Book contents
- The Age of the Gas Mask
- Studies in the Social and Cultural History of Modern Warfare
- The Age of the Gas Mask
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Inventing an Object for Modern Conflict
- 3 Defending Civilians
- 4 Unveiling the Gas Mask
- 5 Curating the Good Citizen
- 6 Facing Wartime
- 7 Conclusion
- Epilogue
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
2 - Inventing an Object for Modern Conflict
The Gas Mask in War and Peace, 1915–1929
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 21 July 2022
- The Age of the Gas Mask
- Studies in the Social and Cultural History of Modern Warfare
- The Age of the Gas Mask
- Copyright page
- Dedication
- Contents
- Figures
- Acknowledgments
- Abbreviations
- 1 Introduction
- 2 Inventing an Object for Modern Conflict
- 3 Defending Civilians
- 4 Unveiling the Gas Mask
- 5 Curating the Good Citizen
- 6 Facing Wartime
- 7 Conclusion
- Epilogue
- Notes
- Bibliography
- Index
Summary
Chapter 2 shows how the arrival of lethal chemical warfare at the Second Battle of Ypres in April 1915 led to the invention of anti-gas protection. It traces the crucial role played by women in this initial process and how the prospect of gas masks for civilians slowly emerged during the First World War and then continued in the war’s aftermath. The prospect of a future war of aero-chemical annihilation motivated feminist antimilitarists and others demanding the curtailment of chemical arms. Nonetheless Britain continued in both the metropole and empire to develop both such weapons and equipment to protect individuals from poison gas. Chemical weapons also had defenders, and the debate over their legitimacy played out in public even as government officials, who were inventing civil defense in secret in the 1920s, incorporated individual anti-gas protection into their calculations.
Keywords
- Type
- Chapter
- Information
- The Age of the Gas MaskHow British Civilians Faced the Terrors of Total War, pp. 15 - 48Publisher: Cambridge University PressPrint publication year: 2022