We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.
Yes
from Section I - Perioperative Management
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 July 2023
It is 2021 and conferences around the world still debate the pros and cons of mechanical bowel prep (MBP). It is baffling how a safe intervention used millions of times every day for screening colonoscopies is a subject of fierce discussions amongst colleagues, in book chapters, and lectures when applied to patients undergoing colorectal resection. Although we believe that for patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing cytoreductive surgery there are other quintessential questions to debate about, we understand that the debate over this issue is far from resolved and expert majority opinion has vacillated over the past decade. With all this in mind, as a disclaimer the authors are allowed to change their minds.
The use of MBP remains a controversial issue. After its adoption in the 1800s it began to fall out of favor when studies including a Cochrane meta-analysis reported that omitting MBP was not associated with increased postoperative complication. However, it is important to note that these studies compared MBP alone and not in combination with oral antibiotics (OABP). In more recent years, the use of MBPs has been reincorporated into clinical practice, however now it is used in conjunction with OABPs after several key trials demonstrated benefit to the combination therapy. Among these benefits are a decrease in surgical site infections, anastomotic leaks, and readmission rates. These findings led multiple large societies to recommend the routine use of combination bowel preparation prior to planned colorectal resections. Based on these recommendations and recent literature, we recommend the use of combination OABP with MBP be tailored towards patients at greatest risk of requiring colorectal resections, which entails a large portion of patients undergoing primary debulking surgery for a gynecologic malignancy. Surgeon assessment of the risk for colonic or rectal resection through clinical history, pelvic exam, and radiological findings can aid in tailoring the need for combination bowel preparation.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.
