nonlinear nature of friction. Nature, 430 (2004), 525–528.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zambrano, H. A., Walther, J. H., Koumoutsakos, P. and Sbalzarini, I. F., Thermophoretic motion of water nanodroplets confined inside carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett., 9 (2008), 66–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Halverson, J. D., Maldarelli, C., Couzis, A. and Koplik, J., A molecular dynamics study of the motion of a nanodroplet of pure liquid on a wetting gradient. J. Chem. Phys., 129 (2008), 164708–164712.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moosavi, A., Rauscher, M. and Dietrich, S., Motion of nanodroplets near edges and wedges. Phys. Rev. Lett., 97 (2006), 236101.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rio, E., Daerr, A., Lequeux, F. and Limat, L., Moving contact lines of a colloidal suspension in the presence of drying. Langmuir, 22 (2006), 3186–3191.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brunet, P., Eggers, J. and Deegan, R. D., Vibration-induced climbing of drops. Phys. Rev. Lett., 99 (2007), 144501.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cottin-Bizonne, C., Cross, B., Steinberger, A. and Charlaix, E., Boundary slip on smooth hydrophobic surfaces: intrinsic effects and possible artifacts. Phys. Rev. Lett., 94 (2005), 056102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sendner, C., Horinek, D., Bocquet, L. and Netz, R. R., Interfacial water at hydrophobic and hydrophilic surfaces: slip, viscosity, and diffusion. Langmuir, 25 (2009), 10768–10781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Gennes, P. G., Wetting: statics and dynamics. Rev. Mod. Phys., 57 (1985), 827–863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berg, H., Random Walks in Biology (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1993).Google Scholar
Zheng, H., Claridge, S. A., Minor, A. M., Alivisatos, A. P. and Dahmen, U., Nanocrystal diffusion in a liquid thin film observed by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 9 (2009), 2460–2465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. R., Mecklenburg, M., Shevitski, B., Singer, S. B. and Regan, B. C., Charged nanoparticle dynamics in water induced by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 28 (2012), 3695–3698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lu, J., Aabdin, Z., Loh, N. D., Bhattacharya, D. and Mirsaidov, U., Nanoparticle dynamics in a nanodroplet. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 2111–2115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grogan, J. M., Rotkina, L. and Bau, H. H., In situ liquid-cell electron microscopy of colloid aggregation and growth dynamics. Phys. Rev. E, 83 (2011), 061405.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Verch, A., Pfaff, M. and de Jonge, N., Exceptionally slow movement of gold nanoparticles at a solid/liquid interface investigated by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 31 (2015), 6956–6964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Li, T.-D., Gao, J., Szoszkiewicz, R., Landman, U. and Riedo, E., Structured and viscous water in subnanometer gaps. Phys. Rev. B, 75 (2007), 115415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jinesh, K. B. and Frenken, J. W. M., Capillary condensation in atomic scale friction: how water acts like a glue. Phys. Rev. Lett., 96 (2006), 166103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, Q., Smith, J. M., Park, J. et al., 3D motion of DNA-Au nanoconjugates in graphene liquid cell electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 13 (2013), 4556–4561.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Park, J., Zheng, H., Lee, W. C. et al., Direct observation of nanoparticle superlattice formation by using liquid cell transmission electron microscopy. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 2078–2085.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Barkay, Z., Wettability study using transmitted electrons in environmental scanning electron microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett., 96 (2010), 183109–183103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barkay, Z., Dynamic study of nanodroplet nucleation and growth on self-supported nanothick liquid films. Langmuir, 26 (2010), 18581–18584.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rykaczewski, K. and Scott, J. H. J., Methodology for imaging nano-to-microscale water condensation dynamics on complex nanostructures. ACS Nano, 5 (2011), 5962–5968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rykaczewski, K., Scott, J. H. J., Rajauria, S. et al., Three dimensional aspects of droplet coalescence during dropwise condensation on superhydrophobic surfaces. Soft Matter, 7 (2011), 8749–8752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miljkovic, N., Enright, R. and Wang, E. N., Effect of droplet morphology on growth dynamics and heat transfer during condensation on superhydrophobic nanostructured surfaces. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 1776–1785.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rykaczewski, K., Microdroplet growth mechanism during water condensation on superhydrophobic surfaces. Langmuir, 28 (2012), 7720–7729.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bhattacharya, D., Bosman, M., Mokkapati, V. R. S. S., Leong, F. Y. and Mirsaidov, U., Nucleation dynamics of water nanodroplets. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 407–415.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Leach, R. N., Stevens, F., Langford, S. C. and Dickinson, J. T., Dropwise condensation: experiments and simulations of nucleation and growth of water drops in a cooling system. Langmuir, 22 (2006), 8864–8872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steyer, A., Guenoun, P., Beysens, D. and Knobler, C. M., Growth of droplets on a substrate by diffusion and coalescence. Phys. Rev. A, 44 (1991), 8271–8277.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rogers, T. M., Elder, K. R. and Desai, R. C., Droplet growth and coarsening during heterogeneous vapor condensation. Physi. Rev. A, 38 (1988), 5303–5309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ucar, I. O. and Erbil, H. Y., Use of diffusion controlled drop evaporation equations for dropwise condensation during dew formation and effect of neighboring droplets. Coll. Surf. A: Physicochem. Eng. Aspects, 411 (2012), 60–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitby, M. and Quirke, N., Fluid flow in carbon nanotubes and nanopipes. Nat. Nano, 2 (2007), 87–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naguib, N., Ye, H., Gogotsi, Y. et al., Observation of water confined in nanometer channels of closed carbon nanotubes. Nano Lett., 4 (2004), 2237–2243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mattia, D. and Gogotsi, Y., Review: static and dynamic behavior of liquids inside carbon nanotubes. Microfluid Nanofluid, 5 (2008), 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rossi, M. P., Ye, H., Gogotsi, Y. et al., Environmental scanning electron microscopy study of water in carbon nanopipes. Nano Lett., 4 (2004), 989–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patra, N., Wang, B. and Král, P., Nanodroplet activated and guided folding of graphene nanostructures. Nano Lett., 9 (2009), 3766–3771.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirsaidov, U., Mokkapati, V. R. S. S., Bhattacharya, D. et al., Scrolling graphene into nanofluidic channels. Lab Chip, 13 (2013), 2874–2878.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukes, M. J., Jacobs, B. W., Morgan, D. G., Hegde, H. and Kelly, D. F., Visualizing nanoparticle mobility in liquid at atomic resolution. Chem. Commun., 49 (2013), 3007–3009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Craster, R. V. and Matar, O. K., Dynamics and stability of thin liquid films. Rev.Mod. Phys., 81 (2009), 1131–1198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
White, E. R., Mecklenburg, M., Singer, S. B., Aloni, S. and Regan, B. C., Imaging nanobubbles in water with scanning transmission electron microscopy. Appl. Phys. Express, 4 (2011), 055201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grogan, J. M., Schneider, N. M., Ross, F. M. and Bau, H. H., Bubble and pattern formation in liquid induced by an electron beam. Nano Lett., 14 (2013), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huang, T.-W., Liu, S.-Y., Chuang, Y.-J. et al., Dynamics of hydrogen nanobubbles in KLH protein solution studied with in situ wet-TEM. Soft Matter, 9 (2013), 8856–8861.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Redon, C., Brochard-Wyart, F. and Rondelez, F., Dynamics of dewetting. Phys. Rev. Lett., 66 (1991), 715–718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Elbaum, M. and Lipson, S. G., How does a thin wetted film dry up? Phys. Rev. Lett., 72 (1994), 3562–3565.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiele, U., Mertig, M. and Pompe, W., Dewetting of an evaporating thin liquid film: heterogeneous nucleation and surface instability. Phys. Rev. Lett., 80 (1998), 2869–2872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pompe, T. and Herminghaus, S., Three-phase contact line energetics from nanoscale liquid surface topographies. Phys. Rev. Lett., 85 (2000), 1930–1933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ross, J. R. H., Heterogeneous Catalysis: Fundamentals and Applications (Kidlington, UK: Elsevier, 2011).Google Scholar
