Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T22:21:39.496Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

References

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  21 January 2021

Dolores Albarracín
Dolores Albarracín
Affiliation:
University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
Get access

Summary

A summary is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Chapter
Information
Action and Inaction in a Social World
Predicting and Changing Attitudes and Behavior
 , pp. 307 - 367
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
Print publication year: 2021

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aarts, H., Dijksterhuis, A., & Midden, C. (1999). To plan or not to plan? Goal achievement or interrupting the performance of mundane behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 29(8), 971–979. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0992(199912)29:8<971::AID-EJSP963>3.0.CO;2-AGoogle Scholar
Abelson, R. P. (1959). Modes of resolution of belief dilemmas. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 3(4), 343–352.Google Scholar
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (2008). Collective identity: Group membership and self-conception. In Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Group processes (pp. 147–181). Malden, MA: Blackwell. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470998458.ch18Google Scholar
Abrams, D., Thomas, J., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Numerical distinctiveness, social identity and gender salience. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(1), 87–92. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00889.xGoogle Scholar
Abrams, D., Wetherell, M., Cochrane, S., Hogg, M. A., & Turner, J. C. (1990). Knowing what to think by knowing who you are: Self-categorization and the nature of norm formation, conformity and group polarization. British Journal of Social Psychology, 29(2), 97–119. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00892.xGoogle Scholar
Ackerman, J. M., Nocera, C. C., & Bargh, J. A. (2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328(5986), 1712–1715. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1189993Google Scholar
Adaval, R., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1998). The role of narratives in consumer information processing. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 7(3), 207–245.Google Scholar
Ahluwalia, R. (2002). How prevalent is the negativity effect in consumer environments? Journal of Consumer Research, 29(2), 270–279.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1985). From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior. In Kuhl, J. & Beckmann, J. (Eds.), Action control (pp. 11–39). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-69746-3_2Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-TCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I. (2001). Nature and operation of attitudes. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 27–58. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.27Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (2002). Residual effects of past on later behavior: Habituation and reasoned action perspectives. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 6(2), 107–122. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0602_02Google Scholar
Ajzen, I. (2019). TPB measurement. Retrieved from https://people.umass.edu/aizen/pdf/tpb.measurement.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I., Czasch, C., & Flood, M. G. (2009). From intentions to behavior: Implementation intention, commitment, and conscientiousness. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39(6), 1356–1372. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2009.00485.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1990). Application of the theory of planned behavior to leisure choice. Journal of Leisure Research, 24(3), 157–162.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Driver, B. L. (1991). Prediction of leisure participation from behavioral, normative, and control beliefs: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Leisure Sciences, 13(3), 185–204. https://doi.org/10.1080/01490409109513137Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1972). Attitudes and normative beliefs as factors influencing behavioral intentions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0031930Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). Theory-based behavior change interventions: Comments on Hobbis and Sutton. Journal of Health Psychology, 10(1), 27. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105305048552Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M., Lohmann, S., & Albarracín, D. (2019). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 197–255). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1986). Prediction of goal directed behavior: Attitudes, intentions, and perceived behavioral control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22, 453–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90045-4Google Scholar
Albarracín, D. (1997). Processing of behavior-related communications as a function of cognitive elaboration: A multiple-stage model (PhD dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations and Theses database.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D. (2002). Cognition in persuasion: An analysis of information processing in response to persuasive communications. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 61–130. Retrieved from www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0065260102800041Google Scholar
Albarracín, D. (2012). Craving activity and losing objectivity: Effects of general action concepts on approach to decision-consistent information. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(1), 55–62. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611408620Google Scholar
Albarracín, D. (2017). Action and inaction content in message. Unpublished raw data, University of Illinois Urbana Champaign.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Cohen, J., & Kumkale, G. T. (2003). When communications collide with recipients’ actions: Effects of post-message behavior on intentions to follow the message recommendation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(7), 834–845. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167203029007003Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Durantini, M. R., Earl, A., Gunnoe, J. B., & Leeper, J. (2008). Beyond the most willing audiences: A meta-intervention to increase exposure to HIV-prevention programs by vulnerable populations. Health Psychology, 27(5), 638–644. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.27.5.038Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Gillette, J. C., Earl, A. N., Glasman, L. R., Durantini, M. R., & Ho, M.-H. (2005). A test of major assumptions about behavior change: A comprehensive look at the effects of passive and active HIV-prevention interventions since the beginning of the epidemic. Psychological Bulletin, 131(6), 856–897. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.6.856Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., & Handley, I. M. (2007). The time for doing is not the time for change: Effects of general action and inaction goals on attitude retrieval and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100, 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023245Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Handley, I. M., Albarracín, D., & Handley, I. M. (2011). The time for doing is not the time for change: Effects of general action and inaction goals on attitude retrieval and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(6), 983–998. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023245Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Handley, I. M., Noguchi, K., McCulloch, K. C., Li, H., Leeper, J., … Hart, W. (2008). Increasing and decreasing motor and cognitive output: A model of general action and inaction goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(3), 510–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012833Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., & Hart, W. (2011). Positive mood plus action = negative mood plus inaction: Effects of general action and inaction concepts on decisions and performance as a function of affect. Emotion, 11(4), 951–957. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024130Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Hart, W., & McCulloch, K. C. (2006). Associating versus proposing or associating what we propose: Comment on Gawronski and Bodenhausen (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132, 732–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.732Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Hepler, J., & Tannenbaum, M. (2011). General action and inaction goals: Their behavioral, cognitive, and affective origins and influences. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(2), 119–123. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721411402666Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Ho, R. M., McNatt, P. S., Williams, W. R., Rhodes, F., Malotte, C. K., … Grp, P. R. S. (2000). Structure of outcome beliefs in condom use. Health Psychology, 19(5), 458–468. https://doi.org/10.1037//0278-6133.19.5.458CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albarracín, D., Hornik, R., & Ajzen, I. (2007). Prediction and change of health behavior: Applying the reasoned action approach. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., Fishbein, M., & Muellerleile, P. A. (2001). Theories of reasoned action and planned behavior as models of condom use: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 127(1), 142–161. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.1.142CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.) (2005). The handbook of attitudes. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Jones, C., Hepler, J., & Li, I. H. (2017). Liking for action and the vertical/horizontal dimension of culture in nineteen nations: Valuing equality over hierarchy promotes positivity towards action. Interamerican Journal of Psychology, 51(3), 335–343. https://doi.org/10.30849/rip/ijp.v51i3.359Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., & Kumkale, G. T. (2003). Affect as information in persuasion: A model of affect identification and discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(3), 453–469. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.453Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Kumkale, G. T., & Poyner-Del Vento, P. (2017). How people can become persuaded by weak messages presented by credible communicators: Not all sleeper effects are created equal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 171–180.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Leeper, J., Earl, A., & Durantini, M. R. (2008). From brochures to videos to counseling: Exposure to HIV-prevention programs. AIDS and Behavior, 12, 354–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-007-9320-xGoogle Scholar
Albarracín, D., McNatt, P. S. P., Klein, C. T. F., Ho, R., Mitchell, A. L., & Kumkale, G. T. (2003). Persuasive communications to change actions: An analysis of behavioral and cognitive impact in HIV prevention. Health Psychology, 22(2), 166–177. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.22.2.166Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., & Mitchell, A. L. (2004). The role of defensive confidence in preference for proattitudinal information: How believing that one is strong can sometimes be a defensive weakness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(12), 1565–1584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204271180Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Noguchi, K., & Earl, A. N. (2006). Joyce’s “Ulysses” and Woolf’s “Jacob’s Room” as the phenomenology of reasoning: Intentions and control as emergent of language and social interaction. Psychological Inquiry, 17(3), 236–245.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Noguchi, K., & Fischler, I. (2011). The syntax of defection and cooperation: The effects of the implicit sentences nice act versus act nice on behavior change. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(3), 298–305.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., & Shavitt, S. (2018). Attitudes and attitude change. Annual Review of Psychology, 69, 299–327. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122216-011911Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Sunderrajan, A., & Dai, W. (2018). Action, inaction, and actionability: Definitions and implications for communications and interventions to change behaviors. In Bevins, R. A. & Hope, D. (Eds.), The 65th annual Nebraska Symposium on Motivation: Change and maintaining change (pp. 75–99). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Sunderrajan, A., Dai, W., & White, B. X. (2019). The social creation of action and inaction: From concepts to goals to behaviors. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 223–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2019.04.001Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Sunderrajan, A., Lohmann, S., Chan, M. S., Jiang, D., Chan, M. P. S., & Jiang, D. (2019). The psychology of attitudes, motivation, and persuasion. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 3–44). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., & Vargas, P. (2010). Attitudes and persuasion: From biology to social responses to persuasive intent. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 394–427). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.57.102904.190034Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Wallace, H. M., & Glasman, L. R. (2004). Survival and change in judgments: A model of activation and comparison. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 36, 251–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(04)36005-3Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Wallace, H. M., Hart, W., & Brown, R. D. (2012). How judgments change following comparison of current and prior information. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/01973533.2011.637480Google Scholar
Albarracín, J., Wang, W., & Albarracín, D. (2012). Are confident partisans disloyal? The role of defensive confidence in party defection. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 42(7), 1576–1598. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00896Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Wang, W., & Leeper, J. (2009). Immediate increase in food intake following exercise messages. Obesity, 17(7), 1451–1452. https://doi.org/10.1038/oby.2009.16Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Wang, W., Li, H., & Noguchi, K. (2011). Structure of attitudes: Judgments, memory, and implications for change. In Crano, W. D. & Prislin, R. (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 19–39). New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203838068Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Wang, W., & McCulloch, K. C. (2018). Action dominance: The performance effects of multiple action demands and the benefits of an inaction focus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 44, 966–1007.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Wilson, K., Chan, M., Pui, S., Durantini, M., & Sanchez, F. (2017). Action and inaction in multi-behaviour recommendations: A meta-analysis of lifestyle interventions. Health Psychology Review, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2017.1369140Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Wilson, K., Durantini, M. R., & Livingood, W. (2013). When is retention in health promotion interventions intentional? Predicting return to health promotion interventions as a function of busyness. Acta de Investigacion Psicologica, 3(3), 1311–1321.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2000). The cognitive impact of past behavior: Influences on beliefs, attitudes, and future behavioral decisions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(1), 5.Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2001). Elaborative and nonelaborative processing of a behavior-related communication. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 27(6), 691–705. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167201276005Google Scholar
Albarracín, D., Zanna, M. P., Johnson, B. T., & Kumkale, T. (2005). Attitudes: Introduction and scope. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 3–19). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Allison, S. T., & Messick, D. M. (1988). The feature-positive effect, attitude strength, and degree of perceived consensus. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 14(2), 231–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167288142002CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Alwin, D. F., Cohen, R. L., & Newcomb, T. M. (1991). Political attitudes over the life span: The Bennington women after fifty years. Madison, WI: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
American Psychiatric Association (2000). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (Vol. 4th ed.). Washington, DC: Author. https://doi.org/10.1097/00001888-195209000-00035Google Scholar
Anderson, C. (1983). The causal structure of situations: The generation of plausible causal attributions as a function of type of event situation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(2), 185–203. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031%2883%2990037-9Google Scholar
Anderson, J. R. (2013). The architecture of cognition. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. H. (1968). Application of a linear-serial model to a personality-impression task using serial presentation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 10(4), 354.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Anderson, N. H. (1974). Information integration theory: A brief survey. Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology, 2, 236–305.Google Scholar
Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundations of information integration theory (Vol. 578). New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, (1938). The Organon, The Categories (H. Tredennick, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Armitage, C. J. (1995). Can the theory of planned behavior predict the maintenance of physical activity? Health Psychology, 24(2), 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.24.3.235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Armitage, C. J., & Conner, M. (2001). Efficacy of the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analytic review. British Journal of Social Psychology, 40(4), 471–499. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466601164939Google Scholar
Aronson, E. (1968). Dissonance theory: Progress and problems. In Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 5–27). Chicago: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
Aronson, E., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1963). Effect of severity of threat on devaluation of forbidden behavior. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 66(6), 584. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0039901CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aronson, , E., & Mills, , J. (1959). The effect of severity of initiation on liking for a group. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 59(2), 177.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1940). Studies in the principles of judgments and attitudes: II. Determination of judgments by group and by ego standards. Journal of Social Psychology, 12(2), 433–465.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1952). Social psychology. Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Asch, S. E. (1957). An experimental investigation of group influence. In Symposium on preventive and social psychiatry (pp. 15–17). Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
Atkinson, J. W. (1964). An introduction to motivation: Vol. 9. Engineering. Oxford, England: Van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Avishai, A., Conner, M., & Sheeran, P. (2019). Setting realistic health goals: Antecedents and consequences. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 53, 1020–1031. https://doi.org/10.1093/abm/kaz012Google Scholar
Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2003). Locomotion, assessment, and regulatory fit: Value transfer from “how” to “what.” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(5), 525–530. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00027-1Google Scholar
Avnet, T., & Higgins, E. T. (2006). How regulatory fit affects value in consumer choices and opinions. Journal of Marketing Research, 43(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
Avnet, T., Laufer, D., & Higgins, E. T. (2013). Are all experiences of fit created equal? Two paths to persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 23(3), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2012.10.011Google Scholar
Bae, R. E., Maloney, E. K., Albarracín, D., & Cappella, J. N. (2018). Does interest in smoking affect youth selection of pro-smoking videos? A selective exposure experiment. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 21, 539–546.Google Scholar
Baer, R. A. (2003). Mindfulness training as a clinical intervention: A conceptual and empirical review. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 10(2), 125–143. https://doi.org/10.1093/clipsy/bpg015Google Scholar
Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1990). Trying to consume. Journal of Consumer Research, 17(2), 127–140. https://doi.org/10.1086/208543Google Scholar
Bailenson, J. N., & Blascovich, J. (2004). Avatars. In Encyclopedia of human–computer interaction (pp. 64–68). Great Barrington, MA: Berkshire.Google Scholar
Bailenson, J. N., & Yee, N. (2005). Digital chameleons – Automatic assimilation of nonverbal gestures in immersive virtual environments. Psychological Science, 16(10), 814–819. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01619.xGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2003). Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: The roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 175–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_01Google Scholar
Banaji, M. R., Lemm, K. M., & Carpenter, S. J. (2001). The social unconscious. In Tesser, A. & Schwarz, N. (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (pp. 134–158). Oxford, England: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory (Series in Social Learning Theory Vol. 1). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 6, 1–60. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1Google Scholar
Bandura, A., & Wood, R. (1989). Effect of perceived controllability and performance standards on self-regulation of complex decision making. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56(5), 805–814. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.56.5.805Google Scholar
Barden, J., & Tormala, Z. L. (2014). Elaboration and attitude strength: The new meta-cognitive perspective. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(1), 17–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12078Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (1994). The four horsemen of automaticity: Intention, awareness, efficiency, and control as separate issues. In Wyer, R. S. (Ed.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 1–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (2014, January). Unconscious impulses and desires impel what we think and do in ways Freud never dreamed of. Scientific American. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0114-30Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A. (2016). Awareness of the prime versus awareness of its influence: implications for the real-world scope of unconscious higher mental processes. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 49–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.05.006Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S. R., Govender, R., & Pratto, F. (1992). The generality of the automatic activation effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(6), 893–912. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.6.893Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., Chaiken, S. R., Raymond, P., & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(1), 104–128. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0005Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., Chen, M., & Burrows, L. (1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 230–244. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.230Google Scholar
Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K., & Trötschel, R. (2001). The automated will: Nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 1014.Google Scholar
Barnidge, M., & Peacock, C. (2019). A third wave of selective exposure research? The challenges posed by hyperpartisan news on social media. Media and Communication, 7(3), 4–7. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2257Google Scholar
Baron, R. S., Hoppe, S. I., Kao, C. F., Brunsman, B., Linneweh, B., & Rogers, D. (1996). Social corroboration and opinion extremity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 537–560. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1996.0024Google Scholar
Bar-Tal, D., Raviv, A., & Goldberg, M. (1982). Helping behavior among preschool children: An observational study. Child Development, 53(2), 396–402. https://doi.org/10.2307/1128982Google Scholar
Bassili, J. N., & Brown, R. D. (2005). Implicit and explicit attitudes: Research, challenges, and theory. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 543–574). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Becker, B. J. (1988). Synthesizing standardized mean change measures. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 41, 257–278. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.2044-8317.1988.tb00901.xGoogle Scholar
Beentjes, J. W. J., de Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, J. W. J. (2012). Identification as a mechanism of narrative persuasion. Communication Research, 39(6), 802–823. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650211408594Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1965). An experimental analysis of self-persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 1, 199–218.Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1967). Self-perception: An alternative interpretation of cognitive dissonance phenomena. Psychological Review, 74(3), 183–200. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0024835Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1968). The epistemological status of interpersonal simulations: A reply to Jones, Linder, Kiesler, Zanna, and Brehm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4(3), 270–274. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90055-3Google Scholar
Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 6, 1–62. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60024-6Google Scholar
Bem, D. J., & McConnell, H. K. (1970). Testing the self-perception explanation of dissonance phenomena: On the salience of premanipulation attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 14(1), 23–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0020916Google Scholar
Bensley, L. S., & Wu, R. (1991). The role of psychological reactance in drinking following alcohol prevention messages. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21(13), 1111–1124. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1991.tb00461.xGoogle Scholar
