Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-13T15:09:25.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter 10 - Çatalhöyük West and the Late Neolithic to Early Chalcolithic Transition in Central Anatolia

from Part II - Anatolia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 April 2022

Peter F. Biehl
Affiliation:
University of California, Santa Cruz
Eva Rosenstock
Affiliation:
Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität Bonn
Get access

Summary

As the Çatalhöyük West Mound has been the subject of much new research during and after the completion of the Çatalhöyük Research Project, this chapter will provide a summary of the research conducted by the West Mound Project. This interdisciplinary project brought together many specialist scholars to address the variety of data created during the excavation of the West Mound. In this chapter we will review the research into the material culture of the West Mound, with attention to the importance of new architectural forms and painted pottery in the changing social and economic life of the period. In addition, plant and animal remains and the stone tool industries see some general trends that may signal changes the environment and the way domestic activities respond. We will conclude the chapter with a look at current discussions on topics that have been highlighted by this new research.

Type
Chapter
Information
6000 BC
Transformation and Change in the Near East and Europe
, pp. 158 - 177
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2022

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anvari, Jana, Brady, J., Franz, I., et al. 2017 Continuous Change: Venturing into the Early Chalcolithic at Catalhoyuk. In The Archaeology of Anatolia. Recent Discoveries, Volume III, edited by Steadman, S. R. and McMahon, G., pp. 6–39. Scholars Publishing, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Asouti, E., and Kabukcu, C. 2014 Holocene Semi-arid Oak Woodlands in the Irano-Anatolian Region of Southwest Asia: Natural or Anthropogenic?. Quaternary Science Reviews 90:158182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Atalay, Sonya 2005 Domesticating Clay: The Role of Clay Balls, Mini Balls, and Geometric Objects in Daily Life at Çatalhöyük. In Changing Materialities at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 1995–99 Seasons, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 139168. McDonald Institute of Archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Ayala, Gianna, Wainwright, John, Walker, Joanna, et al. 2017 Palaeoenvironmental Reconstruction of the Alluvial Landscape of Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Central Southern Turkey: The Implications for Early Agriculture and Responses to Environmental Change. Journal of Archaeological Science, 87:3043. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jas.2017.09.002Google Scholar
Baird, Douglas 2002 Early Holocene Settlement in Central Anatolia: Problems and Prospects as Seen from the Konya Plain. In The Neolithic of Central Anatolia, edited by Gerard, F. and Thissen, L., pp. 139159. Ege Yayinlari, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Baird, Douglas 2005 The History of Settlement and Social Landscapes in the Early Holocene in the Catalhoyuk Area. In Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 6, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 5574. British Institute of Archaeology and McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research, Ankara and Cambridge.Google Scholar
Baird, Douglas 2006 The History of Settlements and Social Landscapes in the Early Holocene in the Çatalhöyük Area. In Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Themes from the 1995–1999 Seasons, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 5574. MacDonald Institute, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Balkan-Atlı, Nur and Binder, Didier 2012 Neolithic Obsidian Workshop at Kömürcü-Kaletepe (Central Anatolia). In The Neolithic in Turkey, Volume 3: Central Anatolia and Mediterranean, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet, Başgelen, Nezih and Kuniholm, Peter, pp. 7188. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Bayliss, A., Brock, F., Farid, S., et al. 2015 Getting to the Bottom of It All: A Bayesian Approach to Dating the Start of Çatalhöyük. Journal of World Prehistory 28:126.Google Scholar