Reddy, T., Linden’s Handbook of Batteries, 4th edn. (New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, 2010).Google Scholar
Tarascon, J. M. and Armand, M., Issues and challenges facing rechargeable lithium batteries. Nature, 414 (2001), 359–367.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ebbinghaus, S., Kim, S. J., Heyden, M. et al., An extended dynamical hydration shell around proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 104 (2007), 20749–20752.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squires, T. M. and Quake, S. R., Microfluidics: fluid physics at the nanoliter scale. Rev. Mod. Phys., 77 (2005), 977–1026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tai, K., Liu, Y. and Dillon, S. J., In situ cryogenic transmission electron microscopy for characterizing the evolution of solidifying water ice in colloidal systems. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 330–337.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

van Dorp, W. F. and Hagen, C. W., A critical literature review of focused electron beam-induced deposition. J. Appl. Phys., 104 (2008), 081301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utke, I., Hoffmann, P. and Melngailis, J., Gas-assisted focused electron beam and ion beam processing and fabrication. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 26 (2008), 1197–1276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolph, S. J., Fowlkes, J. D. and Rack, P. D., Focused, nanoscale electron beam-induced deposition and etching. Crit. Rev. Solid State Mater. Sci., 31 (2006), 55–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botman, A., Mulders, J. J. L. and Hagen, C. W., Creating pure nanostructures from electron beam-induced deposition using purification techniques: a technology perspective. Nanotechnology, 20 (2009), 372001.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Furuya, K., Nanofabrication by advanced electron microscopy using intense and focused beam. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 9 (2008), 014110.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Song, M. H. and Furuya, K., Fabrication and characterization of nanostructures on insulator substrates by electron beam-induced deposition. Sci. Technol. Adv. Mater., 9 (2008), 023002.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lee, S. W. and Sankaran, R. M., Direct writing via electron-driven reactions. Mater. Today, 16 (2013), 117–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Silvis-Cividjian, N. and Hagen, C. W., Electron Beam-Induced Nanometer-Scale Deposition (San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 2006).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Utke, I., Moshkalev, S. and Russell, P., Nanofabrication Using Focused Ion and Electron Beams: Principles and Applications (Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).Google Scholar
Takahashi, T., Arakawa, Y., Nishioka, M. and Ikoma, T., Selective growth of GaAs wire structures by electron beam-induced metalorganic chemical vapor-deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett., 60 (1992), 68–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Crozier, P. A., Tolle, J., Kouvetakis, J. and Ritter, C., Synthesis of uniform GaN quantum dot arrays via electron nanolithography of D2GaN3. Appl. Phys. Lett., 84 (2004), 3441–3443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Che, R. C., Takeguchi, M., Shimojo, M., Zhang, W. and Furuya, K., Fabrication and electron holography characterization of FePt alloy nanorods. Appl. Phys. Lett., 87 (2005), 223109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winhold, M., Weirich, P. M., Schwalb, C. H. and Huth, M., Superconductivity and metallic behavior in PbxCyOδ structures prepared by focused electron beam-induced deposition. Appl. Phys. Lett., 105 (2014), 162603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresin, M., Chamberlain, A., Donev, E. U. et al., Electron beam-induced deposition of bimetallic nanostructures from bulk liquids. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed., 52 (2013), 8004–8007.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bresin, M., Nadimpally, B. R., Nehru, N., Singh, V. P. and Hastings, J. T., Site-specific growth of CdS nanostructures. Nanotechnology, 24 (2013), 505305.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bresin, M., Nehru, N. and Hastings, J. T., Focused electron beam-induced deposition of plasmonic nanostructures from aqueous solutions. In Proc. SPIE 8613, Advanced Fabrication Technologies for Micro/Nano Optics and Photonics VI (2013), p. 861306.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Zhou, L. H., Wang, P. et al., A study of electron beam-induced deposition and nano device fabrication using liquid cell TEM technology. Chinese J. Chem., 32 (2014), 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, X., Zhou, L. H., Wang, P., Zhao, C. J. and Miao, X. L., A study of nano materials and their reactions in liquid using in situ wet cell TEM technology. Chinese J. Chem., 30 (2012), 2839–2843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
den Heijer, M., Shao, I., Radisic, A., Reuter, M. C. and Ross, F. M., Patterned electrochemical deposition of Cu using an electron beam. APL Mater., 2 (2014), 022101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donev, E. U. and Hastings, J. T., Liquid-precursor electron beam-induced deposition of Pt nanostructures: dose, proximity, resolution. Nanotechnology, 20 (2009), 505302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donev, E. U. and Hastings, J. T., Electron beam-induced deposition of Pt from a liquid precursor. Nano Lett., 9 (2009), 2715–2718.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donev, E. U., Schardein, G., Wright, J. C. and Hastings, J. T., Substrate effects on the electron beam-induced deposition of Pt from a liquid precursor. Nanoscale, 3 (2011), 2709–2717.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grogan, J. M., Schneider, N. M., Ross, F. M. and Bau, H. H., Bubble and pattern formation in liquid induced by an electron beam. Nano Lett., 14 (2014), 359–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoshino, T. and Morishima, K., Electron beam direct processing on living cell membrane. Appl. Phys. Lett., 99 (2011), 174102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jensen, E., Kobler, C., Jensen, P. S. and Molhave, K., In-situ SEM microchip setup for electrochemical experiments with water based solutions. Ultramicroscopy, 129 (2013), 63–69.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kolmakova, N. and Kolmakov, A., Scanning electron microscopy for in situ monitoring of semiconductor-liquid interfacial processes: electron assisted reduction of Ag ions from aqueous solution on the surface of TiO2 rutile nanowire. J. Phys. Chem. C, 114 (2010), 17233–17237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kraus, T. and de Jonge, N., Dendritic Au nanowire growth observed in liquid with transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 29 (2013), 8427–8432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Liu, Y., Chen, X., Noh, K. W. and Dillon, S. J., Electron beam-induced deposition of silicon nanostructures from a liquid phase precursor. Nanotechnology, 23 (2012), 385302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, Y., Tai, K. P. and Dillon, S. J., Growth kinetics and morphological evolution of ZnO precipitated from solution. Chem. Mater., 25 (2013), 2927–2933.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Noh, K. W., Liu, Y., Sun, L. and Dillon, S. J., Challenges associated with in-situ TEM in environmental systems: the case of silver in aqueous solutions. Ultramicroscopy, 116 (2012), 34–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ocola, L. E., Joshi-Imre, A., Kessel, C. et al., Growth characterization of electron beam-induced silver deposition from liquid precursor. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 30 (2012), 06FF08.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schardein, G., Donev, E. U. and Hastings, J. T., Electron beam-induced deposition of Au from aqueous solutions. Nanotechnology, 22 (2011), 015301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woehl, T. J., Evans, J. E., Arslan, L., Ristenpart, W. D. and Browning, N. D., Direct in situ determination of the mechanisms controlling nanoparticle nucleation and growth. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 8599–8610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuk, J. M., Park, J., Ercius, P. et al., High-resolution EM of colloidal nanocrystal growth using graphene liquid cells. Science, 336 (2012), 61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, H. M., Smith, R. K., Jun, Y. W. et al., Observation of single colloidal Pt nanocrystal growth trajectories. Science, 324 (2009), 1309–1312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donev, E. U., Nehru, N., Schardein, G. et al., Recent advances in liquid-phase electron beam-induced deposition: characterizing growth processes and optical properties. Microsc. Microanal., 17 (2011), 438–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Randolph, S. J., Botman, A. and Toth, M., Capsule-free fluid delivery and beam-induced electrodeposition in a scanning electron microscope. RSC Adv., 3 (2013), 20016–20023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresin, M., Botman, A., Randolph, S. J., Straw, M. and Hastings, J. T., Liquid phase electron beam-induced deposition on bulk substrates using environmental scanning electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 376–384.