Berger, I. E., & Mitchell, A. A. (1989). The effect of advertising on attitude accessibility, attitude confidence, and the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 269–279.Google Scholar
Berkman, E. T., Burklund, L., & Lieberman, M. D. (2009). Inhibitory spillover: Intentional motor inhibition produces incidental limbic inhibition via right inferior frontal cortex. NeuroImage, 47(2), 705–712. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.084Google Scholar
Betsch, T., Fiedler, K., & Brinkmann, J. (1998). Behavioral routines in decision making: The effects of novelty in task presentation and time pressure on routine maintenance and deviation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 28(6), 861–878.Google Scholar
Bettes, B. A., Dusenbury, L., Kerner, J., James‐Ortiz, S., & Botvin, G. J. (1990). Ethnicity and psychosocial factors in alcohol and tobacco use in adolescence. Child Development, 61(2), 557–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8624.1990.tb02800.xGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, M. H., & Stegner, S. E. (1979). Source credibility in social judgment: Bias, expertise, and the judge’s point of view. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(1), 48–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.1.48Google Scholar
Bizer, G. Y., Tormala, Z. L., Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Memory-based versus on-line processing: Implications for attitude strength. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42(5), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2005.09.002Google Scholar
Blankenship, K. L., Allen, J. J., Kane, K. A., & Anderson, C. A. (2019). The role of attitudes in violence and aggression. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 299–336). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Blascovich, J., Loomis, J., Beall, A. C., Swinth, K. R., Hoyt, C. L., & Bailenson, J. N. (2002). Immersive virtual environment technology as a methodological tool for social psychology. Psychological Inquiry, 13(2), 103–124. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1302_01Google Scholar
Blei, D., Ng, A., & Jordan, M. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3, 993–1022.Google Scholar
Block, L. G., & Keller, P. A. (1995). When to accentuate the negative: The effects of perceived efficacy and message framing on intentions to perform a health-related behavior. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(2), 192–203.Google Scholar
Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing automatic affect towards multiple attitude objects. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38(6), 977–997.Google Scholar
Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119(1), 111–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.1.111Google Scholar
Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265.Google Scholar
Boulding, W., Kalra, A., Staelin, R., & Zeithaml, V. A. (1993). A dynamic process model of service quality: From expectations to behavioral intentions. Journal of Marketing Research, 30(1), 7–27.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., Codispoti, M., Cuthbert, B. N., & Lang, P. J. (2001). Emotion and motivation I: Defensive and appetitive reactions in picture processing. Emotion, 1(3), 276.Google Scholar
Bradley, M. M., Hamby, S., Löw, A., & Lang, P. J. (2007). Brain potentials in perception: Picture complexity and emotional arousal. Psychophysiology, 44(3), 364–373.Google Scholar
Brandstatter, V., Lengfelder, A., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2001). Implementation intentions and efficient action initiation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(5), 946–960. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.81.5.946Google Scholar
Brauer, M., Judd, C. M., & Gliner, M. D. (1995). The effects of repeated expressions on attitude polarization during group discussions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68(6), 1014. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203647585Google Scholar
Brehm, J. W. (1956). Postdecision changes in the desirability of alternatives. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 52(3), 384.Google Scholar
Brehm, J. W. (1966). A theory of psychological reactance. Oxford, England: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20027Google Scholar
Brehm, J. (1972). Responses to loss of freedom: A theory of psychological reactance. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.Google Scholar
Brewer, W. F., & Lichtenstein, E. H. (1981). Event schemas, story schemas, and story grammars. In Long, J. & Baddeley, A. (Eds.), Attention and performance IX (pp. 363–379). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Brindal, E., Freyne, J., Saunders, I., Berkovsky, S., Smith, G., & Noakes, M. (2012). Features predicting weight loss in overweight or obese participants in a web-based intervention: Randomized trial. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 14(6), 114–129. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2156Google Scholar
Brinol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(6), 1123–1139. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1123Google Scholar
Brock, T. C., & Balloun, J. L. (1967). Behavioral receptivity to dissonant information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 6(4), 413. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021225Google Scholar
Bromberg, J. E., Augustson, E. M., & Backinger, C. L. (2012). Portrayal of smokeless tobacco in YouTube videos. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 14(4), 455–462. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntr235Google Scholar
Brown, P. (1995). The role of the evaluator in comprehensive community initiatives. In Connel, J. P., Kubisch, A. C., Schorr, L. B., & Weiss, C. H. (Eds.), New approaches to evaluating community initiatives (pp. 201–237). Washington, DC: Aspen.Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Albarracín, D. (2003). Unpublished data.Google Scholar
Brown, R., & Albarracín, D. (2004). Unpublished data on evaluative procedures.Google Scholar
Brown, S. A., Christiansen, B. A., & Goldman, M. S. (2015). The Alcohol Expectancy Questionnaire: An instrument for the assessment of adolescent and adult alcohol expectancies. Journal of Studies on Alcohol, 48(5), 483–491. https://doi.org/10.15288/jsa.1987.48.483Google Scholar
Brunel, F. F., Collins, C. M., Greenwald, A. G., & Tietje, B. C. (1999). Making the private public, accessing the inaccessible: Marketing applications of the Implicit Association Test. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Association for Consumer Research, Columbus, OH.Google Scholar
Bruner, J. S. (1957). On perceptual readiness. Psychological Review, 64(2), 123.Google Scholar
Bryan, W. L., & Harter, N. (1899). The acquisition of a hierarchy of habits. Psychological Review, 6, 345–375.Google Scholar
Bryant, J., & Oliver, M. B. (2009). Media effects: Advances in theory and research. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Google Scholar
Burchell, K., Rettie, R., & Patel, K. (2013). Marketing social norms: Social marketing and the “social norm approach.” Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 9, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1395Google Scholar
Burger, J. M. (1999). The foot-in-the-door compliance procedure: A multiple-process analysis and review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 3(4), 303–325. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0304_2Google Scholar
Burger, J. M., & Caldwell, D. F. (2003). The effects of monetary incentives and labeling on the foot-in-the-door effect: Evidence for a self-perception process. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 25(3), 235–241. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324834BASP2503_06Google Scholar
Burnstein, E., & Vinokur, A. (1977). Persuasive argumentation and social comparison as determinants of attitude polarization. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(4), 319–332. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90002-6Google Scholar
Byrne, D. (1961). Response to attitude similarity-dissimilarity as a function of affiliation need. American Psychologist, 16(7), 358.Google Scholar
Byrne, R. M. J., & Johnson-Laird, P. N. (1989). Spatial reasoning. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(5), 564–575. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-596X(89)90013-2Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., & Crites, S. L. (1996). Social neuroscience: Principles of psychophysiological arousal and response. In Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 72–101). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W. L., & Berntson, G. G. (1997). Beyond bipolar conceptualizations and measures: The case of attitudes and evaluative space. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1(1), 3–25.Google Scholar
Cameron, C. D., Brown-Iannuzzi, J. L., & Payne, B. K. (2012). Sequential priming measures of implicit social cognition: A meta-analysis of associations with behavior and explicit attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 16(4), 330–350.Google Scholar
Camus, T., Hommel, B., Brunel, L., & Brouillet, T. (2018). From anticipation to integration: the role of integrated action-effects in building sensorimotor contingencies. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 25, 1059–1065. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1308-6Google Scholar
Cannon, L. K. (1964). Self-confidence and selective exposure to information. In Festinger, L. (Ed.), Conflict, decision and dissonance (pp. 83–95). Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N. (1981). Mutual influence in expressive behavior. Adult-adult and infant-adult dyadic interaction. Psychological Bulletin, 89(1), 101–132. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.89.1.101Google Scholar
Cappella, J. N., & Planalp, S. (1981). Talk and silence sequences in information conversations: Interspeaker influence. Human Communication Research, 7(2), 117–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2958.1981.tb00564.xGoogle Scholar
Carpenter, C. J., & Boster, F. J. (2013). The relationship between message recall and persuasion: More complex than it seems. Journal of Communication, 63(4), 661–681. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12042Google Scholar
Carrera, P., Muñoz, D., Caballero, A., Fernández, I., Aguilar, P., & Albarracín, D. (2014). Cómo el tiempo verbal afecta a la interpretación de las acciones: El pasado simple conduce a las personas a un nivel de representación abstracto. Psicologica, 35, 209–223.Google Scholar
Carrera, P., Muñoz, D., Caballero, A., Fernández, I., & Albarracín, D. (2012). The present projects past behavior into the future while the past projects attitudes into the future: How verb tense moderates predictors of drinking intentions. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(5), 1196–1200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2012.04.001Google Scholar
Carroll, M. V., Shensa, A., & Primack, B. A. (2013).A comparison of cigarette- and hookah-related videos on YouTube. Tobacco Control, 22, 319–323. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2011-050253Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., Ganellen, R. J., Froming, W. J., & Chambers, W. (1983). Modeling: An analysis in terms of category accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90019-7Google Scholar
Carver, C. S., & White, T. L. (1994). Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 319–333. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319Google Scholar
Casadio, M., Pressman, A., Acosta, S., Danzinger, Z., Fishbach, A., Mussa-Ivakli, F. A., … Chen, D. (2011). Body machine interface: Remapping motor skills after spinal cord injury. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR).Google Scholar
Cavallo, D. N., Tate, D. F., Ries, A. V., Brown, J. D., DeVellis, R. F., & Ammerman, A. S. (2012). A social media-based physical activity intervention: A randomized controlled trial. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 43(5), 527–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2012.07.019Google Scholar
Centola, D. (2010). The spread of behavior in an online social network experiment. Science, 329, 1194–1197. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185231Google Scholar
Centola, D. (2011). An experimental study of homophily in the adoption of health behavior. Science, 334, 1269–1272. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1207055Google Scholar
Chaiken, S. R. (1979). Communicator physical attractiveness and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8), 1387–1397. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.8.1387Google Scholar
Chaiken, S. R. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing and the use of source versus message cues in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 752–766. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.39.5.752Google Scholar
Chaiken, S. R., & Bargh, J. A. (1993). Occurrence versus moderation of the automatic evaluation effect: Reply. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(5), 759–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.5.759Google Scholar
Chaiken, S. R., & Eagly, A. H. (1976). Communication modality as a determinant of message persuasiveness and message comprehensibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 605–614. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.34.4.605Google Scholar
Chan, M. P. S., Jones, C., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Countering false beliefs: An analysis of the evidence and recommendations of best practices for the retraction and correction of scientific misinformation. In Jamieson, K. H., Kahan, D. M., & Scheufele, D. A. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of the science of science communication. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780190497620.013.37Google Scholar
Chan, M. P. S., Jones, C. R., Hall Jamieson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Debunking: A meta-analysis of the psychological efficacy of messages countering misinformation. Psychological Science, 28(11), 1531–1546. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617714579Google Scholar
Chan, M. P. S., Lohmann, S., Morales, A., Zhai, C., Ungar, L. H., Holtgrave, D. R., & Albarracín, D. (2018). An online risk index predicting HIV and other STIs across US counties and across years. AIDS and Behavior, 22, 2322–2333.Google Scholar
Chan, M. P. S., Morales, A., Farhadloo, M., Palmer, R. P., & Albarracín, D. (2019). Harvesting and harnessing social media data for psychological research. In Blanton, H. & Webster, G. D. (Eds.), Social psychological research methods: Social psychological measurement (pp. 228–264). New York, NY: Routledge/Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Chandler, J., & Schwarz, N. (2009). How extending your middle finger affects your perception of others: Learned movements influence concept accessibility. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45, 123–128. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.06.012Google Scholar
Chang, C. (2004). The interplay of product class knowledge and trial experience in attitude formation. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 83–92. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639156Google Scholar
Chartrand, T. L., & Bargh, J. A. (1999). The Chameleon effect: The perception–behavior link and social interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 893–910. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.893Google Scholar
Chatzisarantis, N. L. D., & Hagger, M. S. (2007). Mindfulness and the intention–behavior relationship within the theory of planned behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 663–676. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206297401Google Scholar
Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The heuristic–systematic model in its broader context. In Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Cheng, C. M., & Chartrand, T. L. (2003). Self-monitoring without awareness: using mimicry as a nonconscious affiliation strategy. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(6), 1170.Google Scholar
Cheung, S.-F., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2000). The role of perceived behavioral control in predicting human behavior: A meta-analytic review of studies on the theory of planned behavior. Unpublished manuscript, Chinese University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., & Goldstein, N. J. (2004). Social influence: Compliance and conformity. Annual Review of Psychology, 55, 591–621. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.55.090902.142015Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Herman, C. P., Levy, A., Kozlowski, L. T., & Petty, R. E. (1976). Elastic shifts of opinion: Determinants of direction and durability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34(4), 663–672. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.34.4.663Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Levy, A., Herman, C. P., & Evenbeck, S. (1973). Attitudinal politics: The strategy of moderation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 25, 100–108. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034265Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., & Trost, M. (1998). Social influence: Social norms, conformity, and compliance. In The handbook of social psychology (pp. 151–192). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R. B., Wosinska, W., Barrett, D. W., Butner, J., & Gornik Durose, M. (2001). The differential impact of two social influence principles on individualists and collectivists in Poland and the United States. In Wosinska, W., Cialdini, R. B. et al. (Eds.), The practice of social influence in multiple cultures: Applied social research (pp. 33–50). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Cioffi, D., & Garner, R. (1996). On doing the decision: Effects of active versus passive choice on commitment and self-perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22, 133–147.Google Scholar
Clark, J. K., & Evans, A. T. (2014). Source credibility and persuasion: The role of message position in self-validation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 40(8), 1024–1036. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167214534733Google Scholar
Clark, J. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2008). Attitudinal ambivalence and message-based persuasion: Motivated Processing of Proattitudinal Information and Avoidance of Counterattitudinal Information, Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 565–577. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167207312527Google Scholar
Clark, J. K., Wegener, D. T., Sawicki, V., Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2013). Evaluating the message or the messenger? Implications for self-validation in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(12), 1571–1584. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213499238Google Scholar
Clore, G. L., & Schnall, S. (2005). The influence of affect on attitude. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 437–489). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Cohen, J. B., & Andrade, E. B. (2018). The ADF framework: A parsimonious model for developing successful behavior change interventions. Journal of Marketing Behavior, 3(2), 81–119. https://doi.org/10.1561/107.00000046Google Scholar
Conner, M., & Higgins, A. R. (2010). Long-term effects of implementation intentions on prevention of smoking uptake among adolescents: A cluster randomized controlled trial. Health Psychology, 29(5), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020317Google Scholar
Converse, P. E., & Apter, D. (1964). Ideology and discontent. New York, NY: Free Press of Glencoe.Google Scholar
Cook, T. D., & Flay, B. R. (1978). The persistence of experimentally induced attitude change. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 1–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60004-0Google Scholar
Cooper, J., Zanna, M. P., & Taves, P. A. (1978). Arousal as a necessary condition for attitude change following induced compliance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36(10), 1101–1106. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.10.1101Google Scholar
Cooper, R. P., & Shallice, T. (2006). Hierarchical schemas and goals in the control of sequential behavior. Psychological Review, 113, 887–916. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.113.4.887Google Scholar
Crano, W. D., & Hannula-Bral, K. A. (1994). Context/categorization model of social influence: Minority and majority influence in the formation of a novel response norm. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 30, 247–276. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.1994.1012Google Scholar
Cuthbert, B. N., Schupp, H. T., Bradley, M. M., Birbaumer, N., & Lang, P. J. (2000). Brain potentials in affective picture processing: covariation with autonomic arousal and affective report. Biological Psychology, 52(2), 95–111.Google Scholar
Czyzewska, M., & Ginsburg, H. J. (2007). Explicit and implicit effects of anti-marijuana and anti-tobacco TV advertisements. Addictive Behaviors, 32(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2006.03.025Google Scholar
Dalton, A. N., Chartrand, T. L., & Finkel, E. J. (2010). The schema-driven chameleon: How mimicry affects executive and self-regulatory resources, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98(4), 605–617. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017629Google Scholar
Darkes, J., & Goldman, M. S. (1998). Expectancy challenge and drinking reduction: Process and structure in the alcohol expectancy network. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 6, 64–76. https://doi.org/10.1037/1064-1297.6.1.64Google Scholar
Dasgupta, N. (2013). Implicit attitudes and beliefs adapt to situations: A decade of research on the malleability of implicit prejudice, stereotypes, and the self-concept. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47, 233–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-407236-7.00005-XGoogle Scholar
Davies, M. (2008). The corpus of contemporary American English (COCA): 400+ million words, 1990–present. Harvard Dataverse.Google Scholar
Davis, J. P., Smith, D. C., & Briley, D. A. (2017). Substance use prevention and treatment outcomes for emerging adults in non-college settings: A meta-analysis. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 31, 242–254. https://doi.org/10.1037/adb0000267Google Scholar
Davis, L. E., Ajzen, I., Saunders, J., & Williams, T. (2002). The decision of African American students to complete high school: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 810–819. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-0663.94.4.810Google Scholar
de Bruin, W. B., & Keren, G. (2003). Order effects in sequentially judged options due to the direction of comparison. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 92(1–2), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(03)00080-3Google Scholar
De Graaf, A., Hoeken, H., Sanders, J., & Beentjes, H. (2009). The role of dimensions of narrative engagement in narrative persuasion. Communications, 34(4). https://doi.org/10.1515/COMM.2009.024Google Scholar
de la Corte, L., Kruglanski, A. W., de Miguel, J., Manuel Sabucedo, J., & Diaz, D. (2007). Seven psychosocial principles to explain terrorism. Psicothema, 19(3), 366–374.Google Scholar
De Leeuw, A., Valois, P., Ajzen, I., & Schmidt, P. (2015). Using the theory of planned behavior to identify key beliefs underlying pro-environmental behavior in high-school students: Implications for educational interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 42, 128–138. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.03.005Google Scholar
DeSteno, D., Petty, R. E., Wegener, D. T., & Rucker, D. D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(4), 707. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.3.397Google Scholar
Deutsch, M., & Gerard, H. B. (1955). A study of normative and informational social influences upon individual judgment. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51(3), 629.Google Scholar
Devine, P. G., & Ostrom, T. M. (1985). Cognitive mediation of inconsistency discounting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(1), 5.Google Scholar
DiGirolamo, A., Thompson, N., Martorell, R., Fein, S., & Grummer-Strawn, L. (2005). Intention or experience? Predictors of continued breastfeeding. Health Education and Behavior, 32(2), 208–226.Google Scholar
Dillard, J. P., Plotnick, C. A., Godbold, L. C., Freimuth, V. S., & Edgar, T. (1996). The multiple affective outcomes of AIDS PSAs: Fear appeals do more than scare people. Communication Research, 23(1), 44–72. https://doi.org/10.1177/009365096023001002Google Scholar
Dittrich, W. H., & Lea, S. E. (1993). Motion as a natural category for pigeons: Generalization and a feature-positive effect. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 59, 115–129. https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1993.59-115Google Scholar
Dolcos, S., & Albarracín, D. (2014). The inner speech of behavioral regulation: Intentions and task performance strengthen when you talk to yourself as a You. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(6), 636–642. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2048Google Scholar
Doll, J., Ajzen, I., & Madden, T. J. (1991). Optimal-scaling and judgment in different domains: A reanalysis. Zeitschrift für Sozialpsychologie, 22(2), 102–111.Google Scholar
Dovidio, J. F., Schellhaas, F. M. H., & Pearson, A. R. (2019). The role of attitudes in intergroup relations. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 419–454). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Doyen, S., Klein, O., Pichon, C. L., & Cleeremans, A. (2012). Behavioral priming: It’s all in the mind, but whose mind? PLoS ONE, 7(1). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0029081Google Scholar
Driscoll, D. M., Blascovich, J., & Fazio, R. H. (1992). On the functional value of attitudes: The influence of accessible attitudes on the ease and quality of decision making. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 388–401. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292184002Google Scholar
Dulany, D. E. (2006). Review of consciousness and behavior. Contemporary Psychology: A Journal of Reviews, 30, 243. https://doi.org/10.1037/023670Google Scholar
Dunning, D., Anderson, J. E., Schlösser, T., & Ehlebracht, D. (2014). Trust at zero acquaintance: More a matter of respect than expectation of reward. Journal of Social and Personality Psychology, 107(1), 122–141.Google Scholar
Durantini, M. R., & Albarracín, D. (2009). Material and social incentives to participation in behavioral interventions: A meta-analysis of gender disparities in enrollment and retention in experimental human immunodeficiency virus prevention interventions. Health Psychology, 28(5), 631–640. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015200Google Scholar
Durantini, M. R., & Albarracín, D. (2012). Men and women have specific needs that facilitate enrollment in HIV-prevention counseling. AIDS Care, 24(10). https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.661834Google Scholar
