Published online by Cambridge University Press: 05 August 2012
Introduction
Since Fraenkel (1959) put secondary plant compounds back on the research agenda for their role as mediators of plant–herbivore interactions, thousands of papers have been published on this topic. In the 150 years before Fraenkel’s paper, plant secondary metabolites (PSMs) were mainly analysed for medicinal purposes or for their application as textile dyes or spices (Hartmann, 2007). In those times, secondary metabolites were merely considered to be the waste products of the plant’s primary metabolism, despite the publication of an early monograph in the late nineteenth century on the role of plant metabolites as protection against snail damage (Stahl, 1888). In the past 50 years of research, we have finally come to acknowledge the fact that there may be ecological and evolutionary reasons for plants having become true ‘chemical factories’ (Gershenzon et al., Chapter 4). It is estimated that plants may produce over 200 000 different compounds, the majority of which are classified as secondary metabolites (Pichersky & Gang, 2000). Despite their name, secondary plant compounds have been found to fulfil essential functions in plant defence against herbivores and in attracting beneficial organisms, such as pollinators and symbionts (Harborne, 1993). Even within one single class of biosynthetically related compounds such as the terpenes, there may be an overwhelming variety of 30 000 structures (Hartmann, 2007). Based on the level of sequence homology in the genes coding for the biosynthetic enzymes producing this dazzling diversity of phytochemicals, it has been postulated that the diversity we observe today may have evolved from several rounds of single gene and whole genome duplications in the past (Maere et al., 2005). After these duplication events, the duplicated genes may have subfunctionalised and assumed slightly different biosynthetic functions, thereby increasing the diversity of plant secondary compounds (Mitchell-Olds & Clauss, 2002). Interestingly, it has been found that genes involved in the synthesis of secondary metabolites and responses to biotic stresses are more often retained than genes involved in hormonal signalling and primary metabolism (Maere et al., 2005). The differences in retention rates between genes in these different classes lend additional support to the hypothesis that the diversity of secondary metabolites represents an important adaptive trait which helps plants to survive in a world full of herbivores (Jones & Firn, 1991; Maere et al., 2005). Small variations in chemical structures may indeed have profound effects on herbivore performance, as was shown in Barbarea vulgaris plants.
To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.
Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.
Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.
To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.