We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
To save content items to your account,
please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies.
If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account.
Find out more about saving content to .
To save content items to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org
is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings
on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part
of your Kindle email address below.
Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations.
‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi.
‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is the second most prevalent neurodegenerative disease globally(1) whereby there is a loss of dopaminergic neurons in the brain and a deficiency of dopamine. PD is characterised by dyskinesia, rigidity, tremor and postural instability, and non-motor symptoms which include neuropsychiatric, sleep and autonomic dysfunction which often occur before motor symptoms(2). Several of these motor and non-motor symptoms can adversely affect nutritional status(3) and a significant number of people with PD are at risk of malnutrition(4). Observational studies have examined the relationship between dietary intake, symptoms and disease progression yet there is a lack of randomised controlled trials of dietary interventions. This presentation will examine the evidence base and suggest future directions for nutrition research in this important area.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a severe neurodegenerative disorder characterized by prominent motor and non-motor (e.g., cognitive) abnormalities. Notwithstanding Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved treatments (e.g., L-dopa), most persons with PD do not adequately benefit from the FDA-approved treatments and treatment emergent adverse events are often reasons for discontinuation. To date, no current therapy for PD is disease modifying or curative. Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) are central nervous system (CNS) penetrant and have shown to be neuroprotective against oxidative stress, neuroinflammation, and insulin resistance, as well as promoting neuroplasticity. Preclinical evidence suggests that GLP-1RAs also attenuate the accumulation of α-synuclein. The cellular and molecular effects of GLP-1RAs provide a basis to hypothesize putative therapeutic benefit in individuals with PD. Extant preclinical and clinical trial evidence in PD provide preliminary evidence of clinically meaningful benefit in the cardinal features of PD. Herein, we synthesize extant preclinical and early-phase clinical evidence, suggesting that GLP-1RAs may be beneficial as a treatment and/or illness progression modification therapeutic in PD.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a complex neurodegenerative disorder that is heterogeneous in both its pathophysiology and clinical presentation. Genetic, imaging and biochemical biomarkers not only provide innovative, objective ways to subtype PD but also offer new insights into the underlying pathophysiology, revealing potential therapeutic targets and improving predictions of clinical phenotype, disease progression and treatment response. In this review, we first summarize the phenotypes linked to key PD genes – such as SNCA, LRRK2, GBA and PRKN – highlighting, for instance, that GBA-PD is often associated with prominent nonmotor features. We then explore studies that have defined new robust subtypes with imaging biomarkers, particularly T1-weighted MRI brain atrophy patterns, and their clinical implications. We also review the role of blood, CSF and urine biomarkers for monitoring disease progression and predicting its presentation in various domains (motor, cognitive, autonomic, psychiatric). These findings could have practical implications by guiding clinicians to individualize symptomatic treatment and helping researchers improve clinical trial design and recruitment, thus bringing us closer to the discovery of effective disease-modifying therapies.
