Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-5b777bbd6c-skqgd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-20T14:52:58.122Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 9 - Age-related differences and second language learning practice

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  27 January 2010

Robert DeKeyser
By
Carmen Muñoz
Robert DeKeyser
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Carmen Muñoz
Affiliation:
University of Barcelona, Spain
Get access

Summary

Introduction

The aim of this chapter is to bring together information about age-related differences from the fields of psychology and second language (L2) acquisition research that may allow the identification of relevant characteristics of L2 learning practice activities appropriate to various ages.

It is assumed here that practice, understood in the sense of “engaging in an activity with the goal of becoming better at it” (DeKeyser, 1998, p. 50), has an important role to play in language learning and hence in the language classroom. This definition is sufficiently neutral to encompass the different views that assign various roles to practice in language acquisition: from item learning and the improvement of fluency (e.g., Ellis, 1997) to gradually bridging the gap between explicit knowledge and use (see DeKeyser, 2003). Further, research seems to provide increasing evidence of the importance of skill-specific practice; for example, input practice seems necessary in order to build comprehension skills and output practice to build production skills (DeKeyser & Sokalski, 1996; DeKeyser, 1997; Salaberry, 1997). In sum, practice may not make perfect (Ellis & Laporte, 1997), but it does make better.

It is also assumed here that good language learning practice activities present an adequate balance between demands and support. An example of the importance of demands on learners is provided by the lack of accuracy observed in learners exposed only to comprehensible input, whose language learning resources are not “stretched” enough by the need to produce accurate L2 output (Swain, 1985, 1995).

Type
Chapter
Information
Practice in a Second Language
Perspectives from Applied Linguistics and Cognitive Psychology
 , pp. 229 - 255
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2007