Biehl, Peter F. 2003 Studien zum Symbolgut des Neolithikums und der Kupferzeit in Südosteuropa. Studies of the Symbolic Material Culture of the Neolithic and the Copper Age in Southeast Europe. Rudolt Habelt, Bonn.Google Scholar
Biehl, Peter F., and Rogasch, Jana 2013 West Trench 5. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2013:94110.Google Scholar
Biehl, Peter F., and Rosenstock, Eva 2009 Von Çatalhöyük Ost nach Çatalhöyük West. Kulturelle Umbrüche an der Schwelle vom 7. zum 6. Jt. v. Chr. in Zentralanatolien. In Zurück zum Gegenstand: Festschrift für Andreas E. Furtwängler, edited by Einicke, Ralph, Lehmann, Stephan, Löhr, Henryk, et al., pp. 471482. Beier und Beran, Langenweißbach.Google Scholar
Biehl, Peter F., Rosenstock, Eva and Franz, Ingmar 2009 West Mound Trench 5, Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2009:38-50.Google Scholar
Biehl, Peter F., Rogasch, Jana and Rosenstock, Eva 2011 West Mound Excavations, Trench 5. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2011:3848.Google Scholar
Biehl, Peter F., Rogasch, Jana and Rosenstock, Eva 2012 West Mound Trench 5 Excavations 2012. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2012:76102.Google Scholar
Bogaard, Amy, Charles, Michael, Livarda, Alexandra, et al. 2013 The Archaeobotany of Mid-later Occupation Levels at Neolithic Çatalhöyük. In Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 8, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 93128. British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Bogaard, Amy, Filipović, Dragana, Fairbairn, Andrew, et al. 2017 Agricultural Innovation and Resilience in a Long-Lived Early Farming Community: The 1500-Year Sequence at Neolithic–Early Chalcolithic Çatalhöyük, Central Anatolia. Anatolian Studies, submitted.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boyer, P. 1999 A Geoarchaeological Approach to Late Quaternary Environmental Change in South Central Turkey. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis. Loughborough University, UK.Google Scholar
Brady, Jacob 2013 A Preliminary Analysis of Ground Stone from Çatalhöyük West Mound Trenches 5–7. Unpublished MA thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo.Google Scholar
Buxó i Capdevila, Ramón, Alonso, Natàlia, Canal, D., Echave, C. and González, I. 1997 Archaeobotanical Remains of Hulled and Naked Cereals in the Iberian Peninsula. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 6/1:1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caneva, Isabella 2012 Mersin-Yumuktepe in the Seventh Millennium BC: An Updated View. In The Neolithic in Turkey, Volume 3: Central Anatolia and Mediterranean, edited by Özdoğan, Mehmet, Başgelen, Nezih and Kuniholm, Peter, pp. 129. Arkeoloji ve Sanat Yayınları, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Carter, Tristan, Milić, Marina, Kayacan, Nurcan and Waś, Marcin 2006 Chipped Stone Report. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2006:241279.Google Scholar
Cauvin, Marie-Claire, Gourgaud, Alain, Gratuze, Bernard, et al. 1998 L’obsidienne au Proche et Moyen Orient: du volcan à l’outil. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Cessford, Craig 2001 A New Dating Sequence for Çatalhöyük. Antiquity 75:717725.Google Scholar
Cessford, Craig and Carter, Tristan 2005 Quantifying the Consumption of Obsidian during Neolithic Catalhöyük, Turkey. Journal of Field Archaeology 30/3:305315.Google Scholar
Cessford, Craig and Near, Julie 2005 Fire, Burning and Pyrotechnology at Çatalhöyük. In Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 171182. McDonald Institute of Archaeology, Cambridge.Google Scholar
Charles, Michael, Doherty, Chris, Asouti, Eleni, et al. 2014 Landscape and Taskscape at Çatalhöyük: An Integrated Perspective. In Integrating Çatalhöyük: Themes from the 2000–2008 Seasons, Volume 10, edited by Hodder, I., pp. 7190. Monographs of the Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, University of California at Los Angeles, Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Czerniak, Lech and Marciniak, Arkadiusz 2008 TP Area. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2008:7382.Google Scholar