This chapter explores the remarkable impact of music and dance on individuals with Parkinson’s disease. Despite motor challenges, patients often experience improved fluidity of movement and reduced symptoms when engaging with music, particularly through dancing. This highlights the brain’s remarkable ability to compensate for impairments through rhythmic and auditory cues. The chapter looks into the therapeutic benefits of music for Parkinson’s, including improvements in gait, timing perception, mood enhancement, and dopamine release. Research demonstrates that rhythmic auditory timulation (RAS) and dance therapies can significantly improve walking patterns, balance, and overall quality of life. The chapter also discusses the profound impact of music on emotional well-being, offering a sense of joy, social connection, and self-acceptance. It emphasizes the importance of music therapy in addressing the emotional challenges often faced by Parkinson’s patients, such as depression and anxiety. The chapter concludes by providing practical recommendations for incorporating music and dance into the lives of Parkinson’s patients, encouraging them to harness the therapeutic power of these activities to enhance their physical, emotional, and cognitive well-being.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) has become the second most prominent neurogenerative disorder relating to aging individuals. PD involves the loss of neurons containing dopamine in the midbrain and leads to a number of motor issues as well as non-motor complications such as cognitive and psychological abnormalities. The default mode network (DMN) is a complex brain network primarily active during rest and serves multiple roles relating to memory, self-referential processing, social cognition and consciousness and awareness. Multiple brain regions are involved in the DMN such as the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC), the posterior cingulate cortex (PCC), the inferior parietal lobule, the precuneus and the lateral temporal cortex. Normal DMN connectivity is vital to preserving consciousness and self-awareness. Neurological pathologies such as PD disrupt DMN connectivity, leading to complex issues. Functional MRI (fMRI) is a neuroimaging modality used to observe brain activity through measuring blood flow differences as it relates to brain activity. DMN connectivity experiments using fMRI find that individuals with PD exhibit impaired DMN connectivity in specific regions including the PCC, mPFC and the precuneus. Individuals with greater PD motor symptoms have also been found to suffer larger alterations in DMN connections anatomically within the frontal lobe and PCC. While fMRI has been utilized as a tool to explore the relationship between PD patients and DMN connectivity, future research should look to develop a better understanding of the specific mechanisms of action that drive this link between DMN abnormality and PD severity.
This study aims to investigate action language processing abilities in Parkinson’s disease (PD) compared to healthy controls (HCs), specifically examining whether the involvement of motor systems is influenced by task context. By focusing on implicit versus explicit task demands, the study evaluates how semantic processing differs in PD and whether these differences align with a flexible embodied cognition framework.
Methods:
The study analyzed the performance of participants on two tasks: an explicit task (semantic judgment task, SJ) and an implicit task (letter detection task, LD). PD outpatients (n = 31, mean age 64.58 years) referred to the Parkinson and Movement Disorders Unit of ICS Maugeri Hermitage were enrolled, along with a group of healthy controls (n = 31, mean age 64.19 years). Performance was measured through reaction times (RTs) and accuracy scores (Acc) during the processing of action verbs and abstract verbs.
Results:
PD patients exhibited slower RTs and lower accuracy when processing action verbs compared to abstract verbs, but only during the SJ task. Slower RTs in the SJ task were predicted by language and executive functioning (semantic fluency) and disease progression (Hoehn and Yahr stages) for both action and abstract verbs. In the LD task, slower RTs were predicted by executive functioning for action verbs and attention (measured by Trail Making Test Part B and Stroop task) for abstract verbs.
Conclusions:
The findings suggest a context-dependent involvement of the motor system in action language processing, supporting a flexible, embodied approach to conceptual semantic processing rather than an automatic one.
Hallucinations are common and distressing symptoms in Parkinson’s disease (PD). Treatment response in clinical trials is measured using validated questionnaires, including the Scale for Assessment of Positive Symptoms-Hallucinations (SAPS-H) and University of Miami PD Hallucinations Questionnaire (UM-PDHQ). The minimum clinically important difference (MCID) has not been determined for either scale. This study aimed to estimate a range of MCIDs for SAPS-H and UM-PDHQ using both consensus-based and statistical approaches.
Methods
A Delphi survey was used to seek opinions of researchers, clinicians, and people with lived experience. We defined consensus as agreement ≥75%. Statistical approaches used blinded data from the first 100 PD participants in the Trial for Ondansetron as Parkinson’s Hallucinations Treatment (TOP HAT, NCT04167813). The distribution-based approach defined the MCID as 0.5 of the standard deviation of change in scores from baseline at 12 weeks. The anchor-based approach defined the MCID as the average change in scores corresponding to a 1-point improvement in clinical global impression-severity scale (CGI-S).
Results
Fifty-one researchers and clinicians contributed to three rounds of the Delphi survey and reached consensus that the MCID was 2 points on both scales. Sixteen experts with lived experience reached the same consensus. Distribution-defined MCIDs were 2.6 points for SAPS-H and 1.3 points for UM-PDHQ, whereas anchor-based MCIDs were 2.1 and 1.3 points, respectively.
