Professionalism in Archaic and Classical Sculpture in Athens: The Price of <span class='italic'>Technē</span>

doi:10.1017/9781108878135.007

6 - Professionalism in Archaic and Classical Sculpture in Athens: The Price of Technē

from Part III - Case Studies of Professions 1: Sculpture

Published online by Cambridge University Press: 18 September 2020

Edited by

Edward Harris and

Edmund Stewart: Affiliation:
University of Nottingham
Edward Harris: Affiliation:
University of Durham
David Lewis: Affiliation:
University of Edinburgh

Book contents

Get access

Summary

The common perception of craftsmen in Classical Athens as banausoi who were looked down on by elite circles in society has become more nuanced over recent years. This chapter contributes to this discussion by investigating the range of social positions in evidence for ancient sculptors. Using theories of professionalism and the aspects of need, demand and reward for sculpture, it argues that in terms of economic rewards as well as social capital, sculptors in Classical Athens were rather well off. As such the negative connotations of banausoi are unlikely to match the realities of ancient Athenian life.

Keywords

Professionalism Classical Athens Ancient Greek Sculpture Social Capital Position of Craftsmen

Type: Chapter
Information: Skilled Labour and Professionalism in Ancient Greece and Rome , pp. 205 - 229

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878135.007 [Opens in a new window]

Publisher: Cambridge University Press

Print publication year: 2020

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Avramidou, A., 2015. Women dedicators on the Athenian Acropolis and their role in family festivals: the evidence for maternal votives between 530–450 BCE. CMA, 6, http://journals.openedition.org/mondesanciens/1365.Google Scholar

Bejor, G., 2012. Nella bottega del marmoraio. In di Bejor, M, Castoldi, M, Lambrugo, C, and Panero, E, eds., Botteghe e artigiani. Marmorari, bronzisti, ceramisti e vetrai nell’antichità classica. Milan, pp. 1–27.Google Scholar

Bergemann, J., 1999. Demos und Thanatos. Untersuchungen zum Wertsystem der Polis im Spiegel der attischen Grabreliefs des 4. Jahrhunderts v. Chr. und zur Funktion der gleichzeitigen Grabbauten. Munich.Google Scholar

Blok, J. H., 2017. Citizenship in Classical Athens. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Boersma, J., 1970. Athenian Building Policy from 561/0 to 405/4 B.C. Groningen.Google Scholar

Bousquet, J., 1984. Inscriptions de Delphes. BCH, 108(2), pp. 695–701.Google Scholar

Burford, A. 1969. The Greek Temple Builders at Epidauros: A Social and Economic Study of Building in the Asklepian Sanctuary, during the Fourth and Early Third Centuries B.C. Liverpool.Google Scholar

Burnett Grossman, J., 2013. Funerary Sculpture. The Athenian Agora, 35. Princeton.Google Scholar

Castoldi, M., 2012. Nella bottega del bronzista. In Bejor, G, Castoldi, M, Lambrugo, C, and Panero, E, eds., Botteghe e artigiani. Marmorari, bronzisti, ceramisti e vetrai nell’antichità classica. Milan, pp. 27–63.Google Scholar

Chatzidimitriou, A., 2005. Παραστάσεις εργαστηρίων και εμπορίου στην εικονογραφία των αρχαϊκών και κλασικών χρόνων. Athens.Google Scholar

Clairmont, C. W., 1993. Classical Attic Tombstones. Kilchberg.Google Scholar

Corso, A., 2013. The education of artists in ancient Greece. In Raviola, F, ed., L’ indagine e la rima: scritti per Lorenzo Braccesi. Rome, pp. 369–400.Google Scholar

Corso, A., 2016. Sugli agoni di artisti nella Grecia classica. RAL, 27, pp. 115–27.Google Scholar

Davies, J. K., 1971. Athenian Propertied Families. Oxford.Google Scholar

Davies, P. A., 2017. Articulating status in ancient Greece: status (in)consistency as a new approach. CCJ, 63, pp. 29–52.Google Scholar

D’Onofrio, A., 2008. L’apporto cicladico nella più antica plastica monumentale in Attica. In Kourayos, N and Prost, F, eds., La sculpture des Cyclades à l’époque archaïque. Histoire des ateliers, rayonnement des styles, Actes du colloque international, Athènes 7–11 septembre 1998, BCH suppl. 48. Athens, pp. 195–254.Google Scholar

Epstein, S., 2008. Why did Attic building projects employ free laborers rather than slaves? ZPE, 166, pp. 108–12.Google Scholar

Epstein, S., 2010. Attic public construction: who were the builders? AncSoc, 40, pp. 1–14.Google Scholar

Feyel, Chr., 1998. La structure d’un groupe socio-économique: les artisans dans les grands sanctuaires grecs du IVe siècle. Topoi, 8(2), pp. 561–79.CrossRef Google Scholar

Feyel, Chr., 2006. Les Artisans dans les sanctuaires grecs aux époques classique et hellénistique à travers la documentation financière en Grèce. Athens.Google Scholar