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tsuda, T., Seino, S. and Kuwabata, S., Au nanoparticles prepared with a room-temperature ionic liquid-radiation irradiation method. Chem. Commun., 44 (2009), 6792–6794.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roy, P., Lynch, R. and Schmuki, P., Electron beam-induced in-vacuo Ag deposition on TiO2 from ionic liquids. Electrochem. Commun., 11 (2009), 1567–1570.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imanishi, A., Tamura, M. and Kuwabata, S., Formation of Au nanoparticles in an ionic liquid by electron beam irradiation. Chem. Commun., 44 (2009), 1775–1777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Imanishi, A., Gonsui, S., Tsuda, T., Kuwabata, S. and Fukui, K., Size and shape of Au nanoparticles formed in ionic liquids by electron beam irradiation. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys., 13 (2011), 14823–14830.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jonge, N., Introduction to special issue on electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 315–316.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jonge, N., and Ross, F. M., Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 695–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiberge, S., Zik, O. and Moses, E., An apparatus for imaging liquids, cells, and other wet samples in the scanning electron microscope. Rev. Sci. Instrum., 75 (2004), 2280–2289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ciarlo, D. R., Silicon nitride thin windows for biomedical microdevices. Biomed. Microdevices, 4 (2002), 63–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stelmashenko, N. A., Craven, J. P., Donald, A. M., Terentjev, E. M. and Thiel, B. L., Topographic contrast of partially wetting water droplets in environmental scanning electron microscopy. J. Microsc. Oxford, 204 (2001), 172–183.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Botman, A., Mulders, J. J. L., Weemaes, R. and Mentink, S., Purification of Pt and Au structures after electron beam-induced deposition. Nanotechnology, 17 (2006), 3779–3785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Langford, R. M., Wang, T. X. and Ozkaya, D., Reducing the resistivity of electron and ion beam assisted deposited Pt. Microelectron. Eng., 84 (2007), 784–788.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lin, J. F., Bird, J. P., Rotkina, L. and Bennett, P. A., Classical and quantum transport in focused-ion beam-deposited Pt nanointerconnects. Appl. Phys. Lett., 82 (2003), 802–804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penate-Quesada, L., Mitra, J. and Dawson, P., Non-linear electronic transport in Pt nanowires deposited by focused ion beam. Nanotechnology, 18 (2007), 215203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tao, T., Ro, J. S., Melngailis, J., Xue, Z. L. and Kaesz, H. D., Focused ion beam-induced deposition of Pt. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 8 (1990), 1826–1829.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Telari, K. A., Rogers, B. R., Fang, H. et al., Characterization of Pt films deposited by focused ion beam-assisted chemical vapor deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 20 (2002), 590–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ritchie, N. W. M., Spectrum simulation in DTSA-II. Microsc. Microanal., 15 (2009), 454–468.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ritchie, N. W. M., Using DTSA-II to simulate and interpret energy dispersive spectra from particles. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 248–258.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Folch, A., Servat, J., Esteve, J., Tejada, J. and Seco, M., High-vacuum versus “environmental” electron beam deposition. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 14 (1996), 2609–2614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brintlinger, T., Fuhrer, M. S., Melngailis, J. et al., Electrodes for carbon nanotube devices by focused electron beam-induced deposition of Au. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 23 (2005), 3174–3177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Green, T. A., Au electrodeposition for microelectronic, optoelectronic and microsystem applications. Gold Bull., 40 (2007), 105–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Friedli, V., Utke, I., Molhave, K. and Michler, J., Dose and energy dependence of mechanical properties of focused electron beam-induced pillar deposits from Cu(C5HF6O2)2. Nanotechnology, 20 (2009), 385304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ochiai, Y., Fujita, J. and Matsui, S., Electron beam-induced deposition of Cu compound with low resistivity. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 14 (1996), 3887–3891.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kunz, R. R. and Mayer, T. M., Electron beam-induced surface nucleation and low-temperature decomposition of metal-carbonyls. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 6 (1988), 1557–1564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chamberlain, A., Donev, E. U., Samantaray, C. B. et al., Electron beam-induced deposition of transition metals from bulk liquids: Ag, Cr, and Ni. In 55th International Conference on Electron, Ion, and Photon Beam Technology and Nanofabrication (Las Vegas, NV, 2011).Google Scholar
Spoddig, D., Schindler, K., Rodiger, P. et al., Transport properties and growth parameters of PdC and WC nanowires prepared in a dual-beam microscope. Nanotechnology, 18 (2007), 495202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anbar, M. and Neta, P., A compilation of specific bimolecular rate constants for the reactions of hydrated electrons, hydrogen atoms and hydroxyl radicals with inorganic and organic compounds in aqueous solution. Int. J. Appl. Radiat. Isot., 18 (1967), 493–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayes, D., Micic, O. I., Nenadovic, M. T., Swayambunathan, V. and Meisel, D., Radiolytic production and properties of ultrasmall cadmium sulfide particles. J. Phys. Chem., 93 (1989), 4603–4608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wu, M. H., Zhong, H. J., Jiao, Z., Li, Z. and Sun, Y. F., Synthesis of PbS nanocrystallites by electron beam irradiation. Coll. Surf. A, 313 (2008), 35–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, J. E., Jungjohann, K. L., Browning, N. D. and Arslan, I., Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 2809–2813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, P., Hochleitner, G., Bertagnolli, E., Wanzenboeck, H. D. and Buehler, W., Focused electron beam-induced etching of silicon using chlorine. Nanotechnology, 21 (2010), 285306.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, P., Wanzenboeck, H. D., Hochleitner, G., Bertagnolli, E. and Buehler, W., Focused electron beam-induced etching of silicon by chlorine gas: negative effects of residual gas contamination on the etching process. J. Appl. Phys., 108 (2010), 124316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Martin, A. A. and Toth, M., Cryogenic electron beam-induced chemical etching. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 6 (2014), 18457–18460.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Roediger, P., Mijic, M., Zeiner, C. et al., Local, direct-write, damage-free thinning of germanium nanowires. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 29 (2011), 06FB03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roediger, P., Wanzenboeck, H. D., Hochleitner, G. and Bertagnolli, E., Crystallinity-retaining removal of germanium by direct-write focused electron beam-induced etching. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 29 (2011), 041801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D., O’Neill, A., Zhou, D. et al., Nitrogen assisted etching of graphene layers in a scanning electron microscope. Appl. Phys. Lett., 98 (2011), 243117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bret, T., Afra, B., Becker, R. et al., Gas assisted focused electron beam-induced etching of alumina. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 27 (2009), 2727–2731.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Spinney, P. S., Howitt, D. G., Smith, R. L. and Collins, S. D., Nanopore formation by low-energy focused electron beam machining. Nanotechnology, 21 (2010), 375301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ganczarczyk, A., Geller, M. and Lorke, A., XeF2 gas-assisted focused-electron beam-induced etching of GaAs with 30 nm resolution. Nanotechnology, 22 (2011), 045301.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Noh, J. H., Fowlkes, J. D., Timilsina, R. et al., Pulsed laser-assisted focused electron beam-induced etching of titanium with XeF2: enhanced reaction rate and precursor transport. ACS Appl. Mater. Inter., 7 (2015), 4179–4184.