Skip to main content Accessibility help
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T07:11:57.767Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Chapter Ten - Phytochemicals as mediators of aboveground–belowground interactions in plants

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  05 August 2012

Nicole M. van Dam
Affiliation:
Department of Ecogenomics, Institute for Water and Wetland Research, Radboud University
Glenn R. Iason
Affiliation:
James Hutton Institute, Aberdeen
Marcel Dicke
Affiliation:
Wageningen Universiteit, The Netherlands
Susan E. Hartley
Affiliation:
University of York
Get access

Summary

Introduction

Since Fraenkel (1959) put secondary plant compounds back on the research agenda for their role as mediators of plant–herbivore interactions, thousands of papers have been published on this topic. In the 150 years before Fraenkel’s paper, plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) were mainly analysed for medicinal purposes or for their application as textile dyes or spices (Hartmann, 2007). In those times, secondary metabolites were merely considered to be the waste products of the plant’s primary metabolism, despite the publication of an early monograph in the late nineteenth century on the role of plant metabolites as protection against snail damage (Stahl, 1888). In the past 50 years of research, we have finally come to acknowledge the fact that there may be ecological and evolutionary reasons for plants having become true ‘chemical factories’ (Gershenzon et al., Chapter 4). It is estimated that plants may produce over 200 000 different compounds, the majority of which are classified as secondary metabolites (Pichersky & Gang, 2000). Despite their name, secondary plant compounds have been found to fulfil essential functions in plant defence against herbivores and in attracting beneficial organisms, such as pollinators and symbionts (Harborne, 1993). Even within one single class of biosynthetically related compounds such as the terpenes, there may be an overwhelming variety of 30 000 structures (Hartmann, 2007). Based on the level of sequence homology in the genes coding for the biosynthetic enzymes producing this dazzling diversity of phytochemicals, it has been postulated that the diversity we observe today may have evolved from several rounds of single gene and whole genome duplications in the past (Maere et al., 2005). After these duplication events, the duplicated genes may have subfunctionalised and assumed slightly different biosynthetic functions, thereby increasing the diversity of plant secondary compounds (Mitchell-Olds & Clauss, 2002). Interestingly, it has been found that genes involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites and responses to biotic stresses are more often retained than genes involved in hormonal signalling and primary metabolism (Maere et al., 2005). The differences in retention rates between genes in these different classes lend additional support to the hypothesis that the diversity of secondary metabolites represents an important adaptive trait which helps plants to survive in a world full of herbivores (Jones & Firn, 1991; Maere et al., 2005). Small variations in chemical structures may indeed have profound effects on herbivore performance, as was shown in Barbarea vulgaris plants.