Fröhlich, P., 2016. La cité grecque entre Aristote et les modernes. Cahiers Glotz, 27, pp. 91–136.Google Scholar

Gehrke, H.-J., 1976. Phokion: Studien zur Erfassung seiner historischen Gestalt. Munich.Google Scholar

Goodlett, V. C., 1991. Rhodian sculpture workshops. AJA, 95(4), pp. 669–81.Google Scholar

Harris, E. M., 2002. Workshops, marketplace and household: the nature of technical specialization in classical Athens and its influence on economy and society. In Cartledge, P, Cohen, E. E., and Foxhall, L, eds., Money, Labour and Land. London and New York, pp. 67–99.Google Scholar

Hedreen, G., 2016. The Image of the Artist in Archaic and Classical Greece: Art, Poetry, and Subjectivity. Cambridge and New York.Google Scholar

Hellmann, M.-Chr., 2000. Les déplacements des artisans de la construction en Grèce d’après les testimonia épigraphiques. In Blondé, Fr and Muller, A, eds., L’artisanat en Grèce ancienne: les productions, les diffusions. Actes du Colloque de Lyon (10–11 décembre 1998). Travaux et Recherches. Lille, pp. 265–80.Google Scholar

Hochscheid, H., 2015. Networks of Stone: Sculpture and Society in Archaic and Classical Athens. Oxford and Bern.Google Scholar

Hochscheid, H., 2017. Not quite Pheidias: status and labour specialization in Athenian sculpture. In Rodríguez Pérez, D, ed., Greek Art in Context: Archaeological and Art Historical Perspectives. Oxford, pp. 142–55.Google Scholar

Humphreys, S. C., 2018. Kinship in Athens: An Anthropological Analysis. Oxford and New York.CrossRef Google Scholar

Hurwit, J., 2015. Artists and Signatures in Ancient Greece. New York.Google Scholar

Ingold, T., 2013. Making: Anthropology, Archaeology, Art and Architecture. London and New York.Google Scholar

Jockey, Ph., 2009. D’une cité l’autre. Brèves réflexions sur la mobilité des artisans de la pierre dans l’antiquité classique. In Moatti, C, Kaiser, W, and Pébarthe, Chr, eds., Le monde de l’itinérance en méditerranée de l’antiquité à l’époque moderne. Procédures de contrôle et d’identification. Bordeaux, pp. 139–59.Google Scholar

Kamen, D., 2013. Status in Classical Athens. Princeton and Oxford.Google Scholar

Keesling, C., 1999. Endoios’s painting from the Themistoklean wall: a reconstruction. Hesperia, 68(4), pp. 509–48.CrossRef Google Scholar

Keesling, C., 2003. The Votive Statues of the Athenian Acropolis. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Keesling, C., 2017. Greek statue terms revisited: what does ἀνδριάς mean? GRBS, 57, pp. 837–61.Google Scholar

Kennedy, R. F., 2014. Immigrant Women in Athens: Gender, Ethnicity, and Citizenship in the Classical City. New York.Google Scholar

Kissas, K., 2000. Die attischen Statuen- und Stelenbasen archaischer Zeit. Bonn.Google Scholar

Korres, M., 1995. From Pentelicon to Parthenon. Athens.Google Scholar

Lambert, S. D., 2000. The Erechtheum workers of ‘IG’ ii² 1654. ZPE, 132, pp. 157–60.Google Scholar

Larson, K. A., 2013. A network approach to Hellenistic sculptural production. JMA, 26(2), pp. 235–60.Google Scholar

Larson, M., 2013. The Rise of Professionalism: A Sociological Analysis, 2nd ed. New Brunswick.Google Scholar

Le Guen, B., 2001. Les associations de Technites dionysiaques à l’époque hellénistique, Études d’Archéologie Classique 12. Nancy.Google Scholar

Loomis, W. T., 1998. Wages, Welfare Costs and Inflation in Classical Athens. Ann Arbor.Google Scholar

Mark, I. S., 1995. The lure of philosophy: craft and higher learning in ancient Greece. In Moon, W. G., ed., Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition. Madison, pp. 25–37.Google Scholar

Muller-Dufeu, M., 2011. Créer du vivant. Sculpteurs et artistes dans l’Antiquité grecque. Villeneuve d’Ascq.Google Scholar

Nielsen, T. H., Bjerstrup, L, Hansen, M. H. J., Rubinstein, L, and Vestergard, T, 1989. Athenian grave monuments and social class. GRBS, 30, pp. 411–20.Google Scholar

Nolte, S., 2005. Steinbruch, Werkstatt, Skulptur: Untersuchungen zu Aufbau und Organisation griechischer Bildhauerwerkstätten. Göttingen.Google Scholar

Oliver, G. J., 2000. Athenian funerary monuments: style, grandeur, and cost. In Oliver, G. J., ed., The Epigraphy of Death: Studies in the History and Society of Greece and Rome. Liverpool, pp. 59–80.Google Scholar