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schoenaker, F. J., Cordoba, R., Fernandez-Pacheco, R. et al., Focused electron beam-induced etching of titanium with XeF2. Nanotechnology, 22 (2011), 265304.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Toth, M., Advances in gas-mediated electron beam-induced etching and related material processing techniques. Appl. Phys. A, 117 (2014), 1623–1629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coburn, J. W. and Winters, H. F., Ion-assisted and electron-assisted gas-surface chemistry: important effect in plasma-etching. J. Appl. Phys., 50 (1979), 3189–3196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yemini, M., Hadad, B., Liebes, Y., Auner, A. and Ashkenasy, N., The controlled fabrication of nanopores by focused electron beam-induced etching. Nanotechnology, 20 (2009), 245302.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liebes, Y., Hadad, B. and Ashkenasy, N., Effects of electrons on the shape of nanopores prepared by focused electron beam-induced etching. Nanotechnology, 22 (2011), 285303.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Crozier, P. A., Nanoscale oxide patterning with electron-solid-gas reactions. Nano Lett., 7 (2007), 2395–2398.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dekker, C., Solid-state nanopores. Nat. Nanotechnol., 2 (2007), 209–215.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Donev, E. U., Samantaray, C. B., Bresin, M. and Hastings, J. T., Recent advances in liquid-phase e-beam-induced processing: silicon nitride etching and palladium deposition. In 39th International Conference on Micro and Nano Engineering (London, 2013), p. O-FEBIP-04.Google Scholar
Drezner, Y., Greenzweig, Y. and Raveh, A., Strategy for focused ion beam compound material removal for circuit editing. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B, 30 (2012), 011207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jaeckervoirol, A., Ponche, J. L. and Mirabel, P., Vapor-pressures in the ternary-system water nitric-acid sulfuric-acid at low-temperatures. J. Geophys. Res. Atmos., 95 (1990), 11857–11863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bresin, M. and Hastings, J. T., Etching of Cu using liquid reactants and a focused electron beam. In International Conference on Electron, Ion, and Photon Beam Technology and Nanofabrication (Washington, D.C., 2014).Google Scholar
Massucci, M., Clegg, S. L. and Brimblecombe, P., Equilibrium vapor pressure of H2O above aqueous H2SO4 at low temperature. J. Chem. Eng. Data, 41 (1996), 765–778.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Beveridge, T. J., Role of cellular design in bacterial metal accumulation and mineralization. Annu. Rev. Microbiol., 43 (1989), 147–171.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Banfield, J. F. and Zhang, H. Z., Nanoparticles in the environment. In Banfield, J. F. and Navrotsky, A., eds., Nanoparticles and the Environment, Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry 44 (Mineralogical Society of America, 2001) pp. 1–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, M. W. I., Torn, M. S., Abiven, S. et al., Persistence of soil organic matter as an ecosystem property. Nature, 478 (2011), 49–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knoll, A. H., Biomineralization and evolutionary history. In Dove, P. M., DeYoreo, J. J. and Weiner, S., eds., Biomineralization, Reviews in Mineralogy & Geochemistry 54 (Mineralogical Society of America, 2003) pp. 329–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lowenstam, H. A. and Weiner, S., On Biomineralization (New York: Oxford University Press, 1989).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hoose, C. and Mohler, O., Heterogeneous ice nucleation on atmospheric aerosols: a review of results from laboratory experiments. Atmos. Chem. Phys., 12 (2012), 9817–9854.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hendricks, S. B., Nelson, R. A. and Alexander, L. T., Hydration mechanism of the clay mineral montmorillonite saturated with various cations. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 62 (1940), 1457–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sposito, G., Skipper, N. T., Sutton, R. et al., Surface geochemistry of the clay minerals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 96 (1999), 3358–3364.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hu, Q., Nielsen, M. H., Freeman, C. L. et al., The thermodynamics of calcite nucleation at organic interfaces: classical vs. non-classical pathways. Faraday Discuss., 159 (2012), 509–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Giuffre, A. J., Hamm, L. M., Han, N., De Yoreo, J. J. and Dove, P. M., Polysaccharide chemistry regulates kinetics of calcite nucleation through competition of interfacial energies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 110 (2013), 9261–9266.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hamm, L. M., Giuffre, A. J., Han, N. et al., Reconciling disparate views of template-directed nucleation through measurement of calcite nucleation kinetics and binding energies. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 111 (2014), 1304–1309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fang, P. A., Conway, J. F., Margolis, H. C., Simmer, J. P. and Beniash, E., Hierarchical self-assembly of amelogenin and the regulation of biomineralization at the nanoscale. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 108 (2011), 14097–14102.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nudelman, F., Pieterse, K., George, A. et al., The role of collagen in bone apatite formation in the presence of hydroxyapatite nucleation inhibitors. Nat. Mater., 9 (2010), 1004–1009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tester, C. C., Brock, R. E., Wu, C. H. et al., In vitro synthesis and stabilization of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC) nanoparticles within liposomes. CrystEngComm, 13 (2011), 3975–3978.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smeets, P. J. M., Cho, K. R., Kempen, R. G. E., Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M. and De Yoreo, J. J., In situ TEM shows ion binding is key to directing CaCO3 nucleation in a biomimetic matrix. Nat. Mater., 14 (2015), 394–399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieger, J., Frechen, T., Cox, G. et al., Precursor structures in the crystallization/precipitation processes of CaCO3 and control of particle formation by polyelectrolytes. Faraday Discuss., 136 (2007), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lee, J. R. I., Han, T. Y. J., Willey, T. M. et al., Structural development of mercaptophenol self-assembled monolayers and the overlying mineral phase during templated CaCO3 crystallization from a transient amorphous film. J. Am. Chem. Soc., 129 (2007), 10370–10381.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Radha, A. V., Forbes, T. Z., Killian, C. E., Gilbert, P. and Navrotsky, A., Transformation and crystallization energetics of synthetic and biogenic amorphous calcium carbonate. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107 (2010), 16438–16443.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bots, P., Benning, L. G., Rodriguez-Blanco, J. D., Roncal-Herrero, T. and Shaw, S., Mechanistic insights into the crystallization of amorphous calcium carbonate (ACC). Crys. Growth Des., 12 (2012), 3806–3814.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibbs, J. W., On the equilibrium of heterogeneous substances. Trans. Connect. Acad. Arts Sci., 3 (1876), 108–248; (1878), 343–524.Google Scholar
Gebauer, D., Volkel, A. and Colfen, H., Stable prenucleation calcium carbonate clusters. Science, 322 (2008), 1819–1822.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pouget, E. M., Bomans, P. H. H., Goos, J. A. C. M. et al., The initial stages of template-controlled CaCO3 formation revealed by cryo-TEM. Science, 323 (2009), 1455–1458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bewernitz, M. A., Gebauer, D., Long, J., Colfen, H. and Gower, L. B., A metastable liquid precursor phase of calcium carbonate and its interactions with polyaspartate. Faraday Discuss., 159 (2012), 291–312.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Demichelis, R., Raiteri, P., Gale, J. D., Quigley, D. and Gebauer, D., Stable prenucleation mineral clusters are liquid-like ionic polymers. Nat. Commun., 2 (2011), 590.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wallace, A. F., Hedges, L. O., Fernandez-Martinez, A. et al., Microscopic evidence for liquid-liquid separation in supersaturated CaCO3 solutions. Science, 341 (2013), 885–889.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brecevic, L. and Nielsen, A. E., Solubility of amorphous calcium carbonate. J. Cryst. Growth, 98 (1989), 504–510.