Durantini, M. R., Albarracín, D., Mitchell, A. L., Earl, A. N., & Gillette, J. C. (2006). Conceptualizing the influence of social agents of behavior change: A meta-analysis of the effectiveness of HIV-prevention interventionists for different groups. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2), 212.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H. (1974). Comprehensibility of persuasive arguments as a determinant of opinion change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(6), 758–773. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036202Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (1993). Psychology of attitudes. In Psychology of attitudes. San Diego, CA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. R. (2005). Attitude research in the 21st century: The current state of knowledge. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 743–767). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., & Chaiken, S. (2007). The advantages of an inclusive definition of attitude. Social Cognition, 25(5), 582–602. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.582Google Scholar
Eagly, A. H., Kulesa, P., Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. R. (2001). Do attitudes affect memory? Tests of the congeniality hypothesis. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(1), 5–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00102Google Scholar
Earl, A., Albarracín, D., Durantini, M. R., Gunnoe, J. B., Leeper, J., & Levitt, J. H. (2009). Participation in counseling programs: High-risk participants are reluctant to accept HIV-prevention counseling. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 77(4), 668.Google Scholar
Earl, A., Crause, C., Vaid, A., Albarracín, D., & Albarracín, D. (2016). Disparities in attention to HIV-prevention information. AIDS Care, 28(1), 79–86. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2015.1066747Google Scholar
Earl, A., Hart, W., Handley, I., & Albarracín, D. (2004). Effects of action goals on prevention and promotion. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Earl, A., Nisson, C. A., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Stigma cues increase self-conscious emotions and decrease likelihood of attention to information about preventing stigmatized health issues. Acta de Investigación Psicológica, 5(1), 1860–1871. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2007-4719(15)30006-5Google Scholar
Eckes, T., & Six, B. (1994). Fakten und Fiktionen in der Einstellungs-Verhaltens-Forschung: Eine Meta-Analyse. Zeitschrift Für Sozialpsychologie, 25, 253–271.Google Scholar
Economist. (2018). American attitudes towards gun control. Retrieved from www.economist.com/graphic-detail/2018/02/23/american-attitudes-towards-gun-controlGoogle Scholar
Eisenstadt, D., & Leippe, M. R. (2005). Dissonance and importance: Attitude change effects of personal relevance and race of the beneficiary of a counterattitudinal advocacy. Journal of Social Psychology, 145(4), 447–467. https://doi.org/10.3200/SOCP.145.4.447-468Google Scholar
Eiser, J. R. (1973). Judgement of attitude statements as a function of judges’ attitudes and the judgemental dimension. British Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 12(3), 231–240.Google Scholar
Eiser, J. R., & White, C. J. M. (1973). Affirmation and denial in evaluative descriptions. British Journal of Psychology, 64(3), 399–403.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1973). Universal facial expressions in emotion. Studia Psychologica, 15, 140–147.Google Scholar
Ekman, P. (1994). Strong evidence for universals in facial expressions: A reply to Russell’s mistaken critique. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 268–287. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.268Google Scholar
Elkin, L., Thomson, G., & Wilson, N. (2010). Connecting world youth with tobacco brands: YouTube and the internet policy vacuum on Web 2.0. Tobacco Control, 19, 361–366. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2010.035949Google Scholar
Elkin, R. A., & Leippe, M. R. (1986). Physiological arousal, dissonance, and attitude change: Evidence for a dissonance arousal link and a don’t remind effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 51(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.1.55Google Scholar
Elliot, A. J., & Church, M. A. (1997). A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(1), 218.Google Scholar
Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 229–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.27.1.229Google Scholar
Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2004). Contiguity and contingency in action-effect learning. Psychological Research, 68, 138–154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-003-0151-8Google Scholar
Epstude, K., Scholl, A., & Roese, N. J. (2016). Prefactual thoughts: Mental simulations about what might happen. Review of General Psychology, 20(1), 48–56. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000064Google Scholar
Erb, H. P., & Bohner, G. (2007). Social influence and persuasion: Recent theoretical developments and integrative attempts. In Fiedler, K. (Ed.), Social communication (pp. 191–221). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Erb, H. P., & Bohner, G. (2010). Consensus as the key: Towards parsimony in explaining majority and minority influence. In Martin, M. & Hewstone, R. (Eds.), Minority influence and innovation: Antecedents, processes, and consequences (pp. 79–103). Hove, England: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Esses, V. M., Hamilton, L. K., & Gaucher, D. (2019). The role of attitudes in migration. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 455–487). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Etter, J., Humair, J., Bergman, M., & Perneger, T. (2000). Development and validation of the Attitudes Towards Smoking Scale (ATS‐18). Addiction, 95(4), 613–625.Google Scholar
Everett, J. A. C., Caviola, L., Kahane, G., Savulescu, J., & Faber, N. S. (2015). Doing good by doing nothing? The role of social norms in explaining default effects in altruistic contexts. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2080Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J. (1967). The dynamics of anxiety and hysteria: An experimental application of modern learning theory to psychiatry. New York, NY: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: A natural science approach. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar
Fabrigar, L. R., MacDonald, T. K., & Wegener, D. T. (2005). The structure of attitudes. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 79–124). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Farhadloo, M., Winneg, K., Chan, M.-P. S., Jamieson, K. H., & Albarracín, D. (2018). Associations of topics of discussion on twitter with survey measures of attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors related to Zika: Probabilistic study in the United States. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 20(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/publichealth.8186Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H. (1989). On the power and functionality of attitudes: The role of attitude accessibility. In Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 153–179). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H. (1990). Multiple processes by which attitudes guide behavior: The mode model as an integrative framework. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 75–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60318-4Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H. (2007). Attitudes as object – evaluation associations of varying strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 603–637.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Chen, J.-M., McDonel, E. C., & Sherman, S. J. (1982). Attitude accessibility, attitude-behavior consistency, and the strength of the object-evaluation association. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 18(4), 339–357.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Jackson, J. R., Dunton, B. C., & Williams, C. J. (1995). Variability in automatic activation as an unobtrusive measure of racial attitudes: A bona fide pipeline? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69, 1013–1027. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.6.1013Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Ledbetter, J. E., & Towles-Schwen, T. (2000). On the costs of accessible attitudes: Detecting that the attitude object has changed. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78, 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.2.197Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (2000). Accessible attitudes as tools for object appraisal: Their costs and benefits. In Why we evaluate: Functions of attitudes (pp. 1–36). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Herr, P. M. (1983). Toward a process model of the attitude behavior relation: Accessing one’s attitude upon mere observation of the attitude object. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(4), 723–735. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.4.723Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Powell, M. C., & Williams, C. J. (1989). The role of attitude accessibility in the attitude-to-behavior process. Journal of Consumer Research, 16(3), 280–288.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Powell, M. C., & Kardes, F. R. (1986). On the automatic activation of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(2), 229.Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Sherman, S. J., & Herr, P. M. (1982). The feature-positive effect in the self-perception process: Does not doing matter as much as doing? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 404–411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.3.404Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., & Williams, C. J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 505–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.51.3.505Google Scholar
Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1978). Direct experience and attitude-behavior consistency: Information processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 4(1), 48–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/014616727800400109Google Scholar
Feather, N. T. (1963). Cognitive-dissonance, sensitivity, and evaluation. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 66(2), 157. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0049383Google Scholar
Feldman, G., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Norm theory and the action-effect: The role of social norms in regret following action and inaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 111–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.009Google Scholar
Feldman, J. M., & Lynch, J. G. (1988). Self-generated validity and other effects of measurement on belief, attitude, intention, and behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 73(3), 421.Google Scholar
Fennis, B. M., & Stel, M. (2011). The pantomime of persuasion: Fit between nonverbal communication and influence strategies. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(4), 806–810. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2011.02.015Google Scholar
Ferguson, M. J., & Bargh, J. A. (2004). Liking is for doing: The effects of goal pursuit on automatic evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(5), 557–572. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.5.557Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1950). Informal social communication. Psychological Review, 57(5), 271.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1954). A theory of social comparison processes. Human Relations, 7, 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872675400700202Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, L. (1964). Conflict, decision, and dissonance. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Festinger, L., & Carlsmith, J. M. (1959). Cognitive consequences of forced compliance. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 58(2), 203–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0041593Google Scholar
Fishbach, A., Steinmetz, J., & Tu, Y. (2016). Motivation in a social context: Coordinating personal and shared goal pursuits with others. In Elliot, A. (Ed.), Advances in motivation science (Vol. 3, pp. 35–79). San Diego, CA: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2015.12.005Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. (1963). An investigation of the relationships between beliefs about an object and the attitude toward that object. Human Relations, 16(3), 233–239. https://doi.org/10.1177/001872676301600302Google Scholar
Fishbein, M. (2008). A reasoned action approach to health promotion. Medical Decision Making: An International Journal of the Society for Medical Decision Making, 28(6), 834–844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0272989X08326092Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1974). Attitudes towards objects as predictors of single and multiple behavioral criteria. Psychological Review, 81(1), 59–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035872Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1981). Acceptance, yielding and impact: Cognitive processes in persuasion. In Petty, R. E., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 339–359). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Predicting and changing behaviour: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203937082Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (2011a). Attitudes, norms, and control as predictors of intentions and behavior. In Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach (pp. 179–219). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., & Azjen, I. (2011b). Predicting and changing behavior: The reasoned action approach. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.2011.563209Google Scholar
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., & Hanson, M. J. S. (1999). Fishbein–Ajzen–Hanson Questionnaire. Retrieved from https://cancercontrol.cancer.gov/brp/tcrb/nciguide_measure/Fishbein-Ajzen-Hanson_Questionnaire.pdfGoogle Scholar
Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I., & McArdle, J. (1980). Changing the behavior of alcoholics: Effects of persuasive communication. In Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior (pp. 217–242). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
Fisher, J. D., Fisher, W. A., Bryan, A. D., & Misovich, S. J. (2002). Information-motivation-behavioral skills model-based HIV risk behavior change intervention for inner-city high school youth. Health Psychology, 21(2), 177–186. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.21.2.177Google Scholar
Fisher, W. A., Fisher, J. D., & Rye, B. J. (1995). Understanding and promoting AIDS-preventive behavior: Insights from the theory of reasoned action. Health Psychology, 14, 255–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-6133.14.3.255Google Scholar
Fiske, S. T., & Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social cognition (2nd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Fitzsimons, G. J., & Williams, P. (2000). Asking questions can change choice behavior: Does it do so automatically or effortfully? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 6(3), 195.Google Scholar
Floyd, D. L., Prentice-Dunn, S., & Rogers, R. W. (2000). A meta-analysis of research on protection motivation theory. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 407–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02323.xGoogle Scholar
Fong, C. P. S., & Wyer, R. S. (2003). Cultural, social, and emotional determinants of decisions under uncertainty. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 90(2), 304–322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00528-9407Google Scholar
Forgas, J. P. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin, 117(1), 39.Google Scholar
Forgas, J. P., & Bower, G. H. (1987). Mood effects on person-perception judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53(1), 53–60. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.1.53Google Scholar
Förster, J., & Strack, F. (1996). Influence of overt head movements on memory for valenced words: A case of conceptual-motor compatibility. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(3), 421.Google Scholar
Forsyth, S. R., & Malone, R. E. (2010). “I’ll be your cigarette – light me up and get on with it”: Examining smoking imagery on YouTube. Nicotine and Tobacco Research, 12, 810–816. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntq101Google Scholar
Fransen, M. L., Fennis, B. M., Pruyn, A. T. H., & Vohs, K. D. (2011). When fit fosters favoring: The role of private self-focus. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(1), 202–207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.09.004Google Scholar
Fraser, R. T., Johnson, K., Hebert, J., Ajzen, I., Copeland, J., Brown, P., & Chan, F. (2010). Understanding employers’ hiring intentions in relation to qualified workers with disabilities: Preliminary findings. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation, 20(4), 420–426. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-009-9220-1Google Scholar
Freedman, J. L. (1965). Confidence, utility, and selective exposure: A partial replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 2(5), 778.Google Scholar
Freedman, J. L., & Fraser, S. C. (1966). Compliance without pressure: The foot-in-the-door technique. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0023552Google Scholar
Freedman, J. L., & Sears, D. O. (1966). Selective exposure. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 2, 57–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60103-3Google Scholar
Freeman, B. F. (2012). New media and tobacco control. Tobacco Control, 21, 139–144.Google Scholar
Freeman, B., & Chapman, S. (2007). Is “YouTube” telling or selling you something? Tobacco content on the YouTube video-sharing website. Tobacco Control, 16, 207–210. https://doi.org/10.1136/tc.2007.020024Google Scholar
Freire, P., & da Veiga Coutinho, J. (1972). Cultural action for freedom (Vol. 48). London, England: Penguin Harmondsworth.Google Scholar
Freitas, A. L., & Higgins, E. T. (2002). Enjoying goal-directed action: The role of regulatory fit. Psychological Science, 13(1), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00401Google Scholar
Freud, S. (1912). La dynamique du transfert. La Technique Psychanalytique, 16, 50–60.Google Scholar
Freund, P. A., Kuhn, J. T., & Holling, H. (2011). Measuring current achievement motivation with the QCM: Short form development and investigation of measurement invariance. Personality and Individual Differences, 51, 629–634. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2011.05.033Google Scholar
Galante, J., Galante, I., Bekkers, M.-J., & Gallacher, J. (2014). Effect of kindness-based meditation on health and well-being: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 82(6), 1101–1114. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037249Google Scholar
Gangestad, S. W., & Snyder, M. (2000). Self-monitoring: Appraisal and reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 530–555. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.4.530Google Scholar
Garcia-Retamero, R., & Galesic, M. (2009). Communicating treatment risk reduction to people with low numeracy skills: A cross-cultural comparison. American Journal of Public Health, 99(12), 2196–2202. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2009.160234Google Scholar
Garling, T., Bamberg, S., & Friman, M. (2019). The role of attitude in choice of travel, satisfaction with travel, and change to sustainable travel. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Ed.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 562–586). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Gartner, L. M., Morton, J., Lawrence, R. A., Naylor, A. J., O’Hare, D., Schanler, R. J., & Eidelman, A. I. (2005). Breastfeeding and the use of human milk. Pediatrics, 115(2), 496–506.Google Scholar
Gasper, K., & Clore, G. L. (2000). Do you have to pay attention to your feelings to be influenced by them? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26(6), 698–711. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167200268005Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2006). Associative and propositional processes in evaluation: Conceptual, empirical, and metatheoretical issues: Reply to Albarracín, Hart, and McCulloch (2006), Kruglanski and Dechesne (2006), and Petty and Brinol (2006). Psychological Bulletin, 132, 745–750. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.745Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2007). Unraveling the processes underlying evaluation: Attitudes from the perspective of the APE model. Social Cognition, 25(5), 687–717.Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Brannon, S. M. (2019). Attitudes and the implicit-explicit dualism. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 158–196). Hoboken, NJ: John WileyGoogle Scholar
Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (2004). On the propositional nature of cognitive consistency: Dissonance changes explicit, but not implicit attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(4), 535–542. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2003.10.005Google Scholar
Gawronski, B., Strack, F., & Bodenhausen, G. V. (2012). Attitudes and cognitive consistency: The role of associative and propositional processes. In Attitudes: Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 85–117). New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203809884Google Scholar
Gebauer, J. E., Maio, G. R., & Pakizeh, A. (2013). Feeling torn when everything seems right: Semantic incongruence causes felt ambivalence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(6), 777–791. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213481679Google Scholar
Geers, A. L., Brinol, P., & Petty, R. E. (2019). An analysis of the basic processes of formation and change of placebo expectations. Review of General Psychology, 23(2), 211–229. https://doi.org/10.1037/gpr0000171Google Scholar
Geers, A. L., Helfer, S. G., Kosbab, K., Weiland, P. E., & Landry, S. J. (2005). Reconsidering the role of personality in placebo effects: dispositional optimism, situational expectations, and the placebo response. Journal of Psychosomatic Research, 58(2), 121–127.Google Scholar
Geers, A. L., & Lassiter, G. D. (1999). Affective expectations and information gain: Evidence for assimilation and contrast effects in affective experience. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(4), 394–413.Google Scholar
Gendolla, G. H. E., & Silvestrini, N. (2010). The implicit “go”: Masked action cues directly mobilize mental effort. Psychological Science, 21, 1389–1393. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610384149Google Scholar
Gentner, D., & Gentner, D. R. (1983). Flowing waters and teeming crowds: Mental models of electricity. In Mental models (pp. 99–129). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1980). The mainstreaming of America: Violence profile no 11. Journal of Communication, 30(3), 10–29. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1980.tb01987.xGoogle Scholar
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Morgan, M., & Signorielli, N. (1982). Charting the mainstream: Television’s contributions to political orientations. Journal of Communication, 32(2), 100–127. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1982.tb00500.xGoogle Scholar
Gerbner, G., Gross, L., Signorielli, N., & Morgan, M. (1980). Television violence, victimization, and power. American Behavioral Scientist, 23(5), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1177/000276428002300506Google Scholar
Gerlach, J. T., Diepolder, H. M., Zachoval, R., Gruener, N. H., Jung, M. C., Ulsenheimer, A., … Pape, G. R. (2003). Acute hepatitis C: High rate of both spontaneous and treatment-induced viral clearance. Gastroenterology, 125(1), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0016-5085(03)00668-1Google Scholar
Gilbert, D. T., & Hixon, J. G. (1991). The trouble of thinking: Activation and application of stereotypic beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4), 509–517. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.4.509Google Scholar
Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Kahneman, D. (1998). Varieties of regret: A debate and partial resolution. Psychological Review, 105, 602–605. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.105.3.602Google Scholar
Gist, M., Rosen, B., & Schwoerer, C. (1988). The influence of training method and trainee age on the acquisition of computer skills. Personnel Psychology, 41, 255–265. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1744-6570.1988.tb02384.xGoogle Scholar
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2003a). Models of health-related behavior. AIDS and Behavior, 7(2), 183–193.Google Scholar
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2003b). Unpublished data.Google Scholar
Glasman, L. R., & Albarracín, D. (2006). Forming attitudes that predict future behavior: a meta-analysis of the attitude–behavior relation. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 778–822. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.132.5.778Google Scholar
Glasman, L. R., & Scott-Sheldon, L. A. J. (2019). The role of attitudes in HIV prevention, testing, and treatment. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 121–151). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Godin, G., Bélanger-Gravel, A., Vézina-Im, L.-A., Amireault, S., & Bilodeau, A. (2012). Question-behaviour effect: A randomised controlled trial of asking intention in the interrogative or declarative form. Psychology and Health, 27(9), 1086–1099. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2012.671617Google Scholar
Godin, G., & Kok, G. (1996). The theory of planned behavior: A review of its applications to health-related behaviors. American Journal of Health Promotion, 11(2), 87–98.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P M. (1996). How goals and plans affect social behavior. International Journal of Psychology, 31(3–4), 2642.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M. (1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54(7), 493–503. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M. (2004). The psychology of goals. International Journal of Psychology, 39(5–6), 502.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M., & Bayer, U. (1999). Deliberative versus implemental mindsets in the control of action. In Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 403–422). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Gollwitzer, P. M., Heckhausen, H., & Steller, B. (1990). Deliberative and implemental mindsets: Cognitive tuning toward congruous thoughts and information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1119–1127. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.59.6.1119Google Scholar
Gowans, C. W. (2004). Philosophy of the Buddha. International Philosophical Quarterly, 44, 1–240. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203480793Google Scholar
Graham, A., Cobb, N., Papandonatos, G., Moreno, J. L., Kang, H., Tinkelman, D. G., … Abrams, D. B. (2011). A randomized trial of internet and telephone treatment for smoking cessation. Archives of Internal Medicine, 171, 46–53.Google Scholar
Graton, A., Ric, F., & Gonzalez, E. (2016). Reparation or reactance? The influence of guilt on reaction to persuasive communication. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 40–49. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2015.09.016Google Scholar
Gray, J. A. (1991). The neuropsychology of temperament. In Explorations in temperament (pp. 105–128). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Gray, J. A., & McNaughton, N. (2000). Fundamentals of the septo-hippocampal system. In The neuropsychology of anxiety: An enquiry into the functions of septo-hippocampal system (2nd ed., pp. 204–232). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Green, M. C. (2006). Narratives and cancer communication. Journal of Communication, 56(Suppl. 1), S163–S183. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00288.xGoogle Scholar
