Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-65f69f4695-s2gkq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-06-27T09:43:44.124Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Evaluating Emergency Risk Communication and Engaging in Public Education for the Next Emergency

from Part III - Communicating and Planning after a Health Emergency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 June 2025

Kathleen G. V. Melville
Affiliation:
Tulane University School of Medicine, Louisiana
Get access

Summary

This chapter outlines practical ways emergency risk communicators can use evaluation throughout a health emergency to inform and improve emergency risk communication messaging strategies and activities. The chapter starts with a basic orientation on program evaluation and its relevance to emergency risk communication. Next, the chapter provides an in-depth look at 16 communication evaluation activities that emergency risk communications can use throughout a health emergency. Then the chapter describes how organizations learn after health emergencies and how organizational learning can inform community resilience and public education. Next, the chapter outlines current theoretical research approaches to evaluating emergency risk communication and practical ways to apply this research during a health emergency. The chapter highlights the ADKAR model for organizational change management, and a student case study uses the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication framework to analyze how the Georgia Department of Health communicating during the e-cigarette or vaping product use-associated lung injury (EVALI) outbreak. End-of-chapter reflection questions are included.

Information

Type
Chapter
Information
Risk Communication in Public Health Emergencies
Practical Guidance Rooted in Theory
, pp. 257 - 280
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2025

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Book purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