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rieger, J., Thieme, J. and Schmidt, C., Study of precipitation reactions by X-ray microscopy: CaCO3 precipitation and the effect of polycarboxylates. Langmuir, 16 (2000), 8300–8305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habraken, W. J. E. M., Tao, J. H., Brylka, L. J. et al., Ion-association complexes unite classical and non-classical theories for the biomimetic nucleation of calcium phosphate. Nat. Commun., 4 (2013), 1507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erdemir, D., Lee, A. Y. and Myerson, A. S., Nucleation of crystals from solution: classical and two-step models. Accounts Chem. Res., 42 (2009), 621–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Galkin, O., Chen, K., Nagel, R. L., Hirsch, R. E. and Vekilov, P. G., Liquid-liquid separation in solutions of normal and sickle cell hemoglobin. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 99 (2002), 8479–8483.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chung, S., Shin, S. H., Bertozzi, C. R. and De Yoreo, J. J., Self-catalyzed growth of S layers via an amorphous to-crystalline transition limited by folding kinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 107 (2010), 16536–16541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Penn, R. L. and Banfield, J. F., Imperfect oriented attachment: dislocation generation in defect-free nanocrystals. Science, 281 (1998), 969–971.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Frandsen, C., Legg, B. A., Comolli, L. R. et al., Aggregation-induced growth and transformation of beta-FeOOH nanorods to micron-sized alpha-Fe2O3 spindles. CrystEngComm, 16 (2014), 1451–1458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baumgartner, J., Dey, A., Bomans, P. H. H. et al., Nucleation and growth of magnetite from solution. Nat. Mater., 12 (2013), 310–314.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
De Yoreo, J. J., Gilbert, P. U. P. A., Sommerdijk, N. A. J. M. et al., Crystallization by particle attachment in synthetic, biogenic, and geologic environments. Science, 349 (2015), aaa6760.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zheng, H. M., Smith, R. K., Jun, Y. W. et al., Observation of single colloidal platinum nanocrystal growth trajectories. Science, 324 (2009), 1309–1312.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Williamson, M. J., Tromp, R. M., Vereecken, P. M., Hull, R. and Ross, F. M., Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid-liquid interface. Nat. Mater., 2 (2003), 532–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, M. H., Lee, J. R. I., Hu, Q. N., Han, T. Y. J. and De Yoreo, J. J., Structural evolution, formation pathways and energetic controls during template-directed nucleation of CaCO3. Faraday Discuss., 159 (2012), 105–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nielsen, M. H., Aloni, S. and De Yoreo, J. J., In situ TEM imaging of CaCO3 nucleation reveals coexistence of direct and indirect pathways. Science, 345 (2014), 1158–1162.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bischoff, J. L., Fitzpatrick, J. A. and Rosenbauer, R. J., The solubility and stabilization of ikaite (CaCO3.6H2O) from 0–25 °C: environmental and paleoclimatic implications for thinolite tufa. J. Geol., 101 (1993), 21–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chernov, A. A., Modern Crystallography III. Springer Series in Solid-State Sciences (Berlin: Springer, 1984).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trotsenko, O., Roiter, Y. and Minko, S., Conformational transitions of flexible hydrophobic polyelectrolytes in solutions of monovalent and multivalent salts and their mixtures. Langmuir, 28 (2012), 6037–6044.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Addadi, L., Moradian, J., Shay, E., Maroudas, N. G. and Weiner, S., A chemical model for the cooperation of sulfates and carboxylates in calcite crystal nucleation: relevance to biomineralization. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 84 (1987), 2732–2736.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nudelman, F., Gotliv, B. A., Addadi, L. and Weiner, S., Mollusk shell formation: mapping the distribution of organic matrix components underlying a single aragonitic tablet in nacre. J. Struct. Biol., 153 (2006), 176–187.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yuk, J. M., Park, J., Ercius, P. et al., High-resolution EM of colloidal nanocrystal growth using graphene liquid cells. Science, 336 (2012), 61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Li, D. S., Nielsen, M. H., Lee, J. R. I. et al., Direction-specific interactions control crystal growth by oriented attachment. Science, 336 (2012), 1014–1018.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, H.-G., Zherebetskyy, D., Xin, H. et al., Facet development during platinum nanocube growth. Science, 345 (2014), 916–919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liao, H. G., Cui, L. K., Whitelam, S. and Zheng, H. M., Real-time imaging of Pt3Fe nanorod growth in solution. Science, 336 (2012), 1011–1014.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parent, L. R., Robinson, D. B., Woehl, T. J. et al., Direct in situ observation of nanoparticle synthesis in a liquid crystal surfactant template. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 3589–3596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woehl, T. J., Evans, J. E., Arslan, L., Ristenpart, W. D. and Browning, N. D., Direct in situ determination of the mechanisms controlling nanoparticle nucleation and growth. ACS Nano, 6 (2012), 8599–8610.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nielsen, M. H., Li, D. S., Zhang, H. Z. et al., Investigating processes of nanocrystal formation and transformation via liquid cell TEM. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 425–436.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukami, A., Fukushima, K., Kohyama, N., Observation technique for wet clay minerals using film-sealed environmental cell equipment attached to high-resolution electron microscope. In Bennett, R. et al., eds., Microstructure of Fine-Grained Sediments ( New York: Springer, 1991) pp. 321–331.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adachi, K., Freney, E. J. and Buseck, P. R., Shapes of internally mixed hygroscopic aerosol particles after deliquescence, and their effect on light scattering. Geophys. Res. Lett., 38 (2011), L13804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

References

Parsons, D. F., Matricardi, V. R., Moretz, R. C. and Turner, J. N., Electron microscopy and diffraction of wet unstained and unfixed biological objects. Adv. Biol. Med. Phys., 15 (1974), 161–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, D. F., Structure of wet specimens in electron microscopy. Science, 186 (1974), 407–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jonge, N. and Ross, F. M., Electron microscopy of specimens in liquid. Nat. Nanotechnol., 6 (2011), 695–704.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jonge, N., Peckys, D. B., Kremers, G. J. and Piston, D. W., Electron microscopy of whole cells in liquid with nanometer resolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 106 (2009), 2159–2164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peckys, D. B., Veith, G. M., Joy, D. C. and de Jonge, N., Nanoscale imaging of whole cells using a liquid enclosure and a scanning transmission electron microscope. PLoS One, 4 (2009), e8214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peckys, D. B. and de Jonge, N., Liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy: imaging protein complexes in their native environment in whole eukaryotic cells. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 346–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
de Jonge, N., Poirier-Demers, N., Demers, H., Peckys, D. B. and Drouin, D., Nanometer-resolution electron microscopy through micrometers-thick water layers. Ultramicroscopy, 110, 1114–1119 (2010).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peckys, D. B. and de Jonge, N., Gold nanoparticle uptake in whole cells in liquid examined by environmental scanning electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 189–197.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peckys, D. B., Baudoin, J. P., Eder, M., Werner, U. and de Jonge, N., Epidermal growth factor receptor subunit locations determined in hydrated cells with environmental scanning electron microscopy. Sci. Rep., 3 (2013), 2626.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukes, M. J., Peckys, D. B. and de Jonge, N., Correlative fluorescence microscopy and scanning transmission electron microscopy of quantum-dot-labeled proteins in whole cells in liquid. ACS Nano, 4 (2010), 4110–4116.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peckys, D. B., Mazur, P., Gould, K. L. and de Jonge, N., Fully hydrated yeast cells imaged with electron microscopy. Biophys. J., 100 (2011), 2522–2529.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peckys, D. B. and de Jonge, N., Visualization of gold nanoparticle uptake in living cells with liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 1733–1738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, E. A. and de Jonge, N., Microfluidic system for transmission electron microscopy. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 622–629.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bogner, A., Thollet, G., Basset, D., Jouneau, P. H. and Gauthier, C., Wet STEM: a new development in environmental SEM for imaging nano-objects included in a liquid phase. Ultramicroscopy, 104 (2005), 290–301.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, N., Sougrat, R., Peckys, D. B., Lupini, A. R. and Pennycook, S. J., 3-Dimensional aberration corrected scanning transmission electron microscopy for biology. In Vo-Dinh, T., ed., Nanotechnology in Biology and Medicine-Methods, Devices and Applications (Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press, 2007) pp. 13.11–13.27.Google Scholar