Greenwald, A. G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, pp. 147–170.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Albert, R. D. (1968). Acceptance and recall of improvised arguments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 8(1, Pt. 1), 31–34. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0021237Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Banaji, M. R. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review, 102(1), 4–27.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Rudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellott, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Draine, S. C., & Abrams, R. L. (1996). Three cognitive markers of unconscious semantic activation. Science, 273(5282), 1699–1702.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the implicit association test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(6), 1022.Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The implicit association test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464–1480. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.6.1464Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Poehlman, T. A., Uhlmann, E. L., & Banaji, M. R. (2009). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(1), 17–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015575Google Scholar
Greenwald, A. G., Pratkanis, A. R., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1986). Under what conditions does theory obstruct research progress? Psychological Review, 93(2), 216.Google Scholar
Grier, S., & Bryant, C. A. (2004). Social marketing in public health. Annual Review of Public Health, 26(1), 319–339. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.publhealth.26.021304.144610Google Scholar
Griffith, D. A., & Chen, Q. (2004). The influence of virtual direct experience (VDE) on online ad effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 55–68. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.2004.10639153Google Scholar
Guimond, S. (1999). Attitude change during college: Normative or informational social influence? Social Psychology of Education, 2, 237–261.Google Scholar
Gunther, A. C., Bolt, D., Borzekowski, D. L. G., Liebhart, J. L., & Dillard, J. P. (2006). Presumed influence on peer norms: How mass media indirectly affect adolescent smoking. Journal of Communication, 56(1), 52–68. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00002.xGoogle Scholar
Haggard, P., & Clark, S. (2003). Intentional action: Conscious experience and neural prediction. Consciousness and Cognition, 12(4), 695–707. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00052-7Google Scholar
Hagger, M. S. (2019). The role of attitudes in physical activity. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 92–120). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Hagger, M. S., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. D. (2014). An integrated behavior change model for physical activity. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 42, 62–69. https://doi.org/10.1249/JES.0000000000000008Google Scholar
Hagger, M. S., Luszczynska, A., de Wit, J., Benyamini, Y., Burkert, S., Chamberland, P.-E., … Gollwitzer, P. M. (2016). Implementation intention and planning interventions in Health Psychology: Recommendations from the Synergy Expert Group for research and practice. Psychology and Health, 31(7), 814–839. https://doi.org/10.1080/08870446.2016.1146719Google Scholar
Handley, I. M., Albarracín, D., & Brown, R. (2007). Inferential and perceptual influences of affective expectations on judgments of experienced affect. ACR North American Advances.Google Scholar
Handley, I. M., Albarracín, D., Brown, R. D., Li, H., Kumkale, E. C., & Kumkale, G. T. (2009). When the expectations from a message will not be realized: Naive theories can eliminate expectation-congruent judgments via correction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 933–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.010Google Scholar
Hansen, K. T., & Singh, V. (2015). Choice concentration. Working paper.Google Scholar
Hanson, M. J. S., & Laffrey, S. C. (1999). Cross-cultural study of beliefs about smoking among teenaged females. Western Journal of Nursing Research, 21(5), 635–651.Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., & Harmon-Jones, C. (2002). Testing the action-based model of cognitive dissonance: The effect of action orientation on postdecisional attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(6), 711–723. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202289001Google Scholar
Harmon-Jones, E., Harmon-Jones, C., & Levy, N. (2015). An action-based model of cognitive-dissonance processes. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24, 184–189. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414566449Google Scholar
Harpaz-Rotem, I., Leslie, D. L., Martin, A., & Rosenheck, R. A. (2005). Changes in child and adolescent inpatient psychiatric admission diagnoses between 1995 and 2000. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 40(8), 642–647.Google Scholar
Harris, C. R., Coburn, N., Rohrer, D., & Pashler, H. (2013). Two failures to replicate high-performance-goal priming effects. PLoS ONE, 8(8), 0072467. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0072467Google Scholar
Hart, W., & Albarracín, D. (2009). The effects of chronic achievement motivation and achievement primes on the activation of achievement and fun goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97, 1129–1141.Google Scholar
Hart, W., & Albarracín, D. (2009). What I was doing versus what I did: Verb aspect influences memory and future actions. Psychological Science, 20(2), 238–244. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02277.xGoogle Scholar
Hart, W., Albarracín, D., Eagly, A. H. A. H., Brechan, I., Lindberg, M. J., & Merrill, L. (2009). Feeling validated versus being correct: A meta-analysis of selective exposure to information. Psychological Bulletin, 135(4), 555–588. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015701Google Scholar
Hart, W., & Gable, P. A. (2013). Motivating goal pursuit: The role of affect motivational intensity and activated goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49, 922–926.Google Scholar
Hasking, P., Lyvers, M., & Carlopio, C. (2011). The relationship between coping strategies, alcohol expectancies, drinking motives and drinking behaviour. Addictive Behaviors, 36, 479–487. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.01.014Google Scholar
Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E., & Parry, S. (2016). Addressing the cross‐country applicability of the theory of planned behaviour (TPB): A structured review of multi‐country TPB studies. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 15(1), 72–86. https://doi.org/10.1002/cb.1536Google Scholar
Hatfield, E., Cacioppo, J. T., & Rapson, R. L. (1994). Emotional contagion. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hatzivassiloglou, V., Klavans, J., Holcombe, M., Barzilay, R., Kan, M.-Y., & McKeown, K. (2001). SIMFINDER: A flexible clustering tool for summarization. Paper presented at the Workshop on Summarization in NAACL-01.Google Scholar
Hatzivassiloglou, V., & McKeown, K. R. (1997). Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the ACL and the 8th Conference of the European Chapter of the ACL (pp. 174–181). Madrid, Spain: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
Hatzivassiloglou, V., & Wiebe, J. (2000). Effects of adjective orientation and gradability on sentence subjectivity. Paper presented at the Conference on Computational Linguistics (COLING-2000).Google Scholar
Hausenblas, H. A., Carron, A. V., & Mack, D. E. (1997). Application of the theories of reasoned action and planned behavior to exercise behavior: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 19(1), 36–51.Google Scholar
Hayes, S. C., et al. (Eds.) (2004). Mindfulness and acceptance: Expanding the cognitive-behavioral tradition. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Heider, F. (1946). Attitudes and cognitive organization. The Journal of Psychology, 21, 107–112.Google Scholar
Heim, E., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P., & Seddig, D. (2018). Women’s decisions to stay in or leave an abusive relationship: Results from a longitudinal study in Bolivia. Violence Against Women, 24(14), 1639–1657. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077801217741993Google Scholar
Hepler, J., & Albarracín, D. (2009). Change blindness. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Hepler, J., & Albarracín, D. (2013). Attitudes without objects: Evidence for a dispositional attitude, its measurement, and its consequences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(6), 1060–1076. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032282Google Scholar
Hepler, J., & Albarracín, D. (2014). Liking more means doing more: Dispositional attitudes predict patterns of general action. Social Psychology, 45(5), 391–398. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-9335/a000198Google Scholar
Hepler, J., Albarracín, D., McCulloch, K. C., & Noguchi, K. (2012). Being active and impulsive: The role of goals for action and inaction in self-control. Motivation and Emotion, 36(4), 416–424. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9263-4Google Scholar
Hepler, J., Wang, W., & Albarracín, D. (2012). Motivating exercise: The interactive effect of general action goals and past behavior on physical activity. Motivation and Emotion, 36(3), 365–370. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-011-9267-0Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1996). Knowledge activation: Accessibility, applicability and salience. In Higgins, E. T. & Kruglanski, A. W. (Eds.), Handbook of basic principles (pp. 133–168). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.Google Scholar
Higgins, E. T. (2012). Regulatory focus theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 483–504). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n24Google Scholar
Hoch, S. J., & Deighton, J. (1989). Managing what consumers learn from experience. Journal of Marketing, 53(2), 1–20.Google Scholar
Hoegg, J., & Alba, J. W. (2006). Taste perception: More than meets the tongue. Journal of Consumer Research, 33(4), 490–498.Google Scholar
Hofmann, T. (1999). Probabilistic latent semantic analysis. In Proceedings of Uncertainty in Artificial Intelligence, UAI’99 (pp. 289–296).Google Scholar
Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Gschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31(10), 1369–1385.Google Scholar
Holtgrave, D. (2007). Applied aspects of health promotion interventions based on theory of reasoned action and theory of planned behavior. In Prediction and change of health behavior: Applying the reasoned action approach (pp. 273–280). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Homer, P. M., & Batra, R. (1994). Attitudinal effects of character-based versus competence-based negative political communications. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 3(2), 163–185.Google Scholar
Hommel, , B. (1997). Toward an action-concept model of stimulus response compatibility. In Hommel, B. & Prinz, W. (Eds.), Theoretical issues in stimulus-response compatibility (pp. 281–320). Amsterdam: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Hong, T., & Cody, M. J. (2002). Presence of pro-tobacco messages on the web. Journal of Health Communication, 7, 273–307. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730290088148Google Scholar
Hong, T., Rice, J., & Johnson, C. (2012). Ethnic group and temporal influences of social norms: Smoking behavior among a panel of adolescents. Journal of Communication, 62(1), 158–174. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2011.01623.xGoogle Scholar
Hornik, R., Ajzen, I., & Albarracín, D. (2007). An extension of the theory of reasoned action and its successors to multiple behavior interventions. In Prediction and change of health behavior: Applying the reasoned action approach (pp. 53–67). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I. (1959). Reconciling conflicting results derived from experimental and survey studies of attitude change. American Psychologist, 14(1), 8.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion.Google Scholar
Howe, L. C., & Krosnick, J. A. (2015). Attitude strength. Annual Review of Psychology, 67, 327–351. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033600Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I., Lumsdaine, A. A., & Sheffield, F. D. (1949). Experiments on mass communications. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15(4), 635–650.Google Scholar
Howell, J. L., & Shepperd, J. A. (2012). Reducing information avoidance through affirmation. Psychological Science, 23, 141–145. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611424164Google Scholar
Hsee, C. K., Yang, A. X., & Wang, L. (2010). Idleness aversion and the need for justifiable busyness. Psychological Science, 21(7), 926–930. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610374738Google Scholar
Huang, M., Hollis, J., Polen, M., Lapidus, J., & Austin, D. (2005). Stages of smoking acquisition versus susceptibility as predictors of smoking initiation in adolescents in primary care. Addictive Behaviors, 30, 1183–1194. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2004.12.009Google Scholar
Hui, Y., See, M., & Petty, R. E. (2008). Affective and cognitive meta-bases of attitudes: Unique effects on information interest and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(6), 938–955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.94.6.938Google Scholar
Humphreys, G. W., & Forde, E. M. E. (2001). Hierarchies, similarity, and interactivity in object recognition: “Category-specific” neuropsychological deficits. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24(3), 453–476.Google Scholar
Hurlbert, , J. S. (1989). The Southern region: A test of the hypothesis of cultural distinctiveness. Sociological Quarterly, 30(2), 245–266. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1533-8525.1989.tb01521.xGoogle Scholar
Igartua, J., & Barrios, I. (2012). Changing real-world beliefs with controversial movies: Processes and mechanisms of narrative persuasion. Journal of Communication, 62(3), 514–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01640.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ireland, M. E., Chen, Q., Schwartz, H. A. A., Ungar, L. H. L. H., & Albarracín, D. (2016). Action tweets linked to reduced county-level HIV prevalence in the United States: Online messages and structural determinants. AIDS and Behavior, 20(6), 1256–1264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-015-1252-2Google Scholar
Ireland, M. E., Hepler, J., Li, H., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Neuroticism and attitudes toward action in 19 countries. Journal of Personality, 83, 243–250. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12099Google Scholar
Ireland, M. E., Schwartz, H. A., Chen, Q., Ungar, L. H., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Future-oriented tweets predict lower county-level HIV prevalence in the United States. Health Psychology, 34(Suppl), 1252–1260. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000279Google Scholar
Isenberg, D. J. (1986). Group polarization: A critical review and meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50(6), 1141.Google Scholar
Izard, C. E. (2005). Innate and universal facial expressions: Evidence from developmental and cross-cultural research. Psychological Bulletin, 115, 288–299. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.2.288Google Scholar
Jaccard, J. J., & King, G. W. (1977). The relation between behavioral intentions and beliefs: A probabilistic model. Human Communication Research, 3, 326–334.Google Scholar
Jacobson, R. P., Mortensen, C. R., & Cialdini, R. B. (2011). Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(3), 433–448. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021470Google Scholar
Janis, I. L., & King, B. T. (1977). The influence of role playing on opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 49(2), 211–218. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0056957Google Scholar
Janis, I. L., & Milholland, H. C., Jr. (1954). The influence of threat appeals on selective learning of the content of a persuasive communication. Journal of Psychology, 37(1), 75–80. https://doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1954.9916132CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, J. R., & Van Der Molen, M. W. (2005). Preparation for speeded action as a psychophysiological concept. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 434–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.434Google Scholar
Jeong, S. S., & Hwang, Y. (2012). Does multitasking increase or decrease persuasion? Effects of multitasking on comprehension and counterarguing. Journal of Communication, 62(4), 571–587. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2012.01659.xGoogle Scholar
Jiang, D., & Albarracín, D. (2019). Acting by a deadline: The interplay between deadline distance and movement induced goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85.Google Scholar
Jiang, D., Albarracín, D., & Jiang, D. (2014). The embodied psychology of time limits: How unrelated motion states shape intentions to act by a deadline. ACR North American Advances, 42, 531–532. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.429963Google Scholar
Johnson, B. T., Lin, H.-Y., Symons, C. S., Campbell, L. A., & Ekstein, G. (1995). Initial beliefs and attitudinal latitudes as factors in persuasion. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(5), 502–511.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. T., Maio, G. R., & Smith-McLallen, A. (2005). Communication and attitude change: Causes, processes, and effects. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 617–670). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. T., Smith-McLallen, A., Killeya, L. A., & Levin, K. D. (2004). Truth or consequences: Overcoming resistance to persuasion with positive thinking. In Resistance and persuasion (pp. 215–233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Johnson, B. T., Wolf, L. J., Maio, G. R., & Smith-McLallen, A. (2019). Communication induced persuasion or resistance: Processes and effects of who says what to whom. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 557–601). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Johnson, E. J., & Goldstein, D. (2003). Do defaults save lives? American Association for the Advancement of Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1091721Google Scholar
Jonas, K., Diehl, M., & Brömer, P. (1997). Effects of attitudinal ambivalence on information processing and attitude-intention consistency. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33(2), 190–210.Google Scholar
Jones, R. A., Linder, D. E., Kiesler, C. A., Zanna, M., & Brehm, J. W. (1968). Internal states or external stimuli: Observers’ attitude judgments and the dissonance-theory-self-persuasion controversy. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 4, 247–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(68)90054-1Google Scholar
Jones, S. S. (2007). Imitation in infancy: The development of mimicry. Psychological Science, 18, 593–599. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01945.xGoogle Scholar
Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137–154.Google Scholar
Judd, C. M., & Kulik, J. A. (1980). Schematic effects of social attitudes on information processing and recall. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(4), 569.Google Scholar
Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990). Full catastrophe living: Using the wisdom of your body and mind to face stress, pain, and illness. New York, NY: Delta.Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, pp. 348–366. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136Google Scholar
Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246(1), 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160Google Scholar
Kalro, A. D., Sivakumaran, B., & Marathe, R. R. (2013). Direct or indirect comparative ads: The moderating role of information processing modes. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 147, 133–147. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbGoogle Scholar
Kamb, M. L., Fishbein, M., Douglas, J. M., Jr., Rhodes, F., Rogers, J., Bolan, G., … Peterman, T. A. (1998). Efficacy of risk-reduction counseling to prevent human immunodeficiency virus and sexually transmitted diseases: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 280, 1161–1167.Google Scholar
Kaufman, G. F., & Libby, L. K. (2012). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(1), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0027525Google Scholar
Keillor, J. M., Barrett, A. M., Crucian, G. P., Kortenkamp, S., & Heilman, K. M. (2002). Emotional experience and perception in the absence of facial feedback. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 8, 130–135. https://doi.org/10.1017/s1355617701020136Google Scholar
Kelley, H. H. (1973). The process of causal attribution. American Psychologist, 28, 107–128.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. A., St Lawrence, J. S., Diaz, Y. E., Stevenson, L. Y., Hauth, A. C., Brasfield, T. L., … Andrew, M. E. (1991). HIV risk behavior reduction following intervention with key opinion leaders of population: an experimental analysis. American Journal of Public Health, 81(2), 168–171.Google Scholar
Kelly, J. A., St Lawrence, J. S., Stevenson, L. Y., Hauth, A. C., Kalichman, S. C., Diaz, Y. E., … Morgan, M. G. (1992). Community AIDS/HIV risk reduction: The effects of endorsements by popular people in three cities. American Journal of Public Health, 82(11), 1483–1489.Google Scholar
Kelman, H. C., & Hovland, C. I. (1953). “Reinstatement” of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 48(3), 327.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kendon, A. (1970). Movement coordination in social interaction: Some examples described. Acta Psychologica, 32, 101–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(70)90094-6Google Scholar
Kerr, M., Stattin, H., Biesecker, G., & Ferrer-Wreder, L. (2002). Handbook of psychology: Developmental psychology. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Kessler, R. C., Demyttenaere, K., Bruffaerts, R., Posada-Villa, J., Gasquet, I., Kovess, V., … Chatterji, , S. (2004). WHO World Mental Health Survey Consortium 2004. Prevalence, severity and unmet need for treatment of mental disorders in the World Health Organization World Mental Health Surveys. JAMA, 291, 2581–2590.Google Scholar
Kiesler, C. A. (1971). The psychology of commitment. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Killeya, L. A., & Johnson, B. T. (1998). Experimental induction of biased systematic processing: The directed-thought technique. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(1), 17–33.Google Scholar
Kim, K., Paek, H. J., & Lynn, J. (2010). A content analysis of smoking fetish videos on YouTube: Regulatory implications for tobacco control. Health Communication, 25, 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1080/10410230903544415Google Scholar
Kim, M. S., & Hunter, J. E. (1993). Relationships among attitudes, behavioral intentions, and behavior: A meta-analysis of past research, part 2. Communication Research, 20(3), 331–364.Google Scholar
Kleinke, C. L., Peterson, T. R., & Rutledge, T. R. (1998). Effects of self-generated facial expressions on mood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 272–279. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.272Google Scholar
Kline, R. B., Canter, W. A., & Robin, A. (1987). Parameters of teenage alcohol use: A path analytic conceptual model. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 55, 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.55.4.521Google Scholar
Koning, I. M., van den Eijnden, R. J. J. M., Verdurmen, J. E. E., Engels, R. C. M. E., & Vollebergh, W. A. M. (2013). A cluster randomized trial on the effects of a parent and student intervention on alcohol use in adolescents four years after baseline; no evidence of catching-up behavior. Addictive Behaviors, 38(4), 2032–2039. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2012.12.013Google Scholar
Kopalle, P. K., & Lehmann, D. R. (1995). The effects of advertised and observed quality on expectations about new product quality. Journal of Marketing Research, 32(3), 280–290.Google Scholar
Kopalle, P. K., & Lehmann, D. R. (2001). Strategic management of expectations: The role of disconfirmation sensitivity and perfectionism. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(3), 386–394.Google Scholar
Koriat, A. (2000). The feeling of knowing: Some metatheoretical implications for consciousness and control. Consciousness and Cognition, 9(2), 149–171.Google Scholar
Kosinski, M., Stillwell, D., & Graepel, T. (2013). Private traits and attributes are predictable from digital records of human behavior. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(15), 5802–5805. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1218772110Google Scholar
Kraus, S. J. (1995). Attitudes and the prediction of behavior: A meta-analysis of the empirical literature. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(1), 58–75.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., & Abelson, R. P. (1992). The case for measuring attitude strength in surveys. In Questions about questions: Inquiries into the cognitive bases of surveys (pp. 177–203). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., Betz, A. L., Jussim, L. J., & Lynn, A. R. (2007). Subliminal conditioning of attitudes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18, 152–162. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292182006Google Scholar
Krosnick, J. A., Charles, M. J., & Wittenbrink, B. (2005). The measurement of attitudes. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 21–76). New York, NY: Psychology Press. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410612823.ch2Google Scholar
Krueger, J., & Clement, R. W. (1997). Estimates of social consensus by majorities and minorities: The case for social projection. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 1, 299–313. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0104_2Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. (1996). Goals as knowledge structures. In The psychology of action: Linking cognition and motivation to behavior (pp. 599–618). New York, NY: Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i28.5086Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., Fishbach, A., Erb, H.-P., Pierro, A., & Mannetti, L. (2004). The parametric unimodel as a theory of persuasion. In Haddock, G. & Maio, G. (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (pp. 399–422). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., & Higgins, E. T. (2007). The goal construct in social psychology. In Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 334–352). New York, NY: Guildford Press.Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999a). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 83–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PL100201Google Scholar
Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999b). The illusory second mode or, the cue is the message. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 182–193. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PL100217Google Scholar