Type
Chapter
Information
The Ecology of Plant Secondary Metabolites
From Genes to Global Processes
, pp. 190 - 203
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A. A. 1999 Induced plant defense: evolution of induction and adaptive phenotypic plasticityAgrawal, A. A.Tuzun, S.Bent, E.Induced Plant Defenses Against Pathogens and HerbivoresSt Paul, MNAPS Press251Google Scholar
Bae, H. H.Herman, E.Bailey, B.Bae, H. J.Sicher, R. 2005 Exogenous trehalose alters transcripts involved in cell wall modification, abiotic stress, nitrogen metabolism, and plant defensePhysiologia Plantarum 125 114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bezemer, T. M.Wagenaar, R.van Dam, N. M.van der Putten, W. H.Wäckers, F. L. 2004 Above- and below-ground terpenoid aldehyde induction in cotton, , following root and leaf injuryJournal of Chemical Ecology 30 53CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Blossey, B.Hunt-Joshi, T. R. 2003 Belowground herbivory by insects: influence on plants and aboveground herbivoresAnnual Review of Entomology 48 521CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Branch, C.Hwang, C. F.Navarre, D. A.Williamson, V. M. 2004 Salicylic acid is part of the Mi-1-mediated defense response to root-knot nematode in tomatoMolecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 17 351CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cole, R. A. 1997 The relative importance of glucosinolates and amino acids to the development of two aphid pests and on wild and cultivated brassica speciesEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 85 121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Constabel, C. P.Yip, L.Ryan, C. A. 1998 Prosystemin from potato, black nightshade, and bell pepper: primary structure and biological activity of predicted system in polypeptidesPlant Molecular Biology 36 55CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Curtis, R. H. C. 2007 Do phytohormones influence nematode invasion and feeding site establishment?Nematology 9 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Davis, E. L.Hussey, R. S.Mitchum, M. G.Baum, T. J. 2008 Parasitism proteins in nematode–plant interactionsCurrent Opinion in Plant Biology 11 360CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Degenhardt, J.Hiltpold, I.Kollner, T. G. 2009 106 13213
de Vos, M.Van Oosten, V. R.Van Poecke, R. M. P. 2005 Signal signature and transcriptome changes of during pathogen and insect attackMolecular Plant–Microbe Interactions 18 923CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dicke, M.Sabelis, M. W. 1988 How plants obtain predatory mites as bodyguardsNetherlands Journal of Zoology 38 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Diezel, C.von Dahl, C. C.Gaquerel, E.Baldwin, I. T. 2009 Different lepidopteran elicitors account for cross-talk in herbivory-induced phytohormone signalingPlant Physiology 150 1576CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Erb, M.Flors, V.Karlen, D. 2009 Signal signature of aboveground-induced resistance upon belowground herbivory in maizePlant Journal 59 292CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Feng, Y. J.Wang, J. W.Jin, Q. 2010 Asian corn borer () damage induced systemic response in chemical defence in Bt corn ( L.)Allelopathy Journal 26 101Google Scholar
Fraenkel, G. S. 1959 The of secondary plant substancesScience 129 1466CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fuller, V. L.Lilley, C. J.Atkinson, H. J.Urwin, P. E. 2007 Differential gene expression in following infection by plant-parasitic nematodes and Molecular Plant Pathology 8 595CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gerber, E.Hinz, H. L.Blossey, B. 2007 Interaction of specialist root and shoot herbivores of and their impact on plant performance and reproductionEcological Entomology 32 357CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gershenzon, J. 1994 Metabolic costs of terpenoid accumulation in higher plantsJournal of Chemical Ecology 20 1281CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Glawe, G. A.Zavala, J. A.Kessler, A.van Dam, N. M.Baldwin, I. T. 2003 Ecological costs and benefits correlated with trypsin protease inhibitor production in Ecology 84 79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gomez, S.Stuefer, J. F. 2006 Members only: induced systemic resistance to herbivory in a clonal plant networkOecologia 147 461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harborne, J. B. 1993 Introduction to Ecological BiochemistryLondonElsevier Academic PressGoogle Scholar
Hartmann, T. 2007 From waste products to ecochemicals: fifty years research of plant secondary metabolismPhytochemistry 68 2831CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Heil, M.Baldwin, I. T. 2002 Fitness costs of induced resistance: emerging experimental support for a slippery conceptTrends in Plant Science 7 61CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Henkes, G. J.Thorpe, M. R.Minchin, P. E. H.Schurr, U.Rös, U. S. R. 2008 Jasmonic acid treatment to part of the root system is consistent with simulated leaf herbivory, diverting recently assimilated carbon towards untreated roots within an hourPlant, Cell and Environment 31 1229CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hiltpold, I.Toepfer, S.Kuhlmann, U.Turlings, T. C. J. 2010 How maize root volatiles affect the efficacy of entomopathogenic nematodes in controlling the western corn rootwormChemoecology 20 155CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, R. J.Birch, A. N. E.Griffiths, D. W.Morrison, I. M.McKinlay, R. G. 1995 Changes in the dry-matter, sugar, plant fiber and lignin contents of