Lippincott-Schwartz, J., Snapp, E. and Kenworthy, A., Studying protein dynamics in living cells. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell. Biol., 2 (2001), 444–456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pawley, J. B., Handbook of Biological Confocal Microscopy, 2nd edn. (New York: Springer, 1995).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Willig, K. I., Rizzoli, S. O., Westphal, V., Jahn, R. and Hell, S. W., STED microscopy reveals that synapthotagmin remains clustered after synaptic vesicle exocytosis. Nature, 440 (2006), 935–939.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hell, S. W., Far-field optical nanoscopy. Science, 316 (2007), 1153–1158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Betzig, E., Patterson, G. H., Sougrat, R. et al., Imaging intracellular fluorescent proteins at nanometer resolution. Science, 313 (2006), 1642–1645.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bates, M., Huang, B., Dempsey, G. T. and Zhuang, X., Multicolor super-resolution imaging with photo-switchable fluorescent probes. Science, 317 (2007), 1749–1753.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lippincott-Schwartz, J. and Manley, S., Putting super-resolution fluorescence microscopy to work. Nat. Meth., 6 (2009), 21–23.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herbert, S., Soares, H., Zimmer, C. and Henriques, R., Single-molecule localization super-resolution microscopy: deeper and faster. Microsc. Microanal., 18 (2012), 1419–1429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Piston, D. W. and Kremers, G. J., Fluorescent protein FRET: the good, the bad and the ugly. Trends Biochem. Sci., 32 (2007), 407–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Warren, C. M. and Landgraf, R., Signaling through ERBB receptors: multiple layers of diversity and control. Cell. Signal., 18 (2006), 923–933.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Needham, S. R., Hirsch, M., Rolfe, D. J. et al., Measuring EGFR separations on cells with ~10 nm resolution via fluorophore localization imaging with photobleaching. PLoS One, 8 (2013), e62331.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, P., Sudhaharan, T., Koh, R. M. et al., Investigation of the dimerization of proteins from the epidermal growth factor receptor family by single wavelength fluorescence cross-correlation spectroscopy. Biophys. J., 93 (2007), 684–698.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoenger, A. and McIntosh, J. R., Probing the macromolecular organization of cells by electron tomography. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol., 21 (2009), 89–96.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kourkoutis, L. F., Plitzko, J. M. and Baumeister, W., Electron microscopy of biological materials at the nanometer scale. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res., 42 (2012), 33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Medalia, O., Weber, I., Frangakis, A. S. et al., Macromolecular architecture in eukaryotic cells visualized by cryoelectron tomography. Science, 298 (2002), 1209–1213.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fujimoto, K., Freeze-fracture replica electron microscopy combined with SDS digestion for cytochemical labeling of integral membrane proteins: application to the immunogold labeling of intercellular junctional complexes. J. Cell Sci., 108 (1995), 3443–3449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bushby, A. J., P'Ng, K. M., Young, R. D. et al., Imaging three-dimensional tissue architectures by focused ion beam scanning electron microscopy. Nat. Protoc., 6 (2011), 845–858.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bergersen, L. H., Storm-Mathisen, J. and Gundersen, V., Immunogold quantification of amino acids and proteins in complex subcellular compartments. Nat. Protoc., 3 (2008), 144–152.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Larabell, C. A. and Nugent, K. A., Imaging cellular architecture with X-rays. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol., 20 (2010), 623–631.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peckys, D. B., Korf, U. and de Jonge, N., Local variations of HER2 dimerization in breast cancer cells discovered by correlative fluorescence and liquid electron microscopy. Sci. Adv., 1 (2015), e1500165.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Peckys, D. B. and de Jonge, N., Studying the stoichiometry of epidermal growth factor receptor in intact cells using correlative microscopy. J. Vis. Exp. (2015). Epub. 2015/09/19.Google Scholar
Williamson, M. J., Tromp, R. M., Vereecken, P. M., Hull, R. and Ross, F. M., Dynamic microscopy of nanoscale cluster growth at the solid-liquid interface. Nat. Mater., 2 (2003), 532–536.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Thiberge, S., Nechushtan, A., Sprinzak, D. et al., Scanning electron microscopy of cells and tissues under fully hydrated conditions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 101 (2004), 3346.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ring, E. A., Peckys, D. B., Dukes, M. J., Baudoin, J. P. and de Jonge, N., Silicon nitride windows for electron microscopy of whole cells. J. Microsc., 243 (2011), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Grogan, J. M. and Bau, H. H., The nanoaquarium: a platform for in situ transmission electron microscopy in liquid media. J. Microelectromech. Sys., 19 (2010), 885–894.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nishiyama, H., Suga, M., Ogura, T. et al., Atmospheric scanning electron microscope observes cells and tissues in open medium through silicon nitride film. J. Struct. Biol., 169 (2010), 438–449.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liv, N., Lazic, I., Kruit, P. and Hoogenboom, J. P., Scanning electron microscopy of individual nanoparticle bio-markers in liquid. Ultramicroscopy, 143 (2014), 93–99.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Stokes, D. J., Recent advances in electron imaging, image interpretation and applications: environmental scanning electron microscopy. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. A, 361 (2003), 2771–2787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, D. L., Principles and Practice of Variable Pressure/Environmental Scanning Electron Microscopy (VP-SEM) (New York: Wiley, 2008).Google Scholar
Li, N., Zonnevylle, A. C., Narvaez, A. C. et al., Simultaneous correlative scanning electron and high-NA fluorescence microscopy. PLoS One, 8 (2013), e55707.Google Scholar
Masenelli-Varlot, K., Malchere, A., Ferreira, J. et al., Wet-STEM tomography: principles, potentialities and limitations. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 366–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Jonge, N., Peckys, D. B., Veith, G. M. et al., Scanning transmission electron microscopy of samples in liquid (liquid STEM). Microsc. Microanal., 13 (2007), 242–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramachandra, R., Demers, H. and de Jonge, N., Atomic-resolution scanning transmission electron microscopy through 50 nm-thick silicon nitride membranes. Appl. Phys. Lett., 98 (2011), 93109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, K. L., Wu, C. C., Huang, Y. J. et al., Novel microchip for in situ TEM imaging of living organisms and bio-reactions in aqueous conditions. Lab Chip, 8 (2008), 1915–1921.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Klein, K. L., Anderson, I. M. and de Jonge, N., Transmission electron microscopy with a liquid flow cell. J. Microsc., 242 (2011), 117–123.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coskun, U. and Simons, K., Cell membranes: the lipid perspective. Structure, 19 (2011), 1543–1548.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Arkhipov, A., Shan, Y., Das, R. et al., Architecture and membrane interactions of the EGF receptor. Cell, 152 (2013), 557–569.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Normanno, N., De Luca, A., Bianco, C. et al., Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling in cancer. Gene, 366 (2006), 2–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schlessinger, J., Signal transduction by allosteric receptor oligomerization. Trends Biochem. Sci., 13 (1988), 443–447.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ullrich, A. and Schlessinger, J., Signal transduction by receptors with tyrosine kinase activity. Cell, 61 (1990), 203–212.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Endres, N. F., Das, R., Smith, A. W. et al., Conformational coupling across the plasma membrane in activation of the EGF receptor. Cell, 152 (2013), 543–556.