Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Review process

This journal uses a double-anonymous model of peer review. Neither author nor reviewers know the identity of each other. 

Articles and Review Essays follow a double-anonymous review process. Book reviews and Encounters with Books from Other Disciplines are reviewed by members of the editorial team. Articles for special issues and themed issues follow a double-anonymous review process.

Appeals

Appeals of editorial decisions will only be considered if they refer to a specific manuscript and must be based on evidence that either (1) an editor or reviewer made a significant factual error/a major misunderstanding of a manuscript, or (2) the integrity of the editorial decision making process was compromised.  In general, only one appeal per manuscript per decision stage will be considered. 

To appeal an editorial decision, contact the Editors-in-Chief and specify the reason for your appeal. Your appeal will be reviewed and the final decision regarding your appeal will rest with the Editors-in-Chief. New submissions take priority over appeals, so it may take a substantial period of time for the journal to reach a conclusion about your appeal.