swede, rape and kale roots in response to turnip root fly () larval damageJournal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 69 321CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, R. J.Birch, A. N. E.Griffiths, D. W. 1997 Leaf surface compounds and oviposition preference of turnip root fly : the role of glucosinolate and nonglucosinolate compoundsJournal of Chemical Ecology 23 629CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hopkins, R. J.van Dam, N. M.van Loon, J. J. A. 2009 Role of glucosinolates in insect–plant relationships and multitrophic interactionsAnnual Review of Entomology 54 57CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Jansen, J. J.Allwood, J. W.Marsden-Edwards, E. 2009 Metabolomic analysis of the interaction between plants and herbivoresMetabolomics 5 150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. N.Gregory, P. J. 2006 Chemically-mediated host-plant location and selection by root-feeding insectsPhysiological Entomology 31 1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Johnson, S. N.Crawford, J. W.Gregory, P. J. 2007 Non-invasive techniques for investigating and modelling root-feeding insects in managed and natural systemsAgricultural and Forest Entomology 9 39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G.Firn, R. D. 1991 On the evolution of plant secondary chemical diversityPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences 333 273CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jones, C. G.Hopper, R. F.Coleman, J. S.Krischik, V. A. 1993 Control of systemically induced herbivore resistance by plant vascular architectureOecologia 93 452CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahl, J.Siemens, D. H.Aerts, R. J. 2000 Herbivore-induced ethylene suppresses a direct defense but not a putative indirect defense against an adapted herbivorePlanta 210 336CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kaplan, I.Halitschke, R.Kessler, A.Sardanelli, S.Denno, R. F. 2008 Constitutive and induced defenses to herbivory in above- and belowground plant tissuesEcology 89 392CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Karban, R.Baldwin, I. T. 1997 Induced Responses to HerbivoryChicago, ILUniversity of Chicago PressCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karban, R.Myers, J. H. 1989 Induced plant responses to herbivoryAnnual Review of Ecology and Systematics 20 331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maere, S.de Bodt, S.Raes, J. 2005 Modeling gene and genome duplications in eukaryotesProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 102 5454CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Maron, J. L. 1998 Insect herbivory above- and belowground: individual and joint effects on plant fitnessEcology 79 1281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J. 1995 The impact of root herbivory on aphid performance – field and laboratory evidenceActa Oecologica International Journal of Ecology 16 135Google Scholar
Masters, G. J.Brown, V. K. 1992 Plant-mediated interactions between two spatially separated insectsFunctional Ecology 6 175CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J.Brown, V. K.Gange, A. C. 1993 Plant mediated interactions between aboveground and belowground insect herbivoresOikos 66 148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Masters, G. J.Jones, T. H.Rogers, M. 2001 Host-plant mediated effects of root herbivory on insect seed predators and their parasitoidsOecologia 127 246CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mitchell-Olds, T.Clauss, M. J. 2002 Plant evolutionary genomicsCurrent Opinion in Plant Biology 5 74CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Moran, N. A.Whitham, T. G. 1990 Interspecific competition between root-feeding and leaf-galling aphids mediated by host-plant resistanceEcology 71 1050CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Neveu, N.Grandgirard, J.Nenon, J. P.Cortesero, A. M. 2002 Systemic release of herbivore-induced plant volatiles by turnips infested by concealed root-feeding larvae LJournal of Chemical Ecology 28 1717CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nuñez-Farfan, J.Fornoni, J.Valverde, P. L. 2007 The evolution of resistance and tolerance to herbivoresAnnual Review of Ecology, Evolution and Systematics 38 541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orians, C. M.Pomerleau, J.Ricco, R. 2000 Vascular architecture generates fine scale variation in systemic induction of proteinase inhibitors in tomatoJournal of Chemical Ecology 26 471CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pichersky, E.Gang, D. R. 2000 Genetics and biochemistry of secondary metabolites in plants: an evolutionary perspectiveTrends in Plant Science 5 439CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pineda, A.Zheng, S.-J.van Loon, J. J. A.Pieterse, C. M. J.Dicke, M. 2010 Helping plants to deal with insects: the role of beneficial soil-borne microbesTrends in Plant Science 15 507CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Potter, M. J.Vanstone, V. A.Davies, K. A.Kirkegaard, J. A.Rathjen, A. J. 1999 Reduced susceptibility of to in plants with elevated root levels of 2-phenylethyl glucosinolateJournal of Nematology 31 291Google ScholarPubMed