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lidke, D. S., Nagy, P., Heintzmann, R. et al., Quantum dot ligands provide new insights into erbB/HER receptor-mediated signal transduction. Nat. Biotechnol., 22 (2004), 198–203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, K. A., Suzuki, K. G., Shirai, Y. M. et al., Membrane molecules mobile even after chemical fixation. Nat. Meth., 7 (2010), 865–866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glenney, J. R. Jr., Chen, W. S., Lazar, C. S. et al., Ligand-induced endocytosis of the EGF receptor is blocked by mutational inactivation and by microinjection of anti-phosphotyrosine antibodies. Cell, 52 (1988), 675–684.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hoenger, A. and Bouchet-Marquis, C., Cellular tomography. Adv. Protein Chem. Struct. Biol., 82 (2011), 67–90.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sousa, A. A., Azari, A. A., Zhang, G. and Leapman, R. D., Dual-axis electron tomography of biological specimens: extending the limits of specimen thickness with bright-field STEM imaging. J. Struct. Biol., 174 (2011), 107–114.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Demers, H., Poirier-Demers, N., Drouin, D. and de Jonge, N., Simulating STEM imaging of nanoparticles in micrometers-thick substrates. Microsc. Microanal., 16 (2010), 795–804.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schuh, T. and de Jonge, N., Liquid scanning transmission electron microscopy: nanoscale imaging in micrometers-thick liquids. C. R. Phys., 15 (2014), 214–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, E. A. and de Jonge, N., Video-frequency scanning transmission electron microscopy of moving gold nanoparticles in liquid. Micron, 43 (2012), 1078–1084.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
White, E. R., Mecklenburg, M., Shevitski, B., Singer, S. B. and Regan, B. C., Charger nanoparticle dynamics in water induced by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 28 (2012), 3695–3698.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Verch, A., Pfaff, M. and de Jonge, N., Exceptionally slow movement of gold nanoparticles at a solid/liquid interface investigated by scanning transmission electron microscopy. Langmuir, 31 (2015), 6956–6964.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yuk, J. M., Park, J., Ercius, P. et al., High-resolution EM of colloidal nanocrystal growth using graphene liquid cells. Science, 336 (2012), 61–64.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Evans, J. E., Jungjohann, K. L., Browning, N. D. and Arslan, I., Controlled growth of nanoparticles from solution with in situ liquid transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 11 (2011), 2809–2813.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lillemeier, B. F., Pfeiffer, J. R., Surviladze, Z., Wilson, B. S. and Davis, M. M., Plasma membrane-associated proteins are clustered into islands attached to the cytoskeleton. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 103 (2006), 18992–18997.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McBride, J., Treadway, J., Feldman, L. C., Pennycook, S. J. and Rosenthal, S. J., Structural basis for near unity quantum yield core/shell nanocrystals. Nano Lett., 6 (2006), 1496–1501.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peckys, D. B., Bandmann, V. and de Jonge, N., Correlative fluorescence and scanning transmission electron microscopy of quantum dot-labeled proteins on whole cells in liquid. Meth. Cell Biol., 124 (2014), 305–322.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tanaka, K. A., Suzuki, K. G., Shirai, Y. M. et al., Membrane molecules mobile even after chemical fixation. Nat. Meth., 7 (2010), 865–866.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reimer, L. and Kohl, H., Transmission Electron Microscopy: Physics of Image Formation (New York: Springer, 2008).Google Scholar
Pohlmann, E. S., Patel, K., Guo, S. et al., Real-time visualization of nanoparticles interacting with glioblastoma stem cells. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2329–2335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Spence, J. C. H., High-Resolution Electron Microscopy, 3rd edn. (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
Agronskaia, A. V., Valentijn, J. A., van Driel, L. F. et al., Integrated fluorescence and transmission electron microscopy. J. Struct. Biol., 164 (2008), 183–189.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Matricardi, V. R., Moretz, R. C. and Parsons, D. F., Electron diffraction of wet proteins: catalase. Science, 177 (1972), 268–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Siegwart, D. J., Srinivasan, A., Bencherif, S. A. et al., Cellular uptake of functional nanogels prepared by inverse miniemulsion ATRP with encapsulated proteins, carbohydrates, and gold nanoparticles. Biomacromol., 10 (2009), 2300–2309.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chithrani, B. D., Ghazani, A. A. and Chan, W. C., Determining the size and shape dependence of gold nanoparticle uptake into mammalian cells. Nano Lett., 6 (2006), 662–668.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bright, N. A., Reaves, B. J., Mullock, B. M. and Luzio, J. P., Dense core lysosomes can fuse with late endosomes and are re-formed from the resultant hybrid organelles. J. Cell Sci., 110 (1997), 2027–2040.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tantra, R. and Knight, A., Cellular uptake and intracellular fate of engineered nanoparticles: a review on the application of imaging techniques. Nanotoxicology, 5 (2011), 381–392.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glavinovic, M. I., Vitale, M. L. and Trifaro, J. M., Comparison of vesicular volume and quantal size in bovine chromaffin cells. Neuroscience, 85 (1998), 957–968.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brandenberger, C., Muhlfeld, C., Ali, Z. et al., Quantitative evaluation of cellular uptake and trafficking of plain and polyethylene glycol-coated gold nanoparticles. Small, 6 (2010), 1669–1678.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sartori, A., Gatz, R., Beck, F. et al., Correlative microscopy: bridging the gap between fluorescence light microscopy and cryo-electron tomography. J. Struct. Biol., 160 (2007), 135–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, B. L., Showalter, S. P., Dukes, M. J. et al., Visualizing viral assemblies in a nanoscale biosphere. Lab Chip, 13 (2013), 216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zheng, H., Claridge, S. A., Minor, A. M., Alivisatos, A. P. and Dahmen, U., Nanocrystal diffusion in a liquid thin film observed by in situ transmission electron microscopy. Nano Lett., 9 (2009), 2460–2465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woehl, T. J., Jungjohann, K. L., Evans, J. E. et al., Experimental procedures to mitigate electron beam induced artifacts during in situ fluid imaging of nanomaterials. Ultramicroscopy, 127 (2013), 53–63.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirsaidov, U. M., Zheng, H., Casana, Y. and Matsudaira, P., Imaging protein structure in water at 2.7 nm resolution by transmission electron microscopy. Biophys. J., 102 (2012), L15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, C., Harb, M., Dwyer, J. R. and Dwayne Miller, R. J., Nanofluidic cells with controlled pathlength and liquid flow for rapid, high-resolution in situ imaging with electrons. J. Phys. Chem. Lett., 4 (2013), 2339–2347.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shu, X., Lev-Ram, V., Deerinck, T. J. et al., A genetically encoded tag for correlated light and electron microscopy of intact cells, tissues, and organisms. PLoS Biol., 9 (2011), e1001041.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaietta, G., Deerinck, T. J., Adams, S. R. et al., Multicolor and electron microscopic imaging of connexin trafficking. Science, 296 (2002), 503–507.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Risco, C., Sanmartin-Conesa, E., Tzeng, W. P. et al., Specific, sensitive, high-resolution detection of protein molecules in eukaryotic cells using metal-tagging transmission electron microscopy. Structure, 20 (2012), 759–766.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tantra, R. and Shard, A., We need answers. Nat. Nanotechnol., 8 (2013), 71.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