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Ahmed, M. O. (1988). Vocabulary learning strategies. In Meara, P. (Ed.), Beyond words. London: CILT.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D. (1999). Introduction: Whys and why nots of the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 1–22). Mawhwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Birdsong, D., & Molis, M. (2001). On the evidence for maturational constraints in second language acquisition. Journal of Memory and Language, 44, 235–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bley-Vroman, R. (1988). The fundamental character of foreign language learning. In Rutherford, W. and Sharwood, M. Smith (Eds.), Grammar and second language teaching: A book of readings (pp. 19–30). New York: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Blondin, C., Candelier, M., Edelenbos, P., Johnstone, R., Kubanek-German, A., & Taeschner, T. (1998). Foreign languages in primary and pre-school education. London: CILT.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T. (1999). Ultimate attainment in L2 pronunciation: The case of very advanced late L2 learners. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 133–59), Mawhwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Bongaerts, T. (2003). Effects de l'âge sur l'acquisition de la prononciation d'une seconde langue. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère (AILE), 18, 79–98.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L. (1980). Metacognitive development and reading. In Spiro, R. J., Bruce, B. C., & Brewer, W. F. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension: perspectives and cognitive psychology, linguistics, artificial intelligence, and education (pp. 453–81). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brown, A. L., & Sullivan Palincsar, A. (1982). Inducing strategic learning from texts by means of informed, self-control training. In Reid, D. K. & Hresko, W. P. (Eds.), TL&LD. Metacognition and learning disabilities 2(1), (pp. 1–18). Rockville, MD: Aspen Publication.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. (1983). Child's talk: Learning to use language. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
Burstall, C., Jamieson, M., Cohen, S., & Hargreaves, M. (1974). Primary French in the balance. Windsor, UK: NFER Publishing Company.Google Scholar
Cameron, L. (2001). Teaching languages to young learners. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Case, R. (1985). Intellectual development. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Celaya, M. L., Torras, M. R., & Pérez-Vidal, C. (2001). Short and mid-term effects of an earlier start: An analysis of EFL written production. In Foster-Cohen, S. & Nizegorodcew, A. (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 2001: 195–210. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Cenoz, J. (2002). Age differences in foreign language learning. I.T.L. Review of applied linguistics, 135–136, 125–42.Google Scholar
Chesterfield, R., & Chesterfield, K. (1985). Natural order in children's use of second language learning strategies. Applied Linguistics, 6(1), 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1997). Beyond explicit rule learning: Automatizing second language morphosyntax. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19(2), 195–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (1998). Beyond focus on form: Cognitive perspectives on learning and practicing second language grammar. In Doughty, C. & Williams, J. (Eds.), Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (pp. 42–63). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2000). The robustness of critical period effects in second language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 22(4), 499–533.Google Scholar
DeKeyser, R. (2003). Implicit and explicit learning. In Doughty, C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 313–48) Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeKeyser, R., & Sokalski, K. (1996). The differential role of comprehension and production practice. Language Learning, 46(4), 613–42.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Donaldson, M. (1978). Children's minds. London: Fontana.Google Scholar
Doughty, C., & Williams, J. (Eds.) (1998). Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dunn, J. (1994). Sibling relationships and perceived self-competence: Patterns of stability between childhood and early adolescence. In Sameroff, A. & Haith, M. M. (Eds.), Reason and responsibility: The passage through childhood. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ellis, N. C., & Laporte, N. (1997). Contexts of acquisition: Effects of formal instruction and naturalistic exposure on second language acquisition. In Groot, A. M. B. & Kroll, J. F. (Eds.), Tutorials in bilingualism: Psycholinguistic perspectives (pp. 53–83). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Ellis, R. (1997). SLA research and language teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Felix, S. (1985). More evidence on competing cognitive systems. Second Language Research, 1, 47–72.Google Scholar
Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring. American Psychologist, 34 (10 Special Issue), 906–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1991). Perception and production: The relevance of phonetic input to L2 phonological learning. In Heubner, T. & Ferguson, C. (Eds.), Crosscurrents in second language acquisition and linguistic theory. Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1992). Speech learning in a second language. In Ferguson, C. A., Menn, L., & Stoel-Gammon, C. (Eds.), Phonological development: Models, research, implications (pp. 565–604). Timonium, MD: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1995). Second language speech learning: Theory, findings, and problems. In Strange, W. (Ed.), Speech perception and linguistic experience: Issues in cross-language research (pp. 233–77). Baltimore: York Press.Google Scholar
Flege, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second language speech. In Birdsong, D. (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis, (pp. 101–32). Mawhwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.Google Scholar