Paga, J., 2015. The monumental definition of Attica in the early democratic period. In Miles, M, ed., Autopsy in Athens: Recent archaeological Research on Athens and Attica. Oxford and Philadelphia, pp. 108–25.Google Scholar

Palagia, O., 2010. Pheidias ‘Epoiesen’: attribution as value judgement. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies. Supplement 104: Exploring Ancient Sculpture: Essays in Honour of Geoffrey Waywell, F. Macfarlane, and C. Morgan, eds., pp. 97–107.Google Scholar

Pollitt, J. J., 1990. The Art of Ancient Greece: Sources and Documents. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Pollitt, J. J., 1995. The canon of Polykleitos and other canons. In Moon, W. G., ed., Polykleitos, the Doryphoros, and Tradition. Madison, pp. 19–24.Google Scholar

Prignitz, S., 2014. Bauurkunden und Bauprogramm von Epidauros (400–350): Asklepiostempel, Tholos, Kultbild, Brunnenhaus, Vestigia 67. Munich.Google Scholar

Randall, R. H., 1953. The Erechtheum workmen. AJA, 57(3), pp. 199–210.Google Scholar

Salta, M., 1991. Attische Grabstelen mit Inschriften: Beiträge zur Topographie und Prosopographie der Nekropolen von Athen, Attika und Salamis vom Peloponnesischen Krieg bis zur Mitte des 4. Jhs. v. Chr. Tübingen.Google Scholar

Sapirstein, Ph., 2019. Picturing work. In Lytle, E, ed., A Cultural History of Work in Antiquity. London, pp. 33–56.Google Scholar

Scholl, A., 1996. Die attischen Bildfeldstelen des 4. Jhs. v. Chr. Untersuchungen zu den kleinformatigen Grabreliefs im spätklassischen Athen. Berlin.Google Scholar

Schultz, P., 2017. Politics and personality? The case of Kephisodotos the Younger. In Seaman, K and Schultz, P, eds., Artists and Artistic Production in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, pp. 141–53.Google Scholar

Seaman, K., 2017. The social and educational background of elite Greek artists. In Seaman, K and Schultz, P, eds., Artists and Artistic Production in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, pp. 12–22.Google Scholar

Sennett, R., 2008. The Craftsman. London.Google Scholar

Shear, T. L. Jr., 2016. Trophies of Victory: Public Building in Periklean Athens. Princeton.CrossRef Google Scholar

Smith, R. R., 2007. Pindar, athletes, and the early Greek statue habit. In Hornblower, S and Morgan, C, eds., Pindar’s Poetry, Patrons, and Festivals: From Archaic Greece to the Roman Empire. Oxford, pp. 83–139.Google Scholar

Snodgrass, A., 2006. Archaeology and the Emergence of Greece. Oxford.Google Scholar

Steiner, D., 1986. The Crown of Song: Metaphor in Pindar. London.Google Scholar

Stewart, A. F., 1990. Greek Sculpture: An Exploration. New Haven.Google Scholar

Stewart, A. F., 2017. Kritios and Nesiotes: two revolutionaries in context. In Seaman, K and Schultz, P, eds., Artists and Artistic Production in Ancient Greece. Cambridge, pp. 37–54.Google Scholar

Stewart, E., 2016. Professionalism and the poetic persona in archaic Greece. CCJ, 62, pp. 200–23.Google Scholar

Taylor, C., 2017. Poverty, Wealth, and Well-Being: Experiencing Penia in Democratic Athens. Oxford.Google Scholar

Tsakirgis, B. 2005. Living and working around the Athenian Agora: a preliminary case study of three houses. In Ault, B. A. and Nevett, L. C., eds., Ancient Greek Houses and Households: Chronological, Regional, and Social Diversity. Philadelphia, pp. 67–82.Google Scholar

Verboven, K., 2014, Attitudes to work and workers in classical Greece and Greece and Rome. TSEG, 11(1), pp. 67–87.Google Scholar

Viviers, D., 1992. Recherches sur les ateliers de sculpteurs et la Cité d’Athènes à l’époque archaïque: Endoios, Philergos, Aristoklès. Brussels.Google Scholar

Vlassopoulos, K., 2016. Que savons-nous vraiment de la société athénienne? Annales. HSS, 71(3), pp. 659–82.Google Scholar

Whitehead, D., 1977. The Ideology of the Athenian Metic. Cambridge.Google Scholar

Wijma, S., 2014. Embracing the Immigrant: The Participation of Metics in Athenian Polis Religion (5th–4th Century BC). Stuttgart.Google Scholar

Young, R. S. 1951. An industrial district of ancient Athens. Hesperia, 20(3), pp. 138–288.Google Scholar

Zimmer, G., 1990. Griechische Bronzegusswerkstätten: zur Technologieentwicklung eines antiken Kunsthandwerkes. Mainz.Google Scholar

Book contents

6 - Professionalism in Archaic and Classical Sculpture in Athens: The Price of Technē

Summary

Keywords

Access options

References

Save book to Kindle

Save book to Dropbox

Save book to Google Drive