De Carlo, S. and Harris, J. R., Negative staining and cryo-negative staining of macromolecules and viruses for TEM. Micron, 42 (2011), 117–131.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dubochet, J. et al., Cryo-electron microscopy of vitrified specimens. Q. Rev. Biophys., 21 (1988), 129–228.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Unwin, N. and Henderson, R., The structure of proteins in biological membranes. Sci. Am., 250 (1984), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, D. F., Matricardi, V. R., Moretz, R. C. and Turner, J. N., Electron microscopy and diffraction of wet unstained and unfixed biological objects. Adv. Biol. Med. Phys., 15 (1974), 161–270.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Parsons, D. F., Structure of wet specimens in electron microscopy: improved environmental chambers make it possible to examine wet specimens easily. Science, 186 (1974), 407–414.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dukes, M. J., Jacobs, B. W., Morgan, D. G., Hegde, H. and Kelly, D. F., Visualizing nanoparticle mobility in liquid at atomic resolution. Chem. Commun., 49 (2013), 3007–3009.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D. F., Abeyrathne, P. D., Dukovski, D. and Walz, T., The Affinity Grid: a pre-fabricated EM grid for monolayer purification. J. Mol. Biol., 382 (2008), 423–433.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kelly, D. F., Dukovski, D. and Walz, T., A practical guide to the use of monolayer purification and affinity grids. Methods Enzymol., 481 (2010), 83–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Degen, K., Dukes, M., Tanner, J. R. and Kelly, D. F., The development of affinity capture devices: a nanoscale purification platform for biological in situ transmission electron microscopy. RSC Adv., 2 (2012), 2408–2412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilmore, B. L., Showalter, S. P., Dukes, M. J. et al., Visualizing viral assemblies in a nanoscale biosphere. Lab Chip, 13 (2013), 216–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dukes, M. J., Thomas, R., Damiano, J. et al., Improved microchip design and application for in situ transmission electron microscopy of macromolecules. Microsc. Microanal., 20 (2014), 338–345.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pohlmann, E. S., Patel, K., Guo, S. et al., Real-time visualization of nanoparticles interacting with glioblastoma stem cells. Nano Lett., 15 (2015), 2329–2335.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mirsaidov, U. M., Zheng, H., Casana, Y. and Matsudaira, P., Imaging protein structure in water at 2.7 nm resolution by transmission electron microscopy. Biophys. J., 102 (2012), L15–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ring, E. A., Peckys, D. B., Dukes, M. J., Baudoin, J. P. and de Jonge, N., Silicon nitride windows for electron microscopy of whole cells. J. Microsc. Oxford, 243 (2011), 273–283.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cameron Varano, A., Rahimi, A., Dukes, M. J. et al., Visualizing virus particle mobility in liquid at the nanoscale. Chem Commun., 51 (2015), 16176–16179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scheres, S. H., A Bayesian view on cryo-EM structure determination. J. Mol. Biol., 415 (2012), 406–418.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zhang, X., Settembre, E., Xu, C. et al., Near-atomic resolution using electron cryomicroscopy and single-particle reconstruction. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105 (2008), 1867–1872.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tilney, L. G., Actin filaments in the acrosomal reaction of Limulus sperm: motion generated by alterations in the packing of the filaments. J. Cell. Biol., 64 (1975), 289–310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Shin, J. H., Tam, B. K., Brau, R. R. et al., Force of an actin spring. Biophys. J., 92 (2007), 3729–3733.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wade, R. H., The temperature-dependence of radiation-damage in organic and biological materials. Ultramicroscopy, 14 (1984), 265–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leapman, R. D. and Sun, S. Q., Cryoelectron energy-loss spectroscopy: observations on vitrified hydrated specimens and radiation-damage. Ultramicroscopy, 59 (1995), 71–79.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Aronova, M. A., Sousa, A. A. and Leapman, R. D., EELS characterization of radiolytic products in frozen samples. Micron, 42 (2011), 252–256.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Yakovlev, S., Misra, M., Shi, S. and Libera, M., Specimen thickness dependence of hydrogen evolution during cryo-transmission electron microscopy of hydrated soft materials. J. Microsc. Oxford, 236 (2009), 174–179.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Danev, R. and Nagayama, K, Transmission electron microscopy with Zernike phase plate. Ultramicroscopy, 88 (2001), 243–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

References

Sugi, H., Akimoto, T., Chaen, K. et al., Dynamic electron microscopy of ATP-induced myosin head movement in living muscle thick filaments. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 94 (1997), 4378–4382.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugi, H., Minoda, H., Inayoshi, Y. et al., Direct demonstration of the cross-bridge recovery stroke in muscle thick filaments in aqueous solution by using the hydration chamber. Proc Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 105 (2008), 17396–17401.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minoda, H., Okabe, T., Inayoshi, Y. et al., Electron microscopic evidence for the myosin head lever arm mechanism in hydrated myosin filaments using the gas environmental chamber. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 405 (2011), 651–656.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugi, H., Minoda, H., Miyakawa, T. and Tanokura, M, Electron microscopic recording of the cross-bridge power stroke in hydrated myosin filaments using the gas environmental chamber. J. Muscle Res. Cell Motility, 32 (2011), 34.Google Scholar
Sugi, H., Visualization and recording of the power stroke in individual myosin heads coupled with ATP hydrolysis using the gas environmental chamber. J. Physiol. Sci. Japan, 103 (2013), S53.Google Scholar
Huxley, H. E. and Hanson, J., Changes in the cross-striations of muscle during contraction and stretch and their structural interpretation. Nature, 173 (1954), 973–976.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, H. E., The double array of filaments in cross-striated muscle. J. Biophys. Biochem. Cytol., 3 (1957), 631–648.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Woledge, R. C., Curtin, N. A. and Homsher, E., Energetic Aspects of Muscle Contraction (London and New York: Academic Press, 1985).Google ScholarPubMed
Bagshaw, C. R., Muscle Contraction (London: Chapman & Hall, 1993).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huxley, H. E., The mechanism of muscular contraction. Science, 164 (1969), 1356–1366.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, A. F., Muscle structure and theories of contraction. Prog. Biophys. Biophys. Chem., 7 (1957), 255–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cooke, R., The mechanism of muscle contraction. CRC Crit. Rev. Biochem., 21 (1986), 53–118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hibbard, M. G. and Trentham, D. R., Relationships between chemical and mechanical events during muscular contraction. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 15 (1986), 119–161.Google Scholar
Sugi, H., Molecular mechanism of actin-myosin interaction in muscle contraction. In Sugi, H., ed., Muscle Contraction and Cell Motility, Advances in Comparative & Environmental Physiology Vol. 12 (Berlin: Springer, 1992).CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Geeves, M. A. and Holmes, K. C., Structural mechanism of muscle contraction. Annu. Rev. Biochem., 68 (1999), 687–728.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Huxley, A. F., Support for the lever arm. Nature, 396 (1998), 317–318.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fukami, A. and Adachi, K., A new method of preparation of a self-perforated micro plastic grid and its application. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo), 14 (1965), 112–116.Google ScholarPubMed
Suda, H., Ishikawa, A. and Fukami, A., Evaluation of the critical electron dose on the contractile activity of hydrated muscle fibers in the film-sealed environmental cell. J. Electron Microsc. (Tokyo), 41 (1992), 223–229.Google ScholarPubMed
Sutoh, K., Tokunaga, M. and Wakabayashi, T., Electron microscopic mapping of myosin head with site-directed antibodies. J. Mol. Biol., 206 (1989), 357–363.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Oiwa, K., Chaen, S. and Sugi, H., Measurement of work done by ATP-induced sliding between rabbit muscle myosin and algal cell actin cables in vitro. J. Physiol. (London), 437 (1991), 751–763.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lymn, R. W. and Taylor, E. W., Mechanism of adenosine triphosphate hydrolysis by actomyosin. Biochemistry, 10 (1971), 4617–4624.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Sugi, H., Chaen, S., Akimoto, T. et al., Electron microscopic recording of myosin head power stroke in hydrated myosin filaments. Sci. Rep., 5 (2015), 15700.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Squire, J. M., The Structural Basis of Muscular Contraction (New York; London: Plenum, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sugi, H., Abe, T., Kobayashi, T. et al., Enhancement of force generated by individual myosin heads in skinned rabbit psoas muscle fibers at low ionic strength. PLOS One, 8 (2013), e63658.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • Applications
  • Edited by Frances M. Ross, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, New York
  • Book: Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy
  • Online publication: 22 December 2016
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • Applications
  • Edited by Frances M. Ross, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, New York
  • Book: Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy
  • Online publication: 22 December 2016
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • Applications
  • Edited by Frances M. Ross, IBM T. J. Watson Research Center, New York
  • Book: Liquid Cell Electron Microscopy
  • Online publication: 22 December 2016
Available formats
×