Kuhl, J. (1984). Volitional aspects of achievement motivation and learned helplessness: Toward a comprehensive theory of action control. Progress in Experimental Personality Research, 13, 99–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-541413-5.50007-3Google Scholar
Kumkale, G. T., & Albarracín, D. (2004). The sleeper effect in persuasion: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 130(1), 143–172. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.1.143Google Scholar
Kumkale, G. T., Albarracín, D., & Seignourel, P. J. (2010). The effects of source credibility in the presence or absence of prior attitudes: Implications for the design of persuasive communication campaigns. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 40(6), 1325–1356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00620.xGoogle Scholar
Kunda, Z. (1987). Motivated inference: Self-serving generation and evaluation of causal theories. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 636–647. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.53.4.636Google Scholar
LaFrance, M., & Broadbent, M. (1976). Group rapport: Posture sharing as a nonverbal indicator. Group and Organization Management, 1, 328–333. https://doi.org/10.1177/105960117600100307Google Scholar
Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524–536. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167287134009CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lang, P. J., Ohman, A., & Vaitl, D. (1988). The international affective picture system [Photographic slides]. Gainesville, FL: Center for Research in Psychophysiology, University of Florida.Google Scholar
Langer, E. J., Blank, A., & Chanowitz, B. (1978). The mindlessness of ostensibly thoughtful action: The role of “placebic” information in interpersonal interaction. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 36, 635–642. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.36.6.635Google Scholar
Laranjo, L., Arguel, A., Neves, A. L., Gallagher, A. M., Kaplan, R., Mortimer, N., … Lau, A. Y. S. (2014). The influence of social networking sites on health behavior change: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 22(1), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1136/amiajnl-2014-002841Google Scholar
Lassiter, G. D., Geers, A. L., & Apple, K. J. (2002). Communication set and the perception of ongoing behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28, 158–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167202282003Google Scholar
Lau-Barraco, C., Braitman, A. L., Leonard, K. E., & Padilla, M. (2012). Drinking buddies and their prospective influence on alcohol outcomes: Alcohol expectancies as a mediator. Psychology of Addictive Behaviors, 26, 747–758. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0028909CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Law, S., Schimmack, U., & Braun, K. A. (2003). Cameo appearances of branded products in TV shows: How effective are they. Manuscript in preparation.Google Scholar
Ledgerwood, A., Callahan, S. P., Ledgerwood, A., & Callahan, S. P. (2019). The social side of abstraction: Psychological distance enhances conformity to group norms. Psychological Science, 23(8), 907–913. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611435920Google Scholar
Lee, A. Y., & Aaker, J. L. (2004). Bringing the frame into focus: the influence of regulatory fit on processing fluency and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 205.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lemmer, G., & Wagner, U. (2015). Can we really reduce ethnic prejudice outside the lab? A meta-analysis of direct and indirect contact interventions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45, 152–168. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2079Google Scholar
Leonardelli, G. J., Pickett, C. L., & Brewer, M. B. (2010). Optimal distinctiveness theory: A framework for social identity, social cognition, and intergroup relations. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 43, 63–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(10)43002-6Google Scholar
Lepper, M. R., Greene, D., & Nisbett, R. E. (1973). Undermining children’s intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the “overjustification” hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 28, 129–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0035519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Levelt, W. J. M., & Kelter, S. (1982). Surface form and memory in question answering. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 78–106. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(82)90005-6Google Scholar
Levine, J. M., & Moreland, R. L. (2002). Group reactions to loyalty and disloyalty. Advances in Group Processes, pp. 203–228. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0882-6145(02)19008-4Google Scholar
Levitan, L. C., & Visser, P. S. (2008). The impact of the social context on resistance to persuasion: Effortful versus effortless responses to counter-attitudinal information. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(3), 640–649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2007.03.004Google Scholar
Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science: Selected theoretical papers. New York, NY: Harper.Google Scholar
Lieberman, M. D., Ochsner, K. N., Gilbert, D. T., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). Do amnesiacs exhibit cognitive dissonance reduction? The role of explicit memory and attention in attitude change. Psychological Science, 12, 135–140. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00323Google Scholar
Lichtenstein, S., & Slovic, P. (1971). Reversals of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 89(1), 46–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lingle, J. H., & Ostrom, T. M. (1981). Principles of memory and cognition in attitude formation. In Petty, R., Ostrom, T. M., & Brock, T. C. (Eds.), Cognitive responses in persuasion (pp. 399–420). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Liu, J., Jones, C., Wilson, K., Durantini, M. R., Livingood, W., Albarracín, D., & Albarracín, D. (2014). Motivational barriers to retention of at-risk young adults in HIV-prevention interventions: Perceived pressure and efficacy. AIDS Care, 26(10), 1242–1248. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2014.896450CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Liu, J., Zhao, S., Chen, X., Falk, E., & Albarracín, D. (2017). The influence of peer behavior as a function of social and cultural closeness: A meta-analysis of normative influence on adolescent smoking initiation and continuation. Psychological Bulletin, 143(10), 1082–1115. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000113Google Scholar
Liu, S., Huang, J. L., & Wang, M. (2014). Effectiveness of job search interventions: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 140(4), 1009–1041. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035923Google Scholar
Locke, E. A., Latham, G. P., & Erez, M. (1988). The determinants of goal commitment. The Academy of Management Review, 13(1), 23. https://doi.org/10.2307/258352Google Scholar
Lockwood, P., Jordan, C. H., & Kunda, Z. (2002). Motivation by positive or negative role models: Regulatory focus determines who will best inspire us. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 854–864. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.4.854Google Scholar
Logan, G. D. (1988). Toward an instance theory of automatization. Psychological Review, 95(4), 492.Google Scholar
Lohmann, S., & Albarracín, D. (2019). The feeling of intention. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Lohmann, S., Jones, C., & Albarracín, D. (2019). The modulating role of self-posed questions in repeated choice: Integral and incidental questions can increase or decrease behavioral rigidity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 85.Google Scholar
Loomis, J. M., Blascovich, J. J., & Beall, A. C. (1999). Immersive virtual environment technology as a basic research tool in psychology. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 31, 557–564. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03200735CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lopez, M. L., & Stack, C. (2001). Social capital and the culture of power: Lessons from the field. In Social capital and poor communities (pp. 31–59). New York, NY: Russell Sage Foundation.Google Scholar
Losch, M. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Cognitive dissonance may enhance sympathetic tonus, but attitudes are changed to reduce negative affect rather than arousal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 289–304. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(90)90040-SGoogle Scholar
Lowin, A. (1967). On choice between supportive and nonsupportive information. American Psychologist, 22(7), 530.Google Scholar
Lu, F. C., & Sinha, J. (2017). Speaking to the heart: Social exclusion and reliance on feelings versus reasons in persuasion. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27(4), 409–421. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2017.03.004Google Scholar
Ludvigh, E. J., & Happ, D. (1974). Extraversion and preferred level of sensory stimulation. British Journal of Psychology, 65(3), 359–365.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lund, M. (2016). Exploring smokers’ opposition to proposed tobacco control strategies. NAD Nordic Studies on Alcohol and Drugs, 33(4), 321–334. https://doi.org/10.1515/nsad-2016-0027Google Scholar
Lundgren, S. R., & Prislin, R. (1998). Motivated cognitive processing and attitude change. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(7), 715–726. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298247004Google Scholar
Luo, C., Zheng, X., Zeng, D. D., Leischow, S., Cui, K., Zhang, Z., & He, S. (2013). Portrayal of electronic cigarettes on YouTube. In Zeng, D. et al. (Eds.), Smart health: ICSH 2013 (Lecture Notes in Computer Science Vol. 8040, pp. 1–6). Berlin, Germany: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-39844-5_1Google Scholar
Lyons, B. A. (2019). Discussion network activation: An expanded approach to selective exposure. Media and Communication, 7(3), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.17645/mac.v7i3.2112Google Scholar
MacDonald, T. K., & Zanna, M. P. (1998). Cross-dimension ambivalence toward social groups: Can ambivalence affect intentions to hire feminists? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(4), 427–441.Google Scholar
Madden, T. J., Ellen, P. S., & Ajzen, I. (1992). A comparison of the theory of planned behavior and the theory of reasoned action. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 18(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292181001Google Scholar
Maddux, J. E., & Rogers, R. W. (1983). Protection motivation and self-efficacy: A revised theory of fear appeals and attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 19(5), 469–479. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(83)90023-9CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Madrian, B. C., & Shea, D. F. (2001). The power of suggestion: Inertia in 401(k) participation and savings behavior. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(4), 1149–1187. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301753265543Google Scholar
Maglione, M. A., Maher, A. R., Ewing, B., Colaiaco, B., Newberry, S., Kandrack, R., … Hempel, S. (2017). Efficacy of mindfulness meditation for smoking cessation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Addictive Behaviors, 69, 27–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2017.01.022Google Scholar
Maio, G. R., Bell, D. W., & Esses, V. M. (1996). Ambivalence and persuasion: The processing of messages about immigrant groups. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32(6), 513–536.Google Scholar
Maio, G. R., & Olson, J. M. (1995). Relations between values, attitudes, and behavioral intentions: The moderating role of attitude function. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 31(3), 266–285.Google Scholar
Ma-Kellams, C., Spencer-Rodgers, J., & Peng, K. (2011). I am against us? Unpacking cultural differences in ingroup favoritism via dialecticism. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(1), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167210388193Google Scholar
Mandler, J. M., & DeForest, M. (1979). Is there more than one way to recall a story? Child Development, 50, 886–889.Google Scholar
Mannetti, L., Levine, J. M., Pierro, A., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2010). Group reaction to defection: The impact of shared reality. Social Cognition, 28(3,SI), 447–464. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2010.28.3.447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Markman, A. B., & Gentner, D. (2001). Thinking. Annual Review of Psychology, 52(1), 223–247.Google Scholar
Marks, L. J., & Kamins, M. A. (1988). The use of product sampling and advertising: Effects of sequence of exposure and degree of advertising claim exaggeration on consumers’ belief strength, belief confidence, and attitudes. Journal of Marketing Research, 25(3), 266–281. https://doi.org/10.2307/3172529Google Scholar
Markus, H. R., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.98.2.224Google Scholar
Marques, J. M., Abrams, D., & Serôdio, R. G. (2001). Being better by being right: Subjective group dynamics and derogation of in-group deviants when generic norms are undermined. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 436–447. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.3.436Google Scholar
Martyniuk, U., & Štulhofer, A. (2018). A longitudinal exploration of the relationship between pornography use and sexual permissiveness in female and male adolescents. Journal of Adolescence, 69, 80–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2018.09.006Google Scholar
Mata, J., Dallacker, M., Vogel, T., & Hertwig, R. (2019). The role of attitudes in diet, eating, and body weight. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 67–91). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Mata, J., Todd, P. M., & Lippke, S. (2010). When weight management lasts. Lower perceived rule complexity increases adherence. Appetite, 54, 37–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2009.09.004Google Scholar
Matheson, H., White, N., & McMullen, P. (2015). Accessing embodied object representations from vision: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 511–524. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000001Google Scholar
Mathew, R. J., Weinman, M. L., & Barr, D. L. (1984). Personality and regional cerebral blood flow. British Journal of Psychiatry, 144, 529–532. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.144.5.529Google Scholar
Matsumoto, D. (1987). The role of facial response in the experience of emotion: More methodological problems and a meta-analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(4), 769.Google Scholar
Matthews, D., & Dietz-Uhler, B. (1998). The black-sheep effect: How positive and negative advertisements affect voters’ perceptions of the sponsor of the advertisement 1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(20), 1903–1915.Google Scholar
Mayer, F. S., Duval, S., & Duval, V. H. (1980). An attributional analysis of commitment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1072–1080. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077726Google Scholar
Mazzocco, P. J., Green, M. C., Sasota, J. A., & Jones, N. W. (2010). This story is not for everyone: Transportability and narrative persuasion. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 1(4), 361–368. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550610376600CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, K. C., Albarracín, D., & Durantini, M. R. (2008). A door to HIV-prevention interventions: How female-targeted materials can enhance female participation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 38(5), 1211–1229. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00345.xGoogle Scholar
McCulloch, K. C., Fitzsimons, G. M. G. M., Chua, S. N. S. N., & Albarracín, D. (2011). Vicarious goal satiation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(3), 685–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2010.12.019Google Scholar
McCulloch, K. C., Li, H., Hong, S., & Albarracín, D. (2012). Naïve definitions of action and inaction: The continuum, spread, and valence of behaviors. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(2), 227–234. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.860Google Scholar
McDonald, J., McDonald, P., Hughes, C., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Recalling and intending to enact health recommendations: Optimal number of prescribed behaviors in multibehavior messages. Clinical Psychological Science, 5(5), 858–865. https://doi.org/10.1177/2167702617704453Google Scholar
McEachan, R. R. C., Conner, M., Taylor, N. J., & Lawton, R. J. (2011). Prospective prediction of health-related behaviours with the theory of planned behaviour: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 5(2), 97–144.Google Scholar
McGregor, I., Newby-Clark, I. R., & Zanna, M. P. (1999). “Remembering” dissonance: Simultaneous accessibility of inconsistent cognitive elements moderates epistemic discomfort. In Harmon-Jones, E. & Mills, J. (Eds.), Cognitive dissonance: Progress on a pivotal theory in social psychology (pp. 325–353). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1960). Cognitive consistency and attitude change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 60, 345–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048563Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1961). Resistance to persuasion conferred by active and passive prior refutation of the same and alternative counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 63, 326–332. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048344Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1968a). Personality and attitude change: An information-processing theory. Psychological Foundations of Attitudes, 171, 196.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1968b). Theory of the structure of human thought. In Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook (pp. 140–162). Chicago, IL: Rand-McNally.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1972). Attitude change: The information-processing paradigm. In McClintock, C. G. (Ed.), Experimental social psychology (pp. 108–141). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In The handbook of social psychology (pp. 233–346). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J., & McGuire, C. V. (1991). The affirmational versus negational self-concepts. In The self: Interdisciplinary approaches (pp. 107–120). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
McGuire, W. J., & Papageorgis, D. (1961). The relative efficacy of various types of prior belief-defense in producing immunity against persuasion. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 327–337. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0042026Google Scholar
McHale, S. M., Dariotis, J. K., & Kauh, T. J. (2003). Social development and social relationships in middle childhood. Handbook of Psychology, 6, 241–265. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471264385.wei0610Google Scholar
McKenzie, C. R. M., Liersch, M. J., & Finkelstein, S. R. (2006). Recommendations implicit in policy defaults. Psychological Science, 17(5), 414–420.Google Scholar
Medin, D. L., & Coley, J. D. (1998). Concepts and categorization. In Perception and cognition at century’s end: Handbook of perception and cognition (pp. 403–439). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meier, B. P., Schnall, S., Schwarz, N., & Bargh, J. A. (2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4(4), 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2012.01212.xGoogle Scholar
Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8(6), 423–429.Google Scholar
Mellott, D. S., & Greenwald, A. G. (2000). But I don’t feel old! Implicit self-esteem, age identity, and ageism in the elderly. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Melnyk, D., & Shepperd, J. A. (2012). Avoiding risk information about breast cancer. Annals of Behavioral Medicine, 44, 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12160-012-9382-5Google Scholar
Meslot, C., Gauchet, A., Allenet, B., François, O., & Hagger, M. S. (2016). Theory-based interventions combining mental simulation and planning techniques to improve physical activity: Null results from two randomized controlled trials. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01789Google Scholar
Meugnot, A., Almecija, Y., & Toussaint, L. (2014). The embodied nature of motor imagery processes highlighted by short-term limb immobilization. Experimental Psychology, 61(3), 180–186. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000237CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Meyers, R. J., & Smith, J. E. (1995). Clinical guide to alcohol treatment: The community reinforcement approach. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
Meyers-Levy, J., & Maheswaran, D. (2004). Exploring message framing outcomes when systematic, heuristic, or both types of processing occur. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(1–2), 159–167.Google Scholar
Miles, E., Miles, E., & Crisp, R. J. (2013). A meta-analytic test of the imagined contact hypothesis. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 17(1), 3–26. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430213510573Google Scholar
Milfont, T. L., & Schultz, P. W. (2019). The role of attitudes in environmental issues. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 337–363). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Miller, N. E. (1944). Experimental studies of conflict. In Hunt, J. M. (Ed.), Personality and the behavior disorders (pp. 431–465). N.p.: Ronald Press.Google Scholar
Monin, B., & Norton, M. I. (2003). Perceptions of a fluid consensus: Uniqueness bias, false consensus, false polarization, and pluralistic ignorance in a water conservation crisis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(5), 559–567.Google Scholar
Monroe, A. E., Dillon, K. D., Guglielmo, S., & Baumeister, R. F. (2018). It’s not what you do, but what everyone else does: On the role of descriptive norms and subjectivism in moral judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 77, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2018.03.010Google Scholar
Montoya, R. M., Horton, R. S., Vevea, J. L., Citkowicz, M., & Lauber, E. A. (2017). A re-examination of the mere exposure effect: The influence of repeated exposure on recognition, familiarity, and liking. Psychological Bulletin, 143(5), 459–498. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000085Google Scholar
Morales, A., Gandhi, N., Chan, M.-P. S., Lohmann, S., Sanchez, T., Brady, K. A., … Zhai, C. (2019). Multi-attribute topic feature construction for social media-based prediction. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Big Data, Big Data 2018. https://doi.org/10.1109/BigData.2018.8622347Google Scholar
Moreland, R. L., & Levine, J. M. (1988). Group dynamics over time: Development and socialization in small groups. In McGrath, J. E. (Ed.), The social psychology of time: New perspectives (pp. 151–181). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Moscovici, S., & Zavalloni, M. (1969). The group as a polarizer of attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(2), 125.Google Scholar
Mostafa, M. M. (2013). More than words: Social networks’ text mining for consumer brand sentiments. Expert Systems with Applications, 40(10), 4241–4251. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2013.01.019Google Scholar
Müller, B. C. N., Ritter, S. M., Glock, S., Dijksterhuis, A., Engels, R. C. M. E., & van Baaren, R. B. (2016). Smoking-related warning messages formulated as questions positively influence short-term smoking behaviour. Journal of Health Psychology, 21(1), 60–68. https://doi.org/10.1177/1359105314522083CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Mussweiler, T., Rüter, K., & Epstude, K. (2004). The ups and downs of social comparison: Mechanisms of assimilation and contrast. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87, 832–844. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.87.6.832Google Scholar
Muthukrishnan, A. V. (2003). Changing positive and negative attitudes. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Muthukrishnan, A. V., Pham, M. T., & Mungalé, A. (1999). Comparison opportunity and judgment revision. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 80, 228–251. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1999.2859Google Scholar
Muthukrishnan, A. V., Pham, M. T., & Mungalé, A. (2001). Does greater amount of information always bolster attitudinal resistance? Marketing Letters, 12, 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011113002473Google Scholar
Nagy, E., & Molnar, P. (2004). Homo imitans or homo provocans? Human imprinting model of neonatal imitation. Infant Behavior and Development, 27(1), 54–63. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infbeh.2003.06.004Google Scholar
Napolitano, M. A., Hayes, S., Bennett, G. G., Ives, A. K., & Foster, G. D. (2012). Using Facebook and text messaging to deliver a weight loss program to college students. Obesity, 21, 25–31.Google Scholar
Newby-Clark, I. R., McGregor, I., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(2), 157.Google Scholar
Newcomb, T. M. (1943). Personality and social change: Attitude formation in a student community. Fort Worth, TX: Dryden Press.Google Scholar
Niederdeppe, J., Heley, K., & Barry, C. L. (2015). Inoculation and narrative strategies in competitive framing of three health policy issues. Journal of Communication, 65(5), 838–862. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12162Google Scholar
Nisson, C., & Earl, A. (2016). Regulating food consumption: Action messages can help or hurt. Appetite, 107, 280–284. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.appet.2016.08.100Google Scholar
Noguchi, K., Albarracín, D., & Durantini, M. (2007). Non random attrition in health prevention programs: A meta-analysis of retention in HIV prevention interventions. ACR North American Advances, 34, 444–445.Google Scholar
Noguchi, K., Albarracín, D., Durantini, M. R., & Glasman, L. R. (2007). Who participates in which health promotion programs? A meta-analysis of motivations underlying enrollment and retention in HIV-prevention interventions. Psychological Bulletin, 133 (6),955. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.133.6.955Google Scholar
Noguchi, K., Handley, I. M. I. M., & Albarracín, D. (2011). Participating in politics resembles physical activity: General action patterns in international archives, United States archives, and experiments. Psychological Science, 22(2), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610393746Google Scholar
Nolder, C. J., & Blankenship, K. L. (2019). Application of attitudes research across domains. current state of knowledge and future directions. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 589–602). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
NORC Center for Public Affairs. (2015). American attitudes toward substance use in the United States. Retrieved from www.apnorc.org/projects/Pages/HTML Reports/american-attitudes-toward-substance-use-in-the-united-states.aspxGoogle Scholar
Norman, D. A. (1983). Some observations on mental models. In Mental models (pp. 7–14).Google Scholar
Norman, K. L. (1976). A solution for weights and scale values in functional measurement. Psychological Review, 83, 80–84.Google Scholar