CDC. Types of Evaluation. National Center for HIV/AIDS, Viral Hepatitis, STD, and TB Prevention, editor. Atlanta, GA, CDC; n.d.Google Scholar
Roberti, J, Jorro, F, Rodríguez, V, Belizán, M, Arias, P, Ratto, ME, et al. Theory-Driven, Rapid Formative Research on Quality Improvement Intervention for Critical Care of Patients with COVID-19 in Argentina. Glob Qual Nurs Res 2021;8:23333936211015660.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
McCann, B, Hunter, SC, McAloney-Kocaman, K, McCarthy, P, Smith, J, Calveley, E. Time for You: A Process Evaluation of the Rapid Implementation of a Multi-Level Mental Health Support Intervention for Frontline Workers during the COVID-19 Pandemic. PLoS ONE 2023;18(10):e0293393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mensah, GA, Johnson, LE, Zhang, X, Stinson, N, Jr., Carrington, K, Malla, G, et al. Community Engagement Alliance (CEAL): A National Institutes of Health Program to Advance Health Equity. Am J Public Health 2024;114(S1):S12S17.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Types of Evaluation in Health Promotion and Disease Prevention Programs. Rural Health Information Hub. 2024. www.ruralhealthinfo.org/toolkits/health-promotion/5/types-of-evaluation (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
What is the Kirkpatrick Model? Kirkpatrick Partners. 2024. www.kirkpatrickpartners.com/the-kirkpatrick-model (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
Study Guide for the Examination for Accreditation in Public Relations. New York, Universal Accreditation Board/Public Relations Society of America, 2021.Google Scholar
CDC. Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication October 2002. Atlanta, GA, CDC, 2002.Google Scholar
CDC. Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication October 2018. Atlanta, GA, CDC, 2018.Google Scholar
Lohiniva, AL, Sibenberg, K, Austero, S, Skogberg, N. Social Listening to Enhance Access to Appropriate Pandemic Information among Culturally Diverse Populations: Case Study from Finland. JMIR Infodemiol 2022;2(2):e38343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mak, S, Thomas, A. Steps for Conducting a Scoping Review. J Grad Med Educ 2022;14(5):565–67.Google ScholarPubMed
Hotwash Guide. Ohio School Safety Center. n.d. https://dam.assets.ohio.gov/image/upload/ohioschoolsafetycenter.ohio.gov/Hotwash%20Guide.pdf (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
Seeger, M, Sellnow, T, Ulmer, R. Communication and Organizational Crisis. London, Bloomsbury Academic, 2003.Google Scholar
Tompkins, PK. Apollo, Challenger, Columbia: The Decline of the Space Program: A Study in Organizational Communication. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 2004.Google Scholar
Moving Forward Summary Report. CDC. 2022. www.cdc.gov/about/organization/cdc-moving-forward-summary-report.html (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
Weick, K, Sutcliffe, KM. Managing the Unexpected: Assuring High Performance in an Age of Complexity. San Francisco, CA, Jossey-Boss, 2001.Google Scholar
Liu, LS, Ran, GJ, Jia, X. New Zealand Border Restrictions amidst COVID-19 and Their Impacts on Temporary Migrant Workers. Asian Pac Migr J 2022;31(3):312–23.Google ScholarPubMed
Parotto, E, Lamberti-Castronuovo, A, Censi, V, Valente, M, Atzori, A, Ragazzoni, L. Exploring Italian Healthcare Facilities Response to COVID-19 Pandemic: Lessons Learned from the Italian Response to COVID-19 Initiative. Front Public Health 2023;10:1016649.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Koliou, M, van de Lindt, JW, McAllister, TP, Ellingwood, BR, Dillard, M, Cutler, H. State of the Research in Community Resilience: Progress and Challenges. Sustain Resilient Infrastruct 2018; doi: 10.1080/23789689.2017.1418547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holkup, PA, Tripp-Reimer, T, Salois, EM, Weinert, C. Community-Based Participatory Research: An Approach to Intervention Research with a Native American Community. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 2004;27:162–75.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Haboush-Deloye, A, Marquez, E, Dunne, R, Pharr, JR. The Importance of Community Voice: Using Community-Based Participatory Research to Understand the Experiences of African American, Native American, and Latinx People during a Pandemic. Prev Chronic Dis 2023;20:E12.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wojcik, A. The Importance of Communication before and during a Public Health Emergency. Dela J Public Health 2019;5(4):2030.Google ScholarPubMed
ASTHO. Evolving view of vaccination COVID-19, flu and RSV. 2023. www.astho.org/globalassets/pdf/covid/evolving-view-of-vaccination-covid-19-flu-rsv.pdf (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
ASTHO. COVID-19 Public Health Communications Resource Hub. 2024. www.astho.org/topic/infectious-disease/covid-19/communications-resource (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
DHS. National Preparedness Month. n.d. www.ready.gov/september (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
CDC. Ready Wrigley. n.d. www.cdc.gov/orr/readywrigley/index.htm (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
CDC. Campaigns: Zombie Preparedness. n.d. www.cdc.gov/orr/campaigns/index.htm (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
Sovoia, E, Lin, L, Gamhewage, G. A Conceptual Framework for the Emergency Risk Communications. Am J Public Health 2017;107(S2):S208–14.Google Scholar
Al Nashmi, E, Bashir, M. The Kuwaiti Government’s Twitter Discourse during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Toward a Crisis Communication Model Using SCCT and CERC. J Creat Commun 2024;18:161–78.Google Scholar