Poveda, K.Steffan-Dewenter, I.Scheu, S.Tscharntke, T. 2005 Effects of decomposers and herbivores on plant performance and aboveground plant-insect interactionsOikos 108 503CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pozo, M. J.van der Ent, S.van Loon, L. C.Pieterse, C. M. J. 2008 Transcription factor MYC2 is involved in priming for enhanced defense during rhizobacteria-induced systemic resistance in New Phytologist 180 511CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Qiu, B. L.Harvey, J. A.Raaijmakers, C. E.Vet, L. E. M.van Dam, N. M. 2009 Nonlinear effects of plant root and shoot jasmonic acid application on the performance of and its parasitoid Functional Ecology 23 496CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmann, S.Agrawal, A. A. 2008 In defense of roots: a research agenda for studying plant resistance to belowground herbivoryPlant Physiology 146 875CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Rasmann, S.Turling, T. C. J. 2008 Simultaneous feeding by aboveground and belowground herbivores attenuates plant-mediated attraction of their respective natural enemiesEcology Letters 10 926CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rasmann, S.Kollner, T. G.Degenhardt, J. 2005 Recruitment of entomopathogenic nematodes by insect-damaged maize rootsNature 434 732CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schittko, U.Preston, C. A.Baldwin, I. T. 2000 Eating the evidence? larvae can not disrupt specific jasmonate induction in by rapid consumptionPlanta 210 343CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Siemens, D. H.Garner, S. H.Mitchell-Olds, T.Callaway, R. M. 2002 Cost of defense in the context of plant competition: may grow and defendEcology 83 505CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, R.Bezemer, T. M.van der Putten, W. H.Vet, L. E. M.Harvey, J. A. 2005 Root herbivore effects on above-ground herbivore, parasitoid and hyperparasitoid performance via changes in plant qualityJournal of Animal Ecology 74 1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Soler, R.Harvey, J. A.Kamp, A. F. D. 2007 Root herbivores influence the behaviour of an aboveground parasitoid through changes in plant-volatile signalsOikos 116 367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Städler, E.Schoni, R. 1990 Oviposition behavior of the cabbage root fly, (L), influenced by host plant-extractsJournal of Insect Behavior 3 195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stahl, E. 1888 Eine biologische Studie über die Schutzmittel der Pflanzen gegen SchneckenfrassJenaer Zeitung fuer Naturwissenschaften 15 557Google Scholar
Staswick, P. E.Tiryaki, I. 2004 The oxylipin signal jasmonic acid is activated by an enzyme that conjugates it to isoleucine in ArabidopsisPlant Cell 16 2117CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Strauss, S. Y.Rudgers, J. A.Lau, J. A.Irwin, R. A. 2002 Direct and ecological costs of resistance to herbivoryTrends in Ecology and Evolution 17 278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dam, N. M.Baldwin, I. T. 1998 Cost of jasmonate-induced responses in plants competing for limited resourcesEcology Letters 1 30CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dam, N. M.Heil, M. 2011 Multitrophic interactions below-ground and aboveground: en route to the next levelJournal of Ecology 99 77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dam, N. M.Raaijmakers, C. E. 2006 Local and systemic induced responses to cabbage root fly larvae () in and Chemoecology 16 17Google Scholar
van Dam, N. M.Harvey, J. A.Wackers, F. L. 2003 Interactions between aboveground and belowground induced responses against phytophagesBasic and Applied Ecology 4 63CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dam, N. M.Raaijmakers, C. E.van der Putten, W. H. 2005 Root herbivory reduces growth and survival of the shoot feeding specialist on aEntomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 115 161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Dam, N. M.Tytgat, T. O. G.Kirkegaard, J. A. 2009 Root and shoot glucosinolates: a comparison of their diversity, function and interactions in natural and managed ecosystemsPhytochemistry Reviews 8 171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van der Putten, W. H.Vet, L. E. M.Harvey, J. A.Wäckers, F. L. 2001 Linking above- and belowground multitrophic interactions of plants, herbivores, pathogens and their antagonistsTrends in Ecology and Evolution 16 547CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leur, H.Raaijmakers, C. E.van Dam, N. M. 2006 A heritable glucosinolate polymorphism within natural populations of Phytochemistry 67 1214CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leur, H.Raaijmakers, C. E.van Dam, N. M. 2008 Reciprocal interactions between the cabbage root fly () and two glucosinolate phenotypes of Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 128 312CrossRefGoogle Scholar
van Leur, H.Vet, L. E. M.van der Putten, W. H.van Dam, N. M. 2008 glucosinolate phenotypes differentially affect performance and preference of two different species of lepidopteran herbivoresJournal of Chemical Ecology 34 121CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
van Tol, R. W. H. M.van der Sommen, A. T. C.Boff, M. I. C. 2001 Plants protect their roots by alerting the enemies of grubsEcology Letters 4 292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vanholme, B.De Meutter, J.Tytgat, T. 2004 Secretions of plant-parasitic nematodes: a molecular updateGene 332 13CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wurst, S.van der Putten, W. H. 2007 Root herbivore identity matters in plant-mediated interactions between root and shoot herbivoresBasic and Applied Ecology 8 491CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zangerl, A. R.Rutledge, C. E. 1996 The probability of attack and patterns of constitutive and induced defense: a test of optimal defense theoryAmerican Naturalist 147 599CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

Available formats
×