Nosek, B. A., Aarts, A. A., Anderson, J. E., Kappes, H. B., & Collaboration, Open Science. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716.Google Scholar
Nyhuis, M. (2012). The reduction problem of priming: An analysis of potential solutions. MS thesis, University of Twente. Retrieved from http://essay.utwente.nl/62293/Google Scholar
Nyhuis, M., Gosselt, J. F., & Rosema, M. (2016). The psychology of electoral mobilization: a subtle priming experiment. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 26(3), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457289.2016.1160909Google Scholar
Ohira, H., Winton, W. M., & Oyama, M. (1998). Effects of stimulus valence on recognition memory and endogenous eyeblinks: Further evidence for positive-negative asymmetry. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 986–993.Google Scholar
Oliver, R. L. (1977). Effect of expectation and disconfirmation on postexposure product evaluations: An alternative interpretation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 62(4), 480.Google Scholar
Olson, J. C., & Dover, P. A. (1979). Disconfirmation of consumer expectations through product trial. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64(2), 179.Google Scholar
Olson, J. M., & Zanna, M. P. (1982). Repression-sensitization differences in responses to a decision. Journal of Personality, 50(1), 46–57. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1982.tb00744.xGoogle Scholar
Olson, M. A., & Fazio, R. H. (2004). Reducing the influence of extrapersonal associations on the Implicit Association Test: personalizing the IAT. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(5), 653.Google Scholar
Orbell, S., & Verplanken, B. (2015). The strength of habit. Health Psychology Review, 9, 311–317. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2014.992031Google Scholar
Orehek, E., Mauro, R., Kruglanski, A. W., & van der Bles, A. M. (2012). Prioritizing association strength versus value: The influence of self-regulatory modes on means evaluation in single goal and multigoal contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025881Google Scholar
Osgood, C. E. (1962). Studies on the generality of affective meaning systems. American Psychologist, 17(1), 10–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0045146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostafin, B. D., Bauer, C., & Myxter, P. (2012). Mindfulness decouples the relation between automatic alcohol motivation and heavy drinking. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 31(7), 729–745. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2012.31.7.729Google Scholar
Ostafin, B. D., & Marlatt, G. A. (2008). Surfing the urge: Experiential acceptance moderates the relation between automatic alcohol motivation and hazardous drinking. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 27(4), 404–418. https://doi.org/10.1521/jscp.2008.27.4.404Google Scholar
Osterhouse, R. A., & Brock, T. C. (1970). Distraction increases yielding to propaganda by inhibiting counterarguing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 15(4), 344+. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0029598Google Scholar
Oswald, F. L., Mitchell, G., Blanton, H., Jaccard, J., & Tetlock, P. E. (2013). Predicting ethnic and racial discrimination: A meta-analysis of IAT criterion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105(2), 171.Google Scholar
Ottati, V. C., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1993). Affect and political judgment. In Iyengar, S. & McGuire, W. J. (Eds.), Duke studies in political psychology: Explorations in political psychology (pp. 296–315). Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Ottati, V., Edwards, J. R., & Krumdick, N. D. (2005). Attitude theory and research: intradisciplinary and interdisciplinary connections. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 707–742). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Ouellette, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124, 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.124.1.54Google Scholar
Pacherie, E. (2008). The phenomenology of action: A conceptual framework. Cognition, 107(1), 179–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2007.09.003Google Scholar
Paek, H. J., Kim, S., Hove, T., & Huh, J. Y. (2014). Reduced harm or another gateway to smoking Source, message, and information characteristics of E-cigarette videos on YouTube. Journal of Health Communication, 19, 545–560. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2013.821560Google Scholar
Paluck, E. L., & Shepherd, H. (2012). The salience of social referents: A field experiment on collective norms and harassment behavior in a school social network. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(6), 899–915. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/a0030015Google Scholar
Papageorgis, D., & McGuire, W. J. (1961). The generality of immunity to persuasion produced by pre-exposure to weakened counterarguments. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 62, 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0048430Google Scholar
Patry, A. L., & Pelletier, L. G. (2001). Extraterrestrial beliefs and experiences: An application of the theory of reasoned action. Journal of Social Psychology, 141(2), 199–217. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224540109600547Google Scholar
Payne, B. K., Cheng, C. M., Govorun, O., & Stewart, B. D. (2005). An inkblot for attitudes: Affect misattribution as implicit measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89(3), 277–293. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.3.277Google Scholar
Peck, J., & Childers, T. L. (2003). Individual differences in haptic information processing: The “Need for Touch{”} scale. Journal of Consumer Research, 30(3), 430–442. https://doi.org/10.1086/378619Google Scholar
Perkins, M. B., Jensen, P. S., Jaccard, J., Gollwitzer, P., Oettingen, G., Pappadopulos, E., & Hoagwood, K. E. (2007). Applying theory-driven approaches to understanding and modifying clinicians’ behavior: What do we know? Psychiatric Services, 58(3), 342–348. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ps.58.3.342Google Scholar
Peters, E., Dieckmann, N., Dixon, A., Hibbard, J. H., & Mertz, C. K. (2007). Less is more in presenting quality information to consumers. Medical Care Research and Review, 64(2), 169–190. https://doi.org/10.1177/10775587070640020301Google Scholar
Peters, K., & Kashima, Y. (2015). A multimodal theory of affect diffusion. Psychological Bulletin, 141(5), 966–992. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000020Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Brinol, P., & DeMarree, K. G. (2007). The meta-cognitive model (MCM) of attitudes: Implications for attitude measurement, change, and strength. Social Cognition, 25(5), 657–686. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2007.25.5.657Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Tormala, Z. L., Briñol, P., & Jarvis, W. B. G. (2006). Implicit ambivalence from attitude change: An exploration of the PAST model. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 21–41. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.21Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Brinol, P., & Tormala, Z. L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(5), 722–741. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.82.5.722Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986a). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986b). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 19, 124–192. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60214-2Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1990). Involvement and persuasion: Tradition versus integration. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 367–374. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.107.3.367Google Scholar
Petty, R. E., Wells, G. L., & Brock, T. C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 34, 874–884. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.874Google Scholar
Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., & Kunde, W. (2013). Editorial: Action effects in perception and action. Frontiers in Psychology, 4. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00223Google Scholar
Pham, M. T. (1998). Representativeness, relevance, and the use of feelings in decision making. Journal of Consumer Research, 25(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.1086/209532Google Scholar
Pham, M. T., & Muthukrishnan, A. V. (2002). Search and alignment in judgment revision: Implications for brand positioning. Journal of Marketing Research, 39(1), 18–30. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmkr.39.1.18.18929Google Scholar
Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Erb, H. P., Spiegel, S., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2005). Informational length and order of presentation as determinants of persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 41(5), 458–469. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2004.09.003Google Scholar
Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Kruglanski, A. W., Klein, K., & Orehek, E. (2012). Persistence of attitude change and attitude-behavior correspondence based on extensive processing of source information. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(1), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.853Google Scholar
Pierro, A., Mannetti, L., Kruglanski, A. W., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2004). Relevance override: On the reduced impact of “cues{”} under high-motivation conditions of persuasion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 251–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.251Google Scholar
Pratkanis, A. R., Greenwald, A. G., Leippe, M. R., & Baumgardner, M. H. (1988). In search of reliable persuasion effects: III. The sleeper effect is dead: Long live the sleeper effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 203.Google Scholar
Praxmarer, S. (2011). Message strength and persuasion when consumers imagine product usage. Journal of Consumer Behavior, 231, 225–231. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbGoogle Scholar
Prentice, D. A., & Miller, D. T. (1993). Pluralistic ignorance and alcohol use on campus. Some consequences of misperceiving the social norm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 64(2), 243–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.64.2.243Google Scholar
Prislin, R., & Wood, W. (2005). Social influence in attitudes and attitude change. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 671–705). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1992). In search of the structure of change. In Self change (pp. 87–114). Berlin, Germany: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., Harlow, L. L., Rossi, J. S., & Velicer, W. F. (1994). The transtheoretical model of change and HIV prevention: A review. Health Education Quarterly, 21(4), 471–486.Google Scholar
Putnam, R. (1993). The prosperous community: Social capital and public life. The American Prospect, 13(4). Retrieved from www.prospect.org/print/vol/13Google Scholar
Rampell, C. (2011, September 1). Do parents put too much pressure on students? New York Times.Google Scholar
Reddit, . (n.d.). In Wikipedia. Retrieved from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RedditGoogle Scholar
Regan, D. T., & Fazio, R. H. (1977). Consistency between attitudes and behavior: Look to method of attitude formation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13(1), 28–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90011-7Google Scholar
Reid, A. E., Cialdini, R. B., & Aiken, L. S. (2010). Social norms and health behavior. In Handbook of behavioral medicine (pp. 263–274). New York, NY: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-09488-5_19Google Scholar
Remington, N. A., Fabrigar, L. R., & Visser, P. S. (2000). Reexamining the circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79(2), 286.Google Scholar
Rice, T. W., & Pepper, M. L. (1997). Region migration, and attitudes in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 78(1), 83–95.Google Scholar
Richardson, A., & Vallone, D. M. (2014). YouTube: A promotional vehicle for little cigars and cigarillos? Tobacco Control, 23, 21–26. https://doi.org/10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050562Google Scholar
Richardson-Klavehn, A., & Bjork, R. A. (1988). Measures of memory. Annual Review of Psychology, 39(1), 475–543.Google Scholar
Rinck, M., & Becker, E. S. (2007). Approach and avoidance in fear of spiders. Journal of Behaviour Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 38, 105–120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2006.10.001Google Scholar
Robinson, J. P., Shaver, P. R., & Wrightsman, L. S. (1999). Measures of political attitudes. New York, NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Roese, N. J. (2004). Twisted pair: Counterfactual thinking and the hindsight bias. In Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 258–273). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Roese, N. J., Hur, T., & Pennington, G. L. (1999). Counterfactual thinking and regulatory focus: Implications for action versus inaction and sufficiency versus necessity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77(6), 1109–1120. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1109Google Scholar
Roese, N. J., & Olson, J. M. (1997). Counterfactual thinking: The intersection of affect and function. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 1–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60015-5Google Scholar
Ronis, D. L., Yates, J. F., & Kirscht, J. P. (1989). Attitudes, decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior. In Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 213–239). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rosario, A. B., Sotgiu, F., De Valck, K., & Bijmolt, T. H. A. (2016). The effect of electronic word of mouth on sales: A meta-analytic review of platform, product, and metric factors. Journal of Marketing Research, 53(3), 297–318. https://doi.org/10.1509/jmr.14.0380Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. J. (1960a). Cognitive reorganization in response to the hypnotic reversal of attitudinal affect. Journal of Personality, 28, 39–63.Google Scholar
Rosenberg, M. J. (1960b). Inconsistency arousal and reduction in attitude change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 24, 319–340.Google Scholar
Rossano, M. J., & Reardon, W. P. (1999). Goal specificity and the acquisition of survey knowledge. Environment and Behavior, 31(3), 395–412. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139169921972164Google Scholar
Rucker, D. D., & Petty, R. E. (2004). When resistance is futile: Consequences of failed counterarguing for attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86(2), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.2.219Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. (1994). Schemata and the cognitive system. In Wyer, R. S. (Ed.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 1–40). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E. (2018). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. Theoretical issues in Reading Comprehension, 11, 33–58. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315107493-4Google Scholar
Rumelhart, D. E., & McClelland, J. L. (1986). On learning the past tenses of English verbs.Google Scholar
Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110(1), 145.Google Scholar
Sanbonmatsu, D. M., Kardes, F. R., & Gibson, B. D. (1991). The role of attribute knowledge and overall evaluations in comparative judgment. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 48(1), 131–146. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90009-IGoogle Scholar
Schachter, S. (1951). Deviation, rejection, and communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 46(2), 190–207. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0062326Google Scholar
Schifter, D. E., & Ajzen, I. (1985). Intention, perceived control, and weight loss: An application of the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(3), 843–851. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.49.3.843Google Scholar
Schimmack, U., & Crites, S. L. (2005). The structure of affect. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 397–435). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Schmidt, M. F. H., Butler, L. P., Heinz, J., & Tomasello, M. (2016). Young children see a single action and infer a social norm: Promiscuous normativity in 3-year-olds. Psychological Science, 27(10), 1360–1370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797616661182Google Scholar
Schroeder, C. M., & Prentice, D. A. (1998). Exposing pluralistic ignorance to reduce alcohol use among college students. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(23), 2150–2180. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1998.tb01365.xGoogle Scholar
Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J., Schultz, P. W., Nolan, J. M., … Griskevicius, V. (2019). The constructive, destructive, and reconstructive power of social norms. Psychological Sciences, 18(5), 429–434.Google Scholar
Schwartz, H. A. (2016). Predicting well-being through the language of social media. In Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing (pp. 516–527). Retrieved from http://psb.stanford.edu/psb-online/proceedings/psb16/schwartz.pdfGoogle Scholar
Schwartz, H. A., Eichstaedt, J. C., Kern, M. L., Dziurzynski, L., Ramones, S. M., Agrawal, M., … Ungar, L. H. (2013). Personality, gender, and age in the language of social media: The open-vocabulary approach. PloS ONE, 8(9), e73791. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0073791Google Scholar
Schwarz, N. (1999). Self-reports: How the questions shape the answers. American Psychologist, 54(2), 93.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Bless, H. (1992). Assimilation and contrast effects in attitude measurement: An inclusion/exclusion model. ACR North American Advances, 19, 72–77.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61, 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Bohner, G. (2001). The construction of attitudes. In Blackwell handbook of social psychology: Intraindividual processes (Vol. 1, pp. 436–457). Malden, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1983). Mood, misattribution, and judgments of well-being: Informative and directive functions of affective states. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 45(3), 513–523. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.45.3.513Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (2007). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 385–407). New York, NY: Guilford Press. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1021223113233Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Oyserman, D. (2001). Asking questions about behavior: Cognition, communication, and questionnaire construction. The American Journal of Evaluation, 22(2), 127–160.Google Scholar
Schwarz, N., & Scheuring, B. (1992). Frequency-reports of psychosomatic symptoms: What respondents learn from response alternatives. Zeitschrift für Klinische Psychologie, 22, 197–208.Google Scholar
Seidenberg, A. B., Rodgers, E. J., Rees, V. W., & Connolly, G. N. (2012). Youth access, creation, and content of smokeless tobacco (“dip”) videos in social media. Journal of Adolescent Health, 50, 334–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2011.09.003Google Scholar
Seligman, M. (2018). PERMA and the building blocks of well-being. Journal of Positive Psychology, 13, 333–335. https://doi.org/10.1080/17439760.2018.1437466Google Scholar
Senay, I., Albarracín, D., & Noguchi, K. (2010). Motivating goal-directed behavior through introspective self-talk: The role of the interrogative form of simple future tense. Psychological Science, 21, 499–504. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610364751Google Scholar
Seske, K. (2012). Type 1 diabetes and its effects on active/inactive goal priming for exercise. John Wesley Powell Student Research Conference 2. http://digitalcommons.iwu.edu/jwprc/2012/oralpres3/2Google Scholar
Sevincer, A. T., & Oettingen, G. (2009). Alcohol breeds empty goal commitments. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 118(3), 623–633. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0016199Google Scholar
Shah, J. Y., Fishbach, A., Friedman, R., Chun, W. Y., & Sleeth-Keppler, D. (2002). A Theory of goal systems. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 34, 331–378. https://doi.org/10.2307/2092805Google Scholar
Shah, J. Y., Friedman, R., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Forgetting all else: On the antecedents and consequences of goal shielding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83, 1261–1280. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.83.6.1261Google Scholar
Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2000). Aspects of goal networks. In Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 85–110). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-012109890-2/50033-0Google Scholar
Shah, J. Y., & Kruglanski, A. W. (2002). Priming against your will: How accessible alternatives affect goal pursuit. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(4), 368–383. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00005-7Google Scholar
Shah, J. Y., Kruglanski, A. W., & Friedman, R. (2003). Goal systems theory: Integrating the cognitive and motivational aspects of self-regulation. In Spencer, S. J., Fein, S., Zanna, M. P., & Olson, J. (Eds.), Motivated social perception: Ontario symposium (Vol. 9, pp. 247–275). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shank, D. B., Peters, K., Li, Y., Robins, G., & Kirley, M. (2019). Norm talk and human cooperation: Can we talk ourselves into cooperation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 117(1), 99–123.Google Scholar
Shavitt, S. (1989). Operationalizing functional theories of attitude. In Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J., & Greenwald, A. G. (Eds.), Attitude structure and function (pp. 311–337). Hillsdale, NJ, Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Shavitt, S., Lalwani, A. K., Zhang, J., & Torelli, C. J. (2006). The horizontal/vertical distinction in cross-cultural consumer research. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 16(4), 325–342. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1604_3Google Scholar
Sheeran, P., Godin, G., Conner, M., & Germain, M. (2017). Paradoxical effects of experience: Past behavior both strengthens and weakens the intention-behavior relationship. Journal of the Association for Consumer Research, 2(3), 309–318. https://doi.org/10.1086/691216Google Scholar
Sheridan, S. L., Halpern, D. J., Viera, A. J., Berkman, N. D., Donahue, K. E., & Crotty, K. (2011). Interventions for individuals with low health literacy: A systematic review. Journal of Health Communication, 16, 30–54. https://doi.org/10.1080/10810730.2011.604391Google Scholar
Sherif, M., & Hovland, C. (1961). Social judgment: Assimilation and contrast effects in communication and attitude change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Sherif, M., & Sherif, C. (1936). The psychology of social norms. Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.2011.00472.xGoogle Scholar
Sherman, D. K., Gangi, C., & White, M. L. (2010). Embodied cognition and health persuasion: Facilitating intention – behavior consistency via motor manipulations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46(2), 461–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.12.008Google Scholar
Shigehisa, T., & Symons, J. R. (1973). Effect of intensity of visual stimulation on auditory sensitivity in relation to personality. British Journal of Psychology, 64(2), 205–213.Google Scholar
Silvestrini, N., & Gendolla, G. H. E. (2013). Automatic effort mobilization and the principle of resource conservation: One can only prime the possible and justified. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(5), 803.Google Scholar
Simmons, J. P., & Nelson, L. D. (2006). Intuitive confidence: Choosing between intuitive and nonintuitive alternatives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 135(3), 409.Google Scholar
Simons-Morton, B. (2004). Prospective association of peer influence, school engagement, drinking expectancies, and parent expectations with drinking initiation among sixth graders. Addictive Behaviors, 29(2), 299–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addbeh.2003.08.005Google Scholar
Singelis, T. M., Triandis, H. C., Bhawuk, D. P. S., & Gelfand, M. J. (1995). Horizontal and vertical dimensions of individualism and collectivism: A theoretical and measurement refinement. Cross-Cultural Research, 29(3), 240–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/106939719502900302Google Scholar
Sivacek, J., & Crano, W. D. (1982). Vested interest as a moderator of attitude-behavior consistency. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43(2), 210–221. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.43.2.210Google Scholar
Skurka, C., Niederdeppe, J., & Romero-Canyas, R. (2018). Pathways of influence in emotional appeals: Benefits and tradeoffs of using fear or humor to promote climate change-related intentions and risk perceptions. Journal of Communication, 68, 169–193. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqx008Google Scholar
Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (2002). Entertainment education and elaboration likelihood: Understanding the processing of narrative persuasion. Communication Theory, 12(2), 173–191.Google Scholar
Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Usoh, M., & Schroeder, R. (2000). Small-group behavior in a virtual and real environment: A comparative study. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 9, 37–51. https://doi.org/10.1162/105474600566600Google Scholar
Smith, E. R. (1989). Procedural efficiency: General and specific components and effects on social judgment. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25(6), 500–523. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(89)90003-6Google Scholar
Smith, E. R. (1994). Procedural knowledge and processing strategies in social cognition. Handbook of Social Cognition, 1, 99–151.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R., Branscombe, N. R., & Bormann, C. (1988). Generality of the effects of practice on social judgment tasks. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(3), 385.Google Scholar
Smith, E. R., Fazio, R. H., & Cejka, M. A. (1996). Accessible attitudes influence categorization of multiply categorizable objects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(5), 888.Google Scholar
Smith, R. E., & Swinyard, W. R. (1988). Cognitive response to advertising and trial: Belief strength, belief confidence and product curiosity. Journal of Advertising, 17(3), 3–14. https://doi.org/10.1080/00913367.1988.10673118Google Scholar
Smith, S. M., Haugtvedt, C. P., & Petty, R. E. (1994). Need for cognition and the effects of repeated expression on attitude accessibility and extremity. In Allen, D. & John, C. T. (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (Vol. 21, pp. 234–237). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.Google Scholar
Snyder, M. (1974). Self-monitoring of expressive behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30, 526–537. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037039Google Scholar
Soussignan, R. (2002). Duchenne smile, emotional experience, and autonomic reactivity: A test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Emotion, 2(1), 52–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.2.1.52Google Scholar