De Meester, T. 1970 Soils of the Great Konya Basin, Turkey. Centre for Agriculture, Publishing and Documentataion, Wageningen: Agric. Res. Report. Vol. 740. Pudoc, 1970.Google Scholar
Doherty, Chris and Tarkan, Duygu 2013 Pottery Production at Çatalhöyük: A Petrographic Perspective. In Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 9, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 183192. British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Düring, Bleda 2006 Constructing Communities: Clustered Neighbourhood Settlements of the Central Anatolian Neolithic ca. 8500–5500 cal. BC. Nederlands Instituut voor het Nabije Oosten, Leiden.Google Scholar
Düring, Bleda 2011 The Prehistory of Asia Minor. Cambridge University Press, New York.Google Scholar
Erdoğu, Burçin 2009a Re-opening the Çatalhöyük West Mound. In In medias res praehistoriae: Miscellanea in honorem annos LXV peragentis Professoris Dan Monah oblata, edited by Bodi, G., pp. 137152. Editura University Press, Iaşi.Google Scholar
Erdoğu, Burçin 2009b Ritual Symbolism in the Early Chalcolithic Period of Central Anatolia. Journal for Interdisciplinary Research on Religion and Science 5:129150.Google Scholar
Erdoğu, Burçin 2010 West Trench 8. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2010:50.Google Scholar
Erdoğu, Burçin 2012 West Mound Trench 8. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2012:103–104.Google Scholar
Farid, Shahina 2014 Timelines: Phasing Neolithic Çatalhöyük. In Çatalhöyük Excavations: The 2000–2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 7, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 91130. British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Franz, Ingmar 2012 Trench 5–7 Pottery Archive Report. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2012:262–272.Google Scholar
Franz, Ingmar and Ostapchouk, Sonia 2012 Illuminating the pottery production process at Çatalhöyük West Mound (Turkey) around 8000 cal BP. In Naturwissenschaftliche Analysen vor- und frühgeschichtlicher Keramik II Methoden, Anwendungsbereiche, Auswertungsmöglichkeiten. Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, Bonn.Google Scholar
French, David 1965 Excavations at Can Hasan: Fourth Preliminary Report. Anatolian Studies 15:8794.Google Scholar
Gibson, Catriona and Last, Jonathan 2003a An Early Chalcolithic Building on the West Mound at Çatalhöyük. Anatolian Archaeology 9:1214.Google Scholar
Gibson, Catriona and Last, Jonathan 2003b West Mound Excavations. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2003:59–68.Google Scholar
Gibson, Catriona, Last, Jonathan, Frame, Sheelagh and Raszick, Tiffany 2004 Study Season Report West Mound. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2004.Google Scholar
Hendy, J., Colonese, A., Franz, I., et al. 2018 Ancient Proteins from Ceramic Vessels at Çatalhöyük West Reveal the Hidden Cuisine of Early Farmers. Nature Communications 9/1:4064.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hillman, Gordon 1985 Traditional Husbandry and Processing of Archaic Cereals in Recent Times: The Operations, Products and Equipment That Might Feature in Sumerian Texts. Part II: The Free-Threshing Cereals. Bulletin on Sumerian Agriculture 2:131.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 1996 On the surface: Çatalhöyük 1993–95. Çatalhöyük Reseach Project Series: Volume 1. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research/ British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph No. 22.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 2006 The Leopard’s Tale. Thames & Hudson Ltd, New York.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 2007 Excavating Çatalhöyük: South, North and KOPAL Area reports from the 1995–99 seasons. Çatalhöyük Reseach Project Series Volume 3. McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research / British Institute of Archaeology at Ankara Monograph.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 2012 Entangled: An Archaeology of the Relationships of Humans and Things. Wiley-Blackwell, Chichester.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 2013a Becoming Entangled in Things. In Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 9, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 125. British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 2013b Dwelling at Çatalhöyük. In Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 8, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 129. British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Hodder, Ian 2014 Çatalhöyük: The Leopard Changes Its Spots. A Summary of Recent Work. Anatolian Studies 64:122.Google Scholar