Bernard, NR, Basit, A, Sofija, E, Phung, H, Lee, JS, Rutherford, S, et al. Analysis of Crisis Communication by the Prime Minister of Australia during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2021;62:9.Google Scholar
Jin, XL, Spence, PR. Understanding Crisis Communication on Social Media with CERC: Topic Model Analysis of Tweets about Hurricane Maria. J Risk Res 2021;24(10):1266–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kinsky, ES, Chen, L, Drumheller, K. Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication: FEMA’s Twitter Use during the 2017 Hurricane Season. Public Relat Rev 2021;47(4):10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lu, JH. Themes and Evolution of Misinformation during the Early Phases of the COVID-19 Outbreak in China – An Application of the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Model. Front Commun 2020;5:7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lwin, MO, Lu, JH, Sheldenkar, A, Schulz, PJ. Strategic Uses of Facebook in Zika Outbreak Communication: Implications for the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Model. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2018;15(9):19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Malik, A, Khan, ML, Quan-Haase, A. Public Health Agencies Outreach through Instagram during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Perspective. Int J Disaster Risk Reduct 2021;61:9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nour, M, Alhajri, M, Farag, E, Al-Romaihi, HE, Al-Thani, M, Al-Marri, S, et al. How Do the First Days Count? A Case Study of Qatar Experience in Emergency Risk Communication during the MERS-CoV Outbreak. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2017;14(12):16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ophir, Y. Coverage of Epidemics in American Newspapers through the Lens of the Crisis and Emergency Risk Communication Framework. Health Secur 2018;16(3):147–57.Google ScholarPubMed
Troy, CLC, Pinto, J, Cui, Z. Managing Complexity during Dual Crises: Social Media Messaging of Hurricane Preparedness during COVID-19. J Risk Res 2022;25(11–12):1458–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dickmann, P, McClelland, A, Gamhewage, GM, Portela de Souza, P, Apfel, F. Making Sense of Communication Interventions in Public Health Emergencies – An Evaluation Framework for Risk Communication. J Commun Healthc 2015;8(3):233–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeger, M, Pechta, L, Price, S, Lubell, KM, Rose, D, Sapru, S, et al. A Conceptual Model for Evaluating Emergency Risk Communication in Public Health. Health Secur 2018;16(3):193203.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Scott, BM. Spokespersons and Message Control: How the CDC Lost Credibility during the Anthrax Crisis. Qual Res Rep Commun 2005;6(1):5968.Google Scholar
Hiatt, J. The Prosci ADKAR Model. n.d. www.prosci.com/methodology/adkar (Accessed April 10, 2024).Google Scholar
Balluck, J, Asturi, E, Brockman, V. Use of the ADKAR® and CLARC® Change Models to Navigate Staffing Model Changes during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Nurse Lead 2020;18(6):539–46.Google ScholarPubMed
CDC. Outbreak of Lung Injury Associated with the Use of E-Cigarette, or Vaping, Products. 2020. www.cdc.gov/tobacco/basic_information/e-cigarettes/severe-lung-disease.html (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar
Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH). About DPH. 2022. https://dph.georgia.gov/public-health-districts (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar
Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH). Georgia DPH Investigating Possible Vaping-related Illnesses. Facebook. 2019. www.facebook.com/GaDPH/posts/2371886426230292 (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar
Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH). Clinical Alert: Georgia Department of Public Health Urges Clinicians to Report Possible Cases of Vaping-Associated Lung Injury. 2019. https://dph.georgia.gov/document/document/dph-clinical-alert-oct-16-2019/download (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar
Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH). Severe Lung Disease among People Who Reported Vaping. 2019. https://dph.georgia.gov/vapinglunginjury (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar
CDC. CERC Introduction. 2018. https://emergency.cdc.gov/cerc/ppt/CERC_Introduction.pdf (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar
Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH). Health Alert: Severe Pulmonary Diseases among People Who Reported Vaping. 2019. http://dph.georgia.gov/document/document/dph-health-alert/download (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar
Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH). DPH Identifies First Death From Vaping-Associated Illness. 2019. https://dph.georgia.gov/press-releases/2019-09-25/dph-identifies-first-death-vaping-associated-illness#:~:text=DPH%20has%20identified%20nine%20cases,)%2C%2078%25%20are%20male. (Accessed May 25, 2024).Google Scholar
Georgia Department of Public Health (DPH). Severe Lung Disease among People Who Reported Vaping. Facebook. 2019. https://www.facebook.com/GaDPH/posts/2459466960805571 (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar
County of Los Angeles Public Health. Vaping Risks, Behaviors and Policy Responses: A View from Los Angeles County. 2020. https://publichealth.lacounty.gov/chie/reports/Vaping_CHIEBrief_March2020_Final.pdf (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar
County of Los Angeles Public Health. CDPH Health Alert: E-Cigarette, or Vaping, Product Use-Associated Lung Injury (EVALI) Cases during California’s COVID-19 Response. 2020. http://publichealth.lacounty.gov/eprp/lahan/alerts/CDPHEVALI05112020.pdf (Accessed April 21, 2024).Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×