Sparkman, G., & Walton, G. M. (2019). Witnessing change: Dynamic norms help resolve diverse barriers to personal. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 82, 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.01.007Google Scholar
Spencer-Rodgers, J., Boucher, H. C., Mori, S. C., Wang, L., & Peng, K. (2009). The dialectical self-concept: Contradiction, change, and holism in East Asian cultures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208325772Google Scholar
Spencer-Rodgers, J., Peng, K., & Wang, L. (2010). Dialecticism and the co-occurrence of positive and negative emotions across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 41(1), 109–115. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022109349508Google Scholar
Spencer-Rodgers, J., Williams, M. J., & Peng, K. (2010). Cultural differences in expectations of change and tolerance for contradiction: A decade of empirical research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(3), 296–312. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868310362982Google Scholar
Staats, C. K., & Staats, A. W. (1957). Meaning established by classical conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54(1), 74.Google Scholar
Stecker, T., Fortney, J., Hamilton, F., Sherbourne, C. D., & Ajzen, I. (2010). Engagement in mental health treatment among veterans returning from Iraq. Patient Preference and Adherence, 4, 45–49.Google Scholar
Stecula, D., Kuru, O., Albarracín, D., & Jamieson, K. H. (in press). Policy views and negative beliefs about vaccines in the United States, 2019. American Journal of Public Health.Google Scholar
Steele, C. M., & Liu, T. J. (1981). Making the dissonant act unreflective of self: Dissonance avoidance and the expectancy of a value-affirming response. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 7(3), 393–397.Google Scholar
Steinmetz, H., Knappstein, M., Ajzen, I., Schmidt, P., & Kabst, R. R. (2016). How effective are behavior change interventions based on the theory of planned behavior? A three-level meta-analysis. Zeitschrift für Psychologie, 224(3), 216–233. https://doi.org/10.1027/2151-2604/a000255Google Scholar
Stern, C., & Ondish, P. (2019). Political attitudes. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 488–523). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Stone, J., & Cooper, J. (2001). A self-standards model of cognitive dissonance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 37, 228–243. https://doi.org/10.1006/jesp.2000.1446Google Scholar
Strahan, E. J., Spencer, S. J., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Subliminal priming and persuasion: Striking while the iron is hot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 38(6), 556–568. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(02)00502-4Google Scholar
Streicher, M. C., & Estes, Z. (2016). ScienceDirect Shopping to and fro: Ideomotor compatibility of arm posture and product choice. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 26(3), 325–336. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2015.12.001Google Scholar
Suitner, C., Giacomantonio, M., & Maass, A. (2015). Embodied social cognition. In International encyclopedia of the social and behavioral sciences (2nd ed., Vol. 7). Oxford, England: Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.24056-7Google Scholar
Sunderrajan, A., & Albarracín, D. (2017). How to initiate adoption of healthy behaviors: Action, inaction, and intentionality. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Suri, G., Sheppes, G., Leslie, S., & Gross, J. J. (2014). Stairs or escalator? Using theories of persuasion and motivation to facilitate healthy decision making. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 20(4), 295–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/xap0000026Google Scholar
Swann, W. B., Pelham, B. W., & Chidester, T. R. (1988). Change through paradox: Using self-verification to alter beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(2), 268.Google Scholar
Sweeny, K., Melnyk, D., Miller, W., & Shepperd, J. A. (2010). Information avoidance: Who, what, when, and why. Review of General Psychology, 14, 340–353. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021288Google Scholar
Sweeny, K., & Rankin, K. (2019). The role of attitudes in cancer. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 3–30). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Symbaluk, D. G., Heth, C. D., Cameron, J., & Pierce, W. D. (1997). Social modeling, monetary incentives, and pain endurance: The role of self-efficacy and pain perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 23, 258–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167297233005Google Scholar
Tait, A. R., Voepel-Lewis, T., Zikmund-Fisher, B. J., & Fagerlin, A. (2010). Presenting research risks and benefits to parents: Does format matter? Anesthesia and Analgesia, 111(3), 718–723. https://doi.org/10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181e8570aGoogle Scholar
Tait, R. J., Hulse, G. K., Waterreus, A., Flicker, L., Lautenschlager, N. T., Jamrozik, K., & Almeida, O. P. (2007). Effectiveness of a smoking cessation intervention in older adults. Addiction (Abingdon, England), 102, 148–155. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1360-0443.2006.01647.xGoogle Scholar
Takahashi, K. J., & Earl, A. (2019). Effect of extraneous affect on health message reception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 46, 270–284. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167219855042Google Scholar
Takarada, Y., & Nozaki, D. (2014). Maximal voluntary force strengthened by the enhancement of motor system state through barely visible priming words with reward. PLoS ONE, 9(10). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0109422Google Scholar
Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S. R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729Google Scholar
Taub, J. M. (1998). Eysenck’s descriptive and biological theory of personality: a review of construct validity. International Journal of Neuroscience, 94(3–4), 145–197.Google Scholar
Tausczik, Y. R., & Pennebaker, J. W. (2010). The psychological meaning of words: LIWC and computerized text analysis methods. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 29, 24–54. https://doi.org/10.1177/0261927X09351676Google Scholar
Taylor, S. E., & Schneider, S. K. (1989). Coping and the simulation of events. Social Cognition, 7(2), 174–194. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.1989.7.2.174Google Scholar
Technology Review. (2019, January 23). The average American spends 24 hours a week online. Retrieved from www.technologyreview.com/f/610045/the-average-american-spends-24-hours-a-week-online/Google Scholar
Terry, D. J., Hogg, M. A., & White, K. M. (1999). The theory of planned behaviour: Self-identity, social identity and group norms. British Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 225–244. https://doi.org/10.1348/014466699164149Google Scholar
Tesser, A. (1978). Self-generated attitude change. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 11, 289–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60010-6Google Scholar
Tesser, A., & Leone, C. (1977). Cognitive schemas and thought as determinants of attitude change. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 340–356. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90004-XGoogle Scholar
Tesser, A., Whitaker, D., Martin, L., & Ward, D. (1998). Attitude heritability, attitude change and physiological responsivity. Personality and Individual Differences, 24(1), 89–96.Google Scholar
Time. (2018). Donald Trump approval rating graph. Retrieved from https://time.com/5103776/donald-trump-approval-rating-graph/Google Scholar
Tom, G., Pettersen, P., Lau, T., Burton, T., & Cook, J. (1991). The role of overt head movement in the formation of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12, 281–289. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp1203_3Google Scholar
Tormala, Z. L., Brinol, P., Petty, R. E., Horcajo, J., Petty, R. E., & Brinol, P. (2007). Changing beliefs and behavior through experience-taking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(3), 562–572.Google Scholar
Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2002). What doesn’t kill me makes me stronger: The effects of resisting persuasion on attitude certainty. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1298–1313. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1298Google Scholar
Tormala, Z. L., & Petty, R. E. (2004). Resisting persuasion and attitude certainty: A meta-cognitive analysis. In Knowles, J. & Linn, E. S. (Eds.), Resistance and persuasion (pp. 65–82). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Treadwell, J. R., & Nelson, T. O. (1996). Availability of information and the aggregation of confidence in prior decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 68(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1996.0086Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C. (2005). Issues in individualism and collectivism research. In Cultural and social behavior: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 10, pp. 207–225). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., & Gelfand, M. J. (1998). Converging measurement of horizontal and vertical individualism and collectivism. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 118–128. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.118Google Scholar
Triandis, H. C., & Suh, E. M. (2002). Cultural influences on personality. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 133–160. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135200Google Scholar
Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2010). Construal-level theory of psychological distance. Psychological Review, 117(2), 440.Google Scholar
Tsakiris, M., & Haggard, P. (2005). Experimenting with the acting self. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 22(3–4), 387–407. https://doi.org/10.1080/02643290442000158Google Scholar
Tuk, M. A., Zhang, K., & Sweldens, S. (2015). The propagation of self-control: Self-control in one domain simultaneously improves self-control in other domains. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144(3), 639–654. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000065Google Scholar
Turney, P. D. (2002). Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th annual meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (pp. 417–424).Google Scholar
Turner, J. C. (1985). Social categorization and the self concept: A social cognitive theory of group behavior. Advances in Group Process, pp. 243–272.Google Scholar
Turner-McGrievy, G., & Tate, D. (2011). Tweets, apps, and pods: Results of the 6-month Mobile Pounds Off Digitally (Mobile POD) randomized weight-loss intervention among adults. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 13(4), e120–e120. https://doi.org/10.2196/jmir.1841Google Scholar
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1973). Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probability. Cognitive Psychology, 5, 207–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/0010-0285(73)90033-9Google Scholar
Tyson, M., Covey, J., & Rosenthal, H. E. S. (2014). Theory of planned behavior interventions for reducing heterosexual risk behaviors: A meta-analysis. Health Psychology, 33, 1454–1467. https://doi.org/10.1037/hea0000047Google Scholar
Valins, S. (1966). Cognitive effects of false heart-rate feedback. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 4(4), 400.Google Scholar
Vallacher, R. R. (2014). A theory of action identification. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315802213Google Scholar
Vallacher, R. R., & Wegner, D. M. (2012). Action identification theory. In Handbook of theories of social psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 327–348). London, England: Sage. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446249215.n17Google Scholar
Valle, C. G., Tate, D. F., Mayer, D. K., Allicock, M., & Cai, J. (2013). A randomized trial of a Facebook-based physical activity intervention for young adult cancer survivors. Journal of Cancer Survivorship: Research and Practice, 7(3), 355–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11764-013-0279-5Google Scholar
Vallerand, R. J. (1997). Toward a hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 271–360.Google Scholar
van Baaren, R. B., Holland, R. W., Steenaert, B., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). Mimicry for money: Behavioral consequences of imitation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(4), 393–398. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00014-3Google Scholar
van Baaren, R. B., Maddux, W. W., Chartrand, T. L., de Bouter, C., & van Knippenberg, A. (2003). It takes two to mimic: Behavioral consequences of self-construals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 84(5), 1093–1102. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.5.1093Google Scholar
Van Harreveld, F., der Pligt, J., de Vries, N. K., Wenneker, C., & Verhue, D. (2004). Ambivalence and information integration in attitudinal judgment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 43(3), 431–447.Google Scholar
van Kleef, E., Shimizu, M., & Wansink, B. (2011). Food compensation: Do exercise ads change food intake? International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, 8(1), 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1479-5868-8-6Google Scholar
van Laer, T., de Ruyter, K., Visconti, L. M., & Wetzels, M. (2014). The extended transportation-imagery model: A meta-analysis of the antecedents and consequences of consumers’ narrative transportation. Journal of Consumer Research, 40, 797–817. https://doi.org/10.1086/673383Google Scholar
Vreeman, R. C., Scanlon, M. L., Tu, W., Slaven, J. E., McAteer, C. I., Kerr, S. J., … Nyandiko, W. M. (2019). Validation of a self-report adherence measurement tool among a multinational cohort of children living with HIV in Kenya, South Africa and Thailand. Journal of the International AIDS Society, 22(5), e25304. https://doi.org/10.1002/jia2.25304Google Scholar
Wallace, D. S., Paulson, R. M., Lord, C. G., & Bond, C. F., Jr. (2005). Which behaviors do attitudes predict? Meta-analyzing the effects of social pressure and perceived difficulty. Review of General Psychology, 9(3), 214–227.Google Scholar
Walton, D., Reed, C., & Macagno, F. (2008). Argumentation schemes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511802034Google Scholar
Wanke, M., Bless, H., & Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), 1105–1113.Google Scholar
Wasserman, T. (2013). Exclusive: Report says YouTube overtakes Facebook among teens. Retrieved from http://Mashable.Com/2013/11/05/Teens-Facebook-y Outube-Most-Popular/#qCZ0q_GYXakL. Nov. 5, 2013.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1985). Toward a consensual structure of mood. Psychological Bulletin, 98(2), 219.Google Scholar
Watson, D., & Tellegen, A. (1999). Issues in dimensional structure of affect effects of descriptors, measurement error, and response formats: Comment on Russell and Carroll (1999). Psychological Bulletin, 125, 601–610.Google Scholar
Wegener, D. T., Clark, J. K., & Petty, R. E. (2019). Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes in attitude formation and change. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 291–331). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., Blankenship, K. L., & Detweiler-Bedell, B. (2010). Elaboration and numerical anchoring: Breadth, depth, and the role of (non-)thoughtful processes in anchoring theories. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(1), 28–32. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcps.2009.12.007Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., Fuller, V. A., & Sparrow, B. (2003). Clever hands: Uncontrolled intelligence in facilitated communication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 5–19. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.1.5Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., & Sparrow, B. (2004). Authorship processing. In Gazzaniga, M. S. (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 1201–1209). Boston, MA: Boston Review.Google Scholar
Wegner, D. M., Sparrow, B., & Winerman, L. (2004). Vicarious agency: Experiencing control over the movements of others. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 838–848. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.86.6.838Google Scholar
Weingarten, E., Chen, Q., McAdams, M., Yi, J., Hepler, J., & Albarracín, D. (2016a). From primed concepts to action: A meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally presented words. Psychological Bulletin, 142(5), 472–497. https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000030Google Scholar
Weingarten, E., Chen, Q., McAdams, M., Yi, J., Hepler, J., & Albarracín, D. (2016b). On priming action: Conclusions from a meta-analysis of the behavioral effects of incidentally-presented words. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 53–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2016.04.015Google Scholar
Wells, G. L., & Petty, R. E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 1(3), 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15324834basp0103_2Google Scholar
White, B. X., & Albarracín, D. (2018). Investigating belief falsehood. Fear appeals do change behaviour in experimental laboratory studies: A commentary on Kok et al. (2018). Health Psychology Review, 12(2), 147–150. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2018.1448292Google Scholar
White, B. X., Chan, M. S., Repetto, A., Gratale, S., Cappella, J. N., & Albarracín, D. (2019). The role of attitudes in the use of tobacco, alcohol, and cannabis. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 2. Applications (2nd ed., pp. 31–66). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
White, B. X., Jiang, D., & Albarracín, D. (2019). The impact of choice time on the in by default advantage. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Wiebe, J. (2000). Learning subjective adjectives from corpora. Paper presented at the 17th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI-2000), Austin, TX.Google Scholar
Wiener, N. (2011). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association. https://doi.org/10.1037/13140-000Google Scholar
Wigboldus, D. H. J., Holland, R. W., & van Knippenberg, A. (2004). Single target implicit associations. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Wiggins, N., Hoffman, P. J., & Taber, T. (1969). Types of judges and cue utilization in judgments of intelligence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 12(1), 52.Google Scholar
Wilder, D. A. (1977). Perception of groups, size of opposition, and social influence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 253–268. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(77)90047-6Google Scholar
Wilson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Barriers to accessing HIV-prevention in clinic settings: Higher alcohol use and more sex partners predict decreased exposure to HIV-prevention counseling. Psychology, Health, and Medicine, 20(1), 87–96. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2014.902484Google Scholar
Wilson, K., Durantini, M. R., Albarracín, J., Crause, C., Albarracín, D., Albarracín, J., … Albarracín, D. (2013). Reducing cultural and psychological barriers to Latino enrollment in HIV-prevention counseling: Initial data on an enrollment meta-intervention. AIDS Care, 25(7), 881–887. https://doi.org/10.1080/09540121.2012.729803Google Scholar
Wilson, K., Senay, I., Durantini, M., Sánchez, F., Hennessy, M., Spring, B., & Albarracín, D. (2015). When it comes to lifestyle recommendations, more is sometimes less: A meta-analysis of theoretical assumptions underlying the effectiveness of interventions promoting multiple behavior domain change. Psychological Bulletin, 141(2), 474–509. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038295Google Scholar
Wilson, T. D., Gilbert, G. T., & Wheathey, T. P. (1998). Protecting our minds: The role of lay beliefs. In Yzerbyt, V. Y., & Lories, G. (Eds.), Metacognition: Cognitive and social dimensions (pp. 171–201). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Wood, W., Lundgren, S., Ouellette, J. A., Busceme, S., & Blackstone, T. (1994). Minority influence. A meta-analytic review of social-influence processes. Psychological Bulletin, 115(3), 323–345. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.115.3.323Google Scholar
Wood, W., Pool, G. J., Leck, K., & Purvis, D. (1996). Self-definition, defensive processing, and influence: The normative impact of majority and minority groups. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 1181–1193. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.6.1181Google Scholar
Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., & Kashy, D. A. (2002). Habits in everyday life: Thought, emotion, and action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), 1281–1297. https://doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.83.6.1281Google Scholar
Wood, W., Tam, L., & Witt, M. G. (2005). Changing circumstances, disrupting habits. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 918.Google Scholar
Wright, A. A., & Lynch, J. G. (1995). Communication effects of advertising versus direct experience when both search and experience attributes and present. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(4), 708–718. https://doi.org/10.1086/209429Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S., Jr. (1974a). Cognitive organization and change: An information-processing approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S. (1974b). Some implications of Socratic effect for alternative models of cognitive consistency. Journal of Personality, 42(3), 399–419. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1974.tb00683.xGoogle Scholar
Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2015). The mental representation of persons, events, and behavioral mindsets. In Stroessner, J. & Sherman, S. J. (Eds.), Social perception from individuals to groups (pp. 29–51). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2016). Priming decisions and motor behavior. Current Opinion in Psychology, 12, 76–79.Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2019). Some determinants and consequences of beliefs: Cognitive, social, and motivational. In Albarracín, B. T. & Johnson, D. (Eds.), Handbook of attitudes: Vol. 1. Basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 332–376). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S., & Albarracín, D. (2005). Belief formation, organization, and change: Cognitive and motivational influences. In Albarracín, D., Johnson, B. T., & Zanna, M. P. (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 273–322). New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S., Budesheim, T. L., & Lambert, A. J. (1990). Cognitive representations of conversations about persons. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(2), 218–238. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.2.218Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S., Budesheim, T. L., Lambert, A. J., & Swan, S. (1994). Person memory and judgment. Pragmatic influences on impressions formed in a social context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(2), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.66.2.254Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S., Jr., Clore, G. L., & Isbell, L. M. (1999). Affect and information processing. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 1–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60271-3Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S., & Goldberg, L. (1970). Probabilistic analysis of relationships among beliefs and attitudes. Psychological Review, 77(2), 100–120. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0028769Google Scholar
Wyer, R. S., Jr., & Srull, T. K. (1989). Memory and cognition in its social context. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
Xu, A. J., & Wyer, R. S., Jr. (2009). The comparative mindset: From animal comparisons to increased purchase intentions. Advances in Consumer Research, 36, 594.Google Scholar
Xu, X., Leung, D. Y. P., Li, B., Wang, P., & Zhao, Y. (2015). Smoking-related knowledge, attitude, social pressure, and environmental constraints among new undergraduates in Chongqing, China. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 12(1), 895–909. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph120100895Google Scholar
Yan, C., Dillard, J. P., & Shen, F. (2010). The effects of mood, message framing, and behavioral advocacy on persuasion. Journal of Communication, 60, 344–363. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.2010.01485.xGoogle Scholar
Ybarra, O., & Trafimow, D. (1998). How priming the private self or collective self affects the relative weights of attitudes and subjective norms. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(4), 362–370. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167298244003Google Scholar
YouTube. (n.d.) Press [Web page]. Retrieved from www.youtube.com/yt/press/Google Scholar
Youyou, W., Kosinski, M., & Stillwell, D. (2015). Computer-based personality judgments are more accurate than those made by humans. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 112(4), 1036–1040. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1418680112Google Scholar
Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 9(2, Pt. 2), 1.Google Scholar
Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1974). Dissonance and pill: Attribution approach to studying arousal properties of dissonance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 29(5), 703–709. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0036651Google Scholar
Zell, E., Su, R., Li, H., Ho, M. H. R., Hong, S., Kumkale, T., … Albarracín, D. (2013). Cultural differences in attitudes toward action and inaction: The role of dialecticism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(5), 521–528. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550612468774Google Scholar
Zell, E., Warriner, A. B., & Albarracín, D. (2012). Splitting of the mind: When the You I talk to is Me and needs commands. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3, 549–555. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611430164Google Scholar
Zemore, S. E., & Ajzen, I. (2014). Predicting substance abuse treatment completion using a new scale based on the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 46(2), 174–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2013.06.011Google Scholar
Zgierska, A., Rabago, D., Chawla, N., Kushner, K., Koehler, R., & Marlatt, A. (2009). Mindfulness meditation for substance use disorders: A systematic review. Substance Abuse, 30(4), 266–294. https://doi.org/10.1080/08897070903250019Google Scholar
Zhang, S., & Markman, A. B. (2001). Processing product unique features: Alignability and involvement in preference construction. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 11(1), 13–27. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327663JCP1101_2Google Scholar
Zhou, Z., Yu, R., & Zhou, X. (2010). To do or not to do? Action enlarges the FRN and P300 effects in outcome evaluation. Neuropsychologia, 48, 3606–3613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2010.08.010Google Scholar
Ziegler, R., & Diehl, M. (2011). Mood and multiple source characteristics: Mood congruency of source consensus status and source trustworthiness as determinants of message scrutiny. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(8), 1016–1030. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167211410438Google Scholar