Kabukcu, Ceren 2015 Prehistoric Vegetation Change and Woodland Management in Central Anatolia: Late Pleistocene–Mid Holocene Anthracological Remains from the Konya Plain. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, University of Liverpool, Dept. of Archaeology, Classics and Egyptology.Google Scholar
Kwiatkowska, Monika 2009 Byzantine and Muslim Cemeteries at Çatalhöyük. An Outline. In Archaeology of the Countryside in Medieval Anatolia (Pihans 113), edited by Vorderstrasse, T. and Roodenberg, J., pp. 129138. Leiden: Netherlands Institute for the Near East.Google Scholar
Lister, Diane and Jones, Martin 2013 Is Naked Barley an Eastern or a Western Crop? The Combined Evidence of Archaeobotany and Genetics. Vegetation History and Archaeobotany 22/5:439446.Google Scholar
Marciniak, Arkadiusz and Czerniak, Lech 2014 Çatalhöyük East at the End of the 7th Millennium. The Demise of Neolithic Mega-City. Paper presented at the 9th ICAANE conference, Basel.Google Scholar
Marciniak, Arkadiusz, Barański, Marek Z., Bayliss, Alex, et al. 2015 Fragmenting Times: Interpreting a Bayesian Chronology for the Late Neolithic Occupation of Çatalhöyük East, Turkey. Antiquity 89:154176.Google Scholar
Martin, Louise and Meskell, Lynn 2012 Animal Figurines from Neolithic Çatalhöyük: Figural and Faunal Perspectives. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 22:401419.Google Scholar
Matthews, Roger and Hodder, Ian 1993 Introduction. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 1993.Google Scholar
Matthews, Wendy 2005 Life-Cycle and Life-Course of Buildings. In Çatalhöyük Perspectives: Reports from the 1995–1999 Seasons, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 125150. Oxbow Books, Oxford.Google Scholar
Mellaart, James 1965 Çatal Hüyük West. Anatolian Studies 15:135156.Google Scholar
Mellaart, James 1967 Çatalhöyük, A Neolithic Town in Anatolia. Thames and Hudson, London.Google Scholar
Meskell, Lynn, Nakamura, Carolyn, King, Rachel and Farid, Shahina 2008 Figured Lifeworlds and Depositional Practices at Çatalhöyük. Cambridge Archaeological Journal 18/2:139161.Google Scholar
Nakamura, Carolyn and Meskell, Lynn 2013 Figurine Worlds at Çatalhöyük. In Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 9, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 201234. British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Naumov, Goce 2014 Neolithic Privileges: The Selection within Burials and Corporeality in the Balkans. European Journal of Archaeology 17/2:184207.Google Scholar
Naumov, Goce and Biehl, Peter F. 2014 Faceless Gender: The Corporeality in the Çatalhöyük West Mound. In 20th Annual Meeting of the European Association of Archaeologists: Abstracts and Oral Presentations, edited by Yilmaz, Özgür, pp. 548549. EAA, Istanbul.Google Scholar
Naumov, G., and Biehl, P. F. 2019 Neolithic and Chalcolithic Human Representations at Çatalhöyük. In The Proceedings of 10th ICAANE, edited by Becker, J. A., Institute for Oriental and European Archaeology, pp. 213224. Harrassowitz Verlag, Vienna.Google Scholar
Nesbitt, Mark 1996 Chalcolithic Crops from Kuruçay Höyük: An Interim Report. In Kuruçay Höyük II: Results of the Excavations 1978–1988 the Late Chalcolithic and Early Bronze Settlements, edited by Duru, Refik, pp. 134144. Türk Tarih Kurumu Basimevi, Ankara.Google Scholar
Orton, David and Piliougine, Camille 2013 West Mound Faunal and Worked Bone Report. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2013:150–157.Google Scholar