Fullana, N. (2005). Second language phonological acquisition in a formal setting. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Grañena, G. (in press). Age, input and interactional skills. In Muñoz, C. (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 24, 287–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harley, B., & Hart, D. (1997). Aptitude, proficiency, and starting age for SLA. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 379–400.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harter, S. (1988). Developmental processes in the construction of the self. In Yawkey, T. D. & Johnson, J. E. (Eds.), Integration processes and socialization: Early to middle childhood (pp. 45–78). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hawkins, E. (1996). The early teaching of modern languages: A pilot scheme. In Hawkins, E. (Ed.), Thirty years of language teaching (pp. 155–64). London: CILT.Google Scholar
Holmstrand, L. (1980). Effekterna på kunskaper, färdigheter och attityder av tidigt påbörjad undervisning I engelska. En delstudie inom EPÅL-projektet [Early English teaching: Effects on knowledge, proficiency and attitudes] (Pedagogisk forkning i Uppsala 18). Uppsala, Sweden: Uppsala universitet, Pedagogiska institutionen.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K. (1992). Non-native features of near-native speakers. On the ultimate attainment of childhood L2 learners. In Harris, R. (Ed.), Cognitive processing in bilinguals (pp. 351–68). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2000). Who can become native-like in a second language? All, some, or none?. On the maturational controversy in second langauge acquisition. Studia Linguistica, 54(2), 150–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2001). Age and L2 learning: The hazards of matching practical “implications” with theoretical “facts.” Comments on Stefka H. Marinova-Todd, D. Bradford Marshall, & Catherine E. Snow's Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 35(1), 151–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyltenstam, K., & Abrahamsson, N. (2003). Maturational constraints in SLA. In Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), The handbook of second language acquisition (pp. 539–88). Malden, MA: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kemler Nelson, D. G., & Smith, J. D. (1989). Analytic and holistic processing in reflection-impulsivity and cognitive development. In Globerson, T. & Zelniker, T. (Eds.), Cognitive style and cognitive development (pp. 116–40). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. (1982). Accounting for child-adult differences in second language rate and attainment. In Krashen, S. D., Scarcella, R. C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Child-adult differences in second language acquisition (pp. 202–26). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Krashen, S. D., Long, M. H. & Scarcella, R. C. (1982). Age, rate and eventual attainment in second language acquisition. In Krashen, S. D., Scarcella, R. C. & Long, M. H. (Eds.), Child-adult differences in second language acquisition (pp. 161–72). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Lázaro, A. (2002). La adquisición de la morfosintaxis del inglés por niños bilingües Euskera-Castellano: Una perspectiva minimalista. Doctoral dissertation, Universidad del País Vasco.Google Scholar
Lenneberg, E. H. (1967). Biological foundations of language. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Long, M. H. (1983). Native speaker/non-native speaker conversation and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Applied Linguistics, 4, 126–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, M. H. (1991). Focus on form: A design feature in language teaching methodology. In Bot, K., Ginsberg, R., & Kramsch, C. (Eds.), Foreign language research in cross-cultural perspective (pp. 39–52). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackey, A., Oliver, R., & Philp, J. (October, 1997). Patterns of interaction in NNS-NNS conversation. Paper presented at Second Language Research Forum, East Lancing, MI.
Muñoz, C. (2001). Factores escolares e individuales en el aprendizaje formal de un idioma extranjero. In Pastor, S. & Salazar, V. (Eds.), Tendencias y líneas de investigación en adquisición de segundas lenguas. Monográfico Revista de Lingüística (pp. 247–68). Universidad de Alicante.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2002). Speech adjustments in L3 interviews. Anuari de Filologia, Vol. XXIV, A (11), 69–80.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2003a). Variation in oral skills development and age of onset. In García, M. P. Mayo & García, M. L. Lecumberri (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of English as a foreign language: Theoretical issues and fieldwork (pp. 161–81). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C. (2003b). Le rythme d'acquisition des savoirs communicationnels chez des apprenants guidés. L'influence de l'âge. Acquisition et interaction en langue étrangère (AILE), 18, 53–77.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C., Corretja, D., & Castañé, M. (2002). A survey of foreign language teachers' age-related beliefs and opinions. Unpublished manuscript, Universitat de Barcelona.Google Scholar
Muñoz, C., & Tragant, E. (2001). Motivation and attitudes towards L2: Some effects of age and instruction. In Foster-Cohen, S. & Nizegorodcew, A. (Eds.), EUROSLA Yearbook 1 (pp. 211–24). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.Google Scholar
Myles, F., Hooper, J., & Mitchell, R. (1998). Rote or rule? Exploring the role of formulaic language in classroom foreign language learning. Language Learning, 48(3), 323–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Myles, F., Mitchell, R., & Hooper, J. (1999). Interrogative chunks in French L2: A basis for creative construction? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21, 49–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R. (1998). Negotiation of meaning in child interactions. The Modern Language Journal, 82, 372–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oliver, R. (2000). Age differences in negotiation and feedback in classroom and pairwork. Language Learning, 50, 119–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oller, J., & Nagato, N. (1974). The long-term effect of FLES: An experiment. Modern Language Journal, 58, 15–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyama, S. (1976). A sensitive period for the acquisition of a nonnative phonological system. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 5, 261–85. Reprinted in Krashen, S. D., Scarcella, R. C., and Long, M. H. (Eds.), (1982). Child-adult differences in second language acquisition (pp. 20–38). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patkowski, M. S. (1980). The sensitive period for the acquisition of syntax in a second language. Language Learning, 30, 449–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pawley, A., & Syder, F. H. (1983). Two puzzles for linguistic theory: Nativelike selection and nativelike fluency. In Richards, J. C. & Schmidt, R. W. (Eds.), Language and communication (pp. 191–226). London: Longman.Google Scholar
