Hostname: page-component-76c49bb84f-kjkt6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-07-09T06:26:27.050Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Relative cell complexes in closure spaces

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 June 2025

Peter Bubenik*
Affiliation:
Department of Mathematics, https://ror.org/02y3ad647 University of Florida, PO Box 118105, Gainesville, FL 32611-8105, United States

Abstract

We give necessary and sufficient conditions for certain pushouts of topological spaces in the category of Čech’s closure spaces to agree with their pushout in the category of topological spaces. We prove that in these two categories, the constructions of cell complexes by a finite sequence of closed cell attachments, which attach arbitrarily many cells at a time, agree. Likewise, the constructions of CW complexes relative to a compactly generated weak Hausdorff space that attach only finitely many cells, also agree. On the other hand, we give examples showing that the constructions of finite-dimensional CW complexes, CW complexes of finite type, and relative CW complexes that attach only finitely many cells, need not agree.

Information

Type
Article
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Canadian Mathematical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

Footnotes

This research was partially supported by the National Science Foundation (NSF) grant DMS-2324353 and by the Southeast Center for Mathematics and Biology, an NSF-Simons Research Center for Mathematics of Complex Biological Systems, under NSF Grant No. DMS-1764406 and Simons Foundation Grant No. 594594.

References

Bubenik, P. and Milićević, N., Eilenberg-Steenrod homology and cohomology theories for Čech’s closure spaces. Preprint, 2021. arXiv:2112.13421 [math.AT].Google Scholar
Bubenik, P. and Milićević, N., Homotopy, homology, and persistent homology using closure spaces . J. Appl. Comput. Topol. 8(2024), no. 3, 579641.Google Scholar
Čech, E., Topological spaces, Publishing House of the Czechoslovak Academy of Sciences, Prague; Interscience Publishers John Wiley & Sons, London, 1966.Google Scholar
Ebel, S. and Kapulkin, K., Synthetic approach to the Quillen model structure on topological spaces . Algebr. Geom. Topol. 25(2025), no. 2, 12271264.Google Scholar
Milićević, N., Singular homology of roots of unity . Topol. Appl. 366(2025), Paper No. 109291.Google Scholar
Palacios Vela, L. J., Homology and cohomology for closure spaces, Master’s thesis (Licentiatura en Matematicas), Universidad de Guanajato, 2019.Google Scholar
Rezk, C., Compactly generated spaces, 2018.Google Scholar
Riehl, E., Category theory in context, Modern Math Originals, Dover Publications Inc., Aurora, 2016.Google Scholar
Rieser, A., Čech closure spaces: A unified framework for discrete and continuous homotopy . Topol. Appl. 296(2021), Paper No. 107613, 41 pp.Google Scholar
Rieser, A., Grothendieck topologies and sheaves on Čech closure spaces. Preprint, 2021. arXiv:2109.13867 [math.AT].Google Scholar
Rieser, A., Cofibration and model category structures for discrete and continuous homotopy. Preprint, 2022. arXiv:2209.13510 [math.AT].Google Scholar