Orton, David, Anvari, Jana, Gibson, Catriona, et al. 2018 A Tale of Two Tells: Dating the Çatalhöyük West Mound Antiquity 92/363:620639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostaptchouk, Sonia 2011 West Mound Chipped Stone, Trench 5 Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2011:97–100.Google Scholar
Ostaptchouk, Sonia 2014 The Contribution of Chert Knapped Stone Studies at Çatalhöyük to notions of territory and group mobility in prehistoric Central Anatolia. Dig it 2/1:3449.Google Scholar
Ostaptchouk, Sonia 2016 L’économie des matières premières de la pierre taillée d’Anatolie centrale au Chalcolithique ancien (5500–6000 cal. BC/ECA IV): l’étude de cas de Çatalhöyük-Ouest. Archaeopress, Oxford.Google Scholar
Roberts, Neil and Rosen, Arlene 2009 Diversity and Complexity in Early Farming Communities of Southwest Asia: New Insights into the Economic and Environmental Basis of Neolithic Çatalhöyük. Current Anthropology 50/3: 393402.Google Scholar
Roberts, Neil, Stuart, Black, Boyer, P., et al. 1999 Chronology and stratigraphy of Late Quaternary sediments in the Konya Basin, Turkey: Results from the KOPAL Project. Quaternary Science Reviews 18/4–5: 611630.Google Scholar
Rollefson, Gary 2002 Ritual and Social Structure at Neolithic “Ain Ghazal.” In Life in Neolithic Farming Communities: Social Organization, Identity and Differentiation, edited by Kuijt, Ian, pp. 165190. Plenum, New York.Google Scholar
Rosenstock, Eva, Anvari, J., Franz, I., et al. 2019 The Transition between the East and West Mounds at Çatalhöyük around 6000 cal B.C.: A View from the West. In Concluding the Neolithic: the Near East in the Second Half of the Seventh Millennium BCE, edited by Marciniak, Arek, pp. 163192. Lockwood.Google Scholar
Russell, Nerissa, Twiss, Katheryn, Orton, David and Demirergi, Arzu 2013a More on the Çatalhöyük Mammal Remains. In Humans and Landscapes of Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 8, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 213258. British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Russell, Nerissa, Twiss, Katheryn, Orton, David and Demirergi, Arzu 2013b Changing Animal Use at Neolithic Çatalhöyük, Turkey. In Archaeozoology of the Near East 10, edited by DeCupere, Bea, Linseele, Veerle and Hamilton-Dyer, Sheila, pp. 4568. Peters, Leuven.Google Scholar
Schoop, Ulf 2005 Das Anatolische Chalkolithikum. Albert Greiner, Remshalden.Google Scholar
Stroud, E., Bogaard, A. and Charles, M. 2021. A Stable Isotope and Functional Weed Ecology Investigation into Chalcolithic Cultivation Practices in Central Anatolia: Çatalhöyük, Çamlıbel Tarlası and Kuruçay. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 38, 103010.Google Scholar
Stroud, Elizabeth 2013 The Archaeobotany Report: West Mound. Çatalhöyük Archive Report 2013:160–168.Google Scholar
Stroud, Elizabeth 2016 An Archaeobotanical Investigation into the Chalcolithic Economy and Social Organisation of Central Anatolia. Unpublished Ph.D. thesis, School of Archaeology, University of Oxford.Google Scholar
Thissen, Laurens, Özbal, Hadi, Bıyık, Ayla Türkekul, Gerritsen, Fokke and Özbal, Rana 2010 The Land of Milk? Approaching Dietary Preferences of Late Neolithic Communities in NW Anatolia. Leiden Journal of Pottery Studies 26:157172.Google Scholar
Willett, Patrick, Franz, Ingmar, Kabukcu, Ceren, et al. 2016 The Aftermath of the 8.2 Event: Cultural and Environmental Effects in the Anatolian Late Neolithic and Early Chalcolithic. In Climate and Cultural Change in Prehistoric Europe and the Near East, edited by Biehl, Peter F. and Nieuwenhuyse, Olivier P., pp. 95116. SUNY Press, Albany, NY.Google Scholar
Wright, Katherine 2013 The Ground Stone Technologies of Çatalhöyük. In Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 9, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 365416. British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar
Yalman, Nurcan, Özbudak, Duygu Tarkan and Gültekin, Hilal 2013 The Neolithic Pottery of Çatalhöyük: Recent Studies. In Substantive Technologies at Çatalhöyük: Reports from the 2000–2008 Seasons. Çatalhöyük Research Project Volume 9, edited by Hodder, Ian, pp. 147182. British Institute at Ankara and Cotsen Institute of Archaeology, London and Los Angeles.Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure coreplatform@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×