Conclusions
We used triangulation from multiple methodologies to derive the range of MCID estimates for the two rating scales, which was between 2 and 2.7 points for SAPS-H and 1.3 and 2 points for UM-PDHQ.
Parkinson’s disease (PD) is a prevalent neurological disorder and the second most common neurodegenerative disease. Research has explored the impact of infectious agents, such as the parasites, on neurological conditions, including PD. Given the limited studies worldwide and in Iran, this study aims to investigate the relationship between Toxocara infection and PD. This case-control study involved 91 PD patients and 90 healthy controls. After obtaining consent, serum samples and questionnaires were collected. All sera were examined using an ELISA test for IgG antibodies against Toxocara canis. Results were analyzed with SPSS, using chi-square tests, and odds ratios (OR), and confidence intervals (CI) were calculated via univariate and multivariate analyses. The prevalence of anti-Toxocara IgG was 33% (30/91) in PD patients and 33.3% (30/90) in the control group. Both univariate analysis (OR: 0.98; 95% CI: 0.52–1.82) and multivariate analysis (OR: 0.95; 95% CI: 0.49–1.83) indicated no statistically significant association. Additionally, univariate analysis (OR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.16–1.5) and multivariate analysis (OR: 0.37; 95% CI: 0.09–1.43) suggested non-significant association between Toxocara infection and the severity of PD. Our findings do not support a statistically significant association between Toxocara infection and the PD. While the analysis suggested that Toxocara infection might reduce the severity of PD, these results were also not statistically significant. Further research with larger sample sizes and diverse populations is needed to fully understand the potential relationship between Toxocara infection and PD.
Noninvasive stimulation techniques are a promising therapy due to the ease of administration and minimal side effects. We investigated the clinical, electrophysiological and side effects of transcranial pulsed current stimulation (tPCS) in patients with Parkinson’s disease (PD).
Materials and Methods:
Ten PD patients were called at monthly intervals in the OFF levodopa state. Patients received active tPCS for 20 minutes in the first visit and sham stimulation for 20 minutes in the second and were assessed for the levodopa response in the third. Clinical and bradykinesia scoring and gait and tremor analysis were done before and after stimulation/sham/levodopa in each visit. Scalp electroencephalography (EEG) was recorded for quantitative analysis during each visit. The interventions were compared between pre- and post-intervention.
Results:
A significant improvement with levodopa as compared to active and sham tPCS was seen in clinical scores. Upper limb postural tremor severity (z-score = −2.410, p = 0.016) and the stride velocity variability during post active stimulation improved by 20.7% compared to post sham stimulation though the difference was statistically non-significant. KINARM testing showed a statistically significant difference in the reaction time (p = 0.036) when comparing pre- and post-tPCS active stimulation. EEG recording showed a transitory increase of electrical activity after tPCS, with the most significant increase seen in alpha bandpower (p = 7.95*10-07; z score: −4.93).
Conclusions:
tPCS was well tolerated in all patients. With minimal side effects, ease of administration and mild improvement in the electrophysiological parameters assessed, tPCS can be an alternative therapeutic option in patients with PD.
Tremor, which is defined as an oscillatory and rhythmic movement of a body part, is the most common movement disorder worldwide. The most frequent tremor syndromes are tremor in Parkinson’s disease, essential tremor, and dystonic tremor syndromes, whereas Holmes tremor, orthostatic tremor, and palatal tremor are less common in clinical practice. The pathophysiology of tremor consists of enhanced oscillatory activity in brain circuits, which are ofen modulated by tremor-related afferent signals from the periphery. The cerebello-thalamo-cortical circuit and the basal ganglia play a key role in most neurologic tremor disorders, but with different roles in each disorder. Here we review the pathophysiology of tremor, focusing both on neuronal mechanisms that promote oscillations (automaticity and synchrony) and circuit-level mechanisms that drive and maintain pathologic oscillations.