Pérez-Vidal, C., Torras, M. R., & Celaya, M. L. (2000). Age and EFL written performance by Catalan/Spanish bilinguals. Spanish Applied Linguistics, 4–2, 267–90.Google Scholar
Peters, A. M. (1983). The units of language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Piaget, J. (1950). The psychology of intelligence. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Reid, J. (1987). The learning style preferences of ESL students. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 87–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salaberry, M. R. (1997). The role of input and output practice in second language acquisition. Canadian Modern Language Review, 53(2), 422–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scarcella, R., & Higa, C. (1982). Input and age differences in second language acquisition. In Krashen, S., Long, M., & Scarcella, R. (Eds.), Child-adult differences in second language acquisition (pp. 175–200). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Schmidt, C. R., Ollendick, T. H., & Stanowicz, L. B. (1988). Developmental changes in the influence of assigned goals on cooperation and competition. Developmental Psychology, 24, 574–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11(2), 17–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmidt, R., Boraie, D., & Kassabgy, O. (1996). Foreign language motivation: internal structure and external connections. University of Hawai'i Working Papers in ESL, 14(2), 1–72.Google Scholar
Schmitt, N. (1997). Vocabulary learning strategies. In Schmitt, N. & McCarthy, M. (Eds.), Vocabulary: Description, acquisition and pedagogy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Schouten-van Parreren, C. (1992). Individual differences in vocabulary acquisition: A qualitative experiment in the first phase of secondary education. In Arnaud, P. & Bejoint, H. (Eds.), Vocabulary and applied linguistics (pp. 94–101). London: Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, B. (1993). On explicit and negative data effecting and affecting competence and linguistic behavior. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 15, 147–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Singleton, D. (1989). Language acquisition: The age factor. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. (1995). Introduction: A critical look at the critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition research. In Singleton, D. & Lengyel, Z. (Eds.), The age factor in second language acquisition (pp. 1–29). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Singleton, D. (1997). Age and second language learning. In Tucker, G. R. & Corson, D. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of language and education. Vol. 4. Second language education, pp. 43–50. Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Skehan, P. (1986). Cluster analysis and the identification of learner types. In Cook, V. (Ed.), Experimental approaches to second language learning (pp. 81–94). Oxford: Pergamon Press.Google Scholar
Snow, C., & Hoefnagel-Höhle, M. (1978). The critical period for language acquisition: Evidence from second language learning. Child Development, 49, 1114–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stankowski Gratton, R. (1980). Una ricerca sperimentale sull'insegnamento del tedesco dalla prima classe elementare, Rassegna Italiana di Linguistica Applicata, 12(3), 119–41.Google Scholar
Sternberg, R. J. (2002). The theory of successful intelligence and its implications for language aptitude testing. In Robinson, P. (Ed.), Individual differences and instructed language learning. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sternberg, R. J., & Nigro, G. (1980). Developmental patterns in the solution of verbal analogies. Child Developments, 51, 27–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In Gass, S. & Madden, C. (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–53). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.Google Scholar
Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In Cook, G. & Seidlhofer, D. (Eds.), Principle and practice in applied linguistics (pp. 125–44). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Takeuchi, O. (2003). What can we learn from good foreign language learners? A qualitative study in the Japanese foreign language context. System, 31, 385–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tragant, E., & Victori, M. (2006). Reported strategy use and age. In Muñoz, C. (Ed.), Age and the rate of foreign language learning (pp. 208–36). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ulman, M. T. (2001). The neural basis of lexicon and grammar in first and second language: The declarative/procedural model. Bilingualism: Language and Cognition, 4, 105–22.Google Scholar
Vasta, R., Haith, M. M., and Miller, S. A. (1999). Child psychology: The modern science, 3rd ed., New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Victori, M., & Tragant, E. (2003). Learner strategies: A cross-sectional and longitudinal study of primary and high-school EFL learners. In García, M. P. Mayo & García, M. L. Lecumberri (Eds.), Age and the acquisition of english as a foreign language: Theoretical issues and fieldwork (pp. 182–209). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.Google Scholar
Weinert, R. (1994). Some effects of a foreign language classroom on the development of German negation. Applied Linguistics, 15, 76–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Williams, J. N. (1999). Memory, attention, and inductive learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 21 (1), 1–48.Google Scholar
Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principle and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21(4), 463–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yamamori, K., Takamichi, I., Tomohito, H., & Oxford, R. L. (2003). Using cluster analysis to uncover L2 learner differences in strategy use, will to learn and achievement over time. IRAL, 41, 381–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×