Save book to Kindle

To save this book to your Kindle, first ensure no-reply@cambridge.org is added to your Approved Personal Document E-mail List under your Personal Document Settings on the Manage Your Content and Devices page of your Amazon account. Then enter the ‘name’ part of your Kindle email address below. Find out more about saving to your Kindle.

Note you can select to save to either the @free.kindle.com or @kindle.com variations. ‘@free.kindle.com’ emails are free but can only be saved to your device when it is connected to wi-fi. ‘@kindle.com’ emails can be delivered even when you are not connected to wi-fi, but note that service fees apply.

Find out more about the Kindle Personal Document Service.

  • References
  • Dolores Albarracín, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Action and Inaction in a Social World
  • Online publication: 21 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878357.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Dropbox

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Dropbox.

  • References
  • Dolores Albarracín, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Action and Inaction in a Social World
  • Online publication: 21 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878357.012
Available formats
×

Save book to Google Drive

To save content items to your account, please confirm that you agree to abide by our usage policies. If this is the first time you use this feature, you will be asked to authorise Cambridge Core to connect with your account. Find out more about saving content to Google Drive.

  • References
  • Dolores Albarracín, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign
  • Book: Action and Inaction in a Social World
  • Online publication: 21 January 2021
  • Chapter DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108878357.012
Available formats
×