Clinical evaluation of motor dysfunction is crucial to make a correct diagnosis. The gold standard is clinical evaluation by a movement disorder specialist, relying on subjective measures and patient report. Regular clinical assessments are needed to provide long-term measures that monitor motor progression over time and therapy response, not only in clinical settings but also during daily activities at home. Wearable sensors have been developed to assess objective and quantifiable measures of motor dysfunction. Such sensors are small, light, cheap and portable, containing built-in accelerometers and gyroscopes and data storage. These new technologies are revolutionizing the field of movement disorders to improve clinical diagnosis and evaluation, treatment monitoring at home, and progression of symptoms over time. They are also of interest for adaptive therapy options, e.g. closed-loop deep brain stimulation, and are successful in quantifying and measuring tremor, showing promise in assessing bradykinesia, dyskinesia, gait impairments and prediction of therapy response. Despite device development, there is no validated clinical application yet; further research is needed.
This chapter summarizes the functional–anatomic organization of the connectivity of the basal ganglia with the thalamocortical systems and the brainstem. This connectional organization substantiates the neural basis for the wide array of functions in which the basal ganglia are involved, ranging from pure sensorimotor to cognitive–executive and emotional–motivational behaviors. Across this broad array of motor and behavioral functions, the mechanism by which the basal ganglia contribute to these functions is through “response selection.” This mechanism fits well with the arrangement of the intrinsic connections between the individual basal ganglia nuclei, supporting the selection of appropriate responses in a particular context and, at the same time, the suppression of inadequate responses. A variety of symptoms as part of neurologic movement disorders, such as Parkinson’s disease, Huntington’s disease and dystonia, or neuropsychiatric diseases like obsessive-compulsive disorder, mood disorders, and drug addiction, might be interpreted as an inadequate selection of motor, cognitive, or affective responses to internal or external stimuli.
Although movement is largely generated from the primary motor cortex, what movement to make and how to make it is influenced from the entire brain. External influences from the environment come from sensory systems in the posterior part of the brain, and internal influences, such as homeostatic drive and reward, from the anterior part. A movement is voluntary when a person’s consciousness recognizes it to be so because of proper activation of the agency network. Behavioral movement disorders can be understood as dysfunction of these mechanisms. Apraxia and task specific dystonia arise from disruption of parietal–premotor connections. Tics arise from a hyperactive limbic system. Functional movement disorders may also have an origin in abnormal limbic function and are believed to be involuntary due to dysfunction of the agency network. In Parkinson’s disease, bradykinesia comes from insufficient basal ganglia support to the anterior part of the brain.
Physical rehabilitation in people with Parkinson’s disease (PD) aims to restore everyday functioning and mobility through a multidisciplinary approach. We present and discuss the current evidence on efficacy of key rehabilitation specialties and therapies that contribute to improving everyday (motor and non-motor) functioning in PD. Rehabilitative therapies aiming to improve posture and balance, transfers, gait, and physical condition have been shown effective. Evidence that physical therapy interventions using for example external or internal cues is effective for improving gait and gait-related mobility is strong, although the evidence for improving upper limb function, speech, and swallowing deficits is still limited. Optimal intensity of rehabilitation services offered by physical therapists, occupational therapists, and speech therapists, as well as their active ingredients and long-term impact, need further underpinning to help continuing development and updating of clinical guidelines.
Parkinson’s disease (PD), a typical Parkinson syndrome, is seen as a progressive multisystem neurodegenerative disease with α-synuclein–containing Lewy bodies and neurites, affecting 1–2 per 1000 of the global population. The prevailing view of PD etiology is that it is the result of cell-autonomous and non-autonomous processes, starting in the olfactory nerve and the autonomous nervous system of the gut, spreading retrogradely through synaptically coupled networks in a topographically predictable sequence to postsynaptic brainstem neurons, affecting the nuclear grays of the basal midbrain and forebrain and finally the neocortex. Cell-autonomous processes (e.g., mitochondrial damage and a defective autophagy by lysosomal and ubiquitin proteasome systems) result in pathologic accumulation of intracellular α-synuclein oligomers and aggregates. Non–cell-autonomous processes comprise the spread of synucleinic pathology in dying neurons to neighboring dopaminergic, cholinergic, serotinergic, and adrenergic neurons and/or to astrocytes, microglia, and lymphocytes across brain regions, plus decreased brain-derived neurotrophic factors and/or microglial-induced inflammatory responses.
In Parkinson’s disease, parkinsonism occurs due to the loss of dopaminergic neurons of the substantia nigra. Existing treatments can enhance dopaminergic activity in the brain, but cause adverse effects due to the non-targeted, non-physiologic dopamine delivery, so there is interest in developing regenerative therapies to restore dopaminergic tone in the striatum in a targeted, physiologic manner. Experimental approaches include using viral vectors to deliver genes encoding growth factors or enzymes involved in dopamine synthesis, or to target nucleic acids and gene expression. A number of cell types have been considered potential sources of cell-based therapies for PD and have been trialled in humans and animals, but all have been limited by either poor efficacy, poor graft survival, or logistical barriers. However, stem cells offer a renewable source of dopaminergic cells and hold great promise as potential regenerative treatments, and human trials have begun. Although these treatments remain experimental, some are entering clinical trials and there is hope that they will become available for clinical use in the future.
The exact mechanisms underlying dysfunction of the basal ganglia that lead to Parkinson’s disease (PD) remain unclear. According to the standard model of PD, motor symptoms result from abnormal neuronal activity in dysfunctional basal ganglia, which can be recorded in human basal ganglia structures as functional neurosurgery for PD provides a unique opportunity to record from these regions. Microelectrode and local field potential recordings studies show alterations exist in basal ganglia nuclei as well as in the motor thalamus. Lesioning or stimulation of the basal ganglia results in significant improvement of PD symptoms, supporting the view that basal ganglia–thalamocortical circuits abnormality is important in parkinsonism generation. Different patterns of oscillatory neuronal activity plus changes in firing rate are associated with different parkinsonian motor subtypes. We present recordings of basal ganglia activity obtained with microelectrode recordings in parkinsonian patients, providing pathophysiology insight.
People with Parkinson’s disease (PD) often suffer from various non-motor symptoms, including manifestations of autonomic dysfunction. The latter encompass cardiovascular, urogenital, gastrointestinal manifestations, sexual dysfunction and thermoregulatory disturbances. Autonomic manifestations can be an intrinsic aspect of PD, resulting from degeneration of parasympathetic and sympathetic pathways, or can be secondary to comorbidity or medication intake. As autonomic dysfunction is prevalent and often troublesome, identification and appropriate treatment are relevant steps in the management of people with Parkinson’s disease. Some manifestations of this autonomic dysfunction may precede the onset of PD motor features by many years, and might be considered biomarkers of this disease. A variety of non-pharmacologic and pharmacologic treatments have been investigated for the treatment of autonomic dysfunction in PD, but a limited evidence base is available so far.
The clinical and pathologic hallmarks of Parkinson’s disease (PD) are motor parkinsonism due to underlying progressive degeneration of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra pars compacta accompanied by an accumulation of intracytoplasmic protein inclusions known as Lewy bodies and Lewy neurites. The diagnostic criteria/guidelines based on the UK Parkinson’s Disease Society Brain Bank clinical diagnostic criteria have guided clinicians and researchers in the diagnosis of PD for many decades. This chapter discusses whether this description represents our current understanding of PD, and why it is time to integrate new research findings and accommodate our definition and diagnostic criteria of PD, such as Parkinson-associated non-motor symptoms, genetics, biomarkers, imaging findings, or heterogeneity of phenotypes and underlying molecular mechanisms. In 2015, the International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society published clinical diagnostic criteria for Parkinson’s disease, which were designed specifically for use in research but also as a general guide to clinical diagnosis of PD. These criteria and